Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Forfeiture and Evidence Limits in NYCHRL/NYSHRL Employer Liability for Employee Sexual Misconduct (Eckhart v. Fox News)

Forfeiture and Evidence Limits in NYCHRL/NYSHRL Employer Liability for Employee Sexual Misconduct (Eckhart v. Fox News)

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Forfeiture and Evidence Limits in NYCHRL/NYSHRL Employer Liability for Employee Sexual Misconduct Commentary on Eckhart v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 25-1538 (2d Cir. Apr. 24, 2026) (Summary Order)....
Hiya v. United States: Reaffirming the Presumption Against Bail Pending Extradition and Rejecting Private-Security “Self-Detention” Absent Wealth-Driven Flight Risk

Hiya v. United States: Reaffirming the Presumption Against Bail Pending Extradition and Rejecting Private-Security “Self-Detention” Absent Wealth-Driven Flight Risk

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Hiya v. United States: Reaffirming the Presumption Against Bail Pending Extradition and Rejecting Private-Security “Self-Detention” Absent Wealth-Driven Flight Risk 1. Introduction In Hiya v. United...
Kulmann v. U.S. Postal Serv.: The FTCA “Postal Exception” Bars Damages Claims for Intentional Non-Delivery of Mail, and Federal Criminal Statutes Create No Private Civil Cause of Action

Kulmann v. U.S. Postal Serv.: The FTCA “Postal Exception” Bars Damages Claims for Intentional Non-Delivery of Mail, and Federal Criminal Statutes Create No Private Civil Cause of Action

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Kulmann v. U.S. Postal Serv.: The FTCA “Postal Exception” Bars Damages Claims for Intentional Non-Delivery of Mail, and Federal Criminal Statutes Create No Private Civil Cause of Action 1....
Full-Video Republishing Is Hard to Dismiss as Fair Use on the Pleadings; Prominent Screenshots Aren’t De Minimis; YouTube TOS License Authorizes Embeds

Full-Video Republishing Is Hard to Dismiss as Fair Use on the Pleadings; Prominent Screenshots Aren’t De Minimis; YouTube TOS License Authorizes Embeds

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Full-Video Republishing Is Hard to Dismiss as Fair Use on the Pleadings; Prominent Screenshots Aren’t De Minimis; YouTube TOS License Authorizes Embeds 1. Introduction In Richardson v. Townsquare...
Golden v. NBCUniversal Media: Reaffirming Solomon’s “Ordinary Person” Test for VPPA PII and Narrowing the “Intervening Supreme Court” Escape Hatch

Golden v. NBCUniversal Media: Reaffirming Solomon’s “Ordinary Person” Test for VPPA PII and Narrowing the “Intervening Supreme Court” Escape Hatch

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Golden v. NBCUniversal Media: Reaffirming Solomon’s “Ordinary Person” Test for VPPA PII and Narrowing the “Intervening Supreme Court” Escape Hatch 1. Introduction Golden v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC...
Severe Emotional Distress for New York IIED Includes Pre-Death Trauma from Witnessing a Spouse’s Fatal Injury, and Liability Is Distinct from Solatium Damages

Severe Emotional Distress for New York IIED Includes Pre-Death Trauma from Witnessing a Spouse’s Fatal Injury, and Liability Is Distinct from Solatium Damages

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Severe Emotional Distress for New York IIED Includes Pre-Death Trauma from Witnessing a Spouse’s Fatal Injury, and Liability Is Distinct from Solatium Damages 1. Introduction Theodoridis v. Islamic...
Seriousness of Supervised-Release Violation Conduct May Support a New Supervised-Release Term; § 3553(a)(2)(A)’s “Offense Seriousness” Bar Targets Only the Underlying Conviction

Seriousness of Supervised-Release Violation Conduct May Support a New Supervised-Release Term; § 3553(a)(2)(A)’s “Offense Seriousness” Bar Targets Only the Underlying Conviction

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Seriousness of Supervised-Release Violation Conduct May Support a New Supervised-Release Term; § 3553(a)(2)(A)’s “Offense Seriousness” Bar Targets Only the Underlying Conviction Introduction In...
ERISA Plan-Asset “Look-Through” Treats RMBS Trust Certificates as Equity (Beneficial Trust Interests), but Not Indenture RMBS Notes Lacking Substantial Equity Features

ERISA Plan-Asset “Look-Through” Treats RMBS Trust Certificates as Equity (Beneficial Trust Interests), but Not Indenture RMBS Notes Lacking Substantial Equity Features

Date: Apr 24, 2026
ERISA Plan-Asset “Look-Through” Treats RMBS Trust Certificates as Equity (Beneficial Trust Interests), but Not Indenture RMBS Notes Lacking Substantial Equity Features 1. Introduction Powell v. Ocwen...
Compliance with a State Tax Warrant Does Not Convert a Bank into a State Actor; Account “Holds” Are Not EFTA Electronic Fund Transfers; Supplemental State Claims Must Be Without Prejudice

Compliance with a State Tax Warrant Does Not Convert a Bank into a State Actor; Account “Holds” Are Not EFTA Electronic Fund Transfers; Supplemental State Claims Must Be Without Prejudice

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Compliance with a State Tax Warrant Does Not Convert a Bank into a State Actor; Account “Holds” Are Not EFTA Electronic Fund Transfers; Supplemental State Claims Must Be Without Prejudice 1....
Explicit Appeal Waivers Bar Second Amendment Attacks on § 922(g)(1) Convictions and Substantive-Reasonableness Sentencing Appeals

Explicit Appeal Waivers Bar Second Amendment Attacks on § 922(g)(1) Convictions and Substantive-Reasonableness Sentencing Appeals

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Explicit Appeal Waivers Bar Second Amendment Attacks on § 922(g)(1) Convictions and Substantive-Reasonableness Sentencing Appeals Introduction In United States v. Mitchell (2d Cir. Apr. 22, 2026)...
Youngpoong Corp. v. PedalPoint Holdings — § 1782 Intel Analysis: Nonparty “Obtainability” and Non-Speculative Foreign-Privilege Assertions

Youngpoong Corp. v. PedalPoint Holdings — § 1782 Intel Analysis: Nonparty “Obtainability” and Non-Speculative Foreign-Privilege Assertions

Date: Apr 24, 2026
§ 1782 After Youngpoong: The First Intel Factor Focuses on Practical Obtainability (Not Admissibility), and the Third Intel Factor Is Not Triggered by Speculative Foreign-Privilege Claims...
Second Circuit: Broad Internet-Activity Monitoring (Including Work Devices) Is Not an “Occupational Restriction” Absent a Specified Job Ban

Second Circuit: Broad Internet-Activity Monitoring (Including Work Devices) Is Not an “Occupational Restriction” Absent a Specified Job Ban

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Second Circuit: Broad Internet-Activity Monitoring (Including Work Devices) Is Not an “Occupational Restriction” Absent a Specified Job Ban I. Introduction In United States v. Brown (2d Cir. Apr. 21,...
Extortion Is Not “Family-Group” Persecution Without Evidence of Animus or Targeting Beyond a Means-to-an-End

Extortion Is Not “Family-Group” Persecution Without Evidence of Animus or Targeting Beyond a Means-to-an-End

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Extortion Is Not “Family-Group” Persecution Without Evidence of Animus or Targeting Beyond a Means-to-an-End 1. Introduction In Xivir-Ixtos v. Blanche (2d Cir. Apr. 21, 2026) (summary order),...
Poor-Performance Evidence—Including OCR Findings—Defeats Rehabilitation Act and § 1981 Retaliation Claims Absent Proof of Pretext (Second Circuit Summary Order)

Poor-Performance Evidence—Including OCR Findings—Defeats Rehabilitation Act and § 1981 Retaliation Claims Absent Proof of Pretext (Second Circuit Summary Order)

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Poor-Performance Evidence—Including OCR Findings—Defeats Rehabilitation Act and § 1981 Retaliation Claims Absent Proof of Pretext (Second Circuit Summary Order) Case: Baptiste v. City Univ. of N.Y....
United States v. Jones — Omissions in Early Cooperation Proffers Are Not Necessarily “Prior Inconsistent Statements,” and Rule 403 Supports Excluding Extrinsic Impeachment That Risks a Mini‑Trial

United States v. Jones — Omissions in Early Cooperation Proffers Are Not Necessarily “Prior Inconsistent Statements,” and Rule 403 Supports Excluding Extrinsic Impeachment That Risks a Mini‑Trial

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Omissions in Early Cooperation Proffers Are Not Necessarily “Prior Inconsistent Statements,” and Rule 403 Supports Excluding Extrinsic Impeachment That Risks a Mini‑Trial Nonprecedential posture....
Independent “Lone-Wolf” Terrorism Is Not “Material Support” Under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B Absent Direction/Control or Coordination

Independent “Lone-Wolf” Terrorism Is Not “Material Support” Under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B Absent Direction/Control or Coordination

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Independent “Lone-Wolf” Terrorism Is Not “Material Support” Under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B Absent Direction/Control or Coordination Case: United States v. Ullah (2d Cir. Apr. 21, 2026) | Court: Court of...
Banyan v. Sikorski: Claim Abandonment at Summary Judgment and Probable Cause Grounded in Eyewitness Identification Despite Later Non‑Indictment

Banyan v. Sikorski: Claim Abandonment at Summary Judgment and Probable Cause Grounded in Eyewitness Identification Despite Later Non‑Indictment

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Banyan v. Sikorski: Claim Abandonment at Summary Judgment and Probable Cause Grounded in Eyewitness Identification Despite Later Non‑Indictment Introduction In Banyan v. Sikorski (Second Circuit,...
“The Proximate Cause” on a Verdict Form Is Not Fundamental Error When the Jury Charge Correctly States “A Proximate Cause”; Late-Disclosed Damages Witnesses May Be Excluded Under Rule 37(c); Rule 609(b) Findings Required but Errors May Be Harmless

“The Proximate Cause” on a Verdict Form Is Not Fundamental Error When the Jury Charge Correctly States “A Proximate Cause”; Late-Disclosed Damages Witnesses May Be Excluded Under Rule 37(c); Rule 609(b) Findings Required but Errors May Be Harmless

Date: Apr 23, 2026
“The Proximate Cause” on a Verdict Form Is Not Fundamental Error When the Jury Charge Correctly States “A Proximate Cause”; Late-Disclosed Damages Witnesses May Be Excluded Under Rule 37(c); Rule...
ADA Title III Standing Requires Past Denial and Plausible Future Use; Dissatisfaction with an Accommodation Process Is Not Discrimination

ADA Title III Standing Requires Past Denial and Plausible Future Use; Dissatisfaction with an Accommodation Process Is Not Discrimination

Date: Apr 23, 2026
ADA Title III Standing Requires Past Denial and Plausible Future Use; Dissatisfaction with an Accommodation Process Is Not Discrimination Introduction In Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. (2d Cir. Apr....
Pseudonymity Is the Exception: Strict Sealed Plaintiff Balancing and No “Second-Bite” Evidence on Reconsideration

Pseudonymity Is the Exception: Strict Sealed Plaintiff Balancing and No “Second-Bite” Evidence on Reconsideration

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pseudonymity Is the Exception: Strict Sealed Plaintiff Balancing and No “Second-Bite” Evidence on Reconsideration 1. Introduction In Doe v. Yale Univ. (2d Cir. Apr. 20, 2026) (summary order), a Yale...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert