Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

In re Z.G.: Termination of Parental Rights Requires Both Adoptability and a Statutory “Sufficient Basis” (Services Terminated or Properly Bypassed)

In re Z.G.: Termination of Parental Rights Requires Both Adoptability and a Statutory “Sufficient Basis” (Services Terminated or Properly Bypassed)

Date: Apr 29, 2026
In re Z.G.: Termination of Parental Rights Requires Both Adoptability and a Statutory “Sufficient Basis” (Services Terminated or Properly Bypassed) Introduction In re Z.G. (Cal. Apr. 27, 2026) is a...
Independent-Judgment Review and No Automatic Deference in Coastal Commission Jurisdiction Disputes; “Principal Permitted Use” Includes Multiple Uses

Independent-Judgment Review and No Automatic Deference in Coastal Commission Jurisdiction Disputes; “Principal Permitted Use” Includes Multiple Uses

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Independent-Judgment Review and No Automatic Deference in Coastal Commission Jurisdiction Disputes; “Principal Permitted Use” Includes Multiple Uses Case: Shear Development Co., LLC v. California...
People v. Bertsch and Hronis (Cal. Apr. 20, 2026) — Commentary

People v. Bertsch and Hronis (Cal. Apr. 20, 2026) — Commentary

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Retroactive Edwards/Johnson Competency Standard for Self-Representation at Capital Penalty Phase; Confrontation Clause Inapplicable to Kelly Hearings I. Introduction People v. Bertsch and Hronis is a...
People v. Deen: Trial Courts Must Independently Determine Juror Actual Bias Under CCP § 225 (Not Defer to Juror Assurances), Reading CCP § 229(f) Together With § 225

People v. Deen: Trial Courts Must Independently Determine Juror Actual Bias Under CCP § 225 (Not Defer to Juror Assurances), Reading CCP § 229(f) Together With § 225

Date: Apr 8, 2026
People v. Deen: Trial Courts Must Independently Determine Juror Actual Bias Under CCP § 225 (Not Defer to Juror Assurances), Reading CCP § 229(f) Together With § 225 1. Introduction People v. Deen...
People v. Morgan: Penal Code § 69(a) “Force or Violence” Resistance Does Not Include Assault’s “Present Ability” Element

People v. Morgan: Penal Code § 69(a) “Force or Violence” Resistance Does Not Include Assault’s “Present Ability” Element

Date: Feb 28, 2026
People v. Morgan: Penal Code § 69(a) “Force or Violence” Resistance Does Not Include Assault’s “Present Ability” Element 1. Introduction In People v. Morgan (Cal. Feb. 26, 2026) S286493, the...
Legibility Is Procedural (Not Substantive) Unconscionability—But Illegible Adhesive Arbitration Clauses Trigger Close Scrutiny of Terms

Legibility Is Procedural (Not Substantive) Unconscionability—But Illegible Adhesive Arbitration Clauses Trigger Close Scrutiny of Terms

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Legibility Is Procedural (Not Substantive) Unconscionability—But Illegible Adhesive Arbitration Clauses Trigger Close Scrutiny of Terms Case: Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc. (Cal. Feb. 2, 2026)...
Sellers v. Superior Court — “Open Container” Marijuana Requires Usable Quantity, Imminent Usability, and Ready Accessibility; Lawful Cannabis Cannot Supply Probable Cause

Sellers v. Superior Court — “Open Container” Marijuana Requires Usable Quantity, Imminent Usability, and Ready Accessibility; Lawful Cannabis Cannot Supply Probable Cause

Date: Jan 31, 2026
Sellers v. Superior Court: “Open Container” Marijuana Requires Usable Quantity, Imminent Usability, and Ready Accessibility; Lawful Cannabis Cannot Supply Probable Cause I. Introduction Case: Sellers...
Content-Based Criminalization of False Police-Misconduct Complaints Is Unconstitutional When It Incidentally Chills Truthful Complaints

Content-Based Criminalization of False Police-Misconduct Complaints Is Unconstitutional When It Incidentally Chills Truthful Complaints

Date: Jan 27, 2026
Content-Based Criminalization of False Police-Misconduct Complaints Is Unconstitutional When It Incidentally Chills Truthful Complaints Case: Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los...
CPRA Declaratory Relief Survives Full Production Where an Ongoing Dispute Is Likely to Recur; CPRA Imposes No Implied Three-Year Preservation Duty After Exemptions Are Invoked

CPRA Declaratory Relief Survives Full Production Where an Ongoing Dispute Is Likely to Recur; CPRA Imposes No Implied Three-Year Preservation Duty After Exemptions Are Invoked

Date: Jan 17, 2026
CPRA Declaratory Relief Survives Full Production Where an Ongoing Dispute Is Likely to Recur; CPRA Imposes No Implied Three-Year Preservation Duty After Exemptions Are Invoked Key Holdings (City of...
People v. Kopp (Cal. 2025) Commentary

People v. Kopp (Cal. 2025) Commentary

Date: Dec 31, 2025
Ability-to-Pay Review for Mandatory Court Operations & Facilities Assessments (Equal Protection), While Punitive Fines Are Initially Tested Under the Excessive Fines Clauses Case: People v. Kopp,...
People v. Kopp: Equal Protection Requires Ability-to-Pay Review (on Request) for Court Operations/Facilities Assessments; Punitive Fine Amount Challenges Proceed Under the Excessive Fines Clauses

People v. Kopp: Equal Protection Requires Ability-to-Pay Review (on Request) for Court Operations/Facilities Assessments; Punitive Fine Amount Challenges Proceed Under the Excessive Fines Clauses

Date: Dec 30, 2025
People v. Kopp: Equal Protection Requires Ability-to-Pay Review (on Request) for Court Operations/Facilities Assessments; Punitive Fine Amount Challenges Proceed Under the Excessive Fines Clauses I....
Pension Obligation Bonds and the “Obligation Imposed by Law” Exception: Commentary on City of San José v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

Pension Obligation Bonds and the “Obligation Imposed by Law” Exception: Commentary on City of San José v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Pension Obligation Bonds and the “Obligation Imposed by Law” Exception: Commentary on City of San José v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association I. Introduction The California Supreme Court’s opinion in...
Single Criminal Act, Single Strike: Extending Vargas to Multi‑Victim Offenses in California’s Three Strikes Law (People v. Shaw)

Single Criminal Act, Single Strike: Extending Vargas to Multi‑Victim Offenses in California’s Three Strikes Law (People v. Shaw)

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Single Criminal Act, Single Strike: Extending Vargas to Multi‑Victim Offenses under California’s Three Strikes Law Commentary on People v. Shaw, Supreme Court of California (Dec. 15, 2025)...
Morgan v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc.: PACE Assessments as “Taxes” and the Exclusivity of California’s Tax-Refund Procedures

Morgan v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc.: PACE Assessments as “Taxes” and the Exclusivity of California’s Tax-Refund Procedures

Date: Dec 6, 2025
Morgan v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc.: PACE Assessments as “Taxes” and the Exclusivity of California’s Tax-Refund Procedures I. Introduction In Morgan v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc. (Cal. Supreme Ct. Dec....
In re S.R.: CACI-Reportable Findings Preserve Justiciability of Terminated Dependency Appeals

In re S.R.: CACI-Reportable Findings Preserve Justiciability of Terminated Dependency Appeals

Date: Dec 2, 2025
In re S.R.: CACI‑Reportable Findings Preserve Justiciability of Terminated Dependency Appeals I. Introduction The California Supreme Court’s decision in In re S.R. (Dec. 1, 2025) addresses a...
Taxpayer Standing After the 2018 Amendment and Pronoun Protections in Long‑Term Care: Commentary on Taking Offense v. State of California

Taxpayer Standing After the 2018 Amendment and Pronoun Protections in Long‑Term Care: Commentary on Taking Offense v. State of California

Date: Nov 30, 2025
Taxpayer Standing After the 2018 Amendment and Pronoun Protections in Long‑Term Care: A Commentary on Taking Offense v. State of California (Cal. Supreme Ct. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary...
Content-Based Limits on “Unprotected” Speech Face Heightened Scrutiny When They Chill Protected Complaints: California Supreme Court Invalidates Penal Code §148.6

Content-Based Limits on “Unprotected” Speech Face Heightened Scrutiny When They Chill Protected Complaints: California Supreme Court Invalidates Penal Code §148.6

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Content-Based Limits on “Unprotected” Speech Face Heightened Scrutiny When They Chill Protected Complaints: California Supreme Court Invalidates Penal Code §148.6 Introduction In Los Angeles Police...
Captive-Audience Care and the Limits of Taxpayer Suits: California Upholds Long‑Term Care Pronoun Protections and Clarifies § 526a Standing

Captive-Audience Care and the Limits of Taxpayer Suits: California Upholds Long‑Term Care Pronoun Protections and Clarifies § 526a Standing

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Captive-Audience Care and the Limits of Taxpayer Suits: California Upholds Long‑Term Care Pronoun Protections and Clarifies § 526a Standing Introduction This commentary analyzes the California...
SB 483 Resentencing Must Apply Prop 36’s Public-Safety Override for Nonserious, Nonviolent Third Strikes: People v. Superior Court (Guevara)

SB 483 Resentencing Must Apply Prop 36’s Public-Safety Override for Nonserious, Nonviolent Third Strikes: People v. Superior Court (Guevara)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
SB 483 Resentencing Must Apply Prop 36’s Public-Safety Override for Nonserious, Nonviolent Third Strikes Commentary on People v. Superior Court (Guevara), California Supreme Court (Oct. 9, 2025)...
People v. Cardenas: “Active Participant” in §190.2(a)(22) Carries Its Plain Meaning; Sanchez and AB 333 Require Reversal of Gang Findings and Death Judgment; Limited McCoy Remand Permitted

People v. Cardenas: “Active Participant” in §190.2(a)(22) Carries Its Plain Meaning; Sanchez and AB 333 Require Reversal of Gang Findings and Death Judgment; Limited McCoy Remand Permitted

Date: Sep 5, 2025
People v. Cardenas: “Active Participant” in §190.2(a)(22) Carries Its Plain Meaning; Sanchez and AB 333 Require Reversal of Gang Findings and Death Judgment; Limited McCoy Remand Permitted...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert