Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Idaho Case Commentaries

When a Tax Statute’s Applicability Date Controls Over Its Emergency-Clause Effective Date: Idaho’s Corporate Rate Cut Applies to Any “Taxable Year Commencing on and After January 1, 2001”

When a Tax Statute’s Applicability Date Controls Over Its Emergency-Clause Effective Date: Idaho’s Corporate Rate Cut Applies to Any “Taxable Year Commencing on and After January 1, 2001”

Date: Apr 24, 2026
When a Tax Statute’s Applicability Date Controls Over Its Emergency-Clause Effective Date: Idaho’s Corporate Rate Cut Applies to Any “Taxable Year Commencing on and after January 1, 2001” Case: WAFD,...
Juvenile Corrections Act “Accountability” Permits Detention and Other Dispositions Beyond Restitution/Service

Juvenile Corrections Act “Accountability” Permits Detention and Other Dispositions Beyond Restitution/Service

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Juvenile Corrections Act “Accountability” Permits Detention and Other Dispositions Beyond Restitution/Service I. Introduction State v. Jane Doe (2024-29) is an Idaho Supreme Court decision affirming...
State v. Perez Garcia: Immigration Status May Be Considered for Probation Only as It Bears on Ability to Comply with Probation’s Law-Abiding Conditions

State v. Perez Garcia: Immigration Status May Be Considered for Probation Only as It Bears on Ability to Comply with Probation’s Law-Abiding Conditions

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Immigration Status and Probation in Idaho: Status Alone Is Not Disqualifying, but May Be Weighed When It Shows Inability to Comply with “Obey All Laws” Conditions Case: State v. Perez Garcia (Idaho...
State v. Lutz: Criminal Defendants May Initiate Nonsummary Contempt Under I.C.R. 42, but Contempt Requires Probable Cause of Conduct Within I.C. § 7-601 (Typically a Violated Court Order)

State v. Lutz: Criminal Defendants May Initiate Nonsummary Contempt Under I.C.R. 42, but Contempt Requires Probable Cause of Conduct Within I.C. § 7-601 (Typically a Violated Court Order)

Date: Apr 8, 2026
State v. Lutz: Criminal Defendants May Initiate Nonsummary Contempt Under I.C.R. 42, but Contempt Requires Probable Cause of Conduct Within I.C. § 7-601 (Typically a Violated Court Order) I....
Uncertain Severance Timing and Inadmissible “Rights-by-Reputation” Proof Bar Summary Judgment for Implied Easements by Prior Use

Uncertain Severance Timing and Inadmissible “Rights-by-Reputation” Proof Bar Summary Judgment for Implied Easements by Prior Use

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Uncertain Severance Timing and Inadmissible “Rights-by-Reputation” Proof Bar Summary Judgment for Implied Easements by Prior Use I. Introduction In Crystal Homestead Estates, LLC v. That Piece of...
State v. Campbell: Idaho Clarifies Inevitable Discovery Does Not Per Se Require a Separate “Parallel” Investigation

State v. Campbell: Idaho Clarifies Inevitable Discovery Does Not Per Se Require a Separate “Parallel” Investigation

Date: Mar 28, 2026
State v. Campbell: Idaho Clarifies Inevitable Discovery Does Not Per Se Require a Separate “Parallel” Investigation Court: Supreme Court of Idaho Date: March 26, 2026 (Substitute Opinion withdrawing...
Best v. State: Mandatory 20-Day Notice for Sua Sponte Post-Conviction Dismissals on Unargued Grounds; Lack-of-Notice Claim Preservable First Time on Appeal

Best v. State: Mandatory 20-Day Notice for Sua Sponte Post-Conviction Dismissals on Unargued Grounds; Lack-of-Notice Claim Preservable First Time on Appeal

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Best v. State (Idaho 2026): Mandatory 20-Day Notice When a Court Sua Sponte Dismisses Post-Conviction Claims on Unargued Grounds; Lack-of-Notice Challenge May Be Raised First Time on Appeal 1....
Miller v. Miller: Idaho Confirms Divorce Arbitrability Under the UAA Despite “Exclusive Original Jurisdiction”

Miller v. Miller: Idaho Confirms Divorce Arbitrability Under the UAA Despite “Exclusive Original Jurisdiction”

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Miller v. Miller: Idaho Confirms Divorce Arbitrability Under the UAA Despite “Exclusive Original Jurisdiction” I. Introduction Miller v. Miller (Idaho Sup. Ct. Mar. 24, 2026) squarely addresses...
Monson v. Monson — TEDRA Authorizes Standalone Civil Actions Parallel to Probate and Requires Joinder of Adverse Claimants to Estate-Related Property Interests

Monson v. Monson — TEDRA Authorizes Standalone Civil Actions Parallel to Probate and Requires Joinder of Adverse Claimants to Estate-Related Property Interests

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Monson v. Monson — TEDRA Authorizes Standalone Civil Actions Parallel to Probate and Requires Joinder of Adverse Claimants to Estate-Related Property Interests Court: Supreme Court of Idaho Date:...
Abdullah v. State — No “Actual Innocence” Gateway to Idaho Code § 19-2719’s 42-Day Capital Post-Conviction Deadline

Abdullah v. State — No “Actual Innocence” Gateway to Idaho Code § 19-2719’s 42-Day Capital Post-Conviction Deadline

Date: Mar 3, 2026
No “Actual Innocence” Gateway to Idaho Code § 19-2719’s 42-Day Capital Post-Conviction Deadline Case: Abdullah v. State (Idaho Supreme Court) Date: March 2, 2026 Posture: Appeal from summary...
Unopposed Summary Judgment Still Requires Rule 56(a) Findings; Rule 11 Sanctions Cannot Rest Solely on Hearsay

Unopposed Summary Judgment Still Requires Rule 56(a) Findings; Rule 11 Sanctions Cannot Rest Solely on Hearsay

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Unopposed Summary Judgment Still Requires Rule 56(a) Findings; Rule 11 Sanctions Cannot Rest Solely on Hearsay Case: Johnson v. SRM-Double L, LLC Court: Supreme Court of Idaho Date: March 2, 2026...
Johnson v. Beadz Brothers Farms: Counsel Declarations Are Insufficient to Admit Business Records on Summary Judgment; Rule 56(d) Requires Specific, Diligent Grounds for Discovery Continuances

Johnson v. Beadz Brothers Farms: Counsel Declarations Are Insufficient to Admit Business Records on Summary Judgment; Rule 56(d) Requires Specific, Diligent Grounds for Discovery Continuances

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Johnson v. Beadz Brothers Farms: Counsel Declarations Are Insufficient to Admit Business Records on Summary Judgment; Rule 56(d) Requires Specific, Diligent Grounds for Discovery Continuances I....
Idaho Administrative Water Appeals: Jurisdiction Requires a Timely Petition Targeting the Operative (Superseding) Final Order

Idaho Administrative Water Appeals: Jurisdiction Requires a Timely Petition Targeting the Operative (Superseding) Final Order

Date: Mar 3, 2026
Idaho Administrative Water Appeals: Jurisdiction Requires a Timely Petition Targeting the Operative (Superseding) Final Order I. Introduction City of Idaho Falls v. Idaho Department of Water...
Employment Alone Does Not Create a Special-Relationship Duty to Protect; Verbal Mediation Does Not Assume a Duty Against Third-Party Criminal Violence (Spears v. Antelope Mountain Resort, LLC)

Employment Alone Does Not Create a Special-Relationship Duty to Protect; Verbal Mediation Does Not Assume a Duty Against Third-Party Criminal Violence (Spears v. Antelope Mountain Resort, LLC)

Date: Mar 1, 2026
Employment Alone Does Not Create a Special-Relationship Duty to Protect; Verbal Mediation Does Not Assume a Duty Against Third-Party Criminal Violence (Spears v. Antelope Mountain Resort, LLC) Court:...
Jurisdiction Requires Appealing the Operative (Superseding) IDWR Methodology Order Within 28 Days

Jurisdiction Requires Appealing the Operative (Superseding) IDWR Methodology Order Within 28 Days

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Jurisdiction Requires Appealing the Operative (Superseding) IDWR Methodology Order Within 28 Days I. Introduction City of Idaho Falls v. Idaho Department of Water Resources (Idaho Sup. Ct. Feb. 25,...
Hyde v. Oxarango: Standing Limits Limited-Partner Litigation—Particularized Demand Futility and Distinct Injury Required

Hyde v. Oxarango: Standing Limits Limited-Partner Litigation—Particularized Demand Futility and Distinct Injury Required

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Hyde v. Oxarango: Standing Limits Limited-Partner Litigation—Particularized Demand Futility and Distinct Injury Required Introduction Hyde v. Oxarango (Idaho Supreme Court, Feb. 20, 2026) arises from...
Bedell v. Parsons: A Deed Name Creates Only a Rebuttable Presumption—Co-Tenants May Prove 0% Ownership and Intent Disputes Bar Summary Judgment in Partition

Bedell v. Parsons: A Deed Name Creates Only a Rebuttable Presumption—Co-Tenants May Prove 0% Ownership and Intent Disputes Bar Summary Judgment in Partition

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Bedell v. Parsons: A Deed Name Creates Only a Rebuttable Presumption—Co-Tenants May Prove 0% Ownership and Intent Disputes Bar Summary Judgment in Partition I. Introduction Case: Bedell v. Parsons...
On Remand for Resentencing, a New Magistrate Is Not Bound by a Prior Judge’s Off-the-Record Sentencing Assurance Absent an Explicit Remand Directive

On Remand for Resentencing, a New Magistrate Is Not Bound by a Prior Judge’s Off-the-Record Sentencing Assurance Absent an Explicit Remand Directive

Date: Feb 17, 2026
On Remand for Resentencing, a New Magistrate Is Not Bound by a Prior Judge’s Off-the-Record Sentencing Assurance Absent an Explicit Remand Directive I. Introduction State v. Salazar-Cabrera (Idaho...
Exceptional-Circumstances Exception to Issue Preservation in CID Bond Challenges (and Key CID Act Interpretations)

Exceptional-Circumstances Exception to Issue Preservation in CID Bond Challenges (and Key CID Act Interpretations)

Date: Feb 15, 2026
Exceptional-Circumstances Exception to Issue Preservation in CID Bond Challenges (and Key CID Act Interpretations) Introduction Doyle v. The Harris Ranch Community Infrastructure District No. 1...
Discovery Defiance as Constructive Waiver: Default Sanctions, Record Limits, and Appellate Waiver in Idaho

Discovery Defiance as Constructive Waiver: Default Sanctions, Record Limits, and Appellate Waiver in Idaho

Date: Feb 13, 2026
Discovery Defiance as Constructive Waiver: Default Sanctions, Record Limits, and Appellate Waiver in Idaho I. Introduction St. Luke's Health System, LTD v. Rodriguez (Idaho Supreme Court, Feb. 10,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert