Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Hawaii Case Commentaries

State v. Bunag: Consecutive Sentencing Requires Contemporaneous, Court-Stated Reasons—No Post-Hoc Orders and No Prosecutor “Parroting”

State v. Bunag: Consecutive Sentencing Requires Contemporaneous, Court-Stated Reasons—No Post-Hoc Orders and No Prosecutor “Parroting”

Date: Apr 24, 2026
State v. Bunag: Consecutive Sentencing Requires Contemporaneous, Court-Stated Reasons—No Post-Hoc Orders and No Prosecutor “Parroting” I. Introduction In State v. Bunag (Haw. Apr. 20, 2026), the...
Temporary Support and Child Support May Rely on Regular Pre-Filing Trust Distributions; Expected Continued Trust Access Can Be a VARC for Property Division

Temporary Support and Child Support May Rely on Regular Pre-Filing Trust Distributions; Expected Continued Trust Access Can Be a VARC for Property Division

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Temporary Support and Child Support May Rely on Regular Pre-Filing Trust Distributions; Expected Continued Trust Access Can Be a VARC for Property Division Case: A.P. v. S.B. | Court: Intermediate...
Escrow Depository’s Fiduciary Duty Is Satisfied by Strict Compliance with an Unambiguous Escrow Agreement—even if the Sales Contract Would Require a Refund

Escrow Depository’s Fiduciary Duty Is Satisfied by Strict Compliance with an Unambiguous Escrow Agreement—even if the Sales Contract Would Require a Refund

Date: Mar 22, 2026
Escrow Depository’s Fiduciary Duty Is Satisfied by Strict Compliance with an Unambiguous Escrow Agreement—even if the Sales Contract Would Require a Refund I. Introduction Case: Yamaguchi v. Title...
Greenspon: “Fraud on the Court” Against Opposing Counsel Requires Egregious, Particularized Misconduct; Vexatious-Litigant Orders Sustainable on Record of Delay and Prior Out-of-State Designation

Greenspon: “Fraud on the Court” Against Opposing Counsel Requires Egregious, Particularized Misconduct; Vexatious-Litigant Orders Sustainable on Record of Delay and Prior Out-of-State Designation

Date: Feb 15, 2026
“Fraud on the Court” Claims Against Opposing Counsel Demand a High, Particularized Showing of Egregious Misconduct (and Courts Must Screen Sufficiency at the Pleading Stage) Case: Greenspon v....
HRS § 663-10 Liens Are Insurers’ Exclusive Remedy After a Tort Class Settlement—No Intervention or “Non-Claimant” Subrogation

HRS § 663-10 Liens Are Insurers’ Exclusive Remedy After a Tort Class Settlement—No Intervention or “Non-Claimant” Subrogation

Date: Feb 13, 2026
HRS § 663-10 Liens Are Insurers’ Exclusive Remedy After a Tort Class Settlement—No Intervention or “Non-Claimant” Subrogation Case: Burnes v. Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. Court: Supreme Court of...
Written Findings Are Mandatory to Seal Civil Dockets and Complaints in Hawaiʻi; Mandamus Lies to Unseal Absent Rogan Findings

Written Findings Are Mandatory to Seal Civil Dockets and Complaints in Hawaiʻi; Mandamus Lies to Unseal Absent Rogan Findings

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Written Findings Are Mandatory to Seal Civil Dockets and Complaints in Hawaiʻi; Mandamus Lies to Unseal Absent Rogan Findings 1. Introduction In Civil Beat Law Center for Public Interest v. Kawashima...
Piezko v. County of Maui — Exclusive Tax Appeal Court Jurisdiction Over Real Property Tax Refund Claims Styled as Civil Actions

Piezko v. County of Maui — Exclusive Tax Appeal Court Jurisdiction Over Real Property Tax Refund Claims Styled as Civil Actions

Date: Jan 5, 2026
Piezko v. County of Maui — Exclusive Tax Appeal Court Jurisdiction Over Real Property Tax Refund Claims Styled as Civil Actions 1. Introduction Parties: Christopher Piezko and Janel Lee Piezko, as...
Lane v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.: Foundation Required to Treat “Low-Impact/Biomechanics” IME Opinions as Substantial Evidence Rebutting HRS § 386-85

Lane v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.: Foundation Required to Treat “Low-Impact/Biomechanics” IME Opinions as Substantial Evidence Rebutting HRS § 386-85

Date: Jan 5, 2026
Lane v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.: Foundation Required to Treat “Low-Impact/Biomechanics” IME Opinions as Substantial Evidence Rebutting HRS § 386-85 Court: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Date: December 30,...
RSCH Rule 2.13 Interim Restraint Requires a Record Showing the Conviction Offense Involved “Dishonesty or False Statement”

RSCH Rule 2.13 Interim Restraint Requires a Record Showing the Conviction Offense Involved “Dishonesty or False Statement”

Date: Oct 1, 2025
RSCH Rule 2.13 Interim Restraint Requires a Record Showing the Conviction Offense Involved “Dishonesty or False Statement” I. Introduction Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leong is an attorney...
Public-Access Rule for Deceased/Missing Foster-Child CPA and Adoption Records; Kema Narrowing of “Legitimate Purpose” Overruled

Public-Access Rule for Deceased/Missing Foster-Child CPA and Adoption Records; Kema Narrowing of “Legitimate Purpose” Overruled

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Public-Access Rule for Deceased/Missing Foster-Child CPA and Adoption Records; Kema Narrowing of “Legitimate Purpose” Overruled Case: Public First Law Center v. Viola Court: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi...
State v. Brown: No Suppression of ISP Subscriber Name Absent Proof of a Subjective Privacy Expectation; No Arceo Unanimity Instruction Without Evidence of Multiple Culpable Acts

State v. Brown: No Suppression of ISP Subscriber Name Absent Proof of a Subjective Privacy Expectation; No Arceo Unanimity Instruction Without Evidence of Multiple Culpable Acts

Date: Oct 1, 2025
State v. Brown: No Suppression of ISP Subscriber Name Absent Proof of a Subjective Privacy Expectation; No Arceo Unanimity Instruction Without Evidence of Multiple Culpable Acts Court: Supreme Court...

      Revocable Water Permit Renewals Are Reviewable Under HRS § 91-14 When a Contested Case Hearing Is Wrongfully Denied

Revocable Water Permit Renewals Are Reviewable Under HRS § 91-14 When a Contested Case Hearing Is Wrongfully Denied

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Revocable Water Permit Renewals Are Reviewable Under HRS § 91-14 When a Contested Case Hearing Is Wrongfully Denied 1. Introduction Kia'i Wai o Wai'ale'ale and Friends of Māhā'ulepū (collectively,...
Eason v. State (Haw. 2025): HRPP Rule 40 Confirmed as Constitutional Unitary Post-Conviction Procedure; Habeas Corpus Not “Abolished”; No Burden-Shift Where Plea Record Is Not Minimal

Eason v. State (Haw. 2025): HRPP Rule 40 Confirmed as Constitutional Unitary Post-Conviction Procedure; Habeas Corpus Not “Abolished”; No Burden-Shift Where Plea Record Is Not Minimal

Date: Oct 1, 2025
HRPP Rule 40 Confirmed as a Constitutional Unitary Post-Conviction Procedure; Habeas Corpus Not “Abolished”; Missing Plea Transcript Does Not Trigger Burden-Shifting Where the Record Is Not Minimal...
HRCP Rule 60(b) Reconsideration Motions Toll the HRAP Rule 4(a)(1) Appeal Deadline When Filed Within the 30-Day Appeal Period

HRCP Rule 60(b) Reconsideration Motions Toll the HRAP Rule 4(a)(1) Appeal Deadline When Filed Within the 30-Day Appeal Period

Date: Oct 1, 2025
HRCP Rule 60(b) Reconsideration Motions Toll the HRAP Rule 4(a)(1) Appeal Deadline When Filed Within the 30-Day Appeal Period I. Introduction Case: Mālama Kakanilua v. Director of the Department of...
Notice, Not Mens Rea: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Holds Indictments Need Not Plead a State of Mind for HRS § 706-660.1 Firearm Sentencing Enhancements

Notice, Not Mens Rea: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Holds Indictments Need Not Plead a State of Mind for HRS § 706-660.1 Firearm Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Notice, Not Mens Rea: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Holds Indictments Need Not Plead a State of Mind for HRS § 706-660.1 Firearm Sentencing Enhancements Case: State v. Smith, SCWC-21-0000504 Court: Supreme...
Fee-Shifting in HEPA Appeals: Private Attorney General Awards Against Developers; HRS § 607‑25(e)(1) Limited to Private Parties and Premature Absent Final Approval Determination

Fee-Shifting in HEPA Appeals: Private Attorney General Awards Against Developers; HRS § 607‑25(e)(1) Limited to Private Parties and Premature Absent Final Approval Determination

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Fee-Shifting in HEPA Appeals: Private Attorney General Awards Against Developers; HRS § 607‑25(e)(1) Limited to Private Parties and Premature Absent Final Approval Determination Introduction In this...
Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing

Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing Introduction In Nakoa III v. Governor of the State of Hawai‘i, the Hawai‘i...
Advancing-the-Trust Test for Attorneys’ Fees: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Requires Merits Determination and “Assistance to the Court” Showing Before Shifting Fees in Contested Trust Matters

Advancing-the-Trust Test for Attorneys’ Fees: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Requires Merits Determination and “Assistance to the Court” Showing Before Shifting Fees in Contested Trust Matters

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Advancing-the-Trust Test for Attorneys’ Fees: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Requires Merits Determination and “Assistance to the Court” Showing Before Shifting Fees in Contested Trust Matters Case: In re:...
Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents

Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents Introduction In Caven, Jr. v. Certified...
CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review

CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review

Date: Sep 8, 2025
CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert