Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Connecticut Case Commentaries

State v. Franqui: Corroboration Limits Newsome and Reaffirms Substantive Use of Whelan Statements and Excited Utterances

State v. Franqui: Corroboration Limits Newsome and Reaffirms Substantive Use of Whelan Statements and Excited Utterances

Date: Apr 21, 2026
State v. Franqui: Corroboration Limits Newsome and Reaffirms Substantive Use of Whelan Statements and Excited Utterances I. Introduction In State v. Franqui (Conn. Apr. 21, 2026), the Supreme Court...
Dodge v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (Conn. 2026) — Employer’s § 31-293(a) Lien Reaches Tort Settlements Attributable to Nonoccupational Causation When a Single Occupational Disease Is Fully Compensable

Dodge v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (Conn. 2026) — Employer’s § 31-293(a) Lien Reaches Tort Settlements Attributable to Nonoccupational Causation When a Single Occupational Disease Is Fully Compensable

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Employer’s § 31-293(a) Lien Reaches Tort Settlements Attributable to Nonoccupational Causation When a Single Occupational Disease Is Fully Compensable 1. Introduction Case: Elizabeth M. Dodge,...
State v. Franqui: Familiar-Witness Identifications Do Not Trigger Plain-Error Reversal for Omitted Ledbetter Instructions; No Blanket Mandatory Eyewitness Charge

State v. Franqui: Familiar-Witness Identifications Do Not Trigger Plain-Error Reversal for Omitted Ledbetter Instructions; No Blanket Mandatory Eyewitness Charge

Date: Apr 20, 2026
State v. Franqui: Familiar-Witness Identifications Do Not Trigger Plain-Error Reversal for Omitted Ledbetter Instructions; No Blanket Mandatory Eyewitness Charge 1. Introduction In State v. Franqui...
License-Withdrawal Denials Are Not UAPA-Appealable “Contested Cases” Absent a Statutory Hearing Right (and Declaratory-Ruling Theories Can Be Waived)

License-Withdrawal Denials Are Not UAPA-Appealable “Contested Cases” Absent a Statutory Hearing Right (and Declaratory-Ruling Theories Can Be Waived)

Date: Apr 16, 2026
License-Withdrawal Denials Are Not UAPA-Appealable “Contested Cases” Absent a Statutory Hearing Right (and Declaratory-Ruling Theories Can Be Waived) I. Introduction In Clearview Electric, Inc. v....
Truth as a Complete Defense Under Rule 8.2(a) and Record-Bound Review of Attorney Discipline

Truth as a Complete Defense Under Rule 8.2(a) and Record-Bound Review of Attorney Discipline

Date: Apr 8, 2026
Truth as a Complete Defense Under Rule 8.2(a) and Record-Bound Review of Attorney Discipline 1. Introduction This dissent in Mills v. Statewide Grievance Committee addresses attorney discipline...
Mills v. Statewide Grievance Committee — Objective-Evidence Requirement for Rule 8.2(a) Attacks on Judicial Integrity

Mills v. Statewide Grievance Committee — Objective-Evidence Requirement for Rule 8.2(a) Attacks on Judicial Integrity

Date: Apr 8, 2026
Objective-Evidence Requirement for Rule 8.2(a) Attacks on Judicial Integrity in Filed Motions Case: Mills v. Statewide Grievance Committee (SC 21090) Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut Officially...
No Implied “Record of” Disability Finding from a “Regarded As” Finding in Connecticut Fair-Housing Accommodation Claims

No Implied “Record of” Disability Finding from a “Regarded As” Finding in Connecticut Fair-Housing Accommodation Claims

Date: Mar 29, 2026
No Implied “Record of” Disability Finding from a “Regarded As” Finding in Connecticut Fair-Housing Accommodation Claims 1. Introduction In Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities ex rel....
Recklessness Subsumes General Intent: No Plain Error for Omitting a Stand-Alone General Intent Instruction in § 53a-55 (a) (3) Firearm Manslaughter

Recklessness Subsumes General Intent: No Plain Error for Omitting a Stand-Alone General Intent Instruction in § 53a-55 (a) (3) Firearm Manslaughter

Date: Mar 1, 2026
Recklessness Subsumes General Intent: No Plain Error for Omitting a Stand-Alone General Intent Instruction in § 53a-55 (a) (3) Firearm Manslaughter Introduction In State v. Anthony V. (Conn. Mar. 3,...
Post-Election Application of Newly Adopted Charter Minority-Representation Rules Is a “Ruling of an Election Official” Under §§ 9-328 and 9-371b

Post-Election Application of Newly Adopted Charter Minority-Representation Rules Is a “Ruling of an Election Official” Under §§ 9-328 and 9-371b

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Post-Election Application of Newly Adopted Charter Minority-Representation Rules Is a “Ruling of an Election Official” Under §§ 9-328 and 9-371b I. Introduction Amadasun v. Armstrong, Town Clerk of...
Self-Defense Unanimity: No Requirement to Agree on a Particular § 53a-19 Disqualification

Self-Defense Unanimity: No Requirement to Agree on a Particular § 53a-19 Disqualification

Date: Feb 17, 2026
Self-Defense Unanimity: No Requirement to Agree on a Particular § 53a-19 Disqualification Case: State of Connecticut v. Kiyon Matheney (SC 20987) Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut Officially...
Colon Inapplicable to Habeas Actual Innocence; Insanity Acquittal Under § 53a-13 (a) Does Not Establish Lack of Conspiratorial Intent

Colon Inapplicable to Habeas Actual Innocence; Insanity Acquittal Under § 53a-13 (a) Does Not Establish Lack of Conspiratorial Intent

Date: Feb 15, 2026
Colon Inapplicable to Habeas Actual Innocence; Insanity Acquittal Under § 53a-13 (a) Does Not Establish Lack of Conspiratorial Intent I. Introduction Case: Moon v. Commissioner of Correction (Supreme...
Connecticut “On-Premises Means Paid”: Mandatory Security Screening Time Is Compensable and No De Minimis Exception Applies

Connecticut “On-Premises Means Paid”: Mandatory Security Screening Time Is Compensable and No De Minimis Exception Applies

Date: Feb 8, 2026
Connecticut “On-Premises Means Paid”: Mandatory Security Screening Time Is Compensable and No De Minimis Exception Applies I. Introduction Case: Del Rio v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. Court: Supreme...
State v. Johnson (Dissent): Purcell “Stop-and-Clarify” Requires Narrow, Accurate Clarification; Re-Mirandizing Cannot Cure Misleading Counsel Deflection

State v. Johnson (Dissent): Purcell “Stop-and-Clarify” Requires Narrow, Accurate Clarification; Re-Mirandizing Cannot Cure Misleading Counsel Deflection

Date: Feb 6, 2026
Purcell “Stop-and-Clarify” Requires Narrow, Accurate Clarification; Re-Mirandizing Cannot Cure Misleading Counsel Deflection Introduction In State v. Johnson (dissenting in part, D’Auria, J., joined...
State v. Johnson: Re-administration of Miranda Warnings Can Clarify an Equivocal Request for Counsel Under Purcell (and “Including, But Not Limited To” Does Not Necessarily Make a Carrier-Records Warrant General)

State v. Johnson: Re-administration of Miranda Warnings Can Clarify an Equivocal Request for Counsel Under Purcell (and “Including, But Not Limited To” Does Not Necessarily Make a Carrier-Records Warrant General)

Date: Feb 5, 2026
State v. Johnson: Re-administration of Miranda Warnings Can Clarify an Equivocal Request for Counsel Under Purcell (and “Including, But Not Limited To” Does Not Necessarily Make a Carrier-Records...
Alternative Holdings in Unappealed Judgments Are “Necessary” for Collateral Estoppel (Connecticut)

Alternative Holdings in Unappealed Judgments Are “Necessary” for Collateral Estoppel (Connecticut)

Date: Feb 5, 2026
Alternative Holdings in Unappealed Judgments Are “Necessary” for Collateral Estoppel (Connecticut) 1. Introduction In Torrington Tax Collector, LLC v. Riley (Conn. Feb. 3, 2026), the Supreme Court of...
DeCicco v. Dynata, LLC — Meaningful Adequacy Review of a Foreign Forum Despite Defendant Consent (and the Proper Use of Conditional Dismissal)

DeCicco v. Dynata, LLC — Meaningful Adequacy Review of a Foreign Forum Despite Defendant Consent (and the Proper Use of Conditional Dismissal)

Date: Jan 31, 2026
DeCicco v. Dynata, LLC: Meaningful Adequacy Review of a Foreign Forum Despite Defendant Consent (and the Proper Use of Conditional Dismissal) 1. Introduction Case: DeCicco v. Dynata, LLC (Supreme...
Objective Phone Records Can Establish Strickland Prejudice Without Habeas Testimony from the Impeached Witness

Objective Phone Records Can Establish Strickland Prejudice Without Habeas Testimony from the Impeached Witness

Date: Jan 22, 2026
Objective Phone Records Can Establish Strickland Prejudice Without Habeas Testimony from the Impeached Witness I. Introduction Case: Grant v. Commissioner of Correction (Supreme Court of Connecticut,...
Specific Unanimity Instruction Alone Cures Duplicitous “Multiple-Instances” Counts—Special Interrogatories Not Constitutionally Required

Specific Unanimity Instruction Alone Cures Duplicitous “Multiple-Instances” Counts—Special Interrogatories Not Constitutionally Required

Date: Jan 18, 2026
Specific Unanimity Instruction Alone Cures Duplicitous “Multiple-Instances” Counts—Special Interrogatories Not Constitutionally Required 1. Introduction In State v. Carlos G. (Conn. Jan. 20, 2026),...
State v. Christon M.: Adequate Sixth Amendment Notice When Information Charges § 53a-100aa Generally and Allegations Necessarily Implicate Multiple Subdivisions

State v. Christon M.: Adequate Sixth Amendment Notice When Information Charges § 53a-100aa Generally and Allegations Necessarily Implicate Multiple Subdivisions

Date: Jan 15, 2026
Adequate Sixth Amendment Notice Where an Information Charges Home Invasion Under § 53a-100aa Generally and the Allegations Necessarily Satisfy Multiple Subdivisions Case: State v. Christon M. (SC...
Premature Subrogation Claims Are Ripe Before Judgment: Make Whole Doctrine Creates an Immediately Actionable Priority Injury

Premature Subrogation Claims Are Ripe Before Judgment: Make Whole Doctrine Creates an Immediately Actionable Priority Injury

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Premature Subrogation Claims Are Ripe Before Judgment: Make Whole Doctrine Creates an Immediately Actionable Priority Injury Case: Orlando v. Liburd, 353 Conn. 845 (Conn. Jan. 6, 2026) Court: Supreme...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert