Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Louisiana v. Callais: Voting Rights Act Compliance Justifies Race-Based Districting Only Under a Narrowed, Politics-Controlled Section 2 Framework

Louisiana v. Callais: Voting Rights Act Compliance Justifies Race-Based Districting Only Under a Narrowed, Politics-Controlled Section 2 Framework

Date: May 2, 2026
Louisiana v. Callais: Voting Rights Act Compliance Justifies Race-Based Districting Only Under a Narrowed, Politics-Controlled Section 2 Framework Introduction Louisiana v. Callais addresses a...
Donor-Disclosure Subpoenas Create Present First Amendment Injury for Article III Standing

Donor-Disclosure Subpoenas Create Present First Amendment Injury for Article III Standing

Date: May 1, 2026
Donor-Disclosure Subpoenas Create Present First Amendment Injury for Article III Standing Case: First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport Court: U.S. Supreme Court | Date: April 29,...
§1446(b)(1)’s 30-Day Civil Removal Deadline Is Not Subject to Equitable Tolling

§1446(b)(1)’s 30-Day Civil Removal Deadline Is Not Subject to Equitable Tolling

Date: Apr 24, 2026
§1446(b)(1)’s 30-Day Civil Removal Deadline Is Not Subject to Equitable Tolling Introduction Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel (608 U. S. ___ (2026)) arose from Michigan’s efforts to halt operation of...
Hencely v. Fluor Corp.: No Combat-Zone “Battlefield Preemption” for Contractor Negligence Absent Government Authorization

Hencely v. Fluor Corp.: No Combat-Zone “Battlefield Preemption” for Contractor Negligence Absent Government Authorization

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Hencely v. Fluor Corp.: No Combat-Zone “Battlefield Preemption” for Contractor Negligence Absent Government Authorization Introduction In Hencely v. Fluor Corp. (608 U. S. ___ (2026)), the Supreme...
Totality-of-the-Circumstances Requires Considering the “Whole Picture” in Reasonable-Suspicion Stops (No “Excising” Key Facts)

Totality-of-the-Circumstances Requires Considering the “Whole Picture” in Reasonable-Suspicion Stops (No “Excising” Key Facts)

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Totality-of-the-Circumstances Requires Considering the “Whole Picture” in Reasonable-Suspicion Stops (No “Excising” Key Facts) 1. Introduction District of Columbia v. R.W. (U.S. Supreme Court, Apr....
Federal-Officer Removal: “Relating To” Requires a Close Wartime-Contract Connection, Not Contractual Specificity

Federal-Officer Removal: “Relating To” Requires a Close Wartime-Contract Connection, Not Contractual Specificity

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Federal-Officer Removal: “Relating To” Requires a Close Wartime-Contract Connection, Not Contractual Specificity I. Introduction Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish (608 U. S. ___ (2026))...
Chiles v. Salazar: Viewpoint-Based Regulation of Talk Therapy Triggers Rigorous First Amendment Scrutiny

Chiles v. Salazar: Viewpoint-Based Regulation of Talk Therapy Triggers Rigorous First Amendment Scrutiny

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Viewpoint Discrimination in Talk Therapy: Conversion-Therapy Bans Applied to Pure Speech Require Searching First Amendment Scrutiny Commentary on Chiles v. Salazar, 607 U. S. ___ (2026) (Decided...
Like Defendants Alike: A Dissent’s Call to Extend Wearry’s Brady Remedy to Similarly Situated Codefendants

Like Defendants Alike: A Dissent’s Call to Extend Wearry’s Brady Remedy to Similarly Situated Codefendants

Date: Apr 3, 2026
Like Defendants Alike: A Dissent’s Call to Extend Wearry’s Brady Remedy to Similarly Situated Codefendants Case: Skinner v. Louisiana (U.S. Supreme Court, Mar. 30, 2026) — Sotomayor, J., dissenting...
Cox v. Sony: Knowledge of Subscriber Infringement Alone Cannot Establish Contributory Copyright Liability

Cox v. Sony: Knowledge of Subscriber Infringement Alone Cannot Establish Contributory Copyright Liability

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Knowledge of Infringement Is Not Enough: Contributory Copyright Liability Requires Inducement or an Infringement-Tailored Service Case: Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment Court:...
Rico v. United States: No Automatic “Fugitive Tolling” of Federal Supervised Release

Rico v. United States: No Automatic “Fugitive Tolling” of Federal Supervised Release

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Rico v. United States (2026): No Automatic “Fugitive Tolling” or Extension of Federal Supervised Release Upon Abscondment I. Introduction Rico v. United States, 607 U. S. ___ (2026), resolved a...
Zorn v. Linton: Qualified Immunity Requires a Factually Specific “Held Unlawful” Precedent for Pain-Compliance Wristlocks Used After Warnings

Zorn v. Linton: Qualified Immunity Requires a Factually Specific “Held Unlawful” Precedent for Pain-Compliance Wristlocks Used After Warnings

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Zorn v. Linton: Qualified Immunity Requires a Factually Specific “Held Unlawful” Precedent for Pain-Compliance Wristlocks Used After Warnings Case: Jacob P. Zorn v. Shela M. Linton (U.S. Supreme...
Due Process and Postconviction DNA Testing: Noncontamination Rules Cannot Arbitrarily Bar Reliable Testing

Due Process and Postconviction DNA Testing: Noncontamination Rules Cannot Arbitrarily Bar Reliable Testing

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Due Process and Postconviction DNA Testing: Noncontamination Rules Cannot Arbitrarily Bar Reliable Testing Introduction Reed v. Goertz (U.S. Supreme Court, Mar. 23, 2026) reached the Court on a...
“Obvious Case” First Amendment Limits on Qualified Immunity for Arrests Targeting Routine Newsgathering (Sotomayor, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari)

“Obvious Case” First Amendment Limits on Qualified Immunity for Arrests Targeting Routine Newsgathering (Sotomayor, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari)

Date: Mar 26, 2026
“Obvious Case” First Amendment Limits on Qualified Immunity for Arrests Targeting Routine Newsgathering (Sotomayor, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) Introduction Villarreal v. Alaniz (No....
Olivier v. City of Brandon: Heck Does Not Bar Wholly Prospective §1983 Injunctions Against Future Enforcement

Olivier v. City of Brandon: Heck Does Not Bar Wholly Prospective §1983 Injunctions Against Future Enforcement

Date: Mar 24, 2026
Heck v. Humphrey Does Not Bar a §1983 Suit Seeking Only Prospective Relief Against Future Enforcement of the Statute of Conviction Case: Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi, 607 U. S. ___ (2026)...
Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.: Corporate Separateness and Formal Treasury Liability Govern Arm-of-the-State Immunity

Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.: Corporate Separateness and Formal Treasury Liability Govern Arm-of-the-State Immunity

Date: Mar 6, 2026
Corporate Separateness and Formal Treasury Liability as the Core Test for Arm-of-the-State Immunity Introduction In Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation (607 U.S. ___ (2026)), the Supreme Court...
Substantial-Evidence Review Governs the BIA’s “Persecution” Determination Even on Undisputed Facts

Substantial-Evidence Review Governs the BIA’s “Persecution” Determination Even on Undisputed Facts

Date: Mar 6, 2026
Substantial-Evidence Review Governs the BIA’s “Persecution” Determination Even on Undisputed Facts 1. Introduction Urias-Orellana v. Bondi (2026) resolves a circuit split over the standard of review...
Mirabelli v. Bonta (2026): Strict Scrutiny and Heightened Parental-Rights Review for School Gender-Transition Nondisclosure Policies

Mirabelli v. Bonta (2026): Strict Scrutiny and Heightened Parental-Rights Review for School Gender-Transition Nondisclosure Policies

Date: Mar 5, 2026
Mirabelli v. Bonta (2026): Strict Scrutiny and Heightened Parental-Rights Review for School Gender-Transition Nondisclosure Policies I. Introduction Mirabelli v. Bonta (U.S. Supreme Court, March 2,...
PLRA Filing-Fee Cap as a Per-Case Limit: Indigent Prisoner Co-Plaintiffs Should Be Able to Split One §1914(a) Fee

PLRA Filing-Fee Cap as a Per-Case Limit: Indigent Prisoner Co-Plaintiffs Should Be Able to Split One §1914(a) Fee

Date: Mar 4, 2026
PLRA Filing-Fee Cap as a Per-Case Limit: Indigent Prisoner Co-Plaintiffs Should Be Able to Split One §1914(a) Fee I. Introduction Johnson v. High Desert State Prison reached the U.S. Supreme Court on...
Malliotakis v. Williams (2026): Treating a State High Court’s Refusal to Stay as a “Final Judgment” for §1257 and Using the All Writs Act to Halt Race-Directed Redistricting Remedies

Malliotakis v. Williams (2026): Treating a State High Court’s Refusal to Stay as a “Final Judgment” for §1257 and Using the All Writs Act to Halt Race-Directed Redistricting Remedies

Date: Mar 4, 2026
Malliotakis v. Williams (2026): Treating a State High Court’s Refusal to Stay as a “Final Judgment” for §1257 and Using the All Writs Act to Halt Race-Directed Redistricting Remedies Court: U.S....
Yearsley Is a Merits Defense (Not Derivative Sovereign Immunity): No Interlocutory Appeal from Denial Under Cohen

Yearsley Is a Merits Defense (Not Derivative Sovereign Immunity): No Interlocutory Appeal from Denial Under Cohen

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Yearsley Is a Merits Defense (Not Derivative Sovereign Immunity): No Interlocutory Appeal from Denial Under Cohen Case: GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal Citation: 607 U. S. ___ (2026) Court: U.S. Supreme...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert