Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

Inevitable Discovery During a Lawful Welfare-Check Search Sustains Evidence Despite Alleged Scope Overreach

Inevitable Discovery During a Lawful Welfare-Check Search Sustains Evidence Despite Alleged Scope Overreach

Date: Apr 25, 2026
Inevitable Discovery During a Lawful Welfare-Check Search Sustains Evidence Despite Alleged Scope Overreach Case: Terelle Anterion Johnson a/k/a Terelle Johnson v. State of Mississippi Court: Supreme...
Rule 41(b) Dismissal Must Be Applied Consistently Among Joint Movants Absent a Record-Based Distinction

Rule 41(b) Dismissal Must Be Applied Consistently Among Joint Movants Absent a Record-Based Distinction

Date: Apr 25, 2026
Rule 41(b) Dismissal Must Be Applied Consistently Among Joint Movants Absent a Record-Based Distinction 1. Introduction First Security Bank v. Dasie Mae Richmond, Administratrix of the Estate of...
Once a Victim’s Name Is Public, Courts Cannot Gag the Press or Exclude It from Trial for Refusing an Unconstitutional Restraint

Once a Victim’s Name Is Public, Courts Cannot Gag the Press or Exclude It from Trial for Refusing an Unconstitutional Restraint

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Once a Victim’s Name Is Public, Courts Cannot Gag the Press or Exclude It from Trial for Refusing an Unconstitutional Restraint Case: LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, INC v. DIST. CT. (CHASING HORSE)...
Selective Sovereign Immunity Cannot Bar Federal Due-Process Claims; Illegal-Exaction Suits Proceed Despite Article 5, Section 20

Selective Sovereign Immunity Cannot Bar Federal Due-Process Claims; Illegal-Exaction Suits Proceed Despite Article 5, Section 20

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Selective Sovereign Immunity Cannot Bar Federal Due-Process Claims; Illegal-Exaction Suits Proceed Despite Article 5, Section 20 I. Introduction In GARLAND COUNTY DISTRICT COURT; PROFESSIONAL...
Thornton v. State (2026 Ark. 71): Rule 33.1 Requires Element-Specific Deficiency Arguments—Not Element-Recitation—to Preserve Sufficiency Review in Bench Trials

Thornton v. State (2026 Ark. 71): Rule 33.1 Requires Element-Specific Deficiency Arguments—Not Element-Recitation—to Preserve Sufficiency Review in Bench Trials

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Rule 33.1 Requires Element-Specific Deficiency Arguments—Not Element-Recitation—to Preserve Sufficiency Review in Bench Trials (and Class-Y “Certification” Issues Are Not Structural Error Absent...
Postconviction Challenges Cannot Be Recast as Civil Declaratory/Mandamus Actions; No Service, No Default, No Appealable Order

Postconviction Challenges Cannot Be Recast as Civil Declaratory/Mandamus Actions; No Service, No Default, No Appealable Order

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Postconviction Challenges Cannot Be Recast as Civil Declaratory/Mandamus Actions; No Service, No Default, No Appealable Order I. Introduction In RODNEY BUNCH v. STATE OF ARKANSAS; WILLIAM MARTIN...
RAP 20 Emergency Relief Is Confined to Injunction Orders; KRS 403.220 Appellate-Fee Requests Belong in Family Court

RAP 20 Emergency Relief Is Confined to Injunction Orders; KRS 403.220 Appellate-Fee Requests Belong in Family Court

Date: Apr 24, 2026
RAP 20 Emergency Relief Is Confined to Injunction Orders; KRS 403.220 Appellate-Fee Requests Belong in Family Court I. Introduction Chastity Ellison v. Hon. Terri Schoborg (Ky. Apr. 23, 2026) arises...
Kentucky Rejects Automatic Immunity and Federal Preemption for Highway Design Consultants; “Mandated Design” Defense Requires Undisputed Mandate

Kentucky Rejects Automatic Immunity and Federal Preemption for Highway Design Consultants; “Mandated Design” Defense Requires Undisputed Mandate

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Kentucky Rejects Automatic Immunity and Federal Preemption for Highway Design Consultants; “Mandated Design” Defense Requires Undisputed Mandate Case: Hmb Professional Engineers, Inc. v. Jennings L....
Reverse Hammer Clauses in Kentucky: Courts May Impose the Original Plea Sentence After a Conditional Leniency Offer Is Breached by a New Arrest—So Long as Sentencing Discretion Is Independently Exercised

Reverse Hammer Clauses in Kentucky: Courts May Impose the Original Plea Sentence After a Conditional Leniency Offer Is Breached by a New Arrest—So Long as Sentencing Discretion Is Independently Exercised

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Reverse Hammer Clauses in Kentucky: Courts May Impose the Original Plea Sentence After a Conditional Leniency Offer Is Breached by a New Arrest—So Long as Sentencing Discretion Is Independently...
Kentucky ORA “Agency-Custody” Rule: Private Emails and Texts of Volunteer Commission Members Are Not “Public Records”

Kentucky ORA “Agency-Custody” Rule: Private Emails and Texts of Volunteer Commission Members Are Not “Public Records”

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Kentucky ORA “Agency-Custody” Rule: Private Emails and Texts of Volunteer Commission Members Are Not “Public Records” I. Introduction In Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Commission...
R.L.P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: KRS Chapter 202C Upheld—“Potential Guilt” Screening by Preponderance Without Jury Is Constitutional in Civil Commitment

R.L.P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: KRS Chapter 202C Upheld—“Potential Guilt” Screening by Preponderance Without Jury Is Constitutional in Civil Commitment

Date: Apr 24, 2026
R.L.P. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: KRS Chapter 202C Upheld—“Potential Guilt” Screening by Preponderance Without Jury Is Constitutional in Civil Commitment 1. Introduction In R.L.P. v. Commonwealth...
Unilateral Rule-Change Clauses in Leases Are Enforceable When Constrained by Reasonableness and the Implied Covenant of Good Faith

Unilateral Rule-Change Clauses in Leases Are Enforceable When Constrained by Reasonableness and the Implied Covenant of Good Faith

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Unilateral Rule-Change Clauses in Leases Are Enforceable When Constrained by Reasonableness and the Implied Covenant of Good Faith 1. Introduction In Vivos xPoint Investment Group, LLC v. Sindorf,...
Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification

Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification 1. Introduction In the Interest Of: AG, minor child concerns whether a juvenile court may change a...
UIFSA Long-Arm Proceedings Are “One-State” Cases: RSA 546-B:31 Does Not Bar New Hampshire Support Orders When Personal Jurisdiction Exists

UIFSA Long-Arm Proceedings Are “One-State” Cases: RSA 546-B:31 Does Not Bar New Hampshire Support Orders When Personal Jurisdiction Exists

Date: Apr 24, 2026
UIFSA Long-Arm Proceedings Are “One-State” Cases: RSA 546-B:31 Does Not Bar New Hampshire Support Orders When Personal Jurisdiction Exists Case: In the Matter of Stansfield & Patti, 2026 N.H. 17...
Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle (ORS 164.135): “Vehicle” Includes Trailers, and Criminal Code Commentary Can Be Decisive Legislative History

Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle (ORS 164.135): “Vehicle” Includes Trailers, and Criminal Code Commentary Can Be Decisive Legislative History

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle (ORS 164.135): “Vehicle” Includes Trailers, and Criminal Code Commentary Can Be Decisive Legislative History Case: State v. McCarthy, 375 Or 157 (Or Apr 23, 2026) Court:...
State v. Miller (2026): Hospital ER Questioning Is Not Per Se “Compelling”; Voluntariness and Blood-Draw Consent Turn on Totality

State v. Miller (2026): Hospital ER Questioning Is Not Per Se “Compelling”; Voluntariness and Blood-Draw Consent Turn on Totality

Date: Apr 24, 2026
State v. Miller (375 Or 173 (2026)): Hospital ER Questioning Is Not Per Se “Compelling”; Voluntariness and Blood-Draw Consent Turn on Totality Introduction State v. Miller arose from a DUII...
Independent-Judgment Review and No Automatic Deference in Coastal Commission Jurisdiction Disputes; “Principal Permitted Use” Includes Multiple Uses

Independent-Judgment Review and No Automatic Deference in Coastal Commission Jurisdiction Disputes; “Principal Permitted Use” Includes Multiple Uses

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Independent-Judgment Review and No Automatic Deference in Coastal Commission Jurisdiction Disputes; “Principal Permitted Use” Includes Multiple Uses Case: Shear Development Co., LLC v. California...
Fees-on-Fees Are Not Automatic: Trial Courts May Deny Post-Settlement Fee-Litigation Time as Unreasonable Under Fee-Shifting Statutes

Fees-on-Fees Are Not Automatic: Trial Courts May Deny Post-Settlement Fee-Litigation Time as Unreasonable Under Fee-Shifting Statutes

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Fees-on-Fees Are Not Automatic: Trial Courts May Deny Post-Settlement Fee-Litigation Time as Unreasonable Under Fee-Shifting Statutes 1. Introduction Butcher v. General R.V. Center, Inc. (Va. Apr....
Edwards Is Not a Permanent Taint: Post-Invocation Statements Are Admissible After Interrogation Ends, the Suspect Reinitiates, and a Knowing Waiver Follows

Edwards Is Not a Permanent Taint: Post-Invocation Statements Are Admissible After Interrogation Ends, the Suspect Reinitiates, and a Knowing Waiver Follows

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Edwards Is Not a Permanent Taint: Post-Invocation Statements Are Admissible After Interrogation Ends, the Suspect Reinitiates, and a Knowing Waiver Follows I. Introduction Commonwealth v. Fayne...
Commonwealth v. Richerson — Totality-of-the-Evidence Controls DUI Sufficiency; Appellate Courts May Not Reweigh Body-Cam “Inconsistencies” or Invent Innocent Hypotheses

Commonwealth v. Richerson — Totality-of-the-Evidence Controls DUI Sufficiency; Appellate Courts May Not Reweigh Body-Cam “Inconsistencies” or Invent Innocent Hypotheses

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Commonwealth v. Richerson: Totality-of-the-Evidence Controls DUI Sufficiency; Appellate Courts May Not Reweigh Body-Cam “Inconsistencies” or Invent Innocent Hypotheses 1. Introduction In Commonwealth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert