Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

CAT “Specific Intent” and Speculation Limits: Harsh Salvadoran Prison Conditions and Prior Police Abuse Do Not Compel Deferral Absent Proof Conditions Are Designed to Torture

CAT “Specific Intent” and Speculation Limits: Harsh Salvadoran Prison Conditions and Prior Police Abuse Do Not Compel Deferral Absent Proof Conditions Are Designed to Torture

Date: Mar 27, 2026
CAT “Specific Intent” and Speculation Limits: Harsh Salvadoran Prison Conditions and Prior Police Abuse Do Not Compel Deferral Absent Proof Conditions Are Designed to Torture I. Introduction...
Hardwick v. FAA — Pilot-in-Command Must Independently Verify Registration/Airworthiness; “Administrative” Unairworthiness and Narrow Reasonable-Reliance Defense Support FAA Suspension

Hardwick v. FAA — Pilot-in-Command Must Independently Verify Registration/Airworthiness; “Administrative” Unairworthiness and Narrow Reasonable-Reliance Defense Support FAA Suspension

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Hardwick v. FAA — Pilot-in-Command Must Independently Verify Registration/Airworthiness; “Administrative” Unairworthiness and Narrow Reasonable-Reliance Defense Support FAA Suspension 1. Introduction...
Molosso v. Board of Supervisors Univ. of LA System: Disability-Accommodation Notice Requires Use of the University’s Designated Process; “Open and Obvious” Is Narrow for Mental Disabilities

Molosso v. Board of Supervisors Univ. of LA System: Disability-Accommodation Notice Requires Use of the University’s Designated Process; “Open and Obvious” Is Narrow for Mental Disabilities

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Disability-Accommodation Notice in Higher Education: Requests Must Be Routed Through the Designated Office; “Open and Obvious” Knowledge Is Narrow for Mental Disabilities I. Introduction Jennifer...
Mandatory “Disaster Premium Pay” Policies Create a Due-Process Property Interest Despite Post-Hoc “Modified Operations” Reframing

Mandatory “Disaster Premium Pay” Policies Create a Due-Process Property Interest Despite Post-Hoc “Modified Operations” Reframing

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Mandatory “Disaster Premium Pay” Policies Create a Due-Process Property Interest Despite Post-Hoc “Modified Operations” Reframing Case: Murphy v. Beaumont Indep School Dist (5th Cir. Mar. 23, 2026)...
Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against As-Applied Bruen Challenges Where Predicate Felonies Are Violent, and Enforces the Rule of Orderliness

Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against As-Applied Bruen Challenges Where Predicate Felonies Are Violent, and Enforces the Rule of Orderliness

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against As-Applied Bruen Challenges Where Predicate Felonies Are Violent, and Enforces the Rule of Orderliness Case: United States v. Williamson (5th Cir. Mar. 23,...
Crawford v. Perkins — Untimely and Indeterminate Notices of Appeal Defeat Fifth Circuit Jurisdiction Despite Liberal Construction

Crawford v. Perkins — Untimely and Indeterminate Notices of Appeal Defeat Fifth Circuit Jurisdiction Despite Liberal Construction

Date: Mar 25, 2026
Untimely and Indeterminate Notices of Appeal Defeat Fifth Circuit Jurisdiction Despite Liberal Construction Introduction Crawford v. Perkins (5th Cir. Mar. 20, 2026) arises from Plaintiff–Appellant...
Beltran v. Lockheed Martin: Employer Defeats NDAA Whistleblower Claim by Clear-and-Convincing “Same-Decision” Proof Under the Carr Factors

Beltran v. Lockheed Martin: Employer Defeats NDAA Whistleblower Claim by Clear-and-Convincing “Same-Decision” Proof Under the Carr Factors

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Beltran v. Lockheed Martin: Employer Defeats NDAA Whistleblower Claim by Clear-and-Convincing “Same-Decision” Proof Under the Carr Factors 1. Introduction Parties: Nestor Beltran (employee;...
Section 5 Deceptive-Advertising Claims Are “Private Rights” Requiring Article III Adjudication After SEC v. Jarkesy

Section 5 Deceptive-Advertising Claims Are “Private Rights” Requiring Article III Adjudication After SEC v. Jarkesy

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Section 5 Deceptive-Advertising Claims Are “Private Rights” Requiring Article III Adjudication After SEC v. Jarkesy Introduction In Intuit, Incorporated v. Federal Trade Commission (5th Cir. Mar. 20,...
Enforcing Appellate Waivers After Competency Is Confirmed: “Hard Look” Review of the Ultimate Competency Finding

Enforcing Appellate Waivers After Competency Is Confirmed: “Hard Look” Review of the Ultimate Competency Finding

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Enforcing Appellate Waivers After Competency Is Confirmed: “Hard Look” Review of the Ultimate Competency Finding I. Introduction In United States v. Barraza (5th Cir. Mar. 20, 2026) (per curiam)...
Crawford v. Perkins — Untimely and Indeterminate Notices of Appeal Defeat Appellate Jurisdiction Despite Liberal Construction

Crawford v. Perkins — Untimely and Indeterminate Notices of Appeal Defeat Appellate Jurisdiction Despite Liberal Construction

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Crawford v. Perkins — Untimely and Indeterminate Notices of Appeal Defeat Appellate Jurisdiction Despite Liberal Construction Introduction Crawford v. Perkins (5th Cir. Mar. 20, 2026) arises from...
Counterman Does Not Unequivocally Overrule Doe v. Mckesson: Protest-Leader Negligence Claims with Triable Facts Must Reach a Jury

Counterman Does Not Unequivocally Overrule Doe v. Mckesson: Protest-Leader Negligence Claims with Triable Facts Must Reach a Jury

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Counterman Does Not Unequivocally Overrule Doe v. Mckesson: Protest-Leader Negligence Claims with Triable Facts Must Reach a Jury Case: Ford v. Mckesson, No. 24-30494 (5th Cir. Mar. 19, 2026) (Jones,...
United States v. Burger: True-Threats Determinations in Online Role-Play Cannot Be Resolved Pretrial Under Rule 12 on a Disputed or Incomplete Context Record

United States v. Burger: True-Threats Determinations in Online Role-Play Cannot Be Resolved Pretrial Under Rule 12 on a Disputed or Incomplete Context Record

Date: Mar 24, 2026
United States v. Burger: True-Threats Determinations in Online Role-Play Cannot Be Resolved Pretrial Under Rule 12 on a Disputed or Incomplete Context Record Court: United States Court of Appeals for...
United States v. Burger — Rule 12 Limits: “True Threats” Under § 875(c) Generally Require a Trial When Context and Recipient Perception Are Disputed

United States v. Burger — Rule 12 Limits: “True Threats” Under § 875(c) Generally Require a Trial When Context and Recipient Perception Are Disputed

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Rule 12 Limits: “True Threats” Under § 875(c) Generally Require a Trial When Context and Recipient Perception Are Disputed Case: United States v. Burger (5th Cir. Mar. 19, 2026) | Court: United...
Rule 12 Cannot Be Used to Pretrial-Dismiss “True Threats” Indictments on Disputed Online Role-Play Context

Rule 12 Cannot Be Used to Pretrial-Dismiss “True Threats” Indictments on Disputed Online Role-Play Context

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Rule 12 Cannot Be Used to Pretrial-Dismiss “True Threats” Indictments on Disputed Online Role-Play Context Case: United States v. Burger (5th Cir. Mar. 19, 2026) (per curiam) Court: United States...
Completed Purchase Orders as Severable, Nonexecutory Contracts: Debtor May Retain Related Indemnity Rights Despite Assignment of the Master Supply Agreement

Completed Purchase Orders as Severable, Nonexecutory Contracts: Debtor May Retain Related Indemnity Rights Despite Assignment of the Master Supply Agreement

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Completed Purchase Orders as Severable, Nonexecutory Contracts: Debtor May Retain Related Indemnity Rights Despite Assignment of the Master Supply Agreement Introduction In GuangDong Midea v....
Hrncir v. IRS: Pro Se Appellate Forfeiture—Failure to Brief Standing and Provide Record-Supported Argument Requires Affirmance of a Rule 12(b)(1) Dismissal

Hrncir v. IRS: Pro Se Appellate Forfeiture—Failure to Brief Standing and Provide Record-Supported Argument Requires Affirmance of a Rule 12(b)(1) Dismissal

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Hrncir v. IRS: Pro Se Appellate Forfeiture—Failure to Brief Standing and Provide Record-Supported Argument Requires Affirmance of a Rule 12(b)(1) Dismissal Introduction In Hrncir v. IRS (5th Cir....
Rahdar v. City of Friendswood: Pleading and Preservation Failures Defeat § 1983 False- and Retaliatory-Arrest Claims Despite Allegations of Harassment

Rahdar v. City of Friendswood: Pleading and Preservation Failures Defeat § 1983 False- and Retaliatory-Arrest Claims Despite Allegations of Harassment

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Rahdar v. City of Friendswood: Pleading and Preservation Failures Defeat § 1983 False- and Retaliatory-Arrest Claims Despite Allegations of Harassment Introduction In Rahdar v. City of Friendswood...
United States v. Mendoza — Restitution-Linked Supervised-Release Financial Conditions Require an Actual Restitution Order; Location Monitoring Must Have a Defined Duration

United States v. Mendoza — Restitution-Linked Supervised-Release Financial Conditions Require an Actual Restitution Order; Location Monitoring Must Have a Defined Duration

Date: Mar 23, 2026
United States v. Mendoza: Restitution-Linked Supervised-Release Financial Conditions Require an Actual Restitution Order; Location Monitoring Must Have a Defined Duration Court: United States Court...
Declaratory-Judgment Litigation as an Unequivocal “Formal Denial” Signal for Michigan PIP Tolling; Texas Insurance Code Art. 21.42 Limited to Policies Made in the Course of Texas Business

Declaratory-Judgment Litigation as an Unequivocal “Formal Denial” Signal for Michigan PIP Tolling; Texas Insurance Code Art. 21.42 Limited to Policies Made in the Course of Texas Business

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Declaratory-Judgment Litigation as an Unequivocal “Formal Denial” Signal for Michigan PIP Tolling; Texas Insurance Code Art. 21.42 Limited to Policies Made in the Course of Texas Business 1....
License-Plate Readers Are Not a Fourth Amendment “Search” When They Provide Only Periodic Public-Road Location Hits; Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(o) Survives Bruen Under Hollis/Wilson

License-Plate Readers Are Not a Fourth Amendment “Search” When They Provide Only Periodic Public-Road Location Hits; Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(o) Survives Bruen Under Hollis/Wilson

Date: Mar 20, 2026
License-Plate Readers Are Not a Fourth Amendment “Search” When They Provide Only Periodic Public-Road Location Hits; Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(o) Survives Bruen Under Hollis/Wilson Case: United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert