Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Mississippi Case Commentaries

Clarifying the MPLA’s Reach: Mississippi Supreme Court Limits Products Liability Act to Defective-Product Claims and Preserves Contract and Commercial Implied-Warranty Actions

Clarifying the MPLA’s Reach: Mississippi Supreme Court Limits Products Liability Act to Defective-Product Claims and Preserves Contract and Commercial Implied-Warranty Actions

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Clarifying the MPLA’s Reach: Mississippi Supreme Court Limits Products Liability Act to Defective-Product Claims and Preserves Contract and Commercial Implied-Warranty Actions Introduction In...
No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization

No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization Case:...
Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State

Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State Introduction In Antonio Sauceda Reyes a/k/a Antonio Reyes v....
Mississippi Supreme Court Restricts In Forma Pauperis Post-Conviction Filings After Frivolous, Successive PCR Pleadings

Mississippi Supreme Court Restricts In Forma Pauperis Post-Conviction Filings After Frivolous, Successive PCR Pleadings

Date: Aug 22, 2025
Mississippi Supreme Court Restricts In Forma Pauperis Post-Conviction Filings After Frivolous, Successive PCR Pleadings Case: Leroy Lynch v. State of Mississippi (Miss. Aug. 21, 2025) (en banc order)...
Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule

Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule Introduction In The Mississippi State Port Authority at Gulfport v. Yilport Holding A.S., No....
“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment

“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment 1. Introduction K.S. v. M.D. and M.F.D. is the Mississippi Supreme Court’s most...
Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases: Commentary on Martez Abram v. State of Mississippi (2025)

Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases: Commentary on Martez Abram v. State of Mississippi (2025)

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases Comprehensive Commentary on Martez Abram a/k/a Martez Tarrell Abram v. State of Mississippi,...
Harrelson v. State: Refining Plain-Error Review of Improper Comments on “Equally Accessible” Witnesses

Harrelson v. State: Refining Plain-Error Review of Improper Comments on “Equally Accessible” Witnesses

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Harrelson v. State: Refining Plain-Error Review of Improper Comments on “Equally Accessible” Witnesses 1. Introduction Jonathan Harrelson, a forty-four-year-old Mississippi resident, was convicted of...
Clarifying the Filing Requirements for Discovery Materials & Embracing E-Service: An Analysis of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Amendment to Rule 5

Clarifying the Filing Requirements for Discovery Materials & Embracing E-Service: An Analysis of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Amendment to Rule 5

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Clarifying the Filing Requirements for Discovery Materials & Embracing E-Service: An Analysis of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Amendment to Rule 5 Introduction On 24 July 2025 the Supreme...
Mandatory Attorney’s-Fee Awards in Certificate-of-Need Litigation Confined to Chancery-Court Appeals: Commentary on Mississippi Methodist Hosp. & Rehab. Ctr. v. MSDH (Miss. 2025)

Mandatory Attorney’s-Fee Awards in Certificate-of-Need Litigation Confined to Chancery-Court Appeals: Commentary on Mississippi Methodist Hosp. & Rehab. Ctr. v. MSDH (Miss. 2025)

Date: Jul 9, 2025
Mandatory Attorney’s-Fee Awards in Certificate-of-Need Litigation Confined to Chancery-Court Appeals A Comprehensive Commentary on Mississippi Methodist Hospital & Rehabilitation Center Inc. v. MSDH...

        “No Fee Without Privity” – Mississippi Supreme Court Forecloses
        Third-Party-Beneficiary, Quantum-Meruit and Common-Fund Claims by
        Associated Counsel against the State

“No Fee Without Privity” – Mississippi Supreme Court Forecloses Third-Party-Beneficiary, Quantum-Meruit and Common-Fund Claims by Associated Counsel against the State

Date: Jul 9, 2025
“No Fee Without Privity” – Mississippi Supreme Court Forecloses Third-Party-Beneficiary, Quantum-Meruit and Common-Fund Claims by Associated Counsel against the State Introduction In Roedel Parsons...
Cole v. State: Clarifying the Tender-Years Hearsay Exception and the Trustworthiness Threshold for 911 CAD Business Records

Cole v. State: Clarifying the Tender-Years Hearsay Exception and the Trustworthiness Threshold for 911 CAD Business Records

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Cole v. State: Clarifying the Tender-Years Hearsay Exception and the Trustworthiness Threshold for 911 CAD Business Records 1. Introduction On 26 June 2025, the Supreme Court of Mississippi released...
“Margin-of-Illegality” Clarified: Houston v. Smith and the Mississippi Supreme Court’s Modern Test for Ordering Special Elections

“Margin-of-Illegality” Clarified: Houston v. Smith and the Mississippi Supreme Court’s Modern Test for Ordering Special Elections

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Margin-of-Illegality” Clarified: Houston v. Smith and the Mississippi Supreme Court’s Modern Test for Ordering Special Elections Introduction In In re: Republican Primary Runoff for Pearl River...
Reaffirming the Evidentiary Threshold for Constructive Notice under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act – A Commentary on City of Jackson & JPS v. Maxie (Miss. 2025)

Reaffirming the Evidentiary Threshold for Constructive Notice under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act – A Commentary on City of Jackson & JPS v. Maxie (Miss. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Reaffirming the Evidentiary Threshold for Constructive Notice under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act – A Commentary on City of Jackson, Mississippi & Jackson Public School District v. LaQuita Maxie,...
“Substantial Compliance” and “Unified Representation” Confirmed for Election-Commissioner Qualifications: A Commentary on Brown v. Madison County Board of Supervisors (Miss. 2025)

“Substantial Compliance” and “Unified Representation” Confirmed for Election-Commissioner Qualifications: A Commentary on Brown v. Madison County Board of Supervisors (Miss. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Substantial Compliance” and “Unified Representation” Confirmed for Election-Commissioner Qualifications: A Commentary on Brown v. Madison County Board of Supervisors (Miss. 2025) Introduction The...
Clark v. State: Mississippi Supreme Court Abolishes Procedural Waiver for First-Time Atkins Claims

Clark v. State: Mississippi Supreme Court Abolishes Procedural Waiver for First-Time Atkins Claims

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Clark v. State: Mississippi Supreme Court Abolishes Procedural Waiver for First-Time Atkins Claims Introduction In Tony Terrell Clark v. State of Mississippi, decided on 19 June 2025, the Mississippi...
No Interstate Sovereign Immunity for Sister-State Municipal Corporations:  The Promenade D’Iberville, LLC v. Jacksonville Electric Authority

No Interstate Sovereign Immunity for Sister-State Municipal Corporations: The Promenade D’Iberville, LLC v. Jacksonville Electric Authority

Date: Jun 13, 2025
No Interstate Sovereign Immunity for Sister-State Municipal Corporations in Mississippi The Supreme Court of Mississippi’s decision in The Promenade D’Iberville, LLC v. Jacksonville Electric...
“Wilful” Means “Knowing” – Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Mens Rea for Drug Possession and Re-affirms a Flexible Lindsey Review

“Wilful” Means “Knowing” – Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Mens Rea for Drug Possession and Re-affirms a Flexible Lindsey Review

Date: Jun 13, 2025
“Wilful” Means “Knowing” – Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Mens Rea for Drug Possession and Re-affirms a Flexible Lindsey Review Introduction The Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision in Mercedes...
Mississippi Reinforces the Invited-Error Bar: When a Defendant Crafts the Faulty Elements Instruction, the State Need Not Save Him

Mississippi Reinforces the Invited-Error Bar: When a Defendant Crafts the Faulty Elements Instruction, the State Need Not Save Him

Date: Jun 6, 2025
Mississippi Reinforces the Invited-Error Bar: Jimmy Allen v. State of Mississippi and the Re-allocation of Jury-Instruction Duties 1. Introduction On 5 June 2025 the Supreme Court of Mississippi...
“From Forms to Flexibility” – The Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Order Streamlining the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure

“From Forms to Flexibility” – The Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Order Streamlining the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure

Date: Jun 6, 2025
“From Forms to Flexibility” – The Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Order Streamlining the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure Introduction On 20 May 2025, the Supreme Court of Mississippi, sitting...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert