Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Samuels v. State: Cumulative Jail-Call “Non-Denial” Commentary Is Not Plain Error When the Calls Are Admitted, and Assumed Intrinsic-Act Error Is Harmless Given Strong Circumstantial Proof

Samuels v. State: Cumulative Jail-Call “Non-Denial” Commentary Is Not Plain Error When the Calls Are Admitted, and Assumed Intrinsic-Act Error Is Harmless Given Strong Circumstantial Proof

Date: Feb 18, 2026
Samuels v. State: Cumulative Jail-Call “Non-Denial” Commentary Is Not Plain Error When the Calls Are Admitted, and Assumed Intrinsic-Act Error Is Harmless Given Strong Circumstantial Proof 1....
Georgia Adopts a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test for When a Third Party “Procured or Caused to Be Procured” a Life Insurance Policy (STOLI/Wagering Analysis)

Georgia Adopts a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test for When a Third Party “Procured or Caused to Be Procured” a Life Insurance Policy (STOLI/Wagering Analysis)

Date: Feb 18, 2026
Georgia Adopts a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test for When a Third Party “Procured or Caused to Be Procured” a Life Insurance Policy (STOLI/Wagering Analysis) 1. Introduction Wilmington Trust,...
Conduct-Based Acceptance of a Nonconforming OCGA § 9-11-67.1 Response Creates an Enforceable Settlement Covering Additional Insureds Named in the Counteroffer

Conduct-Based Acceptance of a Nonconforming OCGA § 9-11-67.1 Response Creates an Enforceable Settlement Covering Additional Insureds Named in the Counteroffer

Date: Feb 18, 2026
Conduct-Based Acceptance of a Nonconforming OCGA § 9-11-67.1 Response Creates an Enforceable Settlement Covering Additional Insureds Named in the Counteroffer 1. Introduction This Court of Appeals of...
Settlement by Counteroffer Accepted Through Conduct Under OCGA § 9-11-67.1 (2013): UM-Exhaustion Communications as Objective Assent and Release Extending to Additional Insureds

Settlement by Counteroffer Accepted Through Conduct Under OCGA § 9-11-67.1 (2013): UM-Exhaustion Communications as Objective Assent and Release Extending to Additional Insureds

Date: Feb 18, 2026
Settlement by Counteroffer Accepted Through Conduct Under OCGA § 9-11-67.1 (2013): UM-Exhaustion Communications as Objective Assent and Release Extending to Additional Insureds Introduction Slaughter...
Police-Power Damage Is Not a Compensable “Taking”: Sovereign Immunity Bars Inverse-Condemnation Claims for Property Damaged During Law-Enforcement Operations

Police-Power Damage Is Not a Compensable “Taking”: Sovereign Immunity Bars Inverse-Condemnation Claims for Property Damaged During Law-Enforcement Operations

Date: Feb 18, 2026
Police-Power Damage Is Not a Compensable “Taking”: Sovereign Immunity Bars Inverse-Condemnation Claims for Property Damaged During Law-Enforcement Operations Introduction In BLUE 42 ORGANICS, LLC v....
Huitron v. Toby (Ga. 2026): Potential Appellate-Counsel Office Conflicts Require Proof of a Specific, Adversely Affected Appellate Decision

Huitron v. Toby (Ga. 2026): Potential Appellate-Counsel Office Conflicts Require Proof of a Specific, Adversely Affected Appellate Decision

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Potential Appellate-Counsel Office Conflicts Do Not Warrant a New Appeal Absent Proof the Conflict Significantly and Adversely Affected a Specific Appellate Choice Case: Huitron v. Toby, Warden...
Welsch v. State — Plain-Error Limits on Unobjected-to Confrontation and Hearsay Claims; Deferential Review of General-Grounds Rulings After Bench Trials

Welsch v. State — Plain-Error Limits on Unobjected-to Confrontation and Hearsay Claims; Deferential Review of General-Grounds Rulings After Bench Trials

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Welsch v. State — Plain-Error Limits on Unobjected-to Confrontation and Hearsay Claims; Deferential Review of General-Grounds Rulings After Bench Trials Introduction In Welsch v. The State (Supreme...
Biggs v. State: Rule 403 Generally Cannot Exclude a Victim’s Prior Violent Act Known to the Defendant When It Substantially Explains Justification

Biggs v. State: Rule 403 Generally Cannot Exclude a Victim’s Prior Violent Act Known to the Defendant When It Substantially Explains Justification

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Biggs v. State: Rule 403 Generally Cannot Exclude a Victim’s Prior Violent Act Known to the Defendant When It Substantially Explains Justification Introduction In Biggs v. The State (Supreme Court of...
Clark v. State — Renewal of Mistrial Motion Required After Curative Instruction; Post-Offense Witness-Killing Solicitation Admissible Under Rule 404(b) as Consciousness of Guilt

Clark v. State — Renewal of Mistrial Motion Required After Curative Instruction; Post-Offense Witness-Killing Solicitation Admissible Under Rule 404(b) as Consciousness of Guilt

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Renewal of Mistrial Motion Required After Curative Instruction; Post-Offense Witness-Killing Solicitation Admissible Under OCGA § 24-4-404(b) as Consciousness of Guilt Introduction In Clark v. The...
Speculative Conflicts Do Not Trigger Prosecutor Disqualification Under GRPC 1.9(a) Absent a “Substantially Related” Prior Representation

Speculative Conflicts Do Not Trigger Prosecutor Disqualification Under GRPC 1.9(a) Absent a “Substantially Related” Prior Representation

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Speculative Conflicts Do Not Trigger Prosecutor Disqualification Under GRPC 1.9(a) Absent a “Substantially Related” Prior Representation Introduction This consolidated Supreme Court of Georgia...
Condra Does Not Mandate a “Personal Practices” Jury Charge; Pattern Instructions Are Not Law and Trial Courts May Tailor Charges

Condra Does Not Mandate a “Personal Practices” Jury Charge; Pattern Instructions Are Not Law and Trial Courts May Tailor Charges

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Condra Does Not Mandate a “Personal Practices” Jury Charge; Pattern Instructions Are Not Law and Trial Courts May Tailor Charges Introduction Georgia Bone & Joint Surgeons, P.C. v. Keel reached the...
Gibson v. State: “Conflict-Free Counsel” Requires an Articulated Actual Conflict; A Desire to Hire Private Counsel Is Not Enough

Gibson v. State: “Conflict-Free Counsel” Requires an Articulated Actual Conflict; A Desire to Hire Private Counsel Is Not Enough

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Gibson v. State: “Conflict-Free Counsel” Requires an Articulated Actual Conflict; A Desire to Hire Private Counsel Is Not Enough Court: Supreme Court of Georgia Date: February 3, 2026 Case: Gibson v....
Graham v. State: No Ineffective Assistance for Omitting Additional Justification/Character Charges and for Declining a Novel Curtilage-Based Defense-of-Habitation Theory; Cumulative Error Requires Identified Trial Error

Graham v. State: No Ineffective Assistance for Omitting Additional Justification/Character Charges and for Declining a Novel Curtilage-Based Defense-of-Habitation Theory; Cumulative Error Requires Identified Trial Error

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Graham v. State: No Ineffective Assistance for Omitting Additional Justification/Character Charges and for Declining a Novel Curtilage-Based Defense-of-Habitation Theory; Cumulative Error Requires...
Kerns v. State — No Separate Right to Virtual Trial Access After Removal for Disruption; No Mandatory Hearing on Substitute-Counsel Requests Absent Adequate Record

Kerns v. State — No Separate Right to Virtual Trial Access After Removal for Disruption; No Mandatory Hearing on Substitute-Counsel Requests Absent Adequate Record

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Kerns v. State — No Separate Right to Virtual Trial Access After Removal for Disruption; No Mandatory Hearing on Substitute-Counsel Requests Absent Adequate Record 1. Introduction In Kerns v. THE...
Riley v. State: No Brady/Giglio Violation Absent a Pretrial Leniency Agreement; Speculation About Cross-County Favor Is Insufficient

Riley v. State: No Brady/Giglio Violation Absent a Pretrial Leniency Agreement; Speculation About Cross-County Favor Is Insufficient

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Riley v. State: No Brady/Giglio Violation Absent a Pretrial Leniency Agreement; Speculation About Cross-County Favor Is Insufficient Court: Supreme Court of Georgia Date: February 3, 2026 Case: Riley...
Cell-Tower “Mapping” and Autonomous Surveillance Foundations: When Location-Tracking Summaries Are Lay Testimony and Timestamped Video Is Self-Authenticating Under OCGA § 24-9-923(c)

Cell-Tower “Mapping” and Autonomous Surveillance Foundations: When Location-Tracking Summaries Are Lay Testimony and Timestamped Video Is Self-Authenticating Under OCGA § 24-9-923(c)

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Cell-Tower “Mapping” and Autonomous Surveillance Foundations: When Location-Tracking Summaries Are Lay Testimony and Timestamped Video Is Self-Authenticating Under OCGA § 24-9-923(c) I. Introduction...
State v. Lee: Clarifying “Why Am I Charged?” Questions Do Not Reinitiate Interrogation After Invocation; “Why Do You Think?” Follow-Ups Are Edwards-Prohibited Interrogation

State v. Lee: Clarifying “Why Am I Charged?” Questions Do Not Reinitiate Interrogation After Invocation; “Why Do You Think?” Follow-Ups Are Edwards-Prohibited Interrogation

Date: Feb 5, 2026
State v. Lee: Clarifying “Why Am I Charged?” Questions Do Not Reinitiate Interrogation After Invocation; “Why Do You Think?” Follow-Ups Are Edwards-Prohibited Interrogation I. Introduction State v....
Taylor v. State: Ineffective-Assistance Claims Must Identify Specific, Record-Supported Deficiencies; Appellate Courts Will Not Cull the Record

Taylor v. State: Ineffective-Assistance Claims Must Identify Specific, Record-Supported Deficiencies; Appellate Courts Will Not Cull the Record

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Taylor v. State: Ineffective-Assistance Claims Must Identify Specific, Record-Supported Deficiencies; Appellate Courts Will Not Cull the Record Introduction In Taylor v. The State (Supreme Court of...
Georgia RICO Cannot Be Used to Transform a Post-Divorce Child-Support Dispute into a Treble-Damages Racketeering Case

Georgia RICO Cannot Be Used to Transform a Post-Divorce Child-Support Dispute into a Treble-Damages Racketeering Case

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Georgia RICO Cannot Be Used to Transform a Post-Divorce Child-Support Dispute into a Treble-Damages Racketeering Case Introduction In WARNER v. ESPITIA et al., the Court of Appeals of Georgia...
Phillips v. State: Curative Instructions Cure Brief “Vouching,” and Recorded Interviews Are Not Admissible in Full Absent Proper Impeachment and Proffer

Phillips v. State: Curative Instructions Cure Brief “Vouching,” and Recorded Interviews Are Not Admissible in Full Absent Proper Impeachment and Proffer

Date: Jan 23, 2026
Phillips v. State: Curative Instructions Cure Brief “Vouching,” and Recorded Interviews Are Not Admissible in Full Absent Proper Impeachment and Proffer I. Introduction In Phillips v. The State...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert