Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

People v Whatts: Remand Required When a Requested Mapp Hearing Was Never Ordered or Litigated

People v Whatts: Remand Required When a Requested Mapp Hearing Was Never Ordered or Litigated

Date: Apr 4, 2026
People v Whatts: Remand Required When a Requested Mapp Hearing Was Never Ordered or Litigated 1. Introduction In People v Whatts (2026 NY Slip Op 01925), the Appellate Division, First Department...
Lack of Informed Consent Must Be Pleaded (Not Added by Bill of Particulars); Unopposed Malpractice Theories Are Dismissed on Summary Judgment

Lack of Informed Consent Must Be Pleaded (Not Added by Bill of Particulars); Unopposed Malpractice Theories Are Dismissed on Summary Judgment

Date: Mar 29, 2026
Lack of Informed Consent Must Be Pleaded (Not Added by Bill of Particulars); Unopposed Malpractice Theories Are Dismissed on Summary Judgment Introduction In Heather J. v Rochester Regional Health...
Lease Reformation for Mutual Mistake Extinguishes Option-Based Claims, While Co-Venturer Fiduciary Duties May Survive a Business Fallout

Lease Reformation for Mutual Mistake Extinguishes Option-Based Claims, While Co-Venturer Fiduciary Duties May Survive a Business Fallout

Date: Mar 29, 2026
Lease Reformation for Mutual Mistake Extinguishes Option-Based Claims, While Co-Venturer Fiduciary Duties May Survive a Business Fallout Case: Laun v Stewart, 2026 NY Slip Op 01883 (App Div, 4th Dept...
Arruda v. New York Central Mutual: Water-Backup and Earth-Movement Exclusions Bar Coverage Beyond Limited Endorsement; CPLR 3212(f) Requires a Concrete Showing

Arruda v. New York Central Mutual: Water-Backup and Earth-Movement Exclusions Bar Coverage Beyond Limited Endorsement; CPLR 3212(f) Requires a Concrete Showing

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Arruda v. New York Central Mutual: Water-Backup and Earth-Movement Exclusions Bar Coverage Beyond Limited Endorsement; CPLR 3212(f) Requires a Concrete Showing 1. Introduction In Arruda v New York...
Fogel v. Kaleida Health: Pleading “Improper Practices” Under Public Health Law § 2801-b Without Naming the Statute; PHHPC Findings Not Preclusive

Fogel v. Kaleida Health: Pleading “Improper Practices” Under Public Health Law § 2801-b Without Naming the Statute; PHHPC Findings Not Preclusive

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Fogel v. Kaleida Health: Pleading “Improper Practices” Under Public Health Law § 2801-b Without Naming the Statute; PHHPC Findings Not Preclusive 1. Introduction Case: Fogel v Health, 2026 NY Slip Op...
Diligent Efforts for Incarcerated Parents: Agency Repeated Attempts and Incarceration-Related Visitation Barriers May Satisfy Social Services Law § 384-b

Diligent Efforts for Incarcerated Parents: Agency Repeated Attempts and Incarceration-Related Visitation Barriers May Satisfy Social Services Law § 384-b

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Diligent Efforts for Incarcerated Parents: Agency Repeated Attempts and Incarceration-Related Visitation Barriers May Satisfy Social Services Law § 384-b Decision: Matter of Jonah M. (Davion D.),...
Prosecutorial Charge Selection Under Penal Law former § 130.96 Does Not Implicate Apprendi; General CSAAS Testimony Remains Admissible

Prosecutorial Charge Selection Under Penal Law former § 130.96 Does Not Implicate Apprendi; General CSAAS Testimony Remains Admissible

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Prosecutorial Charge Selection Under Penal Law former § 130.96 Does Not Implicate Apprendi; General CSAAS Testimony Remains Admissible Introduction People v Litolff (Appellate Division, Fourth...
People v. Mitchell: Denial of Late CPL 250.10 Psychiatric Notice Absent Good Cause; Trespass Lesser-Included Charge Properly Refused Where No Reasonable View of Innocent Entry

People v. Mitchell: Denial of Late CPL 250.10 Psychiatric Notice Absent Good Cause; Trespass Lesser-Included Charge Properly Refused Where No Reasonable View of Innocent Entry

Date: Mar 28, 2026
People v. Mitchell: Denial of Late CPL 250.10 Psychiatric Notice Absent Good Cause; Trespass Lesser-Included Charge Properly Refused Where No Reasonable View of Innocent Entry 1. Introduction In...
People v. Williams (4th Dept 2026): Admitting Prior CPL Article 440 Testimony as an Exculpatory Declaration Against Penal Interest When the Witness Invokes the Fifth

People v. Williams (4th Dept 2026): Admitting Prior CPL Article 440 Testimony as an Exculpatory Declaration Against Penal Interest When the Witness Invokes the Fifth

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Admitting Prior CPL Article 440 Testimony as an Exculpatory Declaration Against Penal Interest When the Witness Invokes the Fifth 1. Introduction In People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 01881 (App Div...
Briggs v. Fresenius: CPLR 306-b Bars Sua Sponte Dismissal for Defective/Untimely Service; Vacatur Required in Substantial Justice

Briggs v. Fresenius: CPLR 306-b Bars Sua Sponte Dismissal for Defective/Untimely Service; Vacatur Required in Substantial Justice

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Briggs v. Fresenius: CPLR 306-b Bars Sua Sponte Dismissal for Defective/Untimely Service; Vacatur Required in Substantial Justice 1. Introduction Briggs v Fresenius (App Div 3d Dept, Mar. 26, 2026)...
Arias v. Brooks Holdings Corp.: No Automatic Labor Law § 240(1) Summary Judgment When a Ladder Fall Is Triggered by an Electrical Blast Without Proof the Ladder or Other Gravity-Device Protection Was Inadequate

Arias v. Brooks Holdings Corp.: No Automatic Labor Law § 240(1) Summary Judgment When a Ladder Fall Is Triggered by an Electrical Blast Without Proof the Ladder or Other Gravity-Device Protection Was Inadequate

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Arias v. Brooks Holdings Corp.: No Automatic Labor Law § 240(1) Summary Judgment When a Ladder Fall Is Triggered by an Electrical Blast Without Proof the Ladder or Other Gravity-Device Protection Was...
Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 Presumption Applies to Unwitnessed Stair-Fall While Reporting Early to Change into Required Uniform; Rebuttal Requires Idiopathic Proof

Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 Presumption Applies to Unwitnessed Stair-Fall While Reporting Early to Change into Required Uniform; Rebuttal Requires Idiopathic Proof

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 Presumption Applies to Unwitnessed Stair-Fall While Reporting Early to Change into Required Uniform; Rebuttal Requires Idiopathic Proof Introduction Matter of Mondesir...
People v. Bryan: No Hearing Required on Contradicted Duress Claims; Unauthorized $1,000 Supplemental Sex Offender Victim Fee Vacated in the Interest of Justice

People v. Bryan: No Hearing Required on Contradicted Duress Claims; Unauthorized $1,000 Supplemental Sex Offender Victim Fee Vacated in the Interest of Justice

Date: Mar 28, 2026
People v. Bryan: No Hearing Required on Contradicted Duress Claims; Unauthorized $1,000 Supplemental Sex Offender Victim Fee Vacated in the Interest of Justice Introduction In People v Bryan...
EDTPA Immunity at the Pleading Stage: Documentary Proof Can Compel Dismissal; Conclusory Gross-Negligence and Pre‑COVID Negligence Allegations Do Not Survive

EDTPA Immunity at the Pleading Stage: Documentary Proof Can Compel Dismissal; Conclusory Gross-Negligence and Pre‑COVID Negligence Allegations Do Not Survive

Date: Mar 28, 2026
EDTPA Immunity at the Pleading Stage: Documentary Proof Can Compel Dismissal; Conclusory Gross-Negligence and Pre‑COVID Negligence Allegations Do Not Survive 1. Introduction In Estate of Middleton v...
Powers v State of New York — Storm-in-Progress Requires an “Appreciable Accumulation”; Overnight Icing Response Can Establish Notice When a Paved Area Is Left Untreated

Powers v State of New York — Storm-in-Progress Requires an “Appreciable Accumulation”; Overnight Icing Response Can Establish Notice When a Paved Area Is Left Untreated

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Storm-in-Progress Requires an “Appreciable Accumulation”; Overnight Icing Response Can Establish Notice When a Paved Area Is Left Untreated Case: Powers v State of New York, 2026 NY Slip Op 01833...
Binding LOI Provisions Can Impose a Good-Faith Negotiation Duty and Bar Break-Fee Recovery Upon Material Breach

Binding LOI Provisions Can Impose a Good-Faith Negotiation Duty and Bar Break-Fee Recovery Upon Material Breach

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Binding LOI Provisions Can Impose a Good-Faith Negotiation Duty and Bar Break-Fee Recovery Upon Material Breach Case: Sabre Oxidation Tech., Inc. v Superior Plus Corp., 2026 NY Slip Op 01835 (App...
Permissive Counterclaims and the “Impairment” Exception: Later Tort Claims from Prior Litigation Survive Unless They Undermine Rights Fixed in the First Action

Permissive Counterclaims and the “Impairment” Exception: Later Tort Claims from Prior Litigation Survive Unless They Undermine Rights Fixed in the First Action

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Permissive Counterclaims and the “Impairment” Exception: Later Tort Claims from Prior Litigation Survive Unless They Undermine Rights Fixed in the First Action Case: Berry v Batash, 2026 NY Slip Op...
Deflorio v. County of Nassau: When Evidence Shows an Unmarked Crosswalk, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152 Need Not Be Charged; Strong Deference to Jury Verdicts Under CPLR 4404(a)

Deflorio v. County of Nassau: When Evidence Shows an Unmarked Crosswalk, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152 Need Not Be Charged; Strong Deference to Jury Verdicts Under CPLR 4404(a)

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Deflorio v. County of Nassau: When Evidence Shows an Unmarked Crosswalk, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152 Need Not Be Charged; Strong Deference to Jury Verdicts Under CPLR 4404(a) 1. Introduction In...
Enforcing One-Year Contractual Limitations in Construction Trade Contracts; Incidental Beneficiaries Cannot Enforce Owner–Manager Settlements

Enforcing One-Year Contractual Limitations in Construction Trade Contracts; Incidental Beneficiaries Cannot Enforce Owner–Manager Settlements

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Enforcing One-Year Contractual Limitations in Construction Trade Contracts; Incidental Beneficiaries Cannot Enforce Owner–Manager Settlements Commentary on Extech Bldg. Materials, Inc. v J Cos., LLC,...
Defaulting Employers Forfeit the “Good Faith” Defense: Liquidated Damages Are Mandatory and Plaintiffs Must Be Heard on Individual “Employer” Status

Defaulting Employers Forfeit the “Good Faith” Defense: Liquidated Damages Are Mandatory and Plaintiffs Must Be Heard on Individual “Employer” Status

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Defaulting Employers Forfeit the “Good Faith” Defense: Liquidated Damages Are Mandatory and Plaintiffs Must Be Heard on Individual “Employer” Status Case: Jin Gang Huang v Long Hing Kitchen, Inc.,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert