Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Government Grant Supremacy Over Rent Control: DRC Act Excluded and Eviction Cannot Be Implied Beyond the Tenor of the Grant

Government Grant Supremacy Over Rent Control: DRC Act Excluded and Eviction Cannot Be Implied Beyond the Tenor of the Grant

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Government Grant Supremacy Over Rent Control: DRC Act Excluded and Eviction Cannot Be Implied Beyond the Tenor of the Grant 1) Introduction In UNION OF INDIA v. SIR SOBHA SINGH AND SONS PVT. LTD....
Cadre Reallocation After State Reorganisation Must Respect Original Option/Domicile and Medical-Hardship Exceptions (Not a “Transfer”)

Cadre Reallocation After State Reorganisation Must Respect Original Option/Domicile and Medical-Hardship Exceptions (Not a “Transfer”)

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Cadre Reallocation After State Reorganisation Must Respect Original Option/Domicile and Medical-Hardship Exceptions (Not a “Transfer”) 1. Introduction In RAJENDRA SINGH BORA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS....
Probate Revocation for Non-Citation and Material Suppression: Pre‑Probate Transferees Have Caveatable Interest (S. Leorex Sebastian v. Sarojini, 2026 INSC 400)

Probate Revocation for Non-Citation and Material Suppression: Pre‑Probate Transferees Have Caveatable Interest (S. Leorex Sebastian v. Sarojini, 2026 INSC 400)

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Probate Revocation for Non-Citation and Material Suppression: Pre‑Probate Transferees Have Caveatable Interest under Sections 263 & 283 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 1. Introduction In S. LEOREX...
Revenue Re-categorisation Cannot Circumvent Section 132: Pattas on Public Utility Land are Void Ab Initio

Revenue Re-categorisation Cannot Circumvent Section 132: Pattas on Public Utility Land are Void Ab Initio

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Revenue Re-categorisation Cannot Circumvent Section 132: Pattas on Public Utility Land are Void Ab Initio 1. Introduction Case: BABU SINGH v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER (2026 INSC 395), Supreme Court of...

      Foreign Summary Judgment Denying Leave to Defend Is Not “On Merits” Under
      Section 13 CPC; FERA Section 47 Permits Adjudication but Bars Enforcement
      Without RBI Permission

Foreign Summary Judgment Denying Leave to Defend Is Not “On Merits” Under Section 13 CPC; FERA Section 47 Permits Adjudication but Bars Enforcement Without RBI Permission

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Foreign Summary Judgment Denying Leave to Defend Is Not “On Merits” Under Section 13 CPC; FERA Section 47 Permits Adjudication but Bars Enforcement Without RBI Permission I. Introduction Parties:...
Standardised Prosthetic-Limb Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: 5-Year Replacement Cycles up to Age 70, Reasonableness Test, and Rejection of Government Rate Caps

Standardised Prosthetic-Limb Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: 5-Year Replacement Cycles up to Age 70, Reasonableness Test, and Rejection of Government Rate Caps

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Standardised Prosthetic-Limb Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: 5-Year Replacement Cycles up to Age 70, Reasonableness Test, and Rejection of Government Rate Caps 1. Introduction Prahlad Sahai v....
High-Powered Committee–Led Nationwide Compliance Framework for Disability Rights in Prisons

High-Powered Committee–Led Nationwide Compliance Framework for Disability Rights in Prisons

Date: Apr 22, 2026
High-Powered Committee–Led Nationwide Compliance Framework for Disability Rights in Prisons 1. Introduction Sathyan Naravoor v. Union of India & Ors. (2026 INSC 397, decided on 21-04-2026) concerns...
Press Conferences, Recusal Campaigns, and “Scandalising the Court”: Supreme Court Declines to Interdict Ongoing Suo Motu Criminal Contempt

Press Conferences, Recusal Campaigns, and “Scandalising the Court”: Supreme Court Declines to Interdict Ongoing Suo Motu Criminal Contempt

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Press Conferences, Recusal Campaigns, and “Scandalising the Court”: Supreme Court Declines to Interdict Ongoing Suo Motu Criminal Contempt Case: Nilesh C Ojha v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay...
Essential Experience as a Threshold: Higher Qualification Cannot Substitute; Relaxation Must Be Reasoned and Recorded

Essential Experience as a Threshold: Higher Qualification Cannot Substitute; Relaxation Must Be Reasoned and Recorded

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Essential Experience as a Threshold: Higher Qualification Cannot Substitute; Relaxation Must Be Reasoned and Recorded Case: HIMAKSHI v. RAHUL VERMA (2026 INSC 391) — Supreme Court of India...
Suppression of Medical Disqualification in Uniformed Service Recruitment Vitiates Appointment Despite Parity Claims (No “Negative Equality”)

Suppression of Medical Disqualification in Uniformed Service Recruitment Vitiates Appointment Despite Parity Claims (No “Negative Equality”)

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Suppression of Medical Disqualification in Uniformed Service Recruitment Vitiates Appointment Despite Parity Claims (No “Negative Equality”) Case: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH v. AJAY KUMAR MALIK (2026...
Limits of Writ/LPA Review in Layout-Plan Disputes: No Adjudication of Title; Municipal Property-Register Entry Not Proof of Ownership

