Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Idaho Case Commentaries

Khalsa v. Ridnour: Arbitration Finality, Implied Contractual Compliance-with-Law Terms, and Fee-Shifting for Merit-Based Vacatur Appeals

Khalsa v. Ridnour: Arbitration Finality, Implied Contractual Compliance-with-Law Terms, and Fee-Shifting for Merit-Based Vacatur Appeals

Date: Feb 11, 2026
Khalsa v. Ridnour: Arbitration Finality, Implied Compliance-with-Law Terms, and Attorney Fees for Appeals that Repackage Merits Challenges as “Exceeded Powers” I. Introduction Khalsa v. Ridnour...
Specific Performance Is a Remedy, Not a Stand-Alone Cause of Action; Breach Must Be Established Before Summary Judgment Grants Specific Performance

Specific Performance Is a Remedy, Not a Stand-Alone Cause of Action; Breach Must Be Established Before Summary Judgment Grants Specific Performance

Date: Feb 10, 2026
Specific Performance Is a Remedy, Not a Stand-Alone Cause of Action; Breach Must Be Established Before Summary Judgment Grants Specific Performance I. Introduction In Cave Bay Community Services,...
Comparative Negligence and Pre-Injury “Mitigation” Cannot Reduce Damages for Constructive Fraud, Fiduciary Breach, or Unjust Enrichment

Comparative Negligence and Pre-Injury “Mitigation” Cannot Reduce Damages for Constructive Fraud, Fiduciary Breach, or Unjust Enrichment

Date: Feb 8, 2026
Comparative Negligence and Pre-Injury “Mitigation” Cannot Reduce Damages for Constructive Fraud, Fiduciary Breach, or Unjust Enrichment I. Introduction Camp Magical Moments, Cancer Camp for Kids,...
Article IX, Section 1 Sets a Floor, Not a Ceiling: Idaho Upholds the Parental Choice Tax Credit and Applies Pragmatic Relaxed Standing

Article IX, Section 1 Sets a Floor, Not a Ceiling: Idaho Upholds the Parental Choice Tax Credit and Applies Pragmatic Relaxed Standing

Date: Feb 7, 2026
Article IX, Section 1 Sets a Floor, Not a Ceiling: Idaho Upholds the Parental Choice Tax Credit and Applies Pragmatic Relaxed Standing Case: Committee to Protect and Preserve v. State (Supreme Court...
State v. Borek: Rule 503 Requires Proof of Treatment-Directed “Confidential Communications”; PMP and Pharmacy Dispensing Records Not Privileged

State v. Borek: Rule 503 Requires Proof of Treatment-Directed “Confidential Communications”; PMP and Pharmacy Dispensing Records Not Privileged

Date: Feb 5, 2026
State v. Borek: Rule 503 Requires Proof of Treatment-Directed “Confidential Communications”; PMP and Pharmacy Dispensing Records Not Privileged Introduction In State v. Borek (Idaho Feb. 4, 2026),...
State v. Smith: Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Cellphone Seizure (with Probable Cause) to Prevent Imminent Destruction of Digital Evidence Pending a Prompt Search Warrant

State v. Smith: Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Cellphone Seizure (with Probable Cause) to Prevent Imminent Destruction of Digital Evidence Pending a Prompt Search Warrant

Date: Feb 5, 2026
State v. Smith: Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Cellphone Seizure (with Probable Cause) to Prevent Imminent Destruction of Digital Evidence Pending a Prompt Search Warrant 1. Introduction In...
Continuing Jurisdiction to Enforce Custody Orders Despite IRFLP 816 Noncompliance; Mandamus Barred by Available Appeal

Continuing Jurisdiction to Enforce Custody Orders Despite IRFLP 816 Noncompliance; Mandamus Barred by Available Appeal

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Continuing Jurisdiction to Enforce Custody Orders Despite IRFLP 816 Noncompliance; Mandamus Barred by Available Appeal Case: Baiz v. Magistrate Division Court: Supreme Court of Idaho Date: February...
State v. Barritt: Controlled-Environment Drug-Dog Certification Suffices for Probable Cause Despite Low Field “Hit Rate”

State v. Barritt: Controlled-Environment Drug-Dog Certification Suffices for Probable Cause Despite Low Field “Hit Rate”

Date: Feb 1, 2026
State v. Barritt: Controlled-Environment Drug-Dog Certification Suffices for Probable Cause Despite Low Field “Hit Rate” 1. Introduction In State v. Barritt (Idaho Jan. 29, 2026), the Idaho Supreme...
Post-Judgment Fee Orders: Untimely Reconsideration Does Not Toll the Appeal Deadline, and a Later “Fee Judgment” Is Not a New Final Judgment

Post-Judgment Fee Orders: Untimely Reconsideration Does Not Toll the Appeal Deadline, and a Later “Fee Judgment” Is Not a New Final Judgment

Date: Jan 24, 2026
Post-Judgment Fee Orders: Untimely Reconsideration Does Not Toll the Appeal Deadline, and a Later “Fee Judgment” Is Not a New Final Judgment 1. Introduction In Medical Recovery Services, LLC v. Wood...
Idaho Reaffirms the Common-Law Ban on Unreasonable Restraints on Alienation and Adopts the Restatement (Third) Utility-vs-Harm Test

Idaho Reaffirms the Common-Law Ban on Unreasonable Restraints on Alienation and Adopts the Restatement (Third) Utility-vs-Harm Test

Date: Jan 23, 2026
Idaho Reaffirms the Common-Law Ban on Unreasonable Restraints on Alienation and Adopts the Restatement (Third) Utility-vs-Harm Test Case: Smallwood v. Little (Idaho Supreme Court, Jan. 22, 2026) |...
Rule 54 Attorney-Fee Waiver: A Timely Memorandum Must Cite and Analyze the Fee Statute; a Complaint Reference or Later Supplement Cannot Cure

Rule 54 Attorney-Fee Waiver: A Timely Memorandum Must Cite and Analyze the Fee Statute; a Complaint Reference or Later Supplement Cannot Cure

Date: Jan 21, 2026
Rule 54 Attorney-Fee Waiver: A Timely Memorandum Must Cite and Analyze the Fee Statute; a Complaint Reference or Later Supplement Cannot Cure I. Introduction In York v. Kemper Northwest, Inc. (Idaho...
Crookham v. County of Canyon: LLUPA “Affected Person” Standing Displaces Idaho’s Self-Imposed Lujan-Style Standing Test

Crookham v. County of Canyon: LLUPA “Affected Person” Standing Displaces Idaho’s Self-Imposed Lujan-Style Standing Test

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Crookham v. County of Canyon: LLUPA “Affected Person” Standing Displaces Idaho’s Self-Imposed Lujan-Style Standing Test 1. Introduction In Crookham v. County of Canyon (Idaho Jan. 16, 2026), the...
Vacatur of Custody Orders Eliminates Any Controlling Custody Schedule; Remand Requires New Temporary Orders and a Complete Best-Interests Analysis (Raber v. Raber)

Vacatur of Custody Orders Eliminates Any Controlling Custody Schedule; Remand Requires New Temporary Orders and a Complete Best-Interests Analysis (Raber v. Raber)

Date: Jan 16, 2026
Vacatur of Custody Orders Eliminates Any Controlling Custody Schedule; Remand Requires New Temporary Orders and a Complete Best-Interests Analysis Case: Raber v. Raber (Supreme Court of Idaho, Jan....
Adverse Medical-Debt Credit Reporting Is Commercial Speech; Idaho Patient Act Preconditions to “Extraordinary Collection Actions” Survive First and Fourteenth Amendment Facial Challenges

Adverse Medical-Debt Credit Reporting Is Commercial Speech; Idaho Patient Act Preconditions to “Extraordinary Collection Actions” Survive First and Fourteenth Amendment Facial Challenges

Date: Jan 11, 2026
Adverse Medical-Debt Credit Reporting Is Commercial Speech; Idaho Patient Act Preconditions to “Extraordinary Collection Actions” Survive First and Fourteenth Amendment Facial Challenges Introduction...
State v. Frandsen: Text Exhibits Must Be Redacted for Unnoticed 404(b) “Other Acts” Even When Admitted for a Non-Hearsay Purpose; Prior Acquaintance Alone Does Not Establish Juror Bias

State v. Frandsen: Text Exhibits Must Be Redacted for Unnoticed 404(b) “Other Acts” Even When Admitted for a Non-Hearsay Purpose; Prior Acquaintance Alone Does Not Establish Juror Bias

Date: Jan 9, 2026
State v. Frandsen: Text Exhibits Must Be Redacted for Unnoticed 404(b) “Other Acts” Even When Admitted for a Non-Hearsay Purpose; Prior Acquaintance Alone Does Not Establish Juror Bias Court: Supreme...
Idaho Code § 55-3211 Makes HOA Short-Term Rental Bans Property-Based Unless the Affected Owner Expressly Consents in Writing

Idaho Code § 55-3211 Makes HOA Short-Term Rental Bans Property-Based Unless the Affected Owner Expressly Consents in Writing

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Idaho Code § 55-3211 Makes HOA Short-Term Rental Bans Property-Based Unless the Affected Owner Expressly Consents in Writing Introduction North Henry's Lake Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Bryan...
Stasiewicz v. South Henry’s Lake Outlet HOA / Henry’s Lake Village: Limits on Sua Sponte Res Judicata and “Mootness” Dismissals Under I.R.C.P. 12(b)(1)

Stasiewicz v. South Henry’s Lake Outlet HOA / Henry’s Lake Village: Limits on Sua Sponte Res Judicata and “Mootness” Dismissals Under I.R.C.P. 12(b)(1)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
New Idaho Rule: Courts May Not Raise Res Judicata Sua Sponte, and Rule 12(b)(1) “Mootness” Dismissals Cannot Decide Intertwined Merits—Especially Where a Restrictive Easement Leaves Effectual Relief...
Compensable Consequences in Idaho: Recurrent Injury Remains Compensable Absent Proof of Rash or Deliberate Disregard

Compensable Consequences in Idaho: Recurrent Injury Remains Compensable Absent Proof of Rash or Deliberate Disregard

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Compensable Consequences in Idaho: Recurrent Injury Remains Compensable Absent Proof of Rash or Deliberate Disregard Introduction Miklos v. L&W Supply Corporation (Idaho Supreme Court, Jan. 6, 2026)...
TEDRA Grants District Courts Broad Subject-Matter Jurisdiction to Decide Declaratory Rights in Estate Assets Despite Ongoing Probate

TEDRA Grants District Courts Broad Subject-Matter Jurisdiction to Decide Declaratory Rights in Estate Assets Despite Ongoing Probate

Date: Jan 7, 2026
TEDRA Grants District Courts Broad Subject-Matter Jurisdiction to Decide Declaratory Rights in Estate Assets Despite Ongoing Probate Introduction Nelson v. Wylie (Idaho Supreme Court, January 6,...
Jurisdiction Requires a Timely Petition Identifying the Operative Agency Order (Superseding Methodology Orders Must Be Appealed)

Jurisdiction Requires a Timely Petition Identifying the Operative Agency Order (Superseding Methodology Orders Must Be Appealed)

Date: Jan 3, 2026
Jurisdiction Requires a Timely Petition Identifying the Operative Agency Order (Superseding Methodology Orders Must Be Appealed) Case: City of Idaho Falls v. IDWR Court: Supreme Court of Idaho Date:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert