Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

No New Substantive Due Process Privacy Right for Police Evidence-Sharing with Untrained Auxiliary Personnel in Child-Image Investigations

No New Substantive Due Process Privacy Right for Police Evidence-Sharing with Untrained Auxiliary Personnel in Child-Image Investigations

Date: Apr 17, 2026
No New Substantive Due Process Privacy Right for Police Evidence-Sharing with Untrained Auxiliary Personnel in Child-Image Investigations Introduction Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Steven V. Sloan, et al....
No New Substantive Due Process “Privacy” Right Against Investigatory Sharing of Child-Exploitation Images Without a Glucksberg/Dobbs Historical Showing

No New Substantive Due Process “Privacy” Right Against Investigatory Sharing of Child-Exploitation Images Without a Glucksberg/Dobbs Historical Showing

Date: Apr 17, 2026
No New Substantive Due Process “Privacy” Right Against Investigatory Sharing of Child-Exploitation Images Without a Glucksberg/Dobbs Historical Showing Introduction Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Steven V....
No New Substantive Due Process “Privacy” Right for Investigative Sharing of Illicit Images Without Historical Grounding

No New Substantive Due Process “Privacy” Right for Investigative Sharing of Illicit Images Without Historical Grounding

Date: Apr 17, 2026
No New Substantive Due Process “Privacy” Right for Investigative Sharing of Illicit Images Without Historical Grounding 1. Introduction Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Steven V. Sloan, et al. is a Seventh...
Qualified Immunity Appeals: A “Without Prejudice” Denial that Postpones Merits Decision Is Not Immediately Appealable

Qualified Immunity Appeals: A “Without Prejudice” Denial that Postpones Merits Decision Is Not Immediately Appealable

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Qualified Immunity Appeals: A “Without Prejudice” Denial that Postpones Merits Decision Is Not Immediately Appealable Case: Marwan Mahajni v. Vu Do (No. 24-3175) — Court: Seventh Circuit — Date:...
Title IX Pseudonym Rule: Mental-Health Risk Alone Does Not Overcome the Presumption of Open Courts; Merits Are Irrelevant to Doe Status

Title IX Pseudonym Rule: Mental-Health Risk Alone Does Not Overcome the Presumption of Open Courts; Merits Are Irrelevant to Doe Status

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Title IX Pseudonym Rule: Mental-Health Risk Alone Does Not Overcome the Presumption of Open Courts; Merits Are Irrelevant to Doe Status 1. Introduction John Doe v. University of Southern Indiana (7th...
No “Faretta-lite” Duty: Midtrial Requests to Reappoint Counsel May Be Denied After a Valid Waiver and Serial Counsel Breakdowns

No “Faretta-lite” Duty: Midtrial Requests to Reappoint Counsel May Be Denied After a Valid Waiver and Serial Counsel Breakdowns

Date: Apr 16, 2026
No “Faretta-lite” Duty: Midtrial Requests to Reappoint Counsel May Be Denied After a Valid Waiver and Serial Counsel Breakdowns Case: United States v. Lennie Perry (7th Cir. Apr. 13, 2026) Court:...
Magistrate-Conducted Supervised-Release Revocation Hearings: No Automatic Second District-Judge Allocution Absent Rule 59 Objections

Magistrate-Conducted Supervised-Release Revocation Hearings: No Automatic Second District-Judge Allocution Absent Rule 59 Objections

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Magistrate-Conducted Supervised-Release Revocation Hearings: No Automatic Second District-Judge Allocution Absent Rule 59 Objections I. Introduction In United States v. Erik D. Zahursky (7th Cir....
Magistrate-Conducted Revocation Hearings and “On-the-Papers” Adoption: No Second Allocution Hearing Absent Rule 59 Objections

Magistrate-Conducted Revocation Hearings and “On-the-Papers” Adoption: No Second Allocution Hearing Absent Rule 59 Objections

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Magistrate-Conducted Revocation Hearings and “On-the-Papers” Adoption: No Second Allocution Hearing Absent Rule 59 Objections 1. Introduction In United States v. Erik Zahursky (7th Cir. Apr. 8, 2026)...
Title VII in the Seventh Circuit: Failure-to-Promote Requires Evidence of Qualification and a Non-White Comparator; Temporary Housing and Undesirable Assignments Are Not “Materially Adverse” Retaliation

Title VII in the Seventh Circuit: Failure-to-Promote Requires Evidence of Qualification and a Non-White Comparator; Temporary Housing and Undesirable Assignments Are Not “Materially Adverse” Retaliation

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Title VII in the Seventh Circuit: Failure-to-Promote Requires Evidence of Qualification and a Non-White Comparator; Temporary Housing and Undesirable Assignments Are Not “Materially Adverse”...
Second-or-Successive Bar for SVP Commitment Challenges Targeting the Original Order; Delay-Driven Bypass of Exhaustion Under § 2254(b)(1)(B)(ii)

Second-or-Successive Bar for SVP Commitment Challenges Targeting the Original Order; Delay-Driven Bypass of Exhaustion Under § 2254(b)(1)(B)(ii)

Date: Apr 8, 2026
Second-or-Successive Bar for SVP Commitment Challenges Targeting the Original Order; Delay-Driven Bypass of Exhaustion Under § 2254(b)(1)(B)(ii) I. Introduction Case: William Walls v. Erin Posey,...
Redacted-Exhibit Pleading Rule: Courts May Consider an Unredacted “Complete” Version Under Incorporation-by-Reference Without Rule 12(d) Conversion

Redacted-Exhibit Pleading Rule: Courts May Consider an Unredacted “Complete” Version Under Incorporation-by-Reference Without Rule 12(d) Conversion

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Redacted-Exhibit Pleading Rule: Courts May Consider an Unredacted “Complete” Version Under Incorporation-by-Reference Without Rule 12(d) Conversion Case: Mohamed Muthana v. Markwayne Mullin, No....
Implementation Plans in Prison Consent Decrees Are Enforceable Only Upon PLRA § 3626(a)(1)(A) Findings; Limited Interlocutory Review Under § 1292(a)(1)

Implementation Plans in Prison Consent Decrees Are Enforceable Only Upon PLRA § 3626(a)(1)(A) Findings; Limited Interlocutory Review Under § 1292(a)(1)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Implementation Plans in Prison Consent Decrees Are Enforceable Only Upon PLRA § 3626(a)(1)(A) Findings; Limited Interlocutory Review Under § 1292(a)(1) I. Introduction Case: Don Lippert v. Latoya...
PLRA-Gated Enforcement of Implementation Plans Incorporated into Prison Consent Decrees (and Narrow § 1292(a)(1) Jurisdiction)

PLRA-Gated Enforcement of Implementation Plans Incorporated into Prison Consent Decrees (and Narrow § 1292(a)(1) Jurisdiction)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
PLRA-Gated Enforcement of Implementation Plans Incorporated into Prison Consent Decrees (and Narrow § 1292(a)(1) Jurisdiction) I. Introduction Don Lippert, et al. v. Latoya Hughes, et al. is a...
MCA Exemption Applies to Intrastate Shuttle Legs Between Off-Site Storage Lots and Final Assembly Plant Destination

MCA Exemption Applies to Intrastate Shuttle Legs Between Off-Site Storage Lots and Final Assembly Plant Destination

Date: Apr 4, 2026
MCA Exemption Applies to Intrastate Shuttle Legs Between Off-Site Storage Lots and Final Assembly Plant Destination Introduction In Renee Stingley, et al. v. L ACI Transport Inc., et al. and...
Motor Carrier Act Exemption Applies to Intrastate Shuttle Runs Between Off-Site Staging Lots and the Final Facility When the Goods Remain in a Continuous Interstate Journey

Motor Carrier Act Exemption Applies to Intrastate Shuttle Runs Between Off-Site Staging Lots and the Final Facility When the Goods Remain in a Continuous Interstate Journey

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Motor Carrier Act Exemption Applies to Intrastate Shuttle Runs Between Off-Site Staging Lots and the Final Facility When the Goods Remain in a Continuous Interstate Journey 1. Introduction In Renee...
When § 1442 Is Invoked, Appellate Review Reaches the Entire Remand Order—But § 1442(d) Still Limits Removal to the Ancillary Subpoena Proceeding

When § 1442 Is Invoked, Appellate Review Reaches the Entire Remand Order—But § 1442(d) Still Limits Removal to the Ancillary Subpoena Proceeding

Date: Apr 4, 2026
When § 1442 Is Invoked, Appellate Review Reaches the Entire Remand Order—But § 1442(d) Still Limits Removal to the Ancillary Subpoena Proceeding I. Introduction Robert Barker v. Edward Boettcher (7th...
Anti-Stacking in Illinois UIM Coverage Caps Recovery at the Highest Single-Policy Limit, Even for Multiple Insureds in One Accident

Anti-Stacking in Illinois UIM Coverage Caps Recovery at the Highest Single-Policy Limit, Even for Multiple Insureds in One Accident

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Anti-Stacking in Illinois UIM Coverage Caps Recovery at the Highest Single-Policy Limit, Even for Multiple Insureds in One Accident Introduction Thomas Polk v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company...
Seventh Circuit Recognizes “Dangerous-Felony” As-Applied Validity of § 922(g)(1) Under Bruen/Rahimi

Seventh Circuit Recognizes “Dangerous-Felony” As-Applied Validity of § 922(g)(1) Under Bruen/Rahimi

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Seventh Circuit Recognizes “Dangerous-Felony” As-Applied Validity of § 922(g)(1) Under Bruen/Rahimi 1. Introduction United States v. Edlando Watson (7th Cir. Apr. 2, 2026) addresses two recurring...
BIPA Section 20 (2024) Damages Amendment Is Retroactive: Per-Person (Not Per-Scan) Recovery as a Remedial, Procedural Change

BIPA Section 20 (2024) Damages Amendment Is Retroactive: Per-Person (Not Per-Scan) Recovery as a Remedial, Procedural Change

Date: Apr 4, 2026
BIPA Section 20 (2024) Damages Amendment Is Retroactive: Per-Person (Not Per-Scan) Recovery as a Remedial, Procedural Change I. Introduction In a consolidated set of interlocutory appeals—Reginald...
Retroactive Application of BIPA Section 20’s Per-Person Damages Cap as a Remedial (Procedural) Amendment

Retroactive Application of BIPA Section 20’s Per-Person Damages Cap as a Remedial (Procedural) Amendment

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Retroactive Application of BIPA Section 20’s Per-Person Damages Cap as a Remedial (Procedural) Amendment I. Introduction This consolidated interlocutory decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert