Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Anticipatory Bail May Be Denied in Large-Scale Cyber-Economic Fraud Where the Accused Is a Prime Perpetrator, Not Merely a Beneficiary

Anticipatory Bail May Be Denied in Large-Scale Cyber-Economic Fraud Where the Accused Is a Prime Perpetrator, Not Merely a Beneficiary

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Anticipatory Bail May Be Denied in Large-Scale Cyber-Economic Fraud Where the Accused Is a Prime Perpetrator, Not Merely a Beneficiary Introduction In RAHUL VERMA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL, the...
Superdari of Rescued Pets: Welfare and Emotional Bond as Determinative Considerations

Superdari of Rescued Pets: Welfare and Emotional Bond as Determinative Considerations

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Superdari of Rescued Pets: Welfare and Emotional Bond as Determinative Considerations 1. Introduction In MR. SUNIL MALHOTRA & ORS. v. STATE, NCT OF DELHI & ORS. (2026 DHC 3171), the Delhi High Court...
No Pre-Notice Hearing Before Lokpal’s Section 20(3) Show-Cause Notice: Prima Facie Opinion After CBI Preliminary Inquiry Does Not Violate Natural Justice

No Pre-Notice Hearing Before Lokpal’s Section 20(3) Show-Cause Notice: Prima Facie Opinion After CBI Preliminary Inquiry Does Not Violate Natural Justice

Date: Apr 22, 2026
No Pre-Notice Hearing Before Lokpal’s Section 20(3) Show-Cause Notice: Prima Facie Opinion After CBI Preliminary Inquiry Does Not Violate Natural Justice 1. Introduction In CHINMOYJIT SEN v. LOKPAL...
Adult Trafficking Victim Repatriation: Magistrate’s Repatriation Order Not Mandatory; Trial Court ‘No Objection’ Suffices

Adult Trafficking Victim Repatriation: Magistrate’s Repatriation Order Not Mandatory; Trial Court ‘No Objection’ Suffices

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Adult Trafficking Victim Repatriation: Magistrate’s Repatriation Order Not Mandatory; Trial Court ‘No Objection’ Suffices Court: Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Case: Writ...
Psychiatric Examination in Divorce Proceedings: No Mechanical Orders—Prima Facie Material and Reasons Are Mandatory

Psychiatric Examination in Divorce Proceedings: No Mechanical Orders—Prima Facie Material and Reasons Are Mandatory

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Psychiatric Examination in Divorce Proceedings: No Mechanical Orders—Prima Facie Material and Reasons Are Mandatory Case: Dimpal Nikhilkumar Sanklecha v. Nikhilkumar Nandakumar Sanklecha Court:...
POCSO Quashing Where No De-facto Victim Exists and Prosecution Would Re-victimise the Child

POCSO Quashing Where No De-facto Victim Exists and Prosecution Would Re-victimise the Child

Date: Apr 22, 2026
POCSO Quashing Where No De-facto Victim Exists and Prosecution Would Re-victimise the Child: “De-juré Victim” Alone Is Insufficient 1. Introduction In HARMEET SINGH v. STATE OF GNCT DELHI AND ANR....
Sudarshan v. State (2026 DHC 3061): Conviction and Sentencing Must Track the Charge in POCSO Attempt Cases

Sudarshan v. State (2026 DHC 3061): Conviction and Sentencing Must Track the Charge in POCSO Attempt Cases

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Sudarshan v. State (2026 DHC 3061): Conviction and Sentencing Must Track the Charge in POCSO Attempt Cases 1) Introduction In SUDARSHAN v. STATE (Delhi High Court, decided on 15.04.2026), the...
Minor Contradictions (Including Date Mix-up) Not Fatal in Child Sexual Assault Trials When Victim Testimony and DNA Evidence Coherently Corroborate the Core Allegation

Minor Contradictions (Including Date Mix-up) Not Fatal in Child Sexual Assault Trials When Victim Testimony and DNA Evidence Coherently Corroborate the Core Allegation

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Minor Contradictions (Including Date Mix-up) Not Fatal in Child Sexual Assault Trials When Victim Testimony and DNA Evidence Coherently Corroborate the Core Allegation 1. Introduction In RAM MURAT v....
Judicial Restraint in Election-PILs: No Mandamus Once the Election Commission Has Initiated Action for Section 127A RPA, 1951 Violations

Judicial Restraint in Election-PILs: No Mandamus Once the Election Commission Has Initiated Action for Section 127A RPA, 1951 Violations

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Judicial Restraint in Election-PILs: No Mandamus Once the Election Commission Has Initiated Action for Section 127A RPA, 1951 Violations 1. Introduction The Madras High Court, in R.A.S.Senthilvel v....
Qualified and Previously High-Earning Spouse May Be Denied Interim Maintenance Under Section 24 HMA

Qualified and Previously High-Earning Spouse May Be Denied Interim Maintenance Under Section 24 HMA

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Qualified and Previously High-Earning Spouse May Be Denied Interim Maintenance Under Section 24 HMA Introduction In Dr Garima Dubey And 3 Others v. Dr. Saurabh Anand Dubey, the Allahabad High Court...
Gang Chart and Criminal Antecedents Alone Do Not Sustain Conviction Under the Gangsters Act Without Proof of an Organized Gang and Continuing Unlawful Activity

Gang Chart and Criminal Antecedents Alone Do Not Sustain Conviction Under the Gangsters Act Without Proof of an Organized Gang and Continuing Unlawful Activity

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Gang Chart and Criminal Antecedents Alone Do Not Sustain Conviction Under the Gangsters Act Without Proof of an Organized Gang and Continuing Unlawful Activity Case: HEMU PANT @ HEMU KALU AND ANOTHER...
Election Petitions Under the Representation of the People Act, 1951: “Proper Parties” Are Impermissible; Misjoinder Is Curable by Striking Out Non-Candidates

Election Petitions Under the Representation of the People Act, 1951: “Proper Parties” Are Impermissible; Misjoinder Is Curable by Striking Out Non-Candidates

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Election Petitions Under the Representation of the People Act, 1951: “Proper Parties” Are Impermissible; Misjoinder Is Curable by Striking Out Non-Candidates Case: HARSH DEV SINGH v. UT OF J AND K TH...
Section 482 Cr.P.C. Cannot Function as a “Second Revision” to Reappreciate Concurrent Findings; Complaints Based on Uncorroborated High-Value Cash Property Payments Fail at Summoning Stage

Section 482 Cr.P.C. Cannot Function as a “Second Revision” to Reappreciate Concurrent Findings; Complaints Based on Uncorroborated High-Value Cash Property Payments Fail at Summoning Stage

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Section 482 Cr.P.C. Cannot Function as a “Second Revision” to Reappreciate Concurrent Findings; Complaints Based on Uncorroborated High-Value Cash Property Payments Fail at Summoning Stage 1....
Recusal Cannot Be Manufactured: Objective “Reasonable Apprehension” Test, Interim Prima Facie Orders, and Non-Lis Associations Do Not Disqualify a Judge

Recusal Cannot Be Manufactured: Objective “Reasonable Apprehension” Test, Interim Prima Facie Orders, and Non-Lis Associations Do Not Disqualify a Judge

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Recusal Cannot Be Manufactured: Objective “Reasonable Apprehension” Test, Interim Prima Facie Orders, and Non-Lis Associations Do Not Disqualify a Judge 1. Introduction The decision in CENTRAL BUREAU...
Article 226 Limits: No Writ Adjudication of Decades-Old Public Works Payment Claims When Records Are Unverifiable

Article 226 Limits: No Writ Adjudication of Decades-Old Public Works Payment Claims When Records Are Unverifiable

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Article 226 Limits: No Writ Adjudication of Decades-Old Public Works Payment Claims When Records Are Unverifiable 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court (Division Bench) in JL WALI & ORS v. UNION OF...
Third-Party Writs/PILs on Alleged Hate Speech in Election Campaigns Are Not Maintainable; Remedy Lies with Aggrieved Persons Under Election Law

Third-Party Writs/PILs on Alleged Hate Speech in Election Campaigns Are Not Maintainable; Remedy Lies with Aggrieved Persons Under Election Law

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Third-Party Writs/PILs on Alleged Hate Speech in Election Campaigns Are Not Maintainable; Remedy Lies with Aggrieved Persons Under Election Law Case: VA PUGAZHENDI v. THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER...
Cancellation of Caste Certificate Requires Formal Show-Cause Notice: Telephone Call Is Not an Effective Hearing

Cancellation of Caste Certificate Requires Formal Show-Cause Notice: Telephone Call Is Not an Effective Hearing

Date: Apr 18, 2026
Cancellation of Caste Certificate Requires Formal Show-Cause Notice: Telephone Call Is Not an Effective Hearing 1. Introduction In MOHD DANISH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND (Uttarakhand High Court, decided...
Death Sentence Cannot Stand Where Circumstantial Chain is “Shattered”: Strict Scrutiny of Extra-Judicial Confession, Section 27 Discovery, and Contradictions in a Section 366 CrPC Reference

Death Sentence Cannot Stand Where Circumstantial Chain is “Shattered”: Strict Scrutiny of Extra-Judicial Confession, Section 27 Discovery, and Contradictions in a Section 366 CrPC Reference

Date: Apr 18, 2026
Death Sentence Cannot Stand Where Circumstantial Chain is “Shattered”: Strict Scrutiny of Extra-Judicial Confession, Section 27 Discovery, and Contradictions in a Section 366 CrPC Reference 1....
Unregistered Customary Marriage Can Be Tested Under Section 27 of the Special Marriage Act: Registration Under Section 15 Is Not a Precondition for Divorce

Unregistered Customary Marriage Can Be Tested Under Section 27 of the Special Marriage Act: Registration Under Section 15 Is Not a Precondition for Divorce

Date: Apr 18, 2026
Unregistered Customary Marriage Can Be Tested Under Section 27 of the Special Marriage Act: Registration Under Section 15 Is Not a Precondition for Divorce 1. Introduction In Smt. Rathna P v. Sri....
Acquittal in 498-A Does Not Bar Section 125 Maintenance; Maintenance to Run from Date of Application; Section 340 Cr.P.C. Requires “Expedient in the Interest of Justice” Threshold

Acquittal in 498-A Does Not Bar Section 125 Maintenance; Maintenance to Run from Date of Application; Section 340 Cr.P.C. Requires “Expedient in the Interest of Justice” Threshold

Date: Apr 18, 2026
Acquittal in 498-A Does Not Bar Section 125 Maintenance; Maintenance to Run from Date of Application; Section 340 Cr.P.C. Requires “Expedient in the Interest of Justice” Threshold 1. Introduction...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert