Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Selective Sovereign Immunity Cannot Bar Federal Due-Process Claims; Illegal-Exaction Suits Proceed Despite Article 5, Section 20

Selective Sovereign Immunity Cannot Bar Federal Due-Process Claims; Illegal-Exaction Suits Proceed Despite Article 5, Section 20

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Selective Sovereign Immunity Cannot Bar Federal Due-Process Claims; Illegal-Exaction Suits Proceed Despite Article 5, Section 20 I. Introduction In GARLAND COUNTY DISTRICT COURT; PROFESSIONAL...
Thornton v. State (2026 Ark. 71): Rule 33.1 Requires Element-Specific Deficiency Arguments—Not Element-Recitation—to Preserve Sufficiency Review in Bench Trials

Thornton v. State (2026 Ark. 71): Rule 33.1 Requires Element-Specific Deficiency Arguments—Not Element-Recitation—to Preserve Sufficiency Review in Bench Trials

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Rule 33.1 Requires Element-Specific Deficiency Arguments—Not Element-Recitation—to Preserve Sufficiency Review in Bench Trials (and Class-Y “Certification” Issues Are Not Structural Error Absent...
Postconviction Challenges Cannot Be Recast as Civil Declaratory/Mandamus Actions; No Service, No Default, No Appealable Order

Postconviction Challenges Cannot Be Recast as Civil Declaratory/Mandamus Actions; No Service, No Default, No Appealable Order

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Postconviction Challenges Cannot Be Recast as Civil Declaratory/Mandamus Actions; No Service, No Default, No Appealable Order I. Introduction In RODNEY BUNCH v. STATE OF ARKANSAS; WILLIAM MARTIN...
Speculative Threats of Prosecution Do Not Create Standing or a Justiciable Controversy for Declaratory Relief Challenging a Criminal Statute (Ark. Sup. Ct. 2026 Ark. 74)

Speculative Threats of Prosecution Do Not Create Standing or a Justiciable Controversy for Declaratory Relief Challenging a Criminal Statute (Ark. Sup. Ct. 2026 Ark. 74)

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Speculative Threats of Prosecution Do Not Create Standing or a Justiciable Controversy for Declaratory Relief Challenging a Criminal Statute Introduction In Duane Gonder v. Tim Griffin, Arkansas...
Under Pre-2026 Arkansas UDITPA, One-Time Sale of an Entire Business (Including Intangibles) Is Nonbusiness Income Unless Regular Disposition Is Integral to Operations

Under Pre-2026 Arkansas UDITPA, One-Time Sale of an Entire Business (Including Intangibles) Is Nonbusiness Income Unless Regular Disposition Is Integral to Operations

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Under Pre-2026 Arkansas UDITPA, One-Time Sale of an Entire Business (Including Intangibles) Is Nonbusiness Income Unless Regular Disposition Is Integral to Operations I. Introduction Jim Hudson, in...
Automatic Suspension and Deemed Surrender for Nonpayment of Arkansas Annual Attorney-License Fees Under Rule VII

Automatic Suspension and Deemed Surrender for Nonpayment of Arkansas Annual Attorney-License Fees Under Rule VII

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Automatic Suspension and Deemed Surrender for Nonpayment of Arkansas Annual Attorney-License Fees Under Rule VII 1. Introduction In In Re Suspension of Attorneys Who Failed to Pay 2026 Annual...
Amendment 80 Authorizes Statutory Interlocutory Appeals: The State May Appeal Juvenile-Transfer Orders (Overruling State v. A.G.)

Amendment 80 Authorizes Statutory Interlocutory Appeals: The State May Appeal Juvenile-Transfer Orders (Overruling State v. A.G.)

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Amendment 80 Authorizes Statutory Interlocutory Appeals: The State May Appeal Juvenile-Transfer Orders (Overruling State v. A.G.) 1. Introduction In State of Arkansas v. Minor Child, 2026 Ark. 66,...
General Verdict Unanimity Not Required as to Alternative Capital-Murder Theories or “Cruel or Depraved” Subdefinitions in Arkansas Postconviction Review

General Verdict Unanimity Not Required as to Alternative Capital-Murder Theories or “Cruel or Depraved” Subdefinitions in Arkansas Postconviction Review

Date: Apr 20, 2026
General Verdict Unanimity Not Required as to Alternative Capital-Murder Theories or “Cruel or Depraved” Subdefinitions in Arkansas Postconviction Review I. Introduction In Zachary Holly v. State of...
State Agencies Are Not “Persons” for § 1983, § 1981, or ACRA Claims; Title VII Claims May Proceed Against the Agency

State Agencies Are Not “Persons” for § 1983, § 1981, or ACRA Claims; Title VII Claims May Proceed Against the Agency

Date: Apr 16, 2026
State Agencies Are Not “Persons” for § 1983, § 1981, or ACRA Claims; Title VII Claims May Proceed Against the Agency Arkansas Highway Police, a Division of the Arkansas State Highway and...
Curative Clarifications for Inadvertent Jail References and Deference to Demeanor-Based Batson Rulings in Arkansas

Curative Clarifications for Inadvertent Jail References and Deference to Demeanor-Based Batson Rulings in Arkansas

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Curative Clarifications for Inadvertent Jail References and Deference to Demeanor-Based Batson Rulings in Arkansas I. Introduction In Elijah Singleton v. State of Arkansas, 2026 Ark. 61, the Arkansas...
Conditional-Use Permit Denials by County Quorum Courts Are Quasi-Judicial and Require De Novo Circuit-Court Review

Conditional-Use Permit Denials by County Quorum Courts Are Quasi-Judicial and Require De Novo Circuit-Court Review

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Conditional-Use Permit Denials by County Quorum Courts Are Quasi-Judicial and Require De Novo Circuit-Court Review I. Introduction In MMSC, LLC, F/K/A MMSW, LLC v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS; QUORUM...
Substantial Compliance with Rule 3(e)(vi) and Equitable Estoppel Bars a Mortgagee from Reasserting Lien Priority After Its Agent Promised Release

Substantial Compliance with Rule 3(e)(vi) and Equitable Estoppel Bars a Mortgagee from Reasserting Lien Priority After Its Agent Promised Release

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Substantial Compliance with Rule 3(e)(vi) and Equitable Estoppel Bars a Mortgagee from Reasserting Lien Priority After Its Agent Promised Release Case: Relyance Bank, N.A. v. Steve Pharr and Simmons...
§ 504 Employment-Retaliation Requires an Employer–Employee Relationship; Contractor Retaliation Claims Require Public-Concern Speech; Official-Capacity Liability Requires Monell Policy/Custom

§ 504 Employment-Retaliation Requires an Employer–Employee Relationship; Contractor Retaliation Claims Require Public-Concern Speech; Official-Capacity Liability Requires Monell Policy/Custom

Date: Mar 14, 2026
§ 504 Employment-Retaliation Requires an Employer–Employee Relationship; Contractor Retaliation Claims Require Public-Concern Speech; Official-Capacity Liability Requires Monell Policy/Custom I....
Denial of Pro Hac Vice Admission Is an Immediately Appealable Disqualification Order; Listing Nonresident Counsel on a Pleading Is Not a Standalone Basis for Denial

Denial of Pro Hac Vice Admission Is an Immediately Appealable Disqualification Order; Listing Nonresident Counsel on a Pleading Is Not a Standalone Basis for Denial

Date: Mar 14, 2026
Denial of Pro Hac Vice Admission Is an Immediately Appealable Disqualification Order; Listing Nonresident Counsel on a Pleading Is Not a Standalone Basis for Denial 1. Introduction In Red Roof Inns,...
Objective Reasonableness Controls Arrests Under Article 2, Section 15: Arkansas Overrules State v. Sullivan’s Pretext-Arrest Rule

Objective Reasonableness Controls Arrests Under Article 2, Section 15: Arkansas Overrules State v. Sullivan’s Pretext-Arrest Rule

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Objective Reasonableness Controls Arrests Under Article 2, Section 15: Arkansas Overrules State v. Sullivan’s Pretext-Arrest Rule Case: Christopher Coy Gamble v. State of Arkansas | Citation: 2026...
Parole Revocation Is Not Double Jeopardy and Does Not Bar Prosecution for a New Sex-Offender Address-Change Violation

Parole Revocation Is Not Double Jeopardy and Does Not Bar Prosecution for a New Sex-Offender Address-Change Violation

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Parole Revocation Is Not Double Jeopardy and Does Not Bar Prosecution for a New Sex-Offender Address-Change Violation Case: Russell Alexander Geaslin v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of...
Admissible Evidence Required to Prove “Case Within a Case” Proximate Cause in Arkansas Legal-Malpractice Actions

Admissible Evidence Required to Prove “Case Within a Case” Proximate Cause in Arkansas Legal-Malpractice Actions

Date: Mar 7, 2026
Admissible Evidence Required to Prove “Case Within a Case” Proximate Cause in Arkansas Legal-Malpractice Actions 1. Introduction In Rebecca Nichols v. James Swindoll and Chuck Gibson, 2026 Ark. 42,...
Arkansas Rape-Shield: Uncorroborated Prior-Encounter Claims Are Inadmissible and Do Not Trigger Confrontation Rights Where Other Impeachment Routes Exist

Arkansas Rape-Shield: Uncorroborated Prior-Encounter Claims Are Inadmissible and Do Not Trigger Confrontation Rights Where Other Impeachment Routes Exist

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Arkansas Rape-Shield: Uncorroborated Prior-Encounter Claims Are Inadmissible and Do Not Trigger Confrontation Rights Where Other Impeachment Routes Exist 1. Introduction In State of Arkansas v. Roy...
Rule 37 Ineffectiveness After Video-Based Familiarity Identifications: No Lineup-Due-Process Analogy, No Prejudice Without Meritorious Objection, and No Cumulative Error Absent Individual Error

Rule 37 Ineffectiveness After Video-Based Familiarity Identifications: No Lineup-Due-Process Analogy, No Prejudice Without Meritorious Objection, and No Cumulative Error Absent Individual Error

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Rule 37 Ineffectiveness After Video-Based Familiarity Identifications: No Lineup-Due-Process Analogy, No Prejudice Without Meritorious Objection, and No Cumulative Error Absent Individual Error Case:...
Rule 37.1 Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Without Strickland Prejudice When the Direct-Appeal Record Refutes Alleged Omissions

Rule 37.1 Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Without Strickland Prejudice When the Direct-Appeal Record Refutes Alleged Omissions

Date: Feb 15, 2026
Rule 37.1 Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Without Strickland Prejudice When the Direct-Appeal Record Refutes Alleged Omissions Introduction In Curtis Dorsey v. State of Arkansas, 2026 Ark. 27, the...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert