Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Mississippi Case Commentaries

Mootness from Superseding Pleadings and the Low Bar of Mississippi Notice Pleading in Public-Figure Defamation at the Rule 12(b)(6) Stage

Mootness from Superseding Pleadings and the Low Bar of Mississippi Notice Pleading in Public-Figure Defamation at the Rule 12(b)(6) Stage

Date: Apr 25, 2026
Mootness from Superseding Pleadings and the Low Bar of Mississippi Notice Pleading in Public-Figure Defamation at the Rule 12(b)(6) Stage Introduction In Phil Bryant and Deborah Bryant v. Deep South...
Inevitable Discovery During a Lawful Welfare-Check Search Sustains Evidence Despite Alleged Scope Overreach

Inevitable Discovery During a Lawful Welfare-Check Search Sustains Evidence Despite Alleged Scope Overreach

Date: Apr 25, 2026
Inevitable Discovery During a Lawful Welfare-Check Search Sustains Evidence Despite Alleged Scope Overreach Case: Terelle Anterion Johnson a/k/a Terelle Johnson v. State of Mississippi Court: Supreme...
Rule 41(b) Dismissal Must Be Applied Consistently Among Joint Movants Absent a Record-Based Distinction

Rule 41(b) Dismissal Must Be Applied Consistently Among Joint Movants Absent a Record-Based Distinction

Date: Apr 25, 2026
Rule 41(b) Dismissal Must Be Applied Consistently Among Joint Movants Absent a Record-Based Distinction 1. Introduction First Security Bank v. Dasie Mae Richmond, Administratrix of the Estate of...
Directed Exit Instructions Can Create Jury Issues on Visitor Status and “Common Feature” Hazardousness

Directed Exit Instructions Can Create Jury Issues on Visitor Status and “Common Feature” Hazardousness

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Directed Exit Instructions Can Create Jury Issues on Visitor Status and “Common Feature” Hazardousness 1. Introduction Case: Rush Health Systems, Inc. v. Sparrow (Supreme Court of Mississippi, Apr....
Recorded-Plat Prerequisite for Mississippi Code § 17-1-23(4) Consent/Notice in Plat-Alteration Challenges to Municipal Subdivision Approvals

Recorded-Plat Prerequisite for Mississippi Code § 17-1-23(4) Consent/Notice in Plat-Alteration Challenges to Municipal Subdivision Approvals

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Recorded-Plat Prerequisite for Mississippi Code § 17-1-23(4) Consent/Notice in Plat-Alteration Challenges to Municipal Subdivision Approvals I. Introduction Longo v. The City of Waveland (Miss. Apr....
Denison v. Mississippi Organ Recovery Agency, Inc. — Mandatory Rule 12(b)(6)-to-Rule 56 Conversion When Extrinsic Materials Are Relied Upon; Limits on Non–Wrongful-Death Emotional Distress Claims

Denison v. Mississippi Organ Recovery Agency, Inc. — Mandatory Rule 12(b)(6)-to-Rule 56 Conversion When Extrinsic Materials Are Relied Upon; Limits on Non–Wrongful-Death Emotional Distress Claims

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Denison v. Mississippi Organ Recovery Agency, Inc.: Mandatory Conversion of Rule 12(b)(6) Motions When Extrinsic Materials Are Considered; “Wrongful-Death-or-Entex” Path for a Child’s Standalone...
Rule 702 Gatekeeping in Medical Malpractice: Trial Courts May Exclude Experts Whose Affidavits Fail to Demonstrate Specialty Familiarity, Even When Critiquing “Non-Surgical” Alternatives

Rule 702 Gatekeeping in Medical Malpractice: Trial Courts May Exclude Experts Whose Affidavits Fail to Demonstrate Specialty Familiarity, Even When Critiquing “Non-Surgical” Alternatives

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Rule 702 Gatekeeping in Medical Malpractice: Trial Courts May Exclude Experts Whose Affidavits Fail to Demonstrate Specialty Familiarity, Even When Critiquing “Non-Surgical” Alternatives 1....
Known Pothole Nonresponse Is Not a Discretionary-Function Policy Choice Under the MTCA

Known Pothole Nonresponse Is Not a Discretionary-Function Policy Choice Under the MTCA

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Known Pothole Nonresponse Is Not a Discretionary-Function Policy Choice Under the MTCA 1. Introduction City of Jackson, Mississippi v. Lawson (Miss. Apr. 2, 2026) is a Mississippi Tort Claims Act...
Attorney “Sanctions” Treated as Constructive Criminal Contempt: Rule 81(d) Notice and Mandatory Judicial Recusal

Attorney “Sanctions” Treated as Constructive Criminal Contempt: Rule 81(d) Notice and Mandatory Judicial Recusal

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Attorney “Sanctions” Treated as Constructive Criminal Contempt: Rule 81(d) Notice and Mandatory Judicial Recusal 1. Introduction Jones v. Jones (Miss. Apr. 2, 2026) arose from a long-running...
Circumstantial Proof of “Deliberate Design”: Digital Location Data, Threats, and an Extrajudicial Confession Sustain a Mississippi First-Degree Murder Conviction

Circumstantial Proof of “Deliberate Design”: Digital Location Data, Threats, and an Extrajudicial Confession Sustain a Mississippi First-Degree Murder Conviction

Date: Mar 29, 2026
Circumstantial Proof of “Deliberate Design”: Digital Location Data, Threats, and an Extrajudicial Confession Sustain a Mississippi First-Degree Murder Conviction Introduction In Phillip Shane House...
Rescission of First Chancery Court District Local Rule 1: Ending the District-Specific Case-Assignment Regime Effective July 1, 2026

Rescission of First Chancery Court District Local Rule 1: Ending the District-Specific Case-Assignment Regime Effective July 1, 2026

Date: Mar 29, 2026
Rescission of First Chancery Court District Local Rule 1: Ending the District-Specific Case-Assignment Regime Effective July 1, 2026 Court: Supreme Court of Mississippi (en banc) Matter: In Re: Local...
Direct-Benefits Estoppel Requires Legal Dependence on Contract Terms—not Mere “But-For” Treatment—to Compel Arbitration

Direct-Benefits Estoppel Requires Legal Dependence on Contract Terms—not Mere “But-For” Treatment—to Compel Arbitration

Date: Mar 29, 2026
Direct-Benefits Estoppel Requires Legal Dependence on Contract Terms—not Mere “But-For” Treatment—to Compel Arbitration Case: Andrew Mallette, M.D. and The Surgical Clinic Associates, P.A. v. Nitkia...
Mississippi COVID-19 Emergency Immunity Extends to Treatment of COVID-Caused Conditions During the Emergency

Mississippi COVID-19 Emergency Immunity Extends to Treatment of COVID-Caused Conditions During the Emergency

Date: Mar 29, 2026
Mississippi COVID-19 Emergency Immunity Extends to Treatment of COVID-Caused Conditions During the Emergency 1. Introduction In James H. Secrist and Dawn Secrist v. Rush Medical Foundation d/b/a Rush...
Gardner v. State (Miss. 2026): Specific Objection Requirement for Rule 609/Peterson Challenges and Rejection of “Tilt” in Evidence Balancing

Gardner v. State (Miss. 2026): Specific Objection Requirement for Rule 609/Peterson Challenges and Rejection of “Tilt” in Evidence Balancing

Date: Mar 29, 2026
Gardner v. State (Miss. 2026): Specific Objection Requirement for Rule 609/Peterson Challenges and Rejection of “Tilt” in Evidence Balancing I. Introduction In Jimmie Leshaun Gardner a/k/a Jimmie L....
Harmless-Error Exception for Conflicting “Deliberate Design” and Manslaughter Instructions When Manslaughter Is Unwarranted

Harmless-Error Exception for Conflicting “Deliberate Design” and Manslaughter Instructions When Manslaughter Is Unwarranted

Date: Mar 25, 2026
Harmless-Error Exception for Conflicting “Deliberate Design” and Manslaughter Instructions When Manslaughter Is Unwarranted Case: McDaniel v. State of Mississippi | Court: Supreme Court of...
Retroactive Reciprocal Suspension When Attorney Is Inactive and Not Practicing: Mississippi Bar v. Newcomb

Retroactive Reciprocal Suspension When Attorney Is Inactive and Not Practicing: Mississippi Bar v. Newcomb

Date: Mar 25, 2026
Retroactive Reciprocal Suspension When Attorney Is Inactive and Not Practicing Case: The Mississippi Bar v. Andrew M. Newcomb (Miss. 2026-03-19) Court: Supreme Court of Mississippi (en banc)...
Gibson v. State of Mississippi — Excusable-Homicide Instruction Required When Evidence Supports § 97-3-17, Even if Defendant Acted Intentionally

Gibson v. State of Mississippi — Excusable-Homicide Instruction Required When Evidence Supports § 97-3-17, Even if Defendant Acted Intentionally

Date: Mar 25, 2026
Excusable-Homicide Instruction Required When Evidence Supports Mississippi Code § 97-3-17—Intentional Push/Strike Is Not a Per Se Bar Introduction In Gibson v. State of Mississippi (Miss. Mar. 19,...
Hewitt v. TJM Properties, Inc.: No Standing or Construction-Lien Rights from Expired Redevelopment Expectations; Senior Foreclosure Extinguishes Subordinate Claims

Hewitt v. TJM Properties, Inc.: No Standing or Construction-Lien Rights from Expired Redevelopment Expectations; Senior Foreclosure Extinguishes Subordinate Claims

Date: Mar 25, 2026
Hewitt v. TJM Properties, Inc.: No Standing or Construction-Lien Rights from Expired Redevelopment Expectations; Senior Foreclosure Extinguishes Subordinate Claims Introduction Hewitt v. TJM...
Youth-Court Restitution Orders Are Not Final and Require Interlocutory Review Under Mississippi Code § 43-21-651

Youth-Court Restitution Orders Are Not Final and Require Interlocutory Review Under Mississippi Code § 43-21-651

Date: Mar 25, 2026
Youth-Court Restitution Orders Are Not Final and Require Interlocutory Review Under Mississippi Code § 43-21-651 1. Introduction In the Interest of R.H., A Minor (Miss. Mar. 19, 2026) arose from...
Randle v. Ivy: Preprimary Qualification Appeals Under § 23-15-961 Become Moot After Elections and Cannot Yield a Special Election

Randle v. Ivy: Preprimary Qualification Appeals Under § 23-15-961 Become Moot After Elections and Cannot Yield a Special Election

Date: Mar 18, 2026
Randle v. Ivy: Preprimary Qualification Appeals Under § 23-15-961 Become Moot After Elections and Cannot Yield a Special Election Introduction Randle v. Ivy (Miss. Mar. 12, 2026) arises from a...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert