Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

April 2026 Pennsylvania Rule Update: Approved Depositories for Attorney Trust (IOLTA) Accounts and “Platinum Leader Bank” Yield Standard

April 2026 Pennsylvania Rule Update: Approved Depositories for Attorney Trust (IOLTA) Accounts and “Platinum Leader Bank” Yield Standard

Date: Apr 29, 2026
April 2026 Pennsylvania Rule Update: Approved Depositories for Attorney Trust (IOLTA) Accounts and “Platinum Leader Bank” Yield Standard 1. Introduction In Re: Financial Institutions Approved as...
Pennsylvania Establishes a Unified Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Regime in Pa.R.J.A. 1990, Defining “Substantial Financial Hardship” and Relaxing Hearing Requirements

Pennsylvania Establishes a Unified Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Regime in Pa.R.J.A. 1990, Defining “Substantial Financial Hardship” and Relaxing Hearing Requirements

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Pennsylvania Establishes a Unified Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Regime in Pa.R.J.A. 1990, Defining “Substantial Financial Hardship” and Relaxing Hearing Requirements 1. Introduction On April 21,...
Unified Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Procedure Under Pa.R.J.A. 1990: Defined “Substantial Financial Hardship,” Ex Parte Determinations, and Specialized Appellate Review

Unified Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Procedure Under Pa.R.J.A. 1990: Defined “Substantial Financial Hardship,” Ex Parte Determinations, and Specialized Appellate Review

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Unified Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Procedure Under Pa.R.J.A. 1990: Defined “Substantial Financial Hardship,” Ex Parte Determinations, and Specialized Appellate Review 1. Introduction In Re:...
Pennsylvania’s Unified In Forma Pauperis Framework: Defined “Substantial Financial Hardship,” Discretionary Denials Without Hearing, and Continuity of Waiver Across Proceedings

Pennsylvania’s Unified In Forma Pauperis Framework: Defined “Substantial Financial Hardship,” Discretionary Denials Without Hearing, and Continuity of Waiver Across Proceedings

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pennsylvania’s Unified In Forma Pauperis Framework: Defined “Substantial Financial Hardship,” Discretionary Denials Without Hearing, and Continuity of Waiver Across Proceedings 1. Introduction This...
New Pennsylvania Appellate Framework for Waiver of Fees and Costs: Automatic Continuation and Ex Parte Specialized Review of Denials

New Pennsylvania Appellate Framework for Waiver of Fees and Costs: Automatic Continuation and Ex Parte Specialized Review of Denials

Date: Apr 23, 2026
New Pennsylvania Appellate Framework for Waiver of Fees and Costs: Automatic Continuation and Ex Parte Specialized Review of Denials 1. Introduction In In Re: Order Adopting Rules 550 and 1614;...
Pennsylvania Criminal Procedure: Rule 124 Establishes a Unified “Waiver of Fees and Costs” Regime (Replacing “In Forma Pauperis”) While Excluding Restitution and Conviction-Imposed Assessments

Pennsylvania Criminal Procedure: Rule 124 Establishes a Unified “Waiver of Fees and Costs” Regime (Replacing “In Forma Pauperis”) While Excluding Restitution and Conviction-Imposed Assessments

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pennsylvania Criminal Procedure: Rule 124 Establishes a Unified “Waiver of Fees and Costs” Regime (Replacing “In Forma Pauperis”) While Excluding Restitution and Conviction-Imposed Assessments 1....
Pennsylvania Establishes a Unified, Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Framework Centered in Pa.R.J.A. 1990

Pennsylvania Establishes a Unified, Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Framework Centered in Pa.R.J.A. 1990

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pennsylvania Establishes a Unified, Statewide In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Framework Centered in Pa.R.J.A. 1990 1. Introduction On April 21, 2026, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania approved a broad...
Pa.R.J.A. 4007/4008: Transcript Cost Waiver Conditioned on Pa.R.J.A. 1990 Fee Waiver and Litigation Necessity

Pa.R.J.A. 4007/4008: Transcript Cost Waiver Conditioned on Pa.R.J.A. 1990 Fee Waiver and Litigation Necessity

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pa.R.J.A. 4007/4008: Transcript Cost Waiver Conditioned on Pa.R.J.A. 1990 Fee Waiver and Litigation Necessity 1. Introduction In In Re: Order Amending Rules 4007, 4008, 4009, and 4011 of the...
Pennsylvania Establishes Uniform, Mandatory Public-Access Rules for Case Records—Including Statewide Confidential-Form Filing and Remote-Access Limits

Pennsylvania Establishes Uniform, Mandatory Public-Access Rules for Case Records—Including Statewide Confidential-Form Filing and Remote-Access Limits

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pennsylvania Establishes Uniform, Mandatory Public-Access Rules for Case Records—Including Statewide Confidential-Form Filing and Remote-Access Limits In Re: Order Amending the Case Records Public...
Per Curiam Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Defect Appeals: No Merits Precedent; Superior Court Orders Stand; Sealing Continued

Per Curiam Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Defect Appeals: No Merits Precedent; Superior Court Orders Stand; Sealing Continued

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Per Curiam Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Defect Appeals: No Merits Precedent; Superior Court Orders Stand; Sealing Continued 1. Introduction This matter consists of numerous...
Per Curiam Denial of Allocatur: No Merits Ruling; Supplemental Record Motion Moot; Sealing Continued

Per Curiam Denial of Allocatur: No Merits Ruling; Supplemental Record Motion Moot; Sealing Continued

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Per Curiam Denial of Allocatur: No Merits Ruling; Supplemental Record Motion Moot; Sealing Continued 1. Introduction This matter consists of a large group of related cases in which numerous...
Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Homeowner Cases: Superior Court Disposition Left Undisturbed; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued

Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Homeowner Cases: Superior Court Disposition Left Undisturbed; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Homeowner Cases: Superior Court Disposition Left Undisturbed; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued 1. Introduction This Pennsylvania Supreme...
Pennsylvania Allocatur Denial: Ancillary Record Motion Moot; Continued Sealing Granted in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions

Pennsylvania Allocatur Denial: Ancillary Record Motion Moot; Continued Sealing Granted in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Pennsylvania Allocatur Denial: Ancillary Record Motion Moot; Continued Sealing Granted in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions 1. Introduction This Supreme Court of Pennsylvania disposition arises...
Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Construction Litigation; Supplemental Record Motion Moot and Sealing Continued

Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Construction Litigation; Supplemental Record Motion Moot and Sealing Continued

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Home-Construction Litigation; Supplemental Record Motion Moot and Sealing Continued 1. Introduction This Pennsylvania Supreme Court disposition...
Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions Leaves Superior Court Orders Intact and Continues Sealing

Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions Leaves Superior Court Orders Intact and Continues Sealing

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Denial of Allocatur in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions Leaves Superior Court Orders Intact and Continues Sealing 1. Introduction This Supreme Court of Pennsylvania disposition (Eastern District)...
Allocatur Denial Leaves Superior Court Order Intact and Continues Sealing in Consolidated Toll Brothers Litigation

Allocatur Denial Leaves Superior Court Order Intact and Continues Sealing in Consolidated Toll Brothers Litigation

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Allocatur Denial Leaves Superior Court Order Intact and Continues Sealing in Consolidated Toll Brothers Litigation 1. Introduction This Supreme Court of Pennsylvania disposition arises from a large...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denial of Allocatur: No Merits Ruling; Supplemental Record Moot; Continued Sealing Permitted

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denial of Allocatur: No Merits Ruling; Supplemental Record Moot; Continued Sealing Permitted

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denial of Allocatur: No Merits Ruling; Supplemental Record Moot; Continued Sealing Permitted 1. Introduction This matter consists of numerous related petitions for...
Allocatur Denied in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions; Supplemental Record Request Moot; Continued Sealing Granted

Allocatur Denied in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions; Supplemental Record Request Moot; Continued Sealing Granted

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Allocatur Denied in Consolidated Toll Brothers Petitions; Supplemental Record Request Moot; Continued Sealing Granted Introduction This matter consists of numerous consolidated Petition[s] for...
Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Cases: Superior Court Disposition Stands; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued

Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Cases: Superior Court Disposition Stands; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Allocatur Denial in Consolidated Toll Brothers Cases: Superior Court Disposition Stands; Supplemental Record Moot; Sealing Continued 1. Introduction This matter consists of numerous consolidated...
Denial of Allocatur Leaves Superior Court Rulings Intact; Ancillary Record Motion Mooted and Sealing Continued

Denial of Allocatur Leaves Superior Court Rulings Intact; Ancillary Record Motion Mooted and Sealing Continued

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Denial of Allocatur Leaves Superior Court Rulings Intact; Ancillary Record Motion Mooted and Sealing Continued Introduction This Supreme Court of Pennsylvania disposition arises from a cluster of...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert