Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Connecticut Case Commentaries

Managerial “Good-Faith” Is Not a Contractual Duty: Clinton v. Aspinwall and the Boundary Between Exculpation and Obligation

Managerial “Good-Faith” Is Not a Contractual Duty: Clinton v. Aspinwall and the Boundary Between Exculpation and Obligation

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Managerial “Good-Faith” Is Not a Contractual Duty: Clinton v. Aspinwall and the Boundary Between Exculpation and Obligation Introduction In Clinton v. Aspinwall, 352 Conn. 597 (2025), the Connecticut...

        State v. Traynham: Clarifying “Degree-Versus-Kind” Inculpation and the
        Trustworthiness Standard for Dual Inculpatory Statements Against Penal Interest

State v. Traynham: Clarifying “Degree-Versus-Kind” Inculpation and the Trustworthiness Standard for Dual Inculpatory Statements Against Penal Interest

Date: Jul 23, 2025
State v. Traynham: Clarifying “Degree-Versus-Kind” Inculpation and the Trustworthiness Standard for Dual Inculpatory Statements Against Penal Interest 1. Introduction In State v. Traynham, 0 Conn. 1...
“Contextual Nexus” Requirement for Third-Party Culpability Instructions – A Commentary on State v. Simmons (Conn. 2025)

“Contextual Nexus” Requirement for Third-Party Culpability Instructions – A Commentary on State v. Simmons (Conn. 2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Contextual Nexus” Requirement for Third-Party Culpability Instructions A Structured Commentary on State v. Simmons, 358 Conn. ___ (July 22, 2025) I. Introduction On 22 July 2025 the Supreme Court of...
Proposed Rule: Admit Showup Identifications Only in “True Exigencies” Where a Showup Is the Only Feasible Procedure

Proposed Rule: Admit Showup Identifications Only in “True Exigencies” Where a Showup Is the Only Feasible Procedure

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Proposed Rule: Admit Showup Identifications Only in “True Exigencies” Where a Showup Is the Only Feasible Procedure Case: State v. McLaurin (Dissent) Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut Date:...
Reliability as the Decisive Safeguard: Connecticut Upholds a Showup Identification Even Assuming Unnecessary Suggestiveness (State v. McLaurin)

Reliability as the Decisive Safeguard: Connecticut Upholds a Showup Identification Even Assuming Unnecessary Suggestiveness (State v. McLaurin)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Reliability as the Decisive Safeguard: Connecticut Upholds a Showup Identification Even Assuming Unnecessary Suggestiveness Introduction In State v. McLaurin (officially released July 22, 2025), the...
State v. Bolton: Neutral Handling of Juror Dissent During a Practice Book § 42-31 Jury Poll; No Per Se Need for a Chip Smith Charge

State v. Bolton: Neutral Handling of Juror Dissent During a Practice Book § 42-31 Jury Poll; No Per Se Need for a Chip Smith Charge

Date: Jul 23, 2025
State v. Bolton: Neutral Handling of Juror Dissent During a Practice Book § 42-31 Jury Poll; No Per Se Need for a Chip Smith Charge I. Introduction State v. Bolton (Supreme Court of Connecticut,...
State v. Iverson: Strategic Waiver Bars Golding Review of Confrontation Challenges to Nontestifying Autopsy Authors; Whistnant Requires a Real Dispute Between Intent and Recklessness

State v. Iverson: Strategic Waiver Bars Golding Review of Confrontation Challenges to Nontestifying Autopsy Authors; Whistnant Requires a Real Dispute Between Intent and Recklessness

Date: Jul 16, 2025
State v. Iverson: Strategic Waiver Bars Golding Review of Confrontation Challenges to Nontestifying Autopsy Authors; Whistnant Requires a Real Dispute Between Intent and Recklessness Court: Supreme...
State v. Villanueva: Evidentiary Predicate for Investigative-Inadequacy Instructions; No Per Se Suppression for § 54-1p Warning Omissions; Autopsy Photographs Are Nonhearsay for Confrontation Purposes

State v. Villanueva: Evidentiary Predicate for Investigative-Inadequacy Instructions; No Per Se Suppression for § 54-1p Warning Omissions; Autopsy Photographs Are Nonhearsay for Confrontation Purposes

Date: Jul 16, 2025
State v. Villanueva: Evidentiary Predicate for Investigative-Inadequacy Instructions; No Per Se Suppression for § 54-1p Warning Omissions; Autopsy Photographs Are Nonhearsay for Confrontation...
The Aquarion Rule: Prohibiting Hindsight Prudence Review and Isolating ROE from Cost Disallowances in Connecticut Utility Rate-Setting

The Aquarion Rule: Prohibiting Hindsight Prudence Review and Isolating ROE from Cost Disallowances in Connecticut Utility Rate-Setting

Date: Jul 11, 2025
The Aquarion Rule: Prohibiting Hindsight Prudence Review and Isolating ROE from Cost Disallowances in Connecticut Utility Rate-Setting Aquarion Water Co. of Connecticut v. Public Utilities Regulatory...
State v. Maharg – Clarifying the Burden of Proof for “Tainted-Evidence” Claims under Golding and the Harmless-Error Standard

State v. Maharg – Clarifying the Burden of Proof for “Tainted-Evidence” Claims under Golding and the Harmless-Error Standard

Date: Jul 11, 2025
State v. Maharg – Clarifying the Burden of Proof for “Tainted-Evidence” Claims under Golding and the Harmless-Error Standard 1. Introduction Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut – July 8, 2025...
State v. Maharg: The Connecticut Supreme Court Affirms a Police Duty to Halt Interrogations When a Suspect Exhibits Acute Medical Distress

State v. Maharg: The Connecticut Supreme Court Affirms a Police Duty to Halt Interrogations When a Suspect Exhibits Acute Medical Distress

Date: Jul 11, 2025
State v. Maharg: The Connecticut Supreme Court Affirms a Police Duty to Halt Interrogations When a Suspect Exhibits Acute Medical Distress 1. Introduction In State v. Maharg, 0 Conn. 0 (July 8 2025),...
State v. Moore: Narrowing the Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” for 30 % Cash Bonds

State v. Moore: Narrowing the Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” for 30 % Cash Bonds

Date: Jul 6, 2025
State v. Moore: Narrowing the Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” for 30 % Cash Bonds Introduction Case: State v. Moore, Supreme Court of Connecticut (2025) Core issue: Whether conspiracy to...
State v. Moore: The Element-Focused Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” in Connecticut Bail Law

State v. Moore: The Element-Focused Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” in Connecticut Bail Law

Date: Jul 6, 2025
State v. Moore: The Element-Focused Definition of “Serious Firearm Offense” in Connecticut Bail Law 1. Introduction On 8 July 2025 the Supreme Court of Connecticut handed down State v. Moore, a...
State v. Hamilton: Foundation Requirements for Uncooperative Witnesses and the Inclusion of Adopted Statements Under the Whelan Doctrine

State v. Hamilton: Foundation Requirements for Uncooperative Witnesses and the Inclusion of Adopted Statements Under the Whelan Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Clarifying Whelan: Foundation for Inconsistency and the Admissibility of Witness-Adopted Statements – A Commentary on State v. Hamilton (Conn. 2025) Introduction On 1 July 2025 the Supreme Court of...
State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine

State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine Introduction State v. Haynes, 345 Conn. ___ (July 1, 2025),...
State v. Haynes: Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution

State v. Haynes: Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Haynes (2025): Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution Introduction State v. Haynes presented the Connecticut Supreme Court with a chance to...
State v. Ramsey (2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted

State v. Ramsey (2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Ramsey (Conn. 2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted Introduction In State v. Ramsey, 208 A.3d ___ (Conn. 2025), the Supreme...
“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (2025)

“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (2025)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (Conn. 2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Connecticut, in State v. Hinton,...
Substantial Compliance Suffices: Johnson v. Superior Court Clarifies Limits on Deferral and Recusal in Summary Criminal Contempt Under Connecticut Practice Book §§ 1-16 & 1-17

Substantial Compliance Suffices: Johnson v. Superior Court Clarifies Limits on Deferral and Recusal in Summary Criminal Contempt Under Connecticut Practice Book §§ 1-16 & 1-17

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Substantial Compliance Suffices: Johnson v. Superior Court Clarifies Limits on Deferral and Recusal in Summary Criminal Contempt Under Connecticut Practice Book §§ 1-16 & 1-17 Introduction Johnson v....
Ambiguity Trumps Advocacy: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Remand Mandate When Separation Agreements Admit of Two Reasonable Meanings

Ambiguity Trumps Advocacy: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Remand Mandate When Separation Agreements Admit of Two Reasonable Meanings

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Ambiguity Trumps Advocacy: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Remand Mandate When Separation Agreements Admit of Two Reasonable Meanings 1. Introduction On 10 June 2025 the Connecticut Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert