Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Traffic-Stop Safety Rule: Police May Temporarily Secure a Firearm in Plain View and Within the Driver’s Reach Without First Determining Licensure

Traffic-Stop Safety Rule: Police May Temporarily Secure a Firearm in Plain View and Within the Driver’s Reach Without First Determining Licensure

Date: Feb 20, 2026
Traffic-Stop Safety Rule: Police May Temporarily Secure a Firearm in Plain View and Within the Driver’s Reach Without First Determining Licensure Commonwealth v. Hawkins-Davenport (Pa. Feb. 18, 2026)...
Section 205 Co-Employee Immunity Turns on “Scope of Employment” Under the Workers’ Compensation Act

Section 205 Co-Employee Immunity Turns on “Scope of Employment” Under the Workers’ Compensation Act

Date: Feb 20, 2026
Section 205 Co-Employee Immunity Turns on “Scope of Employment” Under the Workers’ Compensation Act 1. Introduction Brown, J. v. Gaydos, G. arises from a workplace injury suffered by John Brown, who...
Pa.R.E. 403 Bars Police Interrogation Commentary on a Defendant’s Credibility as Irrelevant and Unfairly Prejudicial (Commonwealth v. Malcolm)

Pa.R.E. 403 Bars Police Interrogation Commentary on a Defendant’s Credibility as Irrelevant and Unfairly Prejudicial (Commonwealth v. Malcolm)

Date: Feb 20, 2026
Pa.R.E. 403 Bars Police Interrogation Commentary on a Defendant’s Credibility as Irrelevant and Unfairly Prejudicial (Commonwealth v. Malcolm) Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Eastern District) —...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Approval Framework for Attorney Trust-Account Depositories and IOLTA Participation

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Approval Framework for Attorney Trust-Account Depositories and IOLTA Participation

Date: Feb 13, 2026
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Approval Framework for Attorney Trust-Account Depositories and IOLTA Participation Introduction In Re: Financial Institutions Approved as Depositories for Fiduciary...
Pa.R.D.E. Rule 222: Mandatory Judicial-Service Reporting, Post-Service Status Election, and Disciplinary Screening for Judges Leaving Office Under Adverse Circumstances

Pa.R.D.E. Rule 222: Mandatory Judicial-Service Reporting, Post-Service Status Election, and Disciplinary Screening for Judges Leaving Office Under Adverse Circumstances

Date: Feb 13, 2026
Pa.R.D.E. Rule 222: Mandatory Judicial-Service Reporting, Post-Service Status Election, and Disciplinary Screening for Judges Leaving Office Under Adverse Circumstances Court: Supreme Court of...
PCRA Timeliness: “Newly Discovered Facts” Must Match the Claim—For Brady, the Predicate Fact Is Suppression (Not Merely a Confession)

PCRA Timeliness: “Newly Discovered Facts” Must Match the Claim—For Brady, the Predicate Fact Is Suppression (Not Merely a Confession)

Date: Jan 31, 2026
PCRA Timeliness: “Newly Discovered Facts” Must Match the Claim—For Brady, the Predicate Fact Is Suppression (Not Merely a Confession) Introduction Commonwealth v. Brown arises from Jamie M. Brown’s...
Pennsylvania Rule 404(b) After Walker: Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test and a Proposed Narrow “Unlinked Plan” Framework

Pennsylvania Rule 404(b) After Walker: Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test and a Proposed Narrow “Unlinked Plan” Framework

Date: Jan 31, 2026
Pennsylvania Rule 404(b) After Commonwealth v. Walker: Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test and a Proposed Narrow “Unlinked Plan” Framework Scope note: The provided text is Justice Dougherty’s...
Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test for Pa.R.E. 404(b) “Plan” Evidence and a Forethought-Based Approach to Consolidation

Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test for Pa.R.E. 404(b) “Plan” Evidence and a Forethought-Based Approach to Consolidation

Date: Jan 31, 2026
Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test for Pa.R.E. 404(b) “Plan” Evidence and a Forethought-Based Approach to Consolidation Case: Commonwealth v. Walker (Justice Dougherty, Concurring and...
Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test Under Pa.R.E. 404(b) and a Narrower Conception of “Plan” in Consolidated Sexual-Assault Trials

Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test Under Pa.R.E. 404(b) and a Narrower Conception of “Plan” in Consolidated Sexual-Assault Trials

Date: Jan 31, 2026
Abrogation of the “Logical Connection” Test Under Pa.R.E. 404(b) and a Narrower Conception of “Plan” in Consolidated Sexual-Assault Trials 1. Introduction Commonwealth v. Walker came to the Supreme...
Creating Municipality’s Continuing Right to Compel Conveyance of Authority Projects Under MAA §§ 5619(a) & 5622(a), Despite Board Recomposition

Creating Municipality’s Continuing Right to Compel Conveyance of Authority Projects Under MAA §§ 5619(a) & 5622(a), Despite Board Recomposition

Date: Jan 22, 2026
Creating Municipality’s Continuing Right to Compel Conveyance of Authority Projects Under MAA §§ 5619(a) & 5622(a), Despite Board Recomposition Commentary on Justice Mundy’s concurring and dissenting...
Orders Compelling Common Law Arbitration and Staying Litigation Are Not Immediately Appealable Collateral Orders in Pennsylvania

Orders Compelling Common Law Arbitration and Staying Litigation Are Not Immediately Appealable Collateral Orders in Pennsylvania

Date: Jan 22, 2026
Orders Compelling Common Law Arbitration and Staying Litigation Are Not Immediately Appealable Collateral Orders in Pennsylvania I. Introduction In Chilutti, S. v. Uber; Apl. of Uber, the Supreme...
RETSL Section 607 Permits Pre-Confirmation Equitable Challenges, Including Grossly Inadequate Upset-Sale Price (Dougherty, J., concurring and dissenting)

RETSL Section 607 Permits Pre-Confirmation Equitable Challenges, Including Grossly Inadequate Upset-Sale Price (Dougherty, J., concurring and dissenting)

Date: Jan 22, 2026
RETSL Section 607 Permits Pre-Confirmation Equitable Challenges, Including Grossly Inadequate Upset-Sale Price (Dougherty, J., concurring and dissenting) 1. Introduction Case: In re: Upset Sale, Tax...
MAA §5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Power/Control After §5610(a.1) Board Reconstitution

MAA §5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Power/Control After §5610(a.1) Board Reconstitution

Date: Jan 22, 2026
MAA §5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Power/Control After §5610(a.1) Board Reconstitution Case: In re: Chester Water Authority Trust (multiple consolidated appeals) Court: Supreme...
Creating Municipality’s Continuing Power to Compel Project Conveyance Under MAA § 5622(a) Despite § 5610(a.1) Board Expansion (Mundy, J., concurring and dissenting)

Creating Municipality’s Continuing Power to Compel Project Conveyance Under MAA § 5622(a) Despite § 5610(a.1) Board Expansion (Mundy, J., concurring and dissenting)

Date: Jan 22, 2026
Creating Municipality’s Continuing Power to Compel Project Conveyance Under MAA § 5622(a) Despite § 5610(a.1) Board Expansion (Mundy, J., concurring and dissenting) 1. Introduction This Pennsylvania...
MAA § 5622(a) Conveyance Power Depends on Present Municipal Authority to Operate the “Project,” Not Mere Status as Creating Municipality

MAA § 5622(a) Conveyance Power Depends on Present Municipal Authority to Operate the “Project,” Not Mere Status as Creating Municipality

Date: Jan 22, 2026
MAA § 5622(a) Conveyance Power Depends on Present Municipal Authority to Operate the “Project,” Not Mere Status as Creating Municipality Introduction This Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision arises...
Section 5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Authority After Section 5610(a.1) Board Recomposition

Section 5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Authority After Section 5610(a.1) Board Recomposition

Date: Jan 22, 2026
Section 5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Authority After Section 5610(a.1) Board Recomposition Case: In re: Chester Water Authority Trust (appeals consolidated) Court: Supreme...
All Expert Manner-of-Death Opinions Must Be Stated to a Reasonable Degree of Certainty (No “Probable” Exception)

All Expert Manner-of-Death Opinions Must Be Stated to a Reasonable Degree of Certainty (No “Probable” Exception)

Date: Jan 22, 2026
All Expert Manner-of-Death Opinions Must Be Stated to a Reasonable Degree of Certainty (No “Probable” Exception) 1) Introduction Commonwealth v. Fitzpatrick is a high-profile homicide prosecution...
Section 5622(a) MAA: A Creating Municipality’s Unilateral Conveyance Power Turns on Present Power to Operate the “Project”

Section 5622(a) MAA: A Creating Municipality’s Unilateral Conveyance Power Turns on Present Power to Operate the “Project”

Date: Jan 22, 2026
Section 5622(a) MAA: A Creating Municipality’s Unilateral Conveyance Power Turns on Present Power to Operate the “Project” 1. Introduction Parties and setting. These consolidated matters concern...
Dynamic Conveyance Power Under MAA § 5622(a): Creation Alone Does Not Preserve a Municipality’s Unilateral Right to Acquire an Authority’s Projects After Board Reconstitution

Dynamic Conveyance Power Under MAA § 5622(a): Creation Alone Does Not Preserve a Municipality’s Unilateral Right to Acquire an Authority’s Projects After Board Reconstitution

Date: Jan 22, 2026
Dynamic Conveyance Power Under MAA § 5622(a): Creation Alone Does Not Preserve a Municipality’s Unilateral Right to Acquire an Authority’s Projects After Board Reconstitution I. Introduction In re:...
MAA § 5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Power to Operate—Not Perpetual “Creator” Control After Multi-County Board Expansion

MAA § 5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Power to Operate—Not Perpetual “Creator” Control After Multi-County Board Expansion

Date: Jan 22, 2026
MAA § 5622(a) Conveyance Power Turns on Present Municipal Power to Operate—Not Perpetual “Creator” Control After Multi-County Board Expansion Introduction This Pennsylvania Supreme Court matter...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert