Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kansas Case Commentaries

State v. Horton: Each Layer of Double Hearsay Must Independently Fit an Exception, and Appellate Courts May Independently Assess Prosecutorial Error Despite Sustained Objections

State v. Horton: Each Layer of Double Hearsay Must Independently Fit an Exception, and Appellate Courts May Independently Assess Prosecutorial Error Despite Sustained Objections

Date: Apr 27, 2026
State v. Horton: Each Layer of Double Hearsay Must Independently Fit an Exception, and Appellate Courts May Independently Assess Prosecutorial Error Despite Sustained Objections Court: Supreme Court...
State v. Montgomery: Kansas Clarifies a Two-Step Framework for Judicial Comment Error (Error + Prejudice) and Chapman Harmlessness

State v. Montgomery: Kansas Clarifies a Two-Step Framework for Judicial Comment Error (Error + Prejudice) and Chapman Harmlessness

Date: Apr 27, 2026
State v. Montgomery: Kansas Clarifies a Two-Step Framework for Judicial Comment Error (Error + Prejudice) and Chapman Harmlessness Court: Supreme Court of Kansas | Date: April 24, 2026 | Disposition:...
State v. Smith (Kan. 2026): Appellate Discretion to Decline Review of Unpreserved Claims Even When an Exception Could Apply

State v. Smith (Kan. 2026): Appellate Discretion to Decline Review of Unpreserved Claims Even When an Exception Could Apply

Date: Apr 27, 2026
Appellate Discretion to Decline Review of Unpreserved Claims Even When an Exception Could Apply Case: State v. Smith Court: Supreme Court of Kansas Date: April 24, 2026 1. Introduction State v. Smith...
State v. Exon: Third-Party Medical Negligence Is Irrelevant Absent a Superseding, Sole Cause; Oral Pronouncement Controls Sentencing

State v. Exon: Third-Party Medical Negligence Is Irrelevant Absent a Superseding, Sole Cause; Oral Pronouncement Controls Sentencing

Date: Apr 20, 2026
State v. Exon: Third-Party Medical Negligence Is Irrelevant Absent a Superseding, Sole Cause; Oral Pronouncement Controls Sentencing 1. Introduction In State v. Exon (Kan. Apr. 17, 2026), the Kansas...
State v. Ruff: K.S.A. 21-2512(a)(3) Requires Proof of Superior “New DNA Techniques”—Time Alone Does Not Justify Retesting

State v. Ruff: K.S.A. 21-2512(a)(3) Requires Proof of Superior “New DNA Techniques”—Time Alone Does Not Justify Retesting

Date: Apr 6, 2026
State v. Ruff: K.S.A. 21-2512(a)(3) Requires Proof of Superior “New DNA Techniques”—Time Alone Does Not Justify Retesting Introduction In State v. Ruff (Kan. Apr. 3, 2026), Herbert Ruff sought...
Plain-Text Jail Credit Allows “Duplicative” Credit Across Consecutive Cases; Absurdity, Legislative Silence, and In Pari Materia Cannot Add Unwritten Carveouts

Plain-Text Jail Credit Allows “Duplicative” Credit Across Consecutive Cases; Absurdity, Legislative Silence, and In Pari Materia Cannot Add Unwritten Carveouts

Date: Apr 6, 2026
Plain-Text Jail Credit Allows “Duplicative” Credit Across Consecutive Cases; Absurdity, Legislative Silence, and In Pari Materia Cannot Add Unwritten Carveouts 1. Introduction Case: State v. Zongker...
Quo Warranto Requires a Concrete Challenged Official Act: Discretionary Original Jurisdiction Declined When the Remaining Dispute Becomes Abstract or Is Better Resolved Elsewhere

Quo Warranto Requires a Concrete Challenged Official Act: Discretionary Original Jurisdiction Declined When the Remaining Dispute Becomes Abstract or Is Better Resolved Elsewhere

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Quo Warranto Requires a Concrete Challenged Official Act: Discretionary Original Jurisdiction Declined When the Remaining Dispute Becomes Abstract or Is Better Resolved Elsewhere I. Introduction...
State v. Craig: Late Witness Endorsement Denials Are Discretionary and May Be Appealed as “Suppressing Evidence” When They Substantially Impair Prosecution

State v. Craig: Late Witness Endorsement Denials Are Discretionary and May Be Appealed as “Suppressing Evidence” When They Substantially Impair Prosecution

Date: Mar 22, 2026
Late Witness Endorsement Denials Are Discretionary and May Be Appealed as “Suppressing Evidence” When They Substantially Impair Prosecution Introduction State v. Craig (Kan. Mar. 20, 2026) arises...
Forfeiture of Juror-Retention Challenges Absent Objection, and Standing Limits for Vehicle Searches

Forfeiture of Juror-Retention Challenges Absent Objection, and Standing Limits for Vehicle Searches

Date: Mar 22, 2026
Forfeiture of Juror-Retention Challenges Absent Objection, and Standing Limits for Vehicle Searches Case: State v. Manzano-Legarda (Kan. Mar. 20, 2026) Court: Supreme Court of Kansas Core holdings...
State v. Lopez: “Substantial and Compelling” Hard-50 Departures Demand Case-Forcing Mitigation; Denials Are Reviewed for Abuse of Discretion

State v. Lopez: “Substantial and Compelling” Hard-50 Departures Demand Case-Forcing Mitigation; Denials Are Reviewed for Abuse of Discretion

Date: Mar 15, 2026
State v. Lopez: “Substantial and Compelling” Hard-50 Departures Demand Case-Forcing Mitigation; Denials Are Reviewed for Abuse of Discretion Introduction In State v. Lopez (Kan. Mar. 13, 2026), the...
State v. Bey: Expansive Use of K.S.A. 60-460(d)(3) for Deceased Victim Statements and Admissibility of Threat/Abuse Evidence Under K.S.A. 60-455

State v. Bey: Expansive Use of K.S.A. 60-460(d)(3) for Deceased Victim Statements and Admissibility of Threat/Abuse Evidence Under K.S.A. 60-455

Date: Mar 15, 2026
State v. Bey: Deceased Victim’s Abuse/Threat Statements Admissible Under K.S.A. 60-460(d)(3) and K.S.A. 60-455; “Puzzle” Analogies Permitted for Circumstantial Evidence (Not Reasonable Doubt) I....
Kansas Classifies Nevada Robbery (NRS 200.380 [1995]) as Nonperson Unless Its Elements Require Fear of Bodily Harm or a Qualifying “Person Present” Circumstance

Kansas Classifies Nevada Robbery (NRS 200.380 [1995]) as Nonperson Unless Its Elements Require Fear of Bodily Harm or a Qualifying “Person Present” Circumstance

Date: Mar 8, 2026
Kansas Classifies Nevada Robbery (NRS 200.380 [1995]) as Nonperson Unless Its Elements Require Fear of Bodily Harm or a Qualifying “Person Present” Circumstance 1. Introduction State v. Evans (Kan....
Uncontested Common-Law Marriage Appeals: Kansas Supreme Court May Review and Affirm to Secure Federal Recognition (In re Common-Law Marriage of Kelley)

Uncontested Common-Law Marriage Appeals: Kansas Supreme Court May Review and Affirm to Secure Federal Recognition (In re Common-Law Marriage of Kelley)

Date: Mar 1, 2026
Uncontested Common-Law Marriage Appeals: Kansas Supreme Court May Review and Affirm to Secure Federal Recognition 1. Introduction Case: In re Common-Law Marriage of Kelley (Kan. Feb. 27, 2026)....
In re Stewart: KRPC 8.4(c) Misrepresentation Requires Proof the Statement Adversely Reflects on Fitness to Practice Law

In re Stewart: KRPC 8.4(c) Misrepresentation Requires Proof the Statement Adversely Reflects on Fitness to Practice Law

Date: Mar 1, 2026
In re Stewart: KRPC 8.4(c) Misrepresentation Requires Proof the Statement Adversely Reflects on Fitness to Practice Law Court: Supreme Court of Kansas Date: February 27, 2026 Disposition: Published...
State v. Arroyo: Context-Driven Limits on “Defense Could Have Presented Evidence” Rebuttal in Closing Argument

State v. Arroyo: Context-Driven Limits on “Defense Could Have Presented Evidence” Rebuttal in Closing Argument

Date: Feb 15, 2026
State v. Arroyo: Context-Driven Limits on “Defense Could Have Presented Evidence” Rebuttal in Closing Argument Introduction In State v. Arroyo (Kan. Feb. 13, 2026), the Kansas Supreme Court affirmed...
State v. Rayton: Direct Appeal of Presentence Plea-Withdrawal Denials and “Lackluster Advocacy” Under Edgar

State v. Rayton: Direct Appeal of Presentence Plea-Withdrawal Denials and “Lackluster Advocacy” Under Edgar

Date: Feb 15, 2026
State v. Rayton: Direct Appeal of Presentence Plea-Withdrawal Denials and “Lackluster Advocacy” Under Edgar 1. Introduction In State v. Rayton (Kan. Feb. 13, 2026), the Kansas Supreme Court affirmed...
State v. Calvert: K.S.A. 21-5801(b)(6) Prior-Theft “Five-Year” Recidivism Is a Sentencing Fact, and Judges May Use Court Records Mechanically to Find Conviction Dates and Statutes

State v. Calvert: K.S.A. 21-5801(b)(6) Prior-Theft “Five-Year” Recidivism Is a Sentencing Fact, and Judges May Use Court Records Mechanically to Find Conviction Dates and Statutes

Date: Feb 1, 2026
State v. Calvert: K.S.A. 21-5801(b)(6) Prior-Theft “Five-Year” Recidivism Is a Sentencing Fact, and Judges May Use Court Records Mechanically to Find Conviction Dates and Statutes Court: Supreme...
Standard Procedures Do Not Defeat Miranda Custody; “No, ’Cause I Don’t Know Where This Is Going” Is Not an Unequivocal Invocation of Silence

Standard Procedures Do Not Defeat Miranda Custody; “No, ’Cause I Don’t Know Where This Is Going” Is Not an Unequivocal Invocation of Silence

Date: Feb 1, 2026
Standard Procedures Do Not Defeat Miranda Custody; “No, ’Cause I Don’t Know Where This Is Going” Is Not an Unequivocal Invocation of Silence Introduction In State v. McCullough (Kan. Jan. 30, 2026),...
State v. Wright: Foreseeability Cannot Supply Specific Intent for Aiding-and-Abetting Premeditated Murder; Limits on Involuntary Manslaughter Lesser-Included Instructions

State v. Wright: Foreseeability Cannot Supply Specific Intent for Aiding-and-Abetting Premeditated Murder; Limits on Involuntary Manslaughter Lesser-Included Instructions

Date: Feb 1, 2026
Foreseeability Cannot Supply Specific Intent for Aiding-and-Abetting Premeditated Murder; Limits on Involuntary Manslaughter Lesser-Included Instructions Introduction In State v. Wright (Kan. Jan....
State v. Denney: Liberal Construction of Pro Se Postconviction Motions—Substance Controls Whether Filing Proceeds Under K.S.A. 22-3504 or K.S.A. 60-1507

State v. Denney: Liberal Construction of Pro Se Postconviction Motions—Substance Controls Whether Filing Proceeds Under K.S.A. 22-3504 or K.S.A. 60-1507

Date: Jan 18, 2026
State v. Denney: Liberal Construction of Pro Se Postconviction Motions—Substance Controls Whether Filing Proceeds Under K.S.A. 22-3504 or K.S.A. 60-1507 Court: Supreme Court of Kansas Date: January...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert