Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Minnesota Supreme Court: § 65A.10 Requires Coverage for Code‑Mandated Sheathing to Replace Damaged Shingles; Overhead and Profit Not Automatic

Minnesota Supreme Court: § 65A.10 Requires Coverage for Code‑Mandated Sheathing to Replace Damaged Shingles; Overhead and Profit Not Automatic

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Minnesota Supreme Court: § 65A.10 Requires Coverage for Code‑Mandated Sheathing to Replace Damaged Shingles; Overhead and Profit Not Automatic Introduction In Great Northwest Insurance Company v....
Starting the Clock: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Accrual and Strict Enforcement of the Two‑Year Postconviction Time Bar for “New Interpretation” and “Newly Discovered Evidence” Claims

Starting the Clock: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Accrual and Strict Enforcement of the Two‑Year Postconviction Time Bar for “New Interpretation” and “Newly Discovered Evidence” Claims

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Starting the Clock: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Accrual and Strict Enforcement of the Two‑Year Postconviction Time Bar for “New Interpretation” and “Newly Discovered Evidence” Claims...
Minnesota Supreme Court Adopts Yee Framework and Upholds Minneapolis’s Voucher-Acceptance Ordinance: No Taking Under Minnesota Constitution; MHRA Does Not Preempt Local Anti-Discrimination Measures

Minnesota Supreme Court Adopts Yee Framework and Upholds Minneapolis’s Voucher-Acceptance Ordinance: No Taking Under Minnesota Constitution; MHRA Does Not Preempt Local Anti-Discrimination Measures

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Minnesota Supreme Court Adopts Yee Framework and Upholds Minneapolis’s Voucher-Acceptance Ordinance: No Taking Under Minnesota Constitution; MHRA Does Not Preempt Local Anti-Discrimination Measures...
A Uniform Corpus Delicti Standard for Attempt and Completed Crimes: Independent Evidence That “Reasonably Tends to Prove” the Offense Suffices (State v. Hill)

A Uniform Corpus Delicti Standard for Attempt and Completed Crimes: Independent Evidence That “Reasonably Tends to Prove” the Offense Suffices (State v. Hill)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
A Uniform Corpus Delicti Standard for Attempt and Completed Crimes: Independent Evidence That “Reasonably Tends to Prove” the Offense Suffices (State v. Hill) Case: State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Lee...
Inherent-Authority Safety Valve for Late Appeals Caused by Missing Rule 77.04 Notice; Minnesota General Rule of Practice 14.01(c)(2) Does Not Extend to Appellate Courts

Inherent-Authority Safety Valve for Late Appeals Caused by Missing Rule 77.04 Notice; Minnesota General Rule of Practice 14.01(c)(2) Does Not Extend to Appellate Courts

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Inherent-Authority Safety Valve for Late Appeals Caused by Missing Rule 77.04 Notice; Minnesota General Rule of Practice 14.01(c)(2) Does Not Extend to Appellate Courts Case and Citation Wells Fargo...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Priority of Performing Construction Surety’s Equitable Subrogation Over Earlier Perfected UCC Security Interests; No Mistake-of-Fact Requirement

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Priority of Performing Construction Surety’s Equitable Subrogation Over Earlier Perfected UCC Security Interests; No Mistake-of-Fact Requirement

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Performing Construction Surety’s Equitable Subrogation Trumps Earlier Perfected UCC Security Interests — No Mistake-of-Fact Requirement Introduction In a significant decision for public construction...
Courts Are Not Agencies: Loper Bright Does Not Trigger Minnesota’s Postconviction “New Interpretation of Law” Exception and the Two-Year Time Bar Remains Strict

Courts Are Not Agencies: Loper Bright Does Not Trigger Minnesota’s Postconviction “New Interpretation of Law” Exception and the Two-Year Time Bar Remains Strict

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Courts Are Not Agencies: Loper Bright Does Not Trigger Minnesota’s Postconviction “New Interpretation of Law” Exception and the Two-Year Time Bar Remains Strict Introduction In Nantambu Noah Kambon...
Disbarment for Misappropriating Employer Funds While Suspended: Prior Similar Discipline and Noncooperation Warrant the Ultimate Sanction Even Absent an 8.4(b) Allegation

Disbarment for Misappropriating Employer Funds While Suspended: Prior Similar Discipline and Noncooperation Warrant the Ultimate Sanction Even Absent an 8.4(b) Allegation

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Disbarment for Misappropriating Employer Funds While Suspended: Prior Similar Discipline and Noncooperation Warrant the Ultimate Sanction Even Absent an 8.4(b) Allegation Introduction In In re...
No “Unlawful Conduct” Carve‑Out to Minnesota’s Reporter Shield; Privilege Logs Permissible Under the MFFIA

No “Unlawful Conduct” Carve‑Out to Minnesota’s Reporter Shield; Privilege Logs Permissible Under the MFFIA

Date: Jul 17, 2025
No “Unlawful Conduct” Carve‑Out to Minnesota’s Reporter Shield; Privilege Logs Permissible Under the MFFIA Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota Case: Energy Transfer LP (formerly known as Energy...
Appellate Deference to DSM‑5‑TR–Based PTSD Diagnoses; Mootness Bars Consequential OSTD Claims; Frivolous Denials Penalized — Commentary on Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Appellate Deference to DSM‑5‑TR–Based PTSD Diagnoses; Mootness Bars Consequential OSTD Claims; Frivolous Denials Penalized — Commentary on Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Appellate Deference to DSM‑5‑TR–Based PTSD Diagnoses; Mootness Bars Consequential OSTD Claims; Frivolous Denials Penalized Introduction In Lucas Peterson v. City of Minneapolis, Self-Insured, 23...
Limiting Dobbs: Minnesota Supreme Court Holds “New Interpretation” Exception Requires Case‑Specific Applicability; Untimely Postconviction Claims Not Revived by Abortion Jurisprudence

Limiting Dobbs: Minnesota Supreme Court Holds “New Interpretation” Exception Requires Case‑Specific Applicability; Untimely Postconviction Claims Not Revived by Abortion Jurisprudence

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Limiting Dobbs: Minnesota Supreme Court Holds “New Interpretation” Exception Requires Case‑Specific Applicability; Untimely Postconviction Claims Not Revived by Abortion Jurisprudence Introduction In...
“Uses Force” Under Minn. Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(d): Bodily Harm Inflicted Before or During Nonconsensual Penetration Suffices

“Uses Force” Under Minn. Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(d): Bodily Harm Inflicted Before or During Nonconsensual Penetration Suffices

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Uses Force” Under Minn. Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(d): Bodily Harm Inflicted Before or During Nonconsensual Penetration Suffices Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Clifford Robert Letourneau, III,...
Presence Is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient: Minnesota Clarifies the Hawkins Threshold for Alternative‑Perpetrator Evidence and Affirms Voluntariness of Hospital Interviews

Presence Is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient: Minnesota Clarifies the Hawkins Threshold for Alternative‑Perpetrator Evidence and Affirms Voluntariness of Hospital Interviews

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Presence Is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient: Minnesota Clarifies the Hawkins Threshold for Alternative‑Perpetrator Evidence and Affirms Voluntariness of Hospital Interviews Introduction In State of...
Harmless Error for Unannounced Criminal History Scores and Reaffirmation of the Multiple‑Victim Exception in Consecutive Sentencing — Sanders v. State (Minn. 2025)

Harmless Error for Unannounced Criminal History Scores and Reaffirmation of the Multiple‑Victim Exception in Consecutive Sentencing — Sanders v. State (Minn. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Harmless Error for Unannounced Criminal History Scores and Reaffirmation of the Multiple‑Victim Exception in Consecutive Sentencing — Sanders v. State (Minn. 2025) Introduction In Milton K. Sanders...
State’s Right to Appeal Jail-Credit Awards After Probation Revocation Arises by Necessary Implication from Rule 27.04

State’s Right to Appeal Jail-Credit Awards After Probation Revocation Arises by Necessary Implication from Rule 27.04

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State’s Right to Appeal Jail-Credit Awards After Probation Revocation Arises by Necessary Implication from Rule 27.04 Case: State of Minnesota v. Jason Turner Johnson, 23 N.W.3d 70 (Minn. July 2,...
Unopposed Excess Fees Still Require Irwin Review; 2024 Workers’ Comp Fee Cap Applies Prospectively Only

Unopposed Excess Fees Still Require Irwin Review; 2024 Workers’ Comp Fee Cap Applies Prospectively Only

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Unopposed Excess Fees Still Require Irwin Review; 2024 Workers’ Comp Fee Cap Applies Prospectively Only Introduction In James Jurgensen, Relator v. Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., and TBG Claims...
Coleman and Noor Apply Retroactively; Knaffla Does Not Bar First Petitions Raising New Interpretations of Law

Coleman and Noor Apply Retroactively; Knaffla Does Not Bar First Petitions Raising New Interpretations of Law

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Coleman and Noor Apply Retroactively; Knaffla Does Not Bar First Petitions Raising New Interpretations of Law Introduction In Carlos Heard v. State of Minnesota, 22 N.W.3d 154 (Minn. 2025), the...
Venue Under Minn. Stat. § 627.01 Is Not an Element: Guilty Plea Accuracy Need Not Include Venue Facts — State v. Paulson (Minn. 2025)

Venue Under Minn. Stat. § 627.01 Is Not an Element: Guilty Plea Accuracy Need Not Include Venue Facts — State v. Paulson (Minn. 2025)

Date: Jun 12, 2025
Venue Under Minn. Stat. § 627.01 Is Not an Element: Guilty Plea Accuracy Need Not Include Venue Facts — State v. Paulson (Minn. 2025) Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Matthew Douglas Paulson, 22...
Torrez: No Probable-Cause Element for Warrant-Based Blood or Urine Test Refusal under Minn. Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 2(2)

Torrez: No Probable-Cause Element for Warrant-Based Blood or Urine Test Refusal under Minn. Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 2(2)

Date: Jun 5, 2025
Torrez: No Probable-Cause Element for Warrant-Based Blood or Urine Test Refusal under Minn. Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 2(2) Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Samuel Alejondro Torrez, 21 N.W.3d 467...
Minnesota Supreme Court: WCCA May Vacate Awards Based on Invalid Workers’ Compensation Settlements and Decide Employee Incapacity Without District Court Referral

Minnesota Supreme Court: WCCA May Vacate Awards Based on Invalid Workers’ Compensation Settlements and Decide Employee Incapacity Without District Court Referral

Date: May 22, 2025
Minnesota Supreme Court: WCCA May Vacate Awards Based on Invalid Workers’ Compensation Settlements and Decide Employee Incapacity Without District Court Referral Case: Bobby Lykins, by Conservator,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert