Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Revocation as the Baseline Sanction for Prolonged Domestic-Abuse Stalking Under SCR 20:8.4(b)—Even on No-Appeal Review

Revocation as the Baseline Sanction for Prolonged Domestic-Abuse Stalking Under SCR 20:8.4(b)—Even on No-Appeal Review

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Revocation as the Baseline Sanction for Prolonged Domestic-Abuse Stalking Under SCR 20:8.4(b)—Even on No-Appeal Review 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Osman A. Mirza (2026 WI 13) is a...
Wisconsin Safe-Place Liability Survives Tatera; Punitive-Damages Cap Turns on Compensatory Damages Recoverable in the Judgment

Wisconsin Safe-Place Liability Survives Tatera; Punitive-Damages Cap Turns on Compensatory Damages Recoverable in the Judgment

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Wisconsin Safe-Place Liability Survives Tatera; Punitive-Damages Cap Turns on Compensatory Damages Recoverable in the Judgment Case: Estate of Carol Lorbiecki v. Pabst Brewing Company, 2026 WI 12...
Revocation for Domestic-Abuse Stalking as “Fitness” Misconduct Under SCR 20:8.4(b): In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Mirza (2026 WI 13)

Revocation for Domestic-Abuse Stalking as “Fitness” Misconduct Under SCR 20:8.4(b): In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Mirza (2026 WI 13)

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Revocation for Domestic-Abuse Stalking as “Fitness” Misconduct Under SCR 20:8.4(b): In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Mirza (2026 WI 13) 1. Introduction Case: Office of Lawyer Regulation v....
Abrogated Claim, No Jury Right: Wisconsin Upholds COVID-Era Health Care Immunity Under Article XIV, Section 13

Abrogated Claim, No Jury Right: Wisconsin Upholds COVID-Era Health Care Immunity Under Article XIV, Section 13

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Abrogated Claim, No Jury Right: Wisconsin Upholds COVID-Era Health Care Immunity Under Article XIV, Section 13 Case: Savannah Wren v. Columbia St. Mary's Hospital Milwaukee, Inc. Court: Supreme Court...
Schoolhouse Miranda Custody: Police-Dominated Interrogations of Minors at School Require Warnings, Though Admission May Be Harmless

Schoolhouse Miranda Custody: Police-Dominated Interrogations of Minors at School Require Warnings, Though Admission May Be Harmless

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Schoolhouse Miranda Custody: Police-Dominated Interrogations of Minors at School Require Warnings, Though Admission May Be Harmless Introduction In State v. K.R.C., 2026 WI 10, the Supreme Court of...
Consensual License Revocation Is Appropriate for Large-Scale Client-Fund Conversion and Tribunal/Client Deceit, Even After Repayment

Consensual License Revocation Is Appropriate for Large-Scale Client-Fund Conversion and Tribunal/Client Deceit, Even After Repayment

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Consensual License Revocation Is Appropriate for Large-Scale Client-Fund Conversion and Tribunal/Client Deceit, Even After Repayment 1. Introduction In Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Guy K. Fish...
Consensual Revocation Is the Presumptive Discipline for Large-Scale Client-Fund Conversion Despite Restitution and No Prior Discipline

Consensual Revocation Is the Presumptive Discipline for Large-Scale Client-Fund Conversion Despite Restitution and No Prior Discipline

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Consensual Revocation Is the Presumptive Discipline for Large-Scale Client-Fund Conversion Despite Restitution and No Prior Discipline 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Guy K. Fish (2026...
WCA § 426.110(4)(c) Bars Damages Class Actions Upon an “Appropriate Remedy” Offered to the Named Plaintiff (Not the Putative Class)

WCA § 426.110(4)(c) Bars Damages Class Actions Upon an “Appropriate Remedy” Offered to the Named Plaintiff (Not the Putative Class)

Date: Mar 7, 2026
WCA § 426.110(4)(c) Bars Damages Class Actions Upon an “Appropriate Remedy” Offered to the Named Plaintiff (Not the Putative Class) 1) Introduction In Heather Gudex v. Franklin Collection Service,...
Domestic-Violence Misdemeanor Convictions Are Professional Misconduct, but Extraordinary Rehabilitation and OLR Delay May Justify a Public Reprimand (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Doherty)

Domestic-Violence Misdemeanor Convictions Are Professional Misconduct, but Extraordinary Rehabilitation and OLR Delay May Justify a Public Reprimand (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Doherty)

Date: Mar 6, 2026
Domestic-Violence Misdemeanor Convictions Are Professional Misconduct, but Extraordinary Rehabilitation and OLR Delay May Justify a Public Reprimand Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ryan V. Doherty...
State v. J.D.B. (2026 WI 5): Appellate Review of Sell Factors—De Novo for Governmental Interest; Clear Error for Factors 2–4; No Mandatory “Green” Checklist

State v. J.D.B. (2026 WI 5): Appellate Review of Sell Factors—De Novo for Governmental Interest; Clear Error for Factors 2–4; No Mandatory “Green” Checklist

Date: Feb 27, 2026
State v. J.D.B. (2026 WI 5): Appellate Review of Sell Factors—De Novo for Governmental Interest; Clear Error for Factors 2–4; No Mandatory “Green” Checklist I. Introduction Parties and posture. The...
State v. J.D.B. (2026 WI 5): Appellate Review Framework for Sell Orders—Factor One De Novo; Factors Two–Four Clearly Erroneous; Green Checklist Rejected

State v. J.D.B. (2026 WI 5): Appellate Review Framework for Sell Orders—Factor One De Novo; Factors Two–Four Clearly Erroneous; Green Checklist Rejected

Date: Feb 27, 2026
State v. J.D.B. (2026 WI 5): Appellate Review Framework for Sell Orders—Factor One De Novo; Factors Two–Four Clearly Erroneous; Green Checklist Rejected I. Introduction Case: State v. J.D.B., 2026 WI...
Wisconsin Clarifies the “Instrument or Agent” Test: ESP CSAM Scanning Remains a Private Search Under a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Analysis

Wisconsin Clarifies the “Instrument or Agent” Test: ESP CSAM Scanning Remains a Private Search Under a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Analysis

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Wisconsin Clarifies the “Instrument or Agent” Test: ESP CSAM Scanning Remains a Private Search Under a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Analysis Introduction State v. Andreas W. Rauch Sharak (2026 WI 4)...
ESPs Remain Private Actors When Scanning for CSAM; Payano-Roman Factors Are Non-Dispositive Under a Totality Test

ESPs Remain Private Actors When Scanning for CSAM; Payano-Roman Factors Are Non-Dispositive Under a Totality Test

Date: Feb 26, 2026
ESPs Remain Private Actors When Scanning for CSAM; Payano-Roman Factors Are Non-Dispositive Under a Totality Test I. Introduction In State v. Andreas W. Rauch Sharak (2026 WI 4), the Wisconsin...
Wisconsin Adopts Virtual-Certainty Private-Search Rule for Hash-Flagged CSAM Files

Wisconsin Adopts Virtual-Certainty Private-Search Rule for Hash-Flagged CSAM Files

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Wisconsin Adopts Virtual-Certainty Private-Search Rule for Hash-Flagged CSAM Files Introduction State v. Michael Joseph Gasper (2026 WI 3) presented the Wisconsin Supreme Court with a recurring...
Hash-Scan Private Search Doctrine: Government Viewing of a PhotoDNA-Flagged CSAM File Does Not Exceed the Private Search

Hash-Scan Private Search Doctrine: Government Viewing of a PhotoDNA-Flagged CSAM File Does Not Exceed the Private Search

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Hash-Scan Private Search Doctrine: Government Viewing of a PhotoDNA-Flagged CSAM File Does Not Exceed the Private Search Case: State v. Michael Joseph Gasper, 2026 WI 3 (Wis. Jan. 14, 2026) Court:...
Prolonged Probate Neglect Violates SCR 20:1.3, but Mitigation May Support Public Reprimand (and Full Costs Absent “Exceptional Circumstances”)

Prolonged Probate Neglect Violates SCR 20:1.3, but Mitigation May Support Public Reprimand (and Full Costs Absent “Exceptional Circumstances”)

Date: Jan 11, 2026
Prolonged Probate Neglect Violates SCR 20:1.3, but Mitigation May Support Public Reprimand (and Full Costs Absent “Exceptional Circumstances”) 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bryant H....
Public Reprimand for Prolonged Probate Neglect Under SCR 20:1.3; Full Costs Required Absent Exceptional Circumstances

Public Reprimand for Prolonged Probate Neglect Under SCR 20:1.3; Full Costs Required Absent Exceptional Circumstances

Date: Jan 11, 2026
Public Reprimand for Prolonged Probate Neglect Under SCR 20:1.3; Full Costs Required Absent Exceptional Circumstances Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bryant H. Klos (2026 WI 1) is a...
Campaign Criticism and Judicial Recusal: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gableman and the Limits of “Appearance of Bias” in Wisconsin

Campaign Criticism and Judicial Recusal: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gableman and the Limits of “Appearance of Bias” in Wisconsin

Date: Dec 6, 2025
Campaign Criticism and Judicial Recusal: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Gableman and the Limits of “Appearance of Bias” in Wisconsin I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the December...
Broadening “Apportionment” in Wisconsin: Three‑Judge Panels for All Congressional and Legislative Redistricting Challenges After Bothfeld v. WEC

Broadening “Apportionment” in Wisconsin: Three‑Judge Panels for All Congressional and Legislative Redistricting Challenges After Bothfeld v. WEC

Date: Nov 30, 2025
Broadening “Apportionment” in Wisconsin: Three‑Judge Panels for All Congressional and Legislative Redistricting Challenges After Bothfeld v. Wisconsin Elections Commission I. Introduction The...
Broad Construction of “Apportionment” and Mandatory Three‑Judge Panels in Wisconsin Redistricting Challenges: Commentary on Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. WEC

Broad Construction of “Apportionment” and Mandatory Three‑Judge Panels in Wisconsin Redistricting Challenges: Commentary on Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. WEC

Date: Nov 30, 2025
Broad Construction of “Apportionment” and Mandatory Three‑Judge Panels in Wisconsin Redistricting Challenges Commentary on Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. Wisconsin Elections Commission,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert