Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Unauthorized Use of Judicial Signature Stamps and Court Seals for Personal Benefit Constitutes CJC 1.3 “Abuse” Warranting Removal

Unauthorized Use of Judicial Signature Stamps and Court Seals for Personal Benefit Constitutes CJC 1.3 “Abuse” Warranting Removal

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Unauthorized Use of Judicial Signature Stamps and Court Seals for Personal Benefit Constitutes CJC 1.3 “Abuse” Warranting Removal 1. Introduction In re Disciplinary Proc. Against Ruzumna is a...
Knowing and Voluntary Barr/Zhao Pleas Stipulating “Separate and Distinct Acts” Bar Collateral Double-Jeopardy Attacks

Knowing and Voluntary Barr/Zhao Pleas Stipulating “Separate and Distinct Acts” Bar Collateral Double-Jeopardy Attacks

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Knowing and Voluntary Barr/Zhao Pleas Stipulating “Separate and Distinct Acts” Bar Collateral Double-Jeopardy Attacks 1. Introduction In re Pers. Restraint of Bin-Bellah (Wash. Apr. 9, 2026)...
Property-in-Washington Nexus Required to Recognize Foreign-Country Money Judgments Absent Personal Jurisdiction

Property-in-Washington Nexus Required to Recognize Foreign-Country Money Judgments Absent Personal Jurisdiction

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Property-in-Washington Nexus Required to Recognize Foreign-Country Money Judgments Absent Personal Jurisdiction Case: Alterna Aircraft V B Ltd. v. SpiceJet Ltd., No. 103759-7 (Wash. Apr. 9, 2026) (en...
False Discounting Alone Is Not a CPA “Business or Property” Injury Absent Objective Economic Loss (Montes v. SPARC Group LLC)

False Discounting Alone Is Not a CPA “Business or Property” Injury Absent Objective Economic Loss (Montes v. SPARC Group LLC)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
False Discounting Alone Is Not a CPA “Business or Property” Injury Absent Objective Economic Loss Case: Montes v. SPARC Group LLC, No. 104162-4 (Wash. Apr. 2, 2026) (en banc) Posture: Certified...
State v. Krause: Victim-Interconnected “Reporting Context” and Overlapping Witnesses Can Justify Denial of Severance Despite Limited Cross-Admissibility of Underlying Sexual-Assault Details

State v. Krause: Victim-Interconnected “Reporting Context” and Overlapping Witnesses Can Justify Denial of Severance Despite Limited Cross-Admissibility of Underlying Sexual-Assault Details

Date: Mar 28, 2026
State v. Krause: Victim-Interconnected “Reporting Context” and Overlapping Witnesses Can Justify Denial of Severance Despite Limited Cross-Admissibility of Underlying Sexual-Assault Details I....
State v. Stearns: ER 404(b) Common Scheme or Plan Does Not Require Markedly Similar Victims

State v. Stearns: ER 404(b) Common Scheme or Plan Does Not Require Markedly Similar Victims

Date: Mar 28, 2026
ER 404(b) “Common Scheme or Plan” in Washington: Markedly Similar Acts Can Suffice Even Without Markedly Similar Victims Case: State v. Stearns (Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc) Date: March 26,...
Mandatory CrR 3.1 Caseload Limits and Noninterference with Public Defense Independence in ITA Appointments

Mandatory CrR 3.1 Caseload Limits and Noninterference with Public Defense Independence in ITA Appointments

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Mandatory CrR 3.1 Caseload Limits and Noninterference with Public Defense Independence in ITA Appointments 1. Introduction In In re Det. of M.E. (consolidated with In re Det. of R.S.), the Supreme...
Washington Felony Harassment After Counterman: RCW 9A.46.020 Survives Facial Challenge, but “True Threat” Instructions Must Require at Least Recklessness (Harmlessness Assessed Under Magaña-Arévalo)

Washington Felony Harassment After Counterman: RCW 9A.46.020 Survives Facial Challenge, but “True Threat” Instructions Must Require at Least Recklessness (Harmlessness Assessed Under Magaña-Arévalo)

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Washington Felony Harassment After Counterman: RCW 9A.46.020 Survives Facial Challenge, but “True Threat” Instructions Must Require at Least Recklessness (Harmlessness Assessed Under Magaña-Arévalo)...
Beard v. Everett Clinic: “Exercise of Judgment” Instruction Requires Evidence of Standard-of-Care-Compliant Decision-Making Process (Not Merely the Outcome)

Beard v. Everett Clinic: “Exercise of Judgment” Instruction Requires Evidence of Standard-of-Care-Compliant Decision-Making Process (Not Merely the Outcome)

Date: Mar 14, 2026
Beard v. Everett Clinic: “Exercise of Judgment” Instruction Requires Evidence of Standard-of-Care-Compliant Decision-Making Process (Not Merely the Outcome) Court: Supreme Court of Washington (En...
Washington Reaffirms that “Clear Preponderance” in ELC 10.14(b) Is the Constitutionally Required Intermediate Burden in Attorney Discipline

Washington Reaffirms that “Clear Preponderance” in ELC 10.14(b) Is the Constitutionally Required Intermediate Burden in Attorney Discipline

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Washington Reaffirms that “Clear Preponderance” in ELC 10.14(b) Is the Constitutionally Required Intermediate Burden in Attorney Discipline I. Introduction In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Monro...
Jailer Special Duty Does Not Preclude Statutory Felony and Intoxication Complete Defenses (Anderson v. Grant County)

Jailer Special Duty Does Not Preclude Statutory Felony and Intoxication Complete Defenses (Anderson v. Grant County)

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Jailer Special Duty Does Not Preclude Statutory Felony and Intoxication Complete Defenses in In-Custody Overdose Wrongful-Death Claims Case: Anderson v. Grant County, No. 103111-4 Court: Supreme...
In re Recall of Clouse: Appearance of Impropriety and Underspecified Policy References Do Not Establish a Recallable Offense

In re Recall of Clouse: Appearance of Impropriety and Underspecified Policy References Do Not Establish a Recallable Offense

Date: Feb 28, 2026
In re Recall of Clouse: Appearance of Impropriety and Underspecified Policy References Do Not Establish a Recallable Offense Court: Supreme Court of Washington (En Banc) Date: February 26, 2026 Case:...
In re Recall of Lauser: Recall Petitions Alleging Criminal Violations Must Plead Intent; Nude Political Protest Is Protected Expression and Not “Obscene Exposure”

In re Recall of Lauser: Recall Petitions Alleging Criminal Violations Must Plead Intent; Nude Political Protest Is Protected Expression and Not “Obscene Exposure”

Date: Feb 28, 2026
In re Recall of Lauser: Recall Petitions Alleging Criminal Violations Must Plead Intent; Nude Political Protest Is Protected Expression and Not “Obscene Exposure” Introduction Case: In re Recall of...
Scott v. Amazon.com, Inc. — Suicide Not a Per Se Superseding Cause in WPLA Product-Seller Negligence Claims

Scott v. Amazon.com, Inc. — Suicide Not a Per Se Superseding Cause in WPLA Product-Seller Negligence Claims

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Suicide Not a Per Se Superseding Cause in WPLA Product-Seller Negligence Claims (Scott v. Amazon.com, Inc.) Supreme Court of Washington (En Banc) — Filed February 19, 2026 — No. 103730-9 1....
Chandrruangphen v. City of Sammamish — LUPA Requires Strict Municipal Service and Treats E-mailed Decisions as “Not Mailed” (No 3-Day Tolling)

Chandrruangphen v. City of Sammamish — LUPA Requires Strict Municipal Service and Treats E-mailed Decisions as “Not Mailed” (No 3-Day Tolling)

Date: Feb 15, 2026
LUPA Requires Strict Municipal Service and Treats E-mailed Written Decisions as “Not Mailed” (No 3-Day Tolling) Introduction In Chandrruangphen v. City of Sammamish, No. 103789-9 (Wash. Feb. 12,...
RCW 35.22.120: “Next Regular Municipal Election” Includes Special Elections; Mandamus Requires a Clear Ministerial Duty

RCW 35.22.120: “Next Regular Municipal Election” Includes Special Elections; Mandamus Requires a Clear Ministerial Duty

Date: Jan 31, 2026
RCW 35.22.120: “Next Regular Municipal Election” Includes Special Elections; Mandamus Requires a Clear Ministerial Duty Introduction A Better Richland v. Chilton is a Washington Supreme Court en banc...
State v. Wasuge: Race and Ethnicity Are Permissible, Objective Factors in Washington’s Miranda Custody “Totality of the Circumstances” Test

State v. Wasuge: Race and Ethnicity Are Permissible, Objective Factors in Washington’s Miranda Custody “Totality of the Circumstances” Test

Date: Jan 16, 2026
State v. Wasuge: Race and Ethnicity Are Permissible, Objective Factors in Washington’s Miranda Custody “Totality of the Circumstances” Test Court: Supreme Court of Washington (En Banc) Date: January...
State v. Magana-Arevalo: Miranda Custody Must Be Assessed Under the Totality (Including Race/Ethnicity) and Constitutional Harmless Error Must Weigh Both Prejudice and Proof

State v. Magana-Arevalo: Miranda Custody Must Be Assessed Under the Totality (Including Race/Ethnicity) and Constitutional Harmless Error Must Weigh Both Prejudice and Proof

Date: Jan 16, 2026
State v. Magana-Arevalo: Miranda Custody Must Be Assessed Under the Totality (Including Race/Ethnicity) and Constitutional Harmless Error Must Weigh Both Prejudice and Proof Introduction Case: State...
State v. Bennett: Completeness-as-Context—Completing an Unavailable Witness Interview to Rebut a Misleading “Inadequate Investigation” Theory Without Triggering Confrontation

State v. Bennett: Completeness-as-Context—Completing an Unavailable Witness Interview to Rebut a Misleading “Inadequate Investigation” Theory Without Triggering Confrontation

Date: Jan 16, 2026
Completeness-as-Context: Completing an Unavailable Witness Interview to Rebut a Misleading “Inadequate Investigation” Theory Does Not Trigger the Confrontation Clause When Used for...
State v. Lee: Intent Not Dispositive—Multiple Assaultive Acts in One Episode Constitute a Single Unit of Prosecution for Second-Degree Assault

State v. Lee: Intent Not Dispositive—Multiple Assaultive Acts in One Episode Constitute a Single Unit of Prosecution for Second-Degree Assault

Date: Jan 16, 2026
State v. Lee: Intent Not Dispositive—Multiple Assaultive Acts in One Episode Constitute a Single Unit of Prosecution for Second-Degree Assault Court: Supreme Court of Washington (en banc) Date:...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert