Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Ellison v. State — Repugnant-Verdict Reversal Requires an Affirmative, On-the-Record Incompatibility; Prosecutorial-Misconduct and Trial-Error Claims Require Proof and Preservation

Ellison v. State — Repugnant-Verdict Reversal Requires an Affirmative, On-the-Record Incompatibility; Prosecutorial-Misconduct and Trial-Error Claims Require Proof and Preservation

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Ellison v. State — Repugnant-Verdict Reversal Requires an Affirmative, On-the-Record Incompatibility; Prosecutorial-Misconduct and Trial-Error Claims Require Proof and Preservation Court: Supreme...
Miller v. State: Eighth Amendment Gross-Disproportionality Is a Cognizable “Void Sentence” Claim Despite a Statutory-Range Sentence

Miller v. State: Eighth Amendment Gross-Disproportionality Is a Cognizable “Void Sentence” Claim Despite a Statutory-Range Sentence

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Miller v. State: Eighth Amendment Gross-Disproportionality Is a Cognizable “Void Sentence” Claim Despite a Statutory-Range Sentence Introduction In Miller v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, April...
Revenue-Generating “Proprietary Function” Contracts Fall Outside OCGA § 36-60-13’s Multiyear Contract Formalities

Revenue-Generating “Proprietary Function” Contracts Fall Outside OCGA § 36-60-13’s Multiyear Contract Formalities

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Revenue-Generating “Proprietary Function” Contracts Fall Outside OCGA § 36-60-13’s Multiyear Contract Formalities Case: CITY OF ALBANY v. SOUTH GEORGIA RAILS TO TRAILS, INC. (A25A0061) Court (per...
Spann v. State: Eyewitness Testimony as Direct Evidence Removes a Case from OCGA § 24-14-6’s “Reasonable Hypothesis” Rule

Spann v. State: Eyewitness Testimony as Direct Evidence Removes a Case from OCGA § 24-14-6’s “Reasonable Hypothesis” Rule

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Spann v. State: Eyewitness Testimony as Direct Evidence Removes a Case from OCGA § 24-14-6’s “Reasonable Hypothesis” Rule Court: Supreme Court of Georgia Date: April 21, 2026 Case: Spann v. State,...
Overwhelming-Evidence Harmlessness for Rule 404(b) Error and Preservation Limits on Cross-Examination/Mistrial Review (Crawford v. State)

Overwhelming-Evidence Harmlessness for Rule 404(b) Error and Preservation Limits on Cross-Examination/Mistrial Review (Crawford v. State)

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Overwhelming-Evidence Harmlessness for Rule 404(b) Error and Preservation Limits on Cross-Examination/Mistrial Review 1. Introduction In Crawford v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Apr. 21, 2026),...
Rule 1.15(I) “Valid Defense” Permits Disregarding a Third-Party Claim—and Eliminates Subsections (c) & (d) Duties

Rule 1.15(I) “Valid Defense” Permits Disregarding a Third-Party Claim—and Eliminates Subsections (c) & (d) Duties

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Rule 1.15(I) “Valid Defense” Permits Disregarding a Third-Party Claim—and Eliminates Subsections (c) & (d) Duties Introduction In the Matter of Darryl J. Ferguson (Supreme Court of Georgia, Apr. 21,...
Monroe v. State — Distribution Under OCGA § 16-13-30(b) Includes Non-Sale Transfers (Including Direct Exposure/Administration to a Child)

Monroe v. State — Distribution Under OCGA § 16-13-30(b) Includes Non-Sale Transfers (Including Direct Exposure/Administration to a Child)

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Distribution Under OCGA § 16-13-30(b) Includes Non-Sale Transfers (Including Direct Exposure/Administration to a Child) I. Introduction In Monroe v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, April 21, 2026),...
Ragland v. State — Strategic Non-Objection as Affirmative Waiver Defeating Plain-Error Review of Evidentiary Admissions

Ragland v. State — Strategic Non-Objection as Affirmative Waiver Defeating Plain-Error Review of Evidentiary Admissions

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Strategic Non-Objection as Affirmative Waiver Defeating Plain-Error Review of Evidentiary Admissions Introduction In Ragland v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Apr. 21, 2026), Sheldon Ragland...
Shine v. State: Res Judicata and “Law-at-the-Time” Limits on OCGA § 5-6-39.1 Out-of-Time Appeals from Pre-Collier Guilty Pleas

Shine v. State: Res Judicata and “Law-at-the-Time” Limits on OCGA § 5-6-39.1 Out-of-Time Appeals from Pre-Collier Guilty Pleas

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Res Judicata and “Law-at-the-Time” Limits on OCGA § 5-6-39.1 Out-of-Time Appeals from Pre-Collier Guilty Pleas I. Introduction Case: Shine v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Apr. 21, 2026). Parties:...
Bailey v. State — No Prejudice for Failure-to-Suppress Claims Without Showing the Challenged Digital-Warrant Evidence Was Used at Trial

Bailey v. State — No Prejudice for Failure-to-Suppress Claims Without Showing the Challenged Digital-Warrant Evidence Was Used at Trial

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Bailey v. State: Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Failure to Suppress Digital Evidence Require a Record-Based Showing that the Challenged Warrant Actually Produced and Introduced Trial Evidence...
Kelly v. State: Affirmative Waiver of Voir Dire Limits and Flexible Rule 807 Admission of a Victim’s Relationship Statements

Kelly v. State: Affirmative Waiver of Voir Dire Limits and Flexible Rule 807 Admission of a Victim’s Relationship Statements

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Kelly v. State: Affirmative Waiver of Voir Dire Limits and Flexible Rule 807 Admission of a Victim’s Relationship Statements Supreme Court of Georgia (Apr. 21, 2026) — Kelly v. State, No. S26A0469 1....
Larkins v. State (Ga. 2026): Plain-Error Review of an Erroneous Bruton-Type Limiting Charge Requires a Showing of Outcome Prejudice

Larkins v. State (Ga. 2026): Plain-Error Review of an Erroneous Bruton-Type Limiting Charge Requires a Showing of Outcome Prejudice

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Plain-Error Relief Requires Outcome Prejudice Even When a Bruton-Type Limiting Instruction Is Incorrect Because the Co-Defendant Testified 1. Introduction In Larkins v. The State (Supreme Court of...
Malcolm v. State — Strategic Forbearance of Suppression Motions and Deference on Juror Nondisclosure

Malcolm v. State — Strategic Forbearance of Suppression Motions and Deference on Juror Nondisclosure

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Strategic Forbearance of Suppression Motions (Standing-Risk and “Worse-Evidence” Exposure) and Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Retain a Juror After Non-Deceptive Voir Dire Nondisclosure 1....
Nexus Under Georgia’s Street Gang Act Is an Evidentiary Showing, Not a Pleading Element

Nexus Under Georgia’s Street Gang Act Is an Evidentiary Showing, Not a Pleading Element

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Nexus Under Georgia’s Street Gang Act Is an Evidentiary Showing, Not a Pleading Element 1. Introduction In McFarland v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Apr. 21, 2026), Travis McFarland appealed his...
Nuckles v. State — Limits on Post‑Judgment Relief After Guilty Pleas: No “Void Conviction” Vacatur Motion; Strict Timeliness