Limits of Writ/LPA Review in Layout-Plan Disputes: No Adjudication of Title; Municipal Property-Register Entry Not Proof of Ownership

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Limits of Writ/LPA Review in Layout-Plan Disputes: No Adjudication of Title; Municipal Property-Register Entry Not Proof of Ownership 1. Introduction Case: Pawan Garg & Ors. v. South Delhi Municipal...
Legal Representatives’ Exclusive Recourse to Section 34 to Challenge Arbitral Awards (Not Article 227/Section 115), with Limitation Running from the Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Representatives’ Exclusive Recourse to Section 34 to Challenge Arbitral Awards (Not Article 227/Section 115), with Limitation Running from the Supreme Court Judgment

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Legal Representatives’ Exclusive Recourse to Section 34 to Challenge Arbitral Awards (Not Article 227/Section 115), with Limitation Running from the Supreme Court Judgment 1. Introduction In V K JOHN...
Non-traverse of Subsequent-Event Affidavit Cannot Alone Defeat Bona Fide Need: Duty to Decide on Entire Record and Apply Material-Change Test

Non-traverse of Subsequent-Event Affidavit Cannot Alone Defeat Bona Fide Need: Duty to Decide on Entire Record and Apply Material-Change Test

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Non-traverse of Subsequent-Event Affidavit Cannot Alone Defeat Bona Fide Need: Duty to Decide on Entire Record and Apply Material-Change Test Case: MARIA MARTINS v. NOEL ZUZARTE Citation: 2026 INSC...
Article 21 “Safe Highway Passage” as a Positive State Obligation: Supreme Court’s Article 142 Interim Framework for National Highway Parking, Encroachment Removal, ATMS Surveillance and Emergency Response

Article 21 “Safe Highway Passage” as a Positive State Obligation: Supreme Court’s Article 142 Interim Framework for National Highway Parking, Encroachment Removal, ATMS Surveillance and Emergency Response

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Article 21 “Safe Highway Passage” as a Positive State Obligation: Supreme Court’s Article 142 Interim Framework for National Highway Parking, Encroachment Removal, ATMS Surveillance and Emergency...
“Can” Means Non-Mandatory Arbitration: Clauses Expressing Mere Possibility Are Not Arbitration Agreements Without Fresh Consent

“Can” Means Non-Mandatory Arbitration: Clauses Expressing Mere Possibility Are Not Arbitration Agreements Without Fresh Consent

Date: Apr 20, 2026
“Can” Means Non-Mandatory Arbitration: Clauses Expressing Mere Possibility Are Not Arbitration Agreements Without Fresh Consent Case: NAGREEKA INDCON PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. v. CARGOCARE LOGISTICS (INDIA)...
Section 306 IPC at the Charge Stage: “Positive Instigation + Proximate Nexus + Discernible Mens Rea” as the Minimum Threshold

Section 306 IPC at the Charge Stage: “Positive Instigation + Proximate Nexus + Discernible Mens Rea” as the Minimum Threshold

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Section 306 IPC at the Charge Stage: “Positive Instigation + Proximate Nexus + Discernible Mens Rea” as the Minimum Threshold 1. Introduction In BALAJI JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (Supreme Court...
Seat Prevails: Venue or Place of Award Does Not Shift Section 34 Jurisdiction Absent Express Agreement

Seat Prevails: Venue or Place of Award Does Not Shift Section 34 Jurisdiction Absent Express Agreement

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Seat Prevails: Venue or Place of Award Does Not Shift Section 34 Jurisdiction Absent Express Agreement Case: J AND K ECONOMIC RECONSTRUCTION AGENCY v. RASH BUILDERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (2026 INSC...
Order II Rule 2 CPC is not a “bar by law” for Order VII Rule 11(d): rejection of plaint cannot rest on a plea of omitted reliefs

Order II Rule 2 CPC is not a “bar by law” for Order VII Rule 11(d): rejection of plaint cannot rest on a plea of omitted reliefs

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Order II Rule 2 CPC is not a “bar by law” for Order VII Rule 11(d): rejection of plaint cannot rest on a plea of omitted reliefs 1. Introduction S. Valliammai & Others v. S. Ramanathan & Another...
Ex Parte Civil Judgments Must Identify “Points for Determination”; Omission to Frame Issues Vitiates Proceedings Where It Causes Prejudice

Ex Parte Civil Judgments Must Identify “Points for Determination”; Omission to Frame Issues Vitiates Proceedings Where It Causes Prejudice

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Ex Parte Civil Judgments Must Identify “Points for Determination”; Omission to Frame Issues Vitiates Proceedings Where It Causes Prejudice 1. Introduction Case: PRAMOD SHROFF v. MOHAN SINGH CHOPRA...
Demand under the Prevention of Corruption Act Can Be Proved Through the Creditworthy Portion of a Hostile Complainant’s Testimony When the Pre-Trap Complaint Is Affirmed and Corroborated

Demand under the Prevention of Corruption Act Can Be Proved Through the Creditworthy Portion of a Hostile Complainant’s Testimony When the Pre-Trap Complaint Is Affirmed and Corroborated

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Demand under the Prevention of Corruption Act Can Be Proved Through the Creditworthy Portion of a Hostile Complainant’s Testimony When the Pre-Trap Complaint Is Affirmed and Corroborated 1....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert