Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wyoming Case Commentaries

Three-Year Suspension for Knowing Client Neglect and Failure to Comply with Disciplinary Probation

Three-Year Suspension for Knowing Client Neglect and Failure to Comply with Disciplinary Probation

Date: Apr 30, 2026
Three-Year Suspension for Knowing Client Neglect and Failure to Comply with Disciplinary Probation Introduction In Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Vaughn H. Neubauer, 2026...
Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification

Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Timely Permanency as the Decisive “Best Interests” Measure When Incarceration Delays Reunification 1. Introduction In the Interest Of: AG, minor child concerns whether a juvenile court may change a...
Wyoming Governmental Claims Act: Courts Must Cap Judgments at the Statutory Waiver Limit Absent Proven Excess Insurance, and County Hospitals Do Not Forfeit the Cap by Operating Statewide Commercially

Wyoming Governmental Claims Act: Courts Must Cap Judgments at the Statutory Waiver Limit Absent Proven Excess Insurance, and County Hospitals Do Not Forfeit the Cap by Operating Statewide Commercially

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Wyoming Governmental Claims Act: Courts Must Cap Judgments at the Statutory Waiver Limit Absent Proven Excess Insurance, and County Hospitals Do Not Forfeit the Cap by Operating Statewide...
WGCA Rule: County Hospital Malpractice Judgments Must Be Capped at $1 Million Absent Excess Insurance

WGCA Rule: County Hospital Malpractice Judgments Must Be Capped at $1 Million Absent Excess Insurance

Date: Apr 24, 2026
WGCA Rule: County Hospital Malpractice Judgments Must Be Capped at $1 Million Absent Excess Insurance Introduction In Memorial Hospital of Converse County - Advanced Medicine, Hometown Care and...
Pro Se Custody Appeals Must Present Cogent Argument and Record Citations; Temporary Custody Disputes Become Moot After Final Modification

Pro Se Custody Appeals Must Present Cogent Argument and Record Citations; Temporary Custody Disputes Become Moot After Final Modification

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pro Se Custody Appeals Must Present Cogent Argument and Record Citations; Temporary Custody Disputes Become Moot After Final Modification 1. Introduction Nurian E. Duncan (Mother) appealed from a...
Motorized Vehicles Are Per Se “Deadly Weapons” Under Wyo. Stat. § 6-1-104(a)(iv); No “Serious Bodily Injury” Instruction Required

Motorized Vehicles Are Per Se “Deadly Weapons” Under Wyo. Stat. § 6-1-104(a)(iv); No “Serious Bodily Injury” Instruction Required

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Motorized Vehicles Are Per Se “Deadly Weapons” Under Wyo. Stat. § 6-1-104(a)(iv); No “Serious Bodily Injury” Instruction Required Case: Susanne Jacqueline Mayeux v. The State of Wyoming (2026 WY 43)...
Bad-Faith Use of a “First Right of Purchase” Can Constitute Tortious Interference; Tender at Closing Is Excused When Seller Cannot Perform; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Survive Due-Process Review

Bad-Faith Use of a “First Right of Purchase” Can Constitute Tortious Interference; Tender at Closing Is Excused When Seller Cannot Perform; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Survive Due-Process Review

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Bad-Faith Use of a “First Right of Purchase” Can Constitute Tortious Interference; Tender at Closing Is Excused When Seller Cannot Perform; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Survive Due-Process Review...
Buyer’s Tender Is Excused When Seller Cannot Close; Bad-Faith Assertion of an Expired Right of First Purchase Can Be Tortious Interference; Fee-Based Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio

Buyer’s Tender Is Excused When Seller Cannot Close; Bad-Faith Assertion of an Expired Right of First Purchase Can Be Tortious Interference; Fee-Based Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Buyer’s Tender Is Excused When Seller Cannot Close; Bad-Faith Assertion of an Expired Right of First Purchase Can Be Tortious Interference; Fee-Based Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio 1....
Wyoming: Tender Excused and Tortious Interference Found Where an Expired Right of First Purchase Is Used to Obstruct Closing; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Upheld Without a 1:1 Ratio

Wyoming: Tender Excused and Tortious Interference Found Where an Expired Right of First Purchase Is Used to Obstruct Closing; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Upheld Without a 1:1 Ratio

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Wyoming: Tender Excused and Tortious Interference Found Where an Expired Right of First Purchase Is Used to Obstruct Closing; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Upheld Without a 1:1 Ratio Introduction In...
Bad-Faith Use of a First Right of Purchase Can Create Tort Liability and Excuse Tender; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio

Bad-Faith Use of a First Right of Purchase Can Create Tort Liability and Excuse Tender; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Bad-Faith Use of a First Right of Purchase Can Create Tort Liability and Excuse Tender; Attorney-Fee Punitive Damages Need Not Track a 1:1 Ratio Case: Wyoming Fall Creek, LLC, a Wyoming Limited...
No Post-Docket “Clarification” Without Supreme Court Leave: Rule 60(a) Limits, Non-Recurring Business Distributions in Imputed Income, and Double-Counting Errors in Divorce Valuation

No Post-Docket “Clarification” Without Supreme Court Leave: Rule 60(a) Limits, Non-Recurring Business Distributions in Imputed Income, and Double-Counting Errors in Divorce Valuation

Date: Apr 17, 2026
No Post-Docket “Clarification” Without Supreme Court Leave: Rule 60(a) Limits, Non-Recurring Business Distributions in Imputed Income, and Double-Counting Errors in Divorce Valuation Introduction...
Callaway v. Callaway (2026 WY 41): Double-Counting Business Value Requires Remand; Post-Docket “Clarifications” Under W.R.C.P. 60(a) Require Supreme Court Leave

Callaway v. Callaway (2026 WY 41): Double-Counting Business Value Requires Remand; Post-Docket “Clarifications” Under W.R.C.P. 60(a) Require Supreme Court Leave

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Callaway v. Callaway (2026 WY 41): Double-Counting Business Value Requires Remand; Post-Docket “Clarifications” Under W.R.C.P. 60(a) Require Supreme Court Leave 1. Introduction Parties: Ralph Walton...
Right-of-Way Does Not Immunize the Preferred Driver: Comparative Fault Applies to Stop-Sign Yield Violations Under Wyo. Stat. § 1-1-109(b)

Right-of-Way Does Not Immunize the Preferred Driver: Comparative Fault Applies to Stop-Sign Yield Violations Under Wyo. Stat. § 1-1-109(b)

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Right-of-Way Does Not Immunize the Preferred Driver: Comparative Fault Applies to Stop-Sign Yield Violations Under Wyo. Stat. § 1-1-109(b) Introduction Charles Bunning v. Ernest Romero, 2026 WY 40...
Legal-Plan Referrals Trigger Full Attorney Duties: Neglect, Communication Failures, and Client-Facing Misstatements Support Suspension Under Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and 8.4(c)

Legal-Plan Referrals Trigger Full Attorney Duties: Neglect, Communication Failures, and Client-Facing Misstatements Support Suspension Under Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and 8.4(c)

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Legal-Plan Referrals Trigger Full Attorney Duties: Neglect, Communication Failures, and Client-Facing Misstatements Support Suspension Under Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and 8.4(c) Case: Board of...
Limited-Scope “Plea-Only” Fee Agreements Are Not Per Se Ineffective Assistance; Conditional Pleas Cannot Preserve Elemental-Guilt Challenges

Limited-Scope “Plea-Only” Fee Agreements Are Not Per Se Ineffective Assistance; Conditional Pleas Cannot Preserve Elemental-Guilt Challenges

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Limited-Scope “Plea-Only” Fee Agreements Are Not Per Se Ineffective Assistance; Conditional Pleas Cannot Preserve Elemental-Guilt Challenges I. Introduction In Anthony M. Fuentes v. The State of...
Fuentes v. State: Limited-Fee Plea Representation and the Limits of Ineffective Assistance Claims After an Alford Plea

Fuentes v. State: Limited-Fee Plea Representation and the Limits of Ineffective Assistance Claims After an Alford Plea

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Fuentes v. State: Limited-Fee Plea Representation and the Limits of Ineffective Assistance Claims After an Alford Plea Introduction In Anthony M. Fuentes v. The State of Wyoming, 2026 WY 36 (Apr. 7,...
Multi-County Plea Agreements Require Each Prosecutor’s Actual Authority and Consent (Wells v. State)

Multi-County Plea Agreements Require Each Prosecutor’s Actual Authority and Consent (Wells v. State)

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Multi-County Plea Agreements Require Each Prosecutor’s Actual Authority and Consent Introduction In Brandon Lee Wells v. The State of Wyoming, 2026 WY 37 (Apr. 7, 2026), the Wyoming Supreme Court...
Due Process Notice in Wyoming Probation Revocations Is Limited to Adjudicatory “Claimed Violations,” Not Dispositional Sentencing Information

Due Process Notice in Wyoming Probation Revocations Is Limited to Adjudicatory “Claimed Violations,” Not Dispositional Sentencing Information

Date: Mar 17, 2026
Due Process Notice in Wyoming Probation Revocations Is Limited to Adjudicatory “Claimed Violations,” Not Dispositional Sentencing Information 1. Introduction In Robert James Bustos v. The State of...
Wyoming Extends the Meander Line Rule to Private Conveyances and Fixes Non‑Navigable Riparian Boundaries at the River’s Thread Absent Clear Contrary Intent

Wyoming Extends the Meander Line Rule to Private Conveyances and Fixes Non‑Navigable Riparian Boundaries at the River’s Thread Absent Clear Contrary Intent

Date: Mar 17, 2026
Wyoming Extends the Meander Line Rule to Private Conveyances and Fixes Non‑Navigable Riparian Boundaries at the River’s Thread Absent Clear Contrary Intent Introduction In Ronald W. Hein and Linda M....
Eligibility for a Second § 7-13-301 Deferral When the First Ended in Revocation: Only a Prior Felony Conviction or Prior “Discharge and Dismissal” Bars Relief

Eligibility for a Second § 7-13-301 Deferral When the First Ended in Revocation: Only a Prior Felony Conviction or Prior “Discharge and Dismissal” Bars Relief

Date: Mar 16, 2026
Eligibility for a Second § 7-13-301 Deferral When the First Ended in Revocation: Only a Prior Felony Conviction or Prior “Discharge and Dismissal” Bars Relief Introduction In Aaron R. Maki v. The...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert