Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Affirmation of Title Decrees and the Limits of Executive Action in Land Registration Introduction The case before the Jharkhand High Court, detailed in the judgment titled "THE STATE OF JHARKHAND...
Establishing Exclusive Jurisdiction Based on the Designated Seat in Arbitration Agreements Introduction The judgment delivered by the Jharkhand High Court on February 4, 2025, in M/S MECON Ltd...
Liberty to Seek Refund of Earnest Money in Sand Ghat Concessions Due to State Delay in Environmental Clearances Introduction In the batch of petitions decided on January 31, 2025, the Jharkhand High...
Judicial Restraint in Appointing Commissioners under Order XXVI Rule 10-A CPC Introduction The judgment in MANOJ KUMAR KHATRI ALIAS MANOJ KHATRI v. KUMAR ROHIT SINGH rendered by the Jharkhand High...
Precedent on Mandatory Notice to Both Actual and Deemed Public Information Officers Under RTI Act Section 20 Introduction Ganesh Kumar v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. arose under Article 226 of the...
Introduction In this case, titled Ganesh Singh @ Nishant Singh v. The State of Jharkhand Through The Chief Secretary, the Jharkhand High Court dealt with the legality of a preventive detention order...
Strict Enforcement of Statutory Limitation Under Section 107 CGST Act: Non‑Condonable Delay in Filing Appeal Post GST Registration Cancellation Introduction In W.P.(T) No. 6208 of 2024, decided on...
Clarifying Deductions and Revising the Interest Rate in Motor Accident Compensation Cases Introduction This commentary examines the decision of the Jharkhand High Court in “The Oriental Insurance Co....
Restricting Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27: No Evidence Beyond Pleadings Introduction This commentary examines the Jharkhand High Court’s decision in the case of Motilal Agarwal v. Ram...
Upholding Capital Punishment in Circumstantial Evidence: State of Jharkhand v. Rahul Kumar Introduction The case of The State of Jharkhand v. Rahul Kumar alias Rahul Raj alias Raj Srivastava alias...
Affirmation of Corruption Convictions Based on Corroborative Evidence Without Complainant Testimony Introduction The case of Ram Janam Sharma v. The State of Jharkhand serves as a pivotal decision in...
Reinforcing Judicial Restraint and Procedural Fairness in Public Appointments: Analysis of Alok Banerjee v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Alok Banerjee v. The State of Jharkhand...
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: A Landmark Decision in 'MD Tauqueer vs. The State of Jharkhand' Introduction The case of MD Tauqueer alias MD Touqeer v. The State of Jharkhand marks a...
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Introduction The case of Shivshankar Paswan v. The State of Jharkhand, adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Basudeo Mahto alias Basu Dev Mahato v. The State of Jharkhand...
Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The...
Jharkhand High Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act Introduction The case of The State of Jharkhand v. Ramai Karua and Others...
High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act Introduction The case of Sharat Gope alias Sarat Gope v. The State of Jharkhand...
Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act Introduction In the landmark case of Sonu Lal v. The State of Jharkhand,...
Jharkhand High Court Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B Introduction The case of Shoaib Akhtar v. The State of Jharkhand marks a significant turning point in...