Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Karnataka High Court Case Commentaries

False “Nil” Statutory Dues and Non-Disclosure of Business Sources in Form 26 Amount to “Undue Influence” (Section 123(2)) Warranting Voidance of Election

False “Nil” Statutory Dues and Non-Disclosure of Business Sources in Form 26 Amount to “Undue Influence” (Section 123(2)) Warranting Voidance of Election

Date: Feb 19, 2026
False “Nil” Statutory Dues and Non-Disclosure of Business Sources in Form 26 Amount to “Undue Influence” (Section 123(2)) Warranting Voidance of Election Case: SRI C MUNIRAJU v. SRI S N SUBBAREDDY...
Continuity of Jurisdiction After Repeal: Section 104(1A) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Preserves Existing Labour Adjudicatory Forums Until Code Tribunals Become Functional

Continuity of Jurisdiction After Repeal: Section 104(1A) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Preserves Existing Labour Adjudicatory Forums Until Code Tribunals Become Functional

Date: Feb 19, 2026
Continuity of Jurisdiction After Repeal: Section 104(1A) of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Preserves Existing Labour Adjudicatory Forums Until Code Tribunals Become Functional 1. Introduction...
Institutional Duty to Report Cognizable Hospital Offences: Section 39 Cr.P.C. Compliance and Accountability of Medical Superintendent & Police

Institutional Duty to Report Cognizable Hospital Offences: Section 39 Cr.P.C. Compliance and Accountability of Medical Superintendent & Police

Date: Feb 19, 2026
Institutional Duty to Report Cognizable Hospital Offences: Section 39 Cr.P.C. Compliance and Accountability of Medical Superintendent & Police Court: High Court of Karnataka (Division Bench) Case:...
Section 34 Specific Relief Act: Declaration May Survive Defective/Missing Consequential Relief; Withdrawal Without Liberty Not an Absolute Bar

Section 34 Specific Relief Act: Declaration May Survive Defective/Missing Consequential Relief; Withdrawal Without Liberty Not an Absolute Bar

Date: Feb 17, 2026
Section 34 Specific Relief Act: Declaration May Survive Defective/Missing Consequential Relief; Withdrawal Without Liberty Not an Absolute Bar 1) Introduction Case: TAJ PARVEEN v. EZAZULLA SHARIFF,...
School Admission Entries Are Not, by Themselves, Proof of Minority Under Section 94 JJ Act: Consequent Non-attraction of POCSO and Kidnapping Where the Girl Voluntarily Elopes

School Admission Entries Are Not, by Themselves, Proof of Minority Under Section 94 JJ Act: Consequent Non-attraction of POCSO and Kidnapping Where the Girl Voluntarily Elopes

Date: Feb 14, 2026
School Admission Entries Are Not, by Themselves, Proof of Minority Under Section 94 JJ Act: Consequent Non-attraction of POCSO and Kidnapping Where the Girl Voluntarily Elopes 1. Introduction The...
Rival Claims Are Not a Ground to Deny Interim Custody of Seized Valuables: Custody Should Be Granted on a Prima Facie Basis with Safeguards

Rival Claims Are Not a Ground to Deny Interim Custody of Seized Valuables: Custody Should Be Granted on a Prima Facie Basis with Safeguards

Date: Feb 14, 2026
Rival Claims Are Not a Ground to Deny Interim Custody of Seized Valuables: Custody Should Be Granted on a Prima Facie Basis with Safeguards 1) Introduction The Karnataka High Court (Mohammad Nawaz...
Paternal School Records Are Highly Probative but Rebuttable; “Lingayat” and “Ganiga” Not Mutually Exclusive in Category II-A Caste Verification

Paternal School Records Are Highly Probative but Rebuttable; “Lingayat” and “Ganiga” Not Mutually Exclusive in Category II-A Caste Verification

Date: Feb 14, 2026
Paternal School Records Are Highly Probative but Rebuttable; “Lingayat” and “Ganiga” Not Mutually Exclusive in Category II-A Caste Verification Case: T N Jagadeesh v. Chairman / Deputy Commissioner,...
Convenience of the Wife as the Primary Test for Transfer of BNSS Maintenance Proceedings

Convenience of the Wife as the Primary Test for Transfer of BNSS Maintenance Proceedings

Date: Feb 11, 2026
Convenience of the Wife as the Primary Test for Transfer of BNSS Maintenance Proceedings 1. Introduction The decision in SRI SRIDUTTA S v. SMT POOJITHA O (Karnataka High Court, 10-02-2026) concerns a...
Non-supply of Written Grounds of Arrest under Section 47 BNSS Renders Arrest Illegal and Requires Release, Despite Gravity of Offence

Non-supply of Written Grounds of Arrest under Section 47 BNSS Renders Arrest Illegal and Requires Release, Despite Gravity of Offence

Date: Feb 11, 2026
Non-supply of Written Grounds of Arrest under Section 47 BNSS Renders Arrest Illegal and Requires Release, Despite Gravity of Offence Case: NANJUNDA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Court: High Court of...
Stigmatic Termination for Alleged Fake Certificates Requires Departmental Enquiry and Hearing

Stigmatic Termination for Alleged Fake Certificates Requires Departmental Enquiry and Hearing

Date: Feb 11, 2026
Stigmatic Termination for Alleged Fake Educational Certificates Requires Prior Departmental Enquiry and Hearing 1. Introduction This decision of the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench...
Quashing of Railways Act Prosecution for Protest-Related Train Delay Absent Ingredients of Sections 154 and 174(a) and for Non-Speaking Cognizance

Quashing of Railways Act Prosecution for Protest-Related Train Delay Absent Ingredients of Sections 154 and 174(a) and for Non-Speaking Cognizance

Date: Feb 10, 2026
Quashing of Railways Act Prosecution for Protest-Related Train Delay Absent Ingredients of Sections 154 and 174(a) and for Non-Speaking Cognizance Case: SRI. MOHAMMED HARIS NALAPAD v. STATE BY SGWF...
Police-Recorded Dying Declaration under Section 161 CrPC as Substantive Evidence When Certified Fit by Doctor: ASIF v. State of Karnataka (Karnataka HC, 09-02-2026)

Police-Recorded Dying Declaration under Section 161 CrPC as Substantive Evidence When Certified Fit by Doctor: ASIF v. State of Karnataka (Karnataka HC, 09-02-2026)

Date: Feb 10, 2026
Police-Recorded Dying Declaration under Section 161 CrPC as Substantive Evidence When Certified Fit by Doctor: ASIF v. State of Karnataka (Karnataka HC, 09-02-2026) 1. Introduction The Division Bench...
Omission of Raja Kaluve in Master Plan/Sanctioned Plan Does Not Defeat Statutory Vesting of “B” Kharab Storm-Water Drains

Omission of Raja Kaluve in Master Plan/Sanctioned Plan Does Not Defeat Statutory Vesting of “B” Kharab Storm-Water Drains

Date: Feb 7, 2026
Omission of Raja Kaluve in Master Plan/Sanctioned Plan Does Not Defeat Statutory Vesting of “B” Kharab Storm-Water Drains Case: MANTRI TRANQUIL APARTMENTS OWNERS ASSOCIATION v. BRUHAT BENGALURU...
TIP Not Vitiated by Vague “Media Photos” Admission; Conspiracy Proved by Circumstantial Chain (Motive–Last Seen–Recoveries–FSL)

TIP Not Vitiated by Vague “Media Photos” Admission; Conspiracy Proved by Circumstantial Chain (Motive–Last Seen–Recoveries–FSL)

Date: Feb 7, 2026
TIP Not Vitiated by Vague “Media Photos” Admission; Conspiracy Proved by Circumstantial Chain (Motive–Last Seen–Recoveries–FSL) 1) Introduction Case: SANDEEP v. STATE OF KARNATAKA (Karnataka High...
UAPA Bail: Non-furnishing of Written Grounds of Arrest Is Not Per Se Fatal—Prejudice Test, Delay, and ‘Reasons’ vs ‘Grounds’

UAPA Bail: Non-furnishing of Written Grounds of Arrest Is Not Per Se Fatal—Prejudice Test, Delay, and ‘Reasons’ vs ‘Grounds’

Date: Feb 7, 2026
UAPA Bail: Non-furnishing of Written Grounds of Arrest Is Not Per Se Fatal—Prejudice Test, Delay, and ‘Reasons’ vs ‘Grounds’ 1. Introduction This decision of the Karnataka High Court (Division Bench)...
Section 23 (Senior Citizens Act): No Express Maintenance Clause Needed—Implied Assurance, Constructive Fraud, and Limits on Derivative Objections

Section 23 (Senior Citizens Act): No Express Maintenance Clause Needed—Implied Assurance, Constructive Fraud, and Limits on Derivative Objections

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Section 23 (Senior Citizens Act): No Express Maintenance Clause Needed—Implied Assurance, Constructive Fraud, and Limits on Derivative Objections 1. Introduction The Karnataka High Court (Suraj...
Mother Excluded from Christian Intestate Succession Where Widow and Lineal Descendants Survive: Mandatory Grant of Succession Certificate for Share Transmission

Mother Excluded from Christian Intestate Succession Where Widow and Lineal Descendants Survive: Mandatory Grant of Succession Certificate for Share Transmission

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Mother Excluded from Christian Intestate Succession Where Widow and Lineal Descendants Survive: Mandatory Grant of Succession Certificate for Share Transmission 1. Introduction The decision in MRS....
Section 196 CrPC Sanction is Required Only at Cognizance—Not for FIR/Investigation—In Section 295A IPC Cases Involving Online Religious Insult Content

Section 196 CrPC Sanction is Required Only at Cognizance—Not for FIR/Investigation—In Section 295A IPC Cases Involving Online Religious Insult Content

Date: Jan 31, 2026
Section 196 CrPC Sanction is Required Only at Cognizance—Not for FIR/Investigation—In Section 295A IPC Cases Involving Online Religious Insult Content 1. Introduction The decision in Sri Sirajuddin...
DNA Test in Section 125 Maintenance Proceedings: Presumption of Legitimacy Prevails Absent Strong Prima Facie Non-Access

DNA Test in Section 125 Maintenance Proceedings: Presumption of Legitimacy Prevails Absent Strong Prima Facie Non-Access

Date: Jan 28, 2026
DNA Test in Section 125 Maintenance Proceedings: Presumption of Legitimacy Prevails Absent Strong Prima Facie Non-Access 1. Introduction The Karnataka High Court (Kalaburagi Bench) in SRI B S...
Sanction Under UAP Act Section 45 Is Offence-Centric (Not Accused-Centric): Procedural Seizure Lapses and Case-Diary Access Do Not Loosen the Section 43D(5) Bail Bar

Sanction Under UAP Act Section 45 Is Offence-Centric (Not Accused-Centric): Procedural Seizure Lapses and Case-Diary Access Do Not Loosen the Section 43D(5) Bail Bar

Date: Jan 24, 2026
Sanction Under UAP Act Section 45 Is Offence-Centric (Not Accused-Centric): Procedural Seizure Lapses and Case-Diary Access Do Not Loosen the Section 43D(5) Bail Bar Case: SHAHID KHAN v. THE STATE OF...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert