Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Mexico Case Commentaries

Vacated Utility Rates Cannot Be “Trued-Up” Through Later Regulatory Assets Absent a Stay or Interim Rates (No Retroactive Loss Recovery)

Vacated Utility Rates Cannot Be “Trued-Up” Through Later Regulatory Assets Absent a Stay or Interim Rates (No Retroactive Loss Recovery)

Date: Apr 27, 2026
Vacated Utility Rates Cannot Be “Trued-Up” Through Later Regulatory Assets Absent a Stay or Interim Rates (No Retroactive Loss Recovery) Case: El Paso Elec. Co. v. N.M. Pub. Regul. Comm'n (Supreme...
State v. Neal: General-Verdict Kidnapping Elevated by a “Sexual Offense” Requires Vacatur of the Lone Sexual-Offense Conviction; Appellate Courts Must Compare Each Lesser Conviction to the Longest-Sentence Offense

State v. Neal: General-Verdict Kidnapping Elevated by a “Sexual Offense” Requires Vacatur of the Lone Sexual-Offense Conviction; Appellate Courts Must Compare Each Lesser Conviction to the Longest-Sentence Offense

Date: Apr 8, 2026
State v. Neal: General-Verdict Kidnapping Elevated by a “Sexual Offense” Requires Vacatur of the Lone Sexual-Offense Conviction; Appellate Courts Must Compare Each Lesser Conviction to the...
State v. Ward: Involuntary Manslaughter Requires Recklessness (Not “Criminal Negligence”)

State v. Ward: Involuntary Manslaughter Requires Recklessness (Not “Criminal Negligence”)

Date: Mar 19, 2026
State v. Ward: Involuntary Manslaughter Requires Recklessness (Not “Criminal Negligence”) and UJI 14-231 Must Remove “Should Have Known” 1. Introduction In State v. Ward (N.M. Sup. Ct. Mar. 16,...
Serious Youthful Offender First-Degree Murder: Five-Year Parole Applies Even When the Life Sentence Is Mitigated

Serious Youthful Offender First-Degree Murder: Five-Year Parole Applies Even When the Life Sentence Is Mitigated

Date: Feb 25, 2026
Serious Youthful Offender First-Degree Murder: Five-Year Parole Applies Even When the Life Sentence Is Mitigated I. Introduction State v. Benavidez (Supreme Court of New Mexico, Feb. 23, 2026) arises...
Reaffirming Herron: “Sufficient Indicia of Distinctness,” Not an “Incidental Acts” Test, Governs Multiple CSP Punishments Under Section 30-9-11

Reaffirming Herron: “Sufficient Indicia of Distinctness,” Not an “Incidental Acts” Test, Governs Multiple CSP Punishments Under Section 30-9-11

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Reaffirming Herron: “Sufficient Indicia of Distinctness,” Not an “Incidental Acts” Test, Governs Multiple CSP Punishments Under Section 30-9-11 Introduction In State v. Urquidi-Martinez (N.M. Feb....
State v. Aguilar: Unstricken Unsolicited Testimony Becomes Fair Game in Closing, and “Sosa” Constrains Reversal for Misquoted Evidence

State v. Aguilar: Unstricken Unsolicited Testimony Becomes Fair Game in Closing, and “Sosa” Constrains Reversal for Misquoted Evidence

Date: Feb 17, 2026
State v. Aguilar: Unstricken Unsolicited Testimony Becomes Fair Game in Closing, and “Sosa” Constrains Reversal for Misquoted Evidence Court: Supreme Court of New Mexico Date: February 16, 2026...
State v. Valencia: Trial Courts Must Not Weigh “Sobriety” Evidence When Deciding Whether to Give a Voluntary-Intoxication Instruction; “Slight Evidence” Standard Disavowed

State v. Valencia: Trial Courts Must Not Weigh “Sobriety” Evidence When Deciding Whether to Give a Voluntary-Intoxication Instruction; “Slight Evidence” Standard Disavowed

Date: Feb 17, 2026
State v. Valencia: Trial Courts Must Not Weigh “Sobriety” Evidence When Deciding Whether to Give a Voluntary-Intoxication Instruction; “Slight Evidence” Standard Disavowed Court: Supreme Court of New...
State v. Skeets: Section 39-3-3(B)(1) Allows State Appeals Only From Final (or Practically Final) Dismissals—No Jurisdiction to Appeal a No-Probable-Cause Discharge When Refiling Is Available

State v. Skeets: Section 39-3-3(B)(1) Allows State Appeals Only From Final (or Practically Final) Dismissals—No Jurisdiction to Appeal a No-Probable-Cause Discharge When Refiling Is Available

Date: Feb 15, 2026
State v. Skeets: Section 39-3-3(B)(1) Allows State Appeals Only From Final (or Practically Final) Dismissals—No Jurisdiction to Appeal a No-Probable-Cause Discharge When Refiling Is Available...
State v. Valdez: No Heightened Rule 11-403 Balancing for Combined Rule 11-404(B) and Rule 11-804(B)(5) Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Evidence; Breakdown-in-Communication Substitution Claims Require Prejudice

State v. Valdez: No Heightened Rule 11-403 Balancing for Combined Rule 11-404(B) and Rule 11-804(B)(5) Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Evidence; Breakdown-in-Communication Substitution Claims Require Prejudice

Date: Feb 7, 2026
State v. Valdez: No Heightened Rule 11-403 Balancing for Combined Rule 11-404(B) and Rule 11-804(B)(5) Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Evidence; Breakdown-in-Communication Substitution Claims Require...
Butterworth v. Jackson — New Mexico Abolishes the Tort of Alienation of Affections and Bars “Repackaging” as Prima Facie Tort

Butterworth v. Jackson — New Mexico Abolishes the Tort of Alienation of Affections and Bars “Repackaging” as Prima Facie Tort

Date: Jan 28, 2026
Butterworth v. Jackson: New Mexico Abolishes Alienation of Affections (and Rejects Prima Facie Tort as a Substitute) I. Introduction In Butterworth v. Jackson (N.M. Jan. 26, 2026), the Supreme Court...
Enforcing Scheduling Orders by Striking Untimely, Contradictory Expert Affidavits Is Docket Management, Not a Dismissal Sanction

Enforcing Scheduling Orders by Striking Untimely, Contradictory Expert Affidavits Is Docket Management, Not a Dismissal Sanction

Date: Jan 24, 2026
Enforcing Scheduling Orders by Striking Untimely, Contradictory Expert Affidavits Is Docket Management, Not a Dismissal Sanction I. Introduction In Burns v. Presbyterian Healthcare Servs. (N.M. Jan....
Section 29-1-18 Body-Camera “Bad Faith” Presumption Is Civil-Only; Criminal Sanctions for Unrecorded Interviews Turn on Materiality Under Ware

Section 29-1-18 Body-Camera “Bad Faith” Presumption Is Civil-Only; Criminal Sanctions for Unrecorded Interviews Turn on Materiality Under Ware

Date: Jan 24, 2026
Section 29-1-18 Body-Camera “Bad Faith” Presumption Is Civil-Only; Criminal Sanctions for Unrecorded Interviews Turn on Materiality Under Ware I. Introduction In State v. Hubbard (No. S-1-SC-40649,...
Imperfect Self‑Defense as Mitigation Only: State v. Kindred and New Mexico’s Treatment of Rap Lyrics, Social Media, and Voir Dire

Imperfect Self‑Defense as Mitigation Only: State v. Kindred and New Mexico’s Treatment of Rap Lyrics, Social Media, and Voir Dire

Date: Dec 5, 2025
Imperfect Self‑Defense as Mitigation Only: State v. Kindred and New Mexico’s Treatment of Rap Lyrics, Social Media, and Voir Dire Introduction The Supreme Court of New Mexico’s nonprecedential...
Deliberate Intent in Split-Second Killings and Limits on Prosecutorial Misconduct: Commentary on State v. Gallegos (N.M. 2025)

Deliberate Intent in Split-Second Killings and Limits on Prosecutorial Misconduct: Commentary on State v. Gallegos (N.M. 2025)

Date: Dec 5, 2025
Deliberate Intent in Split-Second Killings and Limits on Prosecutorial Misconduct: Commentary on State v. Gallegos (N.M. 2025) I. Introduction The Supreme Court of New Mexico’s nonprecedential...
State v. Munford: Police Exploitation as a Prerequisite to Intoxication-Based Involuntariness Claims and the Treatment of Tampering with Evidence Tied to Multiple Felonies

State v. Munford: Police Exploitation as a Prerequisite to Intoxication-Based Involuntariness Claims and the Treatment of Tampering with Evidence Tied to Multiple Felonies

Date: Nov 21, 2025
State v. Munford: Police Exploitation as a Prerequisite to Intoxication-Based Involuntariness Claims and the Treatment of Tampering with Evidence Tied to Multiple Felonies I. Introduction In State v....
Reaffirming Strict Standards for Fundamental and Harmless Error in New Mexico: Commentary on State v. Hayhurst

Reaffirming Strict Standards for Fundamental and Harmless Error in New Mexico: Commentary on State v. Hayhurst

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Reaffirming Strict Standards for Fundamental and Harmless Error in New Mexico: Commentary on State v. Hayhurst I. Introduction The New Mexico Supreme Court’s unpublished decision in State v....
Reaffirming Strict Limits on Self-Defense and Castle Doctrine in Domestic Homicides: Commentary on State v. Ricoy

Reaffirming Strict Limits on Self-Defense and Castle Doctrine in Domestic Homicides: Commentary on State v. Ricoy

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Reaffirming Strict Limits on Self-Defense and Castle Doctrine in Domestic Homicides: Commentary on State v. Ricoy Case: State v. Ezequiel Profeta Ricoy, No. S-1-SC-40471, Supreme Court of New Mexico...
Attempted Armed Robbery Needs No Express Demand; Deliberate-Intent Murder May Be Proven by Circumstantial Timeline and Post-Offense Conduct: Commentary on State v. Sanders (N.M. 2025)

Attempted Armed Robbery Needs No Express Demand; Deliberate-Intent Murder May Be Proven by Circumstantial Timeline and Post-Offense Conduct: Commentary on State v. Sanders (N.M. 2025)

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Attempted Armed Robbery Needs No Express Demand; Deliberate-Intent Murder May Be Proven by Circumstantial Timeline and Post-Offense Conduct: Commentary on State v. Sanders (N.M. 2025) Note on...
State v. Chavez: Reaffirming that Pre‑arming, a Prolonged Multi‑Stab Attack, and Post‑Crime Evasion Support Deliberate Intent; Self‑Defense Instruction Requires Subjective Fear of Death or Great Bodily Harm

State v. Chavez: Reaffirming that Pre‑arming, a Prolonged Multi‑Stab Attack, and Post‑Crime Evasion Support Deliberate Intent; Self‑Defense Instruction Requires Subjective Fear of Death or Great Bodily Harm

Date: Oct 9, 2025
State v. Chavez: Reaffirming that Pre‑arming, a Prolonged Multi‑Stab Attack, and Post‑Crime Evasion Support Deliberate Intent; Self‑Defense Instruction Requires Subjective Fear of Death or Great...
Reaffirming the NMPRC’s Discretion: Partial Imprudence Disallowances, Recovery of Undepreciated Nuclear Lease Investments, Deferral of Decommissioning Allocations, and Ratepayer Recovery of Board Governance Costs

Reaffirming the NMPRC’s Discretion: Partial Imprudence Disallowances, Recovery of Undepreciated Nuclear Lease Investments, Deferral of Decommissioning Allocations, and Ratepayer Recovery of Board Governance Costs

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Reaffirming the NMPRC’s Discretion: Partial Imprudence Disallowances, Recovery of Undepreciated Nuclear Lease Investments, Deferral of Decommissioning Allocations, and Ratepayer Recovery of Board...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert