Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Kerala High Court Case Commentaries

Presumption of Rule 2A(2) Publication from Rule 2A(3) Newspaper Notice: Limitation Strictly Bars Belated Vesting Act Challenges

Presumption of Rule 2A(2) Publication from Rule 2A(3) Newspaper Notice: Limitation Strictly Bars Belated Vesting Act Challenges

Date: Feb 12, 2026
Presumption of Rule 2A(2) Publication from Rule 2A(3) Newspaper Notice: Limitation Strictly Bars Belated Vesting Act Challenges 1) Introduction State of Kerala v. Kurien E. Kalathil (Kerala High...
Guilty Plea Conviction Cannot Be the Sole Ground to Deny Evidence on Negligence Before the MACT

Guilty Plea Conviction Cannot Be the Sole Ground to Deny Evidence on Negligence Before the MACT

Date: Feb 12, 2026
Guilty Plea Conviction Cannot Be the Sole Ground to Deny Evidence on Negligence Before the MACT Case: MENON P.S, v. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL (2026 KER 12467) | Court: High Court of Kerala | Date:...
Speaking-Order Requirement When Taking Cognizance on a Protest Complaint After a “Further Action Dropped” Refer Report under the SC/ST (PoA) Act

Speaking-Order Requirement When Taking Cognizance on a Protest Complaint After a “Further Action Dropped” Refer Report under the SC/ST (PoA) Act

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Speaking-Order Requirement When Taking Cognizance on a Protest Complaint After a “Further Action Dropped” Refer Report under the SC/ST (PoA) Act 1. Introduction Case: NISHA V. NAIR v. STATE OF KERALA...
Section 18 RTE Act: Unrecognised Schools Must Be Closed—NIOS Accreditation Not a Substitute (with Transitional Relief)

Section 18 RTE Act: Unrecognised Schools Must Be Closed—NIOS Accreditation Not a Substitute (with Transitional Relief)

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Section 18 RTE Act: Unrecognised Schools Must Be Closed—NIOS Accreditation Not a Substitute (with Transitional Relief) 1. Introduction The Kerala High Court in MOITHUNNYKUTTY v. THE DISTRICT...
Defective Reference Doctrine in “Sham Closure” Disputes: Tribunal Cannot Recast a Retrenchment Reference into a Closure Adjudication

Defective Reference Doctrine in “Sham Closure” Disputes: Tribunal Cannot Recast a Retrenchment Reference into a Closure Adjudication

Date: Jan 31, 2026
Defective Reference Doctrine in “Sham Closure” Disputes: Tribunal Cannot Recast a Retrenchment Reference into a Closure Adjudication 1) Introduction The Kerala High Court, in LUNAR RUBBERS v. Kerala...
Quarterly Vigilance Reporting Framework for Travancore Devaswom Board: Separate Sabarimala Reporting, Mandatory Copies to Special Commissioner, and Court-Tracked Action Taken Reports

Quarterly Vigilance Reporting Framework for Travancore Devaswom Board: Separate Sabarimala Reporting, Mandatory Copies to Special Commissioner, and Court-Tracked Action Taken Reports

Date: Jan 30, 2026
Quarterly Vigilance Reporting Framework for Travancore Devaswom Board: Separate Sabarimala Reporting, Mandatory Copies to Special Commissioner, and Court-Tracked Action Taken Reports 1. Introduction...
App-Based Road-Safety Grievance Redressal and “Liberty-to-Revive” Disposal in Pedestrian-Facility Writ Petitions

App-Based Road-Safety Grievance Redressal and “Liberty-to-Revive” Disposal in Pedestrian-Facility Writ Petitions

Date: Jan 30, 2026
App-Based Road-Safety Grievance Redressal and “Liberty-to-Revive” Disposal in Pedestrian-Facility Writ Petitions 1. Introduction Prasad Somarajan v. State of Kerala (2026 KER 7176, decided on...
Heat-of-the-Moment Remark “Go away and die” Not Abetment: Intention (Mens Rea) as the Core Threshold for Section 306 IPC at the Discharge Stage

Heat-of-the-Moment Remark “Go away and die” Not Abetment: Intention (Mens Rea) as the Core Threshold for Section 306 IPC at the Discharge Stage

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Heat-of-the-Moment Remark “Go away and die” Not Abetment: Intention (Mens Rea) as the Core Threshold for Section 306 IPC at the Discharge Stage Case: SAFWAN ADHUR v. STATE OF KERALA (2026 KER 6717)...
Article 229 Supremacy in High Court Establishment Matters: Executive Cannot Deny Chief Justice’s Recommendation on Leave Benefits Without Cogent Reasons

Article 229 Supremacy in High Court Establishment Matters: Executive Cannot Deny Chief Justice’s Recommendation on Leave Benefits Without Cogent Reasons

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Article 229 Supremacy in High Court Establishment Matters: Executive Cannot Deny Chief Justice’s Recommendation on Leave Benefits Without Cogent Reasons Case: KERALA HIGH COURT GAZETTED OFFICERS’...
Proactive Devaswom Board Duty to Publicly Discourage Synthetic Kumkum and Prohibited Plastics During Sabarimala Pilgrimage

Proactive Devaswom Board Duty to Publicly Discourage Synthetic Kumkum and Prohibited Plastics During Sabarimala Pilgrimage

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Proactive Devaswom Board Duty to Publicly Discourage Synthetic Kumkum and Prohibited Plastics During Sabarimala Pilgrimage Case: SUO MOTU v. UNION GOVERNMENT | Citation: 2026 KER 6791 | Court: Kerala...
NBEMS Leave Cap Cannot Pedantically Cancel DrNB Training Where Maternity Leave (a Reproductive Right) and Prolonged Illness Co-exist

NBEMS Leave Cap Cannot Pedantically Cancel DrNB Training Where Maternity Leave (a Reproductive Right) and Prolonged Illness Co-exist

Date: Jan 21, 2026
NBEMS Leave Cap Cannot Pedantically Cancel DrNB Training Where Maternity Leave (a Reproductive Right) and Prolonged Illness Co-exist 1. Introduction Case: SUSAN K. JOHN v. NATIONAL BOARD OF...
Automatic Cancellation of Petroleum/Explosives Licence on Loss of Site Rights under Rule 152—No Prior Hearing; Writ Eviction Not Against Private Dealer

Automatic Cancellation of Petroleum/Explosives Licence on Loss of Site Rights under Rule 152—No Prior Hearing; Writ Eviction Not Against Private Dealer

Date: Jan 13, 2026
Automatic Cancellation of Petroleum/Explosives Licence on Loss of Site Rights under Rule 152—No Prior Hearing; Writ Eviction Not Against Private Dealer Case: CHOORAPILAN JAMEELA v. PADAVANNA...
Article 363 Bar and the Privy Purse–Malikhana Distinction: Kerala High Court on Non-Justiciability of Pre-Constitution Covenant Claims

Article 363 Bar and the Privy Purse–Malikhana Distinction: Kerala High Court on Non-Justiciability of Pre-Constitution Covenant Claims

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Article 363 Bar and the Privy Purse–Malikhana Distinction: Kerala High Court on Non-Justiciability of Pre-Constitution Covenant Claims 1. Introduction Case: SANOOP VV v. THE STATE OF KERALA (2026 KER...
Quasi‑Judicial Admission Supervisory Committee Lacks Standing to Appeal: Not an “Aggrieved Person” Under Act 15 of 2017

Quasi‑Judicial Admission Supervisory Committee Lacks Standing to Appeal: Not an “Aggrieved Person” Under Act 15 of 2017

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Quasi‑Judicial Admission Supervisory Committee Lacks Standing to Appeal: Not an “Aggrieved Person” Under Act 15 of 2017 Case: THE ADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION IN KERALA v....
Rule 400 “Direct Nephew/Niece” Includes Both Brother’s and Sister’s Children: Equality-Based Interpretation of Emergency Leave Eligibility

Rule 400 “Direct Nephew/Niece” Includes Both Brother’s and Sister’s Children: Equality-Based Interpretation of Emergency Leave Eligibility

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Rule 400 “Direct Nephew/Niece” Includes Both Brother’s and Sister’s Children: Equality-Based Interpretation of Emergency Leave Eligibility Case: SHADULI P.M v. STATE OF KERALA Citation: 2025 KER...
Dock Identification After Long Delay Without Prior Acquaintance Requires Strong Corroboration: Acquittal for Unreliable Eyewitness Identification and Unput Section 313 Material

Dock Identification After Long Delay Without Prior Acquaintance Requires Strong Corroboration: Acquittal for Unreliable Eyewitness Identification and Unput Section 313 Material

Date: Dec 17, 2025
Dock Identification After Long Delay Without Prior Acquaintance Requires Strong Corroboration: Acquittal for Unreliable Eyewitness Identification and Unput Section 313 Material 1. Introduction Manden...
Age of POCSO Victim Can Be Proved Through Any Admissible Evidence: JJ Act Method Not Exclusive

Age of POCSO Victim Can Be Proved Through Any Admissible Evidence: JJ Act Method Not Exclusive

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Age of POCSO Victim Can Be Proved Through Any Admissible Evidence: JJ Act Method Not Exclusive 1. Introduction SURESH.K v. STATE OF KERALA (Kerala High Court, 10-12-2025; 2025 KER 95276) arose from...
Presumption of Marriage, Halala and Maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.: Commentary on V.P. Abdurahiman v. C. Safiya

Presumption of Marriage, Halala and Maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.: Commentary on V.P. Abdurahiman v. C. Safiya

Date: Dec 6, 2025
Presumption of Marriage, Halala and Maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.: A Detailed Commentary on V.P. Abdurahiman v. C. Safiya, 2025 KER 94062 (Kerala High Court) 1. Introduction The decision of...
Civil Character of Section 3 Proceedings under the Muslim Women Act and Applicability of Article 137 Limitation Act – Commentary on Safia P.M. v. State of Kerala

Civil Character of Section 3 Proceedings under the Muslim Women Act and Applicability of Article 137 Limitation Act – Commentary on Safia P.M. v. State of Kerala

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Civil Character of Section 3 Proceedings under the Muslim Women Act and Applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation Act: A Commentary on Safia P.M. v. State of Kerala 1. Introduction The decision...
Limits on Non‑Remittable Life Sentences and Standards for Circumstantial Proof of Conspiracy: Commentary on Vinesh v. State of Kerala

Limits on Non‑Remittable Life Sentences and Standards for Circumstantial Proof of Conspiracy: Commentary on Vinesh v. State of Kerala

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Limits on Non‑Remittable Life Sentences and Standards for Circumstantial Proof of Conspiracy: Commentary on Vinesh v. State of Kerala I. Introduction The decision of the Kerala High Court in Vinesh...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert