Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Realistic Probability” Actual-Case Requirement for Facially Overbroad State Drug Statutes (and Enforces Oral Pronouncement Control Over Discretionary Supervised-Release Conditions)

Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Realistic Probability” Actual-Case Requirement for Facially Overbroad State Drug Statutes (and Enforces Oral Pronouncement Control Over Discretionary Supervised-Release Conditions)

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Realistic Probability” Actual-Case Requirement for Facially Overbroad State Drug Statutes (and Enforces Oral Pronouncement Control Over Discretionary Supervised-Release...
Post-Alliance Standing Rule: Legal-Services Organizations and Counties Cannot Manufacture Article III Injury by Voluntarily Incurring Costs to Oppose or Adapt to S.B. 4

Post-Alliance Standing Rule: Legal-Services Organizations and Counties Cannot Manufacture Article III Injury by Voluntarily Incurring Costs to Oppose or Adapt to S.B. 4

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Post-Alliance Standing Rule: Legal-Services Organizations and Counties Cannot Manufacture Article III Injury by Voluntarily Incurring Costs to Oppose or Adapt to S.B. 4 Case: United States v. State...
Battieste v. United States: Mississippi’s Seven-Year Medical-Malpractice Time Bar as a Statute of Repose Under the FTCA

Battieste v. United States: Mississippi’s Seven-Year Medical-Malpractice Time Bar as a Statute of Repose Under the FTCA

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Battieste v. United States: Mississippi’s Seven-Year Medical-Malpractice Time Bar as a Statute of Repose Under the FTCA 1. Introduction Battieste v. United States (5th Cir. Apr. 22, 2026) concerns...
Mixed Domestic/Foreign Insurance Policies: Separate-Contract Construction Bars Arbitration for Domestic Insurers Under La. R.S. 22:868, Yet Litigation Must Be Stayed Pending Convention Arbitration

Mixed Domestic/Foreign Insurance Policies: Separate-Contract Construction Bars Arbitration for Domestic Insurers Under La. R.S. 22:868, Yet Litigation Must Be Stayed Pending Convention Arbitration

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Mixed Domestic/Foreign Insurance Policies: Separate-Contract Construction Bars Arbitration for Domestic Insurers Under La. R.S. 22:868, Yet Litigation Must Be Stayed Pending Convention Arbitration 1....
Flemons v. DeJoy: Forfeiture of Rule 4(i) Cure and Affirmance of Rule 4(m)/12(b)(5) Dismissal Where Plaintiff—Later Represented by Counsel—Does Not Seek More Time or Oppose the Motion

Flemons v. DeJoy: Forfeiture of Rule 4(i) Cure and Affirmance of Rule 4(m)/12(b)(5) Dismissal Where Plaintiff—Later Represented by Counsel—Does Not Seek More Time or Oppose the Motion

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Flemons v. DeJoy: Forfeiture of Rule 4(i) Cure and Affirmance of Rule 4(m)/12(b)(5) Dismissal Where Plaintiff—Later Represented by Counsel—Does Not Seek More Time or Oppose the Motion Court: United...
Davis v. Warren — Pro Se § 1983 “Failure-to-Act” Claims Should Be Dismissed Without Prejudice Absent a Clear “Best Case” Showing

Davis v. Warren — Pro Se § 1983 “Failure-to-Act” Claims Should Be Dismissed Without Prejudice Absent a Clear “Best Case” Showing

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Davis v. Warren — Pro Se § 1983 “Failure-to-Act” Claims Should Be Dismissed Without Prejudice Absent a Clear “Best Case” Showing 1. Introduction In Davis v. Warren (5th Cir. Apr. 21, 2026), Daryl L....
Founding-Era “Religious Establishment” Hallmarks Govern Ten Commandments Classroom Displays (Stone v. Graham Treated as Defunct After Lemon’s Abandonment)

Founding-Era “Religious Establishment” Hallmarks Govern Ten Commandments Classroom Displays (Stone v. Graham Treated as Defunct After Lemon’s Abandonment)

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Founding-Era “Religious Establishment” Hallmarks Govern Ten Commandments Classroom Displays (Stone v. Graham Treated as Defunct After Lemon’s Abandonment) Case: Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent...
Carter v. Dupuy: Brief, Minimal Physical Guidance to Remove a Noncompliant Parent from a School Office Is De Minimis Force and Not a Fourth Amendment Violation

Carter v. Dupuy: Brief, Minimal Physical Guidance to Remove a Noncompliant Parent from a School Office Is De Minimis Force and Not a Fourth Amendment Violation

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Carter v. Dupuy: Brief, Minimal Physical Guidance to Remove a Noncompliant Parent from a School Office Is De Minimis Force and Not a Fourth Amendment Violation Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
PSR Disclosure Satisfies Notice for Unread Supervised-Release Conditions; Written Judgment Must Not Add Burdens Beyond Oral Pronouncement

PSR Disclosure Satisfies Notice for Unread Supervised-Release Conditions; Written Judgment Must Not Add Burdens Beyond Oral Pronouncement

Date: Apr 23, 2026
PSR Disclosure Satisfies Notice for Unread Supervised-Release Conditions; Written Judgment Must Not Add Burdens Beyond Oral Pronouncement 1. Introduction United States v. Lezama-Ramirez (5th Cir....
Repackaging an “Overcharge” Theory Does Not Create Article III Standing When Earl v. Boeing Co. Makes Economic Harm Implausible

Repackaging an “Overcharge” Theory Does Not Create Article III Standing When Earl v. Boeing Co. Makes Economic Harm Implausible

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Repackaging an “Overcharge” Theory Does Not Create Article III Standing When Earl v. Boeing Co. Makes Economic Harm Implausible Case: Monahan v. Southwest Airlines Company (5th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026)...
Mississippi Construction Liens: Whether Ambiguous Invoice Attachments Can “Specify” the Statutory “Last Date” Under Miss. Code Ann. § 85-7-405(1)(b)

Mississippi Construction Liens: Whether Ambiguous Invoice Attachments Can “Specify” the Statutory “Last Date” Under Miss. Code Ann. § 85-7-405(1)(b)

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Mississippi Construction Liens: Whether Ambiguous Invoice Attachments Can “Specify” the Statutory “Last Date” Under Miss. Code Ann. § 85-7-405(1)(b) Introduction Cuevas Machine Company v. Calgon...
Certification on Whether an Insured’s Cooperation-Clause Breach Bars a Louisiana Direct Action Under a Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy

Certification on Whether an Insured’s Cooperation-Clause Breach Bars a Louisiana Direct Action Under a Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Certification on Whether an Insured’s Cooperation-Clause Breach Bars a Louisiana Direct Action Under a Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy I. Introduction Hargiss v. Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines...
Section 8(a)(1) Liability for Employer-Requested NLRB Subpoenas Requires Brookwood “Totality of the Circumstances,” Not National Telephone’s Discovery Balancing

Section 8(a)(1) Liability for Employer-Requested NLRB Subpoenas Requires Brookwood “Totality of the Circumstances,” Not National Telephone’s Discovery Balancing

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Section 8(a)(1) Liability for Employer-Requested NLRB Subpoenas Requires Brookwood “Totality of the Circumstances,” Not National Telephone’s Discovery Balancing 1. Introduction In Starbucks...
Sheets v. Scott & White Hospital: Remote Temporal Proximity and Speculative Critiques of an Investigation Do Not Establish Title VII/§ 1981 Retaliation Causation

Sheets v. Scott & White Hospital: Remote Temporal Proximity and Speculative Critiques of an Investigation Do Not Establish Title VII/§ 1981 Retaliation Causation

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Sheets v. Scott & White Hospital: Remote Temporal Proximity and Speculative Critiques of an Investigation Do Not Establish Title VII/§ 1981 Retaliation Causation 1. Introduction In Sheets v. Scott &...
Certified Canine “Alert” (Without a Full “Indication”) Can Supply Probable Cause Under the Totality of the Circumstances

Certified Canine “Alert” (Without a Full “Indication”) Can Supply Probable Cause Under the Totality of the Circumstances

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Certified Canine “Alert” (Without a Full “Indication”) Can Supply Probable Cause Under the Totality of the Circumstances 1. Introduction In United States v. Conchas-Mancilla (5th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026),...
Thomas v. Steiner (5th Cir. Apr. 14, 2026) Commentary

Thomas v. Steiner (5th Cir. Apr. 14, 2026) Commentary

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Unpublished Fifth Circuit Clarifies: Summary-Judgment Proof, Timely Discovery Motions, and Taxable Deposition Costs in Federal EEO Discrimination Litigation I. Introduction In Thomas v. Steiner, the...
Digital Messages and Prior Paid Trips Suffice to Prove § 1324 Conspiracy and “Financial-Gain” Purpose; Unpreserved Constitutional Challenges Fail Under Plain-Error Review

Digital Messages and Prior Paid Trips Suffice to Prove § 1324 Conspiracy and “Financial-Gain” Purpose; Unpreserved Constitutional Challenges Fail Under Plain-Error Review

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Digital Messages and Prior Paid Trips Suffice to Prove § 1324 Conspiracy and “Financial-Gain” Purpose; Unpreserved Constitutional Challenges Fail Under Plain-Error Review I. Introduction In United...
Plain-View Seizures During a Firearms-Warrant Search: Tips + On-Scene Corroboration + Officer Experience Can Make Stolen-Property Incriminating “Immediately Apparent”

Plain-View Seizures During a Firearms-Warrant Search: Tips + On-Scene Corroboration + Officer Experience Can Make Stolen-Property Incriminating “Immediately Apparent”

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Plain-View Seizures During a Firearms-Warrant Search: Tips + On-Scene Corroboration + Officer Experience Can Make Stolen-Property Incriminating “Immediately Apparent” I. Introduction In Alexander v....
Taxing Power Cannot Be Used to Criminalize Taxable Conduct: Fifth Circuit Invalidates Federal Ban on At-Home Distilling

Taxing Power Cannot Be Used to Criminalize Taxable Conduct: Fifth Circuit Invalidates Federal Ban on At-Home Distilling

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Taxing Power Cannot Be Used to Criminalize Taxable Conduct: Fifth Circuit Invalidates Federal Ban on At-Home Distilling Introduction McNutt v. US Dept of Justice (5th Cir. Apr. 10, 2026) addresses a...
Fifth Circuit Reaffirms State Authority to Protect 340B Contract-Pharmacy Distribution: No Preemption, No Extraterritorial Regulation, and “Interfere” Narrowed by Context

Fifth Circuit Reaffirms State Authority to Protect 340B Contract-Pharmacy Distribution: No Preemption, No Extraterritorial Regulation, and “Interfere” Narrowed by Context

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Fifth Circuit Reaffirms State Authority to Protect 340B Contract-Pharmacy Distribution: No Preemption, No Extraterritorial Regulation, and “Interfere” Narrowed by Context Introduction In...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert