Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
No New Substantive Due Process Privacy Right for Police Evidence-Sharing with Untrained Auxiliary Personnel in Child-Image Investigations Introduction Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Steven V. Sloan, et al....
No New Substantive Due Process “Privacy” Right Against Investigatory Sharing of Child-Exploitation Images Without a Glucksberg/Dobbs Historical Showing Introduction Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Steven V....
No New Substantive Due Process “Privacy” Right for Investigative Sharing of Illicit Images Without Historical Grounding 1. Introduction Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Steven V. Sloan, et al. is a Seventh...
Qualified Immunity Appeals: A “Without Prejudice” Denial that Postpones Merits Decision Is Not Immediately Appealable Case: Marwan Mahajni v. Vu Do (No. 24-3175) — Court: Seventh Circuit — Date:...
Title IX Pseudonym Rule: Mental-Health Risk Alone Does Not Overcome the Presumption of Open Courts; Merits Are Irrelevant to Doe Status 1. Introduction John Doe v. University of Southern Indiana (7th...
No “Faretta-lite” Duty: Midtrial Requests to Reappoint Counsel May Be Denied After a Valid Waiver and Serial Counsel Breakdowns Case: United States v. Lennie Perry (7th Cir. Apr. 13, 2026) Court:...
Magistrate-Conducted Supervised-Release Revocation Hearings: No Automatic Second District-Judge Allocution Absent Rule 59 Objections I. Introduction In United States v. Erik D. Zahursky (7th Cir....
Magistrate-Conducted Revocation Hearings and “On-the-Papers” Adoption: No Second Allocution Hearing Absent Rule 59 Objections 1. Introduction In United States v. Erik Zahursky (7th Cir. Apr. 8, 2026)...
Title VII in the Seventh Circuit: Failure-to-Promote Requires Evidence of Qualification and a Non-White Comparator; Temporary Housing and Undesirable Assignments Are Not “Materially Adverse”...
Second-or-Successive Bar for SVP Commitment Challenges Targeting the Original Order; Delay-Driven Bypass of Exhaustion Under § 2254(b)(1)(B)(ii) I. Introduction Case: William Walls v. Erin Posey,...
Redacted-Exhibit Pleading Rule: Courts May Consider an Unredacted “Complete” Version Under Incorporation-by-Reference Without Rule 12(d) Conversion Case: Mohamed Muthana v. Markwayne Mullin, No....
Implementation Plans in Prison Consent Decrees Are Enforceable Only Upon PLRA § 3626(a)(1)(A) Findings; Limited Interlocutory Review Under § 1292(a)(1) I. Introduction Case: Don Lippert v. Latoya...
PLRA-Gated Enforcement of Implementation Plans Incorporated into Prison Consent Decrees (and Narrow § 1292(a)(1) Jurisdiction) I. Introduction Don Lippert, et al. v. Latoya Hughes, et al. is a...
MCA Exemption Applies to Intrastate Shuttle Legs Between Off-Site Storage Lots and Final Assembly Plant Destination Introduction In Renee Stingley, et al. v. L ACI Transport Inc., et al. and...
Motor Carrier Act Exemption Applies to Intrastate Shuttle Runs Between Off-Site Staging Lots and the Final Facility When the Goods Remain in a Continuous Interstate Journey 1. Introduction In Renee...
When § 1442 Is Invoked, Appellate Review Reaches the Entire Remand Order—But § 1442(d) Still Limits Removal to the Ancillary Subpoena Proceeding I. Introduction Robert Barker v. Edward Boettcher (7th...
Anti-Stacking in Illinois UIM Coverage Caps Recovery at the Highest Single-Policy Limit, Even for Multiple Insureds in One Accident Introduction Thomas Polk v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company...
Seventh Circuit Recognizes “Dangerous-Felony” As-Applied Validity of § 922(g)(1) Under Bruen/Rahimi 1. Introduction United States v. Edlando Watson (7th Cir. Apr. 2, 2026) addresses two recurring...
BIPA Section 20 (2024) Damages Amendment Is Retroactive: Per-Person (Not Per-Scan) Recovery as a Remedial, Procedural Change I. Introduction In a consolidated set of interlocutory appeals—Reginald...
Retroactive Application of BIPA Section 20’s Per-Person Damages Cap as a Remedial (Procedural) Amendment I. Introduction This consolidated interlocutory decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for...