Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Vannelli: District Courts May Reject Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Pleas on § 3553(a) Grounds and Treat Multi-Day Child-Sex Conduct as “Separate Occasions” Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(b) (Even Assuming Wooden Applies)

United States v. Vannelli: District Courts May Reject Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Pleas on § 3553(a) Grounds and Treat Multi-Day Child-Sex Conduct as “Separate Occasions” Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(b) (Even Assuming Wooden Applies)

Date: Apr 5, 2026
United States v. Vannelli: District Courts May Reject Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Pleas on § 3553(a) Grounds and Treat Multi-Day Child-Sex Conduct as “Separate Occasions” Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(b) (Even...
United States v. John C. Farris: Sixth Circuit Sanctions for Unverified AI-Generated Appellate Briefing and Reaffirms Nondelegable Duty of Candor and Citation Verification

United States v. John C. Farris: Sixth Circuit Sanctions for Unverified AI-Generated Appellate Briefing and Reaffirms Nondelegable Duty of Candor and Citation Verification

Date: Apr 5, 2026
United States v. John C. Farris: Sixth Circuit Sanctions for Unverified AI-Generated Appellate Briefing and Reaffirms Nondelegable Duty of Candor and Citation Verification Court: Court of Appeals for...
ACCA Elements Clause: Intent Must Attach to the Use of Force (Not the Resulting Injury) and Florida Aggravated Assault/Felony Battery and Ohio Domestic Violence Qualify as Violent Felonies

ACCA Elements Clause: Intent Must Attach to the Use of Force (Not the Resulting Injury) and Florida Aggravated Assault/Felony Battery and Ohio Domestic Violence Qualify as Violent Felonies

Date: Apr 4, 2026
ACCA Elements Clause: Intent Must Attach to the Use of Force (Not the Resulting Injury) and Florida Aggravated Assault/Felony Battery and Ohio Domestic Violence Qualify as Violent Felonies...
Mercer v. Stewart: Omitted Defense-of-Others Instructions Are Mixed Questions Governed by AEDPA § 2254(d)(1), and Habeas Relief Is Barred Absent a Clearly Established Supreme Court Right

Mercer v. Stewart: Omitted Defense-of-Others Instructions Are Mixed Questions Governed by AEDPA § 2254(d)(1), and Habeas Relief Is Barred Absent a Clearly Established Supreme Court Right

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Mercer v. Stewart: Omitted Defense-of-Others Instructions Are Mixed Questions Governed by AEDPA § 2254(d)(1), and Habeas Relief Is Barred Absent a Clearly Established Supreme Court Right 1....
Violent-Felony Arrests, Active Resistance, and Qualified Immunity: Fact-Specific “Clearly Established” Limits on Takedowns and Knee Strikes

Violent-Felony Arrests, Active Resistance, and Qualified Immunity: Fact-Specific “Clearly Established” Limits on Takedowns and Knee Strikes

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Violent-Felony Arrests, Active Resistance, and Qualified Immunity: Fact-Specific “Clearly Established” Limits on Takedowns and Knee Strikes Case: Latoya Aaron v. Darren King (as Legal Guardian of...
Mercer v. Stewart: Denial of Defense-of-Others Instruction Is a § 2254(d)(1) Mixed Question; No Clearly Established Federal Right Requires the Instruction

Mercer v. Stewart: Denial of Defense-of-Others Instruction Is a § 2254(d)(1) Mixed Question; No Clearly Established Federal Right Requires the Instruction

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Denial of a Defense-of-Others Jury Instruction Is Reviewed Under AEDPA § 2254(d)(1), and Keahey Forecloses Habeas Relief Absent Clearly Established Supreme Court Law Requiring the Instruction...
Full Faith and Credit Claim Preclusion Bars Later I-864 Affidavit of Support Enforcement When the Claim Could Have Been Raised in Divorce

Full Faith and Credit Claim Preclusion Bars Later I-864 Affidavit of Support Enforcement When the Claim Could Have Been Raised in Divorce

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Full Faith and Credit Claim Preclusion Bars Later I-864 Affidavit of Support Enforcement When the Claim Could Have Been Raised in Divorce Introduction In Randy Kris Ramgoolam v. Ritu Gupta (6th Cir....
Sixth Circuit: No Williams Remand When the Record Makes Felon Dangerousness “Self-Evident” Under § 922(g)(1)

Sixth Circuit: No Williams Remand When the Record Makes Felon Dangerousness “Self-Evident” Under § 922(g)(1)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Sixth Circuit: No Williams Remand When the Record Makes Felon Dangerousness “Self-Evident” Under § 922(g)(1) I. Introduction Case: United States v. Tony Wilkinson (6th Cir. Apr. 2, 2026)...
Sixth Circuit Limits Judicial-Ethics Enforcement: “Cascading” Discipline Fails Strict Scrutiny Absent Proven, Knowing Falsity

Sixth Circuit Limits Judicial-Ethics Enforcement: “Cascading” Discipline Fails Strict Scrutiny Absent Proven, Knowing Falsity

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Sixth Circuit Limits Judicial-Ethics Enforcement: “Cascading” Discipline Fails Strict Scrutiny Absent Proven, Knowing Falsity Case: Hon. Donna Greenwell Dutton v. Jimmy Shaffer, et al. (6th Cir.)...
Sixth Circuit Limits “Cascading” Judicial-Ethics Enforcement: Integrity and Relationship Canons Cannot Be Used to Punish Campaign Speech Absent an Independent, Fact-Supported Basis Beyond Alleged Falsity

Sixth Circuit Limits “Cascading” Judicial-Ethics Enforcement: Integrity and Relationship Canons Cannot Be Used to Punish Campaign Speech Absent an Independent, Fact-Supported Basis Beyond Alleged Falsity

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Sixth Circuit Limits “Cascading” Judicial-Ethics Enforcement: Integrity and Relationship Canons Cannot Be Used to Punish Campaign Speech Absent an Independent, Fact-Supported Basis Beyond Alleged...
Post–Loper Bright Validation of DOL’s 2013 Third-Party Home-Care Overtime Rule and No Standing to Challenge Companionship Definition

Post–Loper Bright Validation of DOL’s 2013 Third-Party Home-Care Overtime Rule and No Standing to Challenge Companionship Definition

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Post–Loper Bright Validation of DOL’s 2013 Third-Party Home-Care Overtime Rule and No Standing to Challenge Companionship Definition I. Introduction In U.S. Dep't of Labor v. Americare Healthcare...
Sixth Circuit Bars “50%-Served” Customs for Early Termination of Supervised Release Absent an Individualized § 3553(a) Analysis

Sixth Circuit Bars “50%-Served” Customs for Early Termination of Supervised Release Absent an Individualized § 3553(a) Analysis

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Sixth Circuit Bars “50%-Served” Customs for Early Termination of Supervised Release Absent an Individualized § 3553(a) Analysis I. Introduction In United States v. Guy Collins (6th Cir. Apr. 1,...
United States v. Collins: Early-Termination Denials Cannot Rest on a “Fifty-Percent” Custom Without an Individualized § 3553(a) Analysis

United States v. Collins: Early-Termination Denials Cannot Rest on a “Fifty-Percent” Custom Without an Individualized § 3553(a) Analysis

Date: Apr 4, 2026
United States v. Collins: Early-Termination Denials Cannot Rest on a “Fifty-Percent” Custom Without an Individualized § 3553(a) Analysis 1. Introduction In United States v. Guy Collins (Sixth Cir....
Post-Esteras Revocation Sentencing: Courts May Sanction Breach of Trust and Consider Violation Seriousness (for Deterrence/Rehabilitation) and May Impose Consecutive Terms When Separately Explained

Post-Esteras Revocation Sentencing: Courts May Sanction Breach of Trust and Consider Violation Seriousness (for Deterrence/Rehabilitation) and May Impose Consecutive Terms When Separately Explained

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Post-Esteras Revocation Sentencing: Courts May Sanction Breach of Trust and Consider Violation Seriousness (for Deterrence/Rehabilitation) and May Impose Consecutive Terms When Separately Explained...
Post-Esteras Revocation Sentencing: Breach-of-Trust and Violation Seriousness Remain Permissible; Consecutive Terms Supported by § 7B1.3(f)

Post-Esteras Revocation Sentencing: Breach-of-Trust and Violation Seriousness Remain Permissible; Consecutive Terms Supported by § 7B1.3(f)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Post-Esteras Revocation Sentencing: Breach-of-Trust and Violation Seriousness Remain Permissible; Consecutive Terms Supported by § 7B1.3(f) Introduction In United States v. Michael Williams (6th Cir....
Chapter 20 Lien-Retention Rule: No “Plan-Completion” Substitute for § 1325(a)(5)(B)(i)(I) When § 1328 Discharge Is Unavailable

Chapter 20 Lien-Retention Rule: No “Plan-Completion” Substitute for § 1325(a)(5)(B)(i)(I) When § 1328 Discharge Is Unavailable

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Chapter 20 Lien-Retention Rule: No “Plan-Completion” Substitute for § 1325(a)(5)(B)(i)(I) When § 1328 Discharge Is Unavailable 1. Introduction In re: Sharenne L. Tucker is a Sixth Circuit Bankruptcy...
FINRA May Discipline Unregistered “Associated Persons” Who Control Member Firms; Jarkesy-Based Jury-Trial Objections Must Be Exhausted Before the SEC

FINRA May Discipline Unregistered “Associated Persons” Who Control Member Firms; Jarkesy-Based Jury-Trial Objections Must Be Exhausted Before the SEC

Date: Mar 29, 2026
FINRA May Discipline Unregistered “Associated Persons” Who Control Member Firms; Jarkesy-Based Jury-Trial Objections Must Be Exhausted Before the SEC I. Introduction Case: Eric Smith v. SEC, No....
Pearson v. Michigan Department of Corrections: Qualified Immunity for Non-Treating Officials Who Rely on Contract Medical/Infection-Control Judgments; Michigan GTLA “The Proximate Cause” Not Resolved on the Pleadings

Pearson v. Michigan Department of Corrections: Qualified Immunity for Non-Treating Officials Who Rely on Contract Medical/Infection-Control Judgments; Michigan GTLA “The Proximate Cause” Not Resolved on the Pleadings

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Pearson v. Michigan Department of Corrections: Qualified Immunity for Non-Treating Officials Who Rely on Contract Medical/Infection-Control Judgments; Michigan GTLA “The Proximate Cause” Not Resolved...
Sixth Circuit: Nursing-Home Arbitration Enforced When POA Signer Acts as “Resident Representative” Without Affirmatively Disclaiming Agency; Contract Terms May Be Clarified by Integrated Admission Papers

Sixth Circuit: Nursing-Home Arbitration Enforced When POA Signer Acts as “Resident Representative” Without Affirmatively Disclaiming Agency; Contract Terms May Be Clarified by Integrated Admission Papers

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Sixth Circuit: Nursing-Home Arbitration Enforced When POA Signer Acts as “Resident Representative” Without Affirmatively Disclaiming Agency; Contract Terms May Be Clarified by Integrated Admission...
Correctable Due-Process Claims Must Be Exhausted Before the BIA and Require a Showing of Prejudice in In Absentia Reopening

Correctable Due-Process Claims Must Be Exhausted Before the BIA and Require a Showing of Prejudice in In Absentia Reopening

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Correctable Due-Process Claims Must Be Exhausted Before the BIA and Require a Showing of Prejudice in In Absentia Reopening I. Introduction In Chinedu Onyenobi v. Pamela Bondi (Sixth Cir. Mar. 26,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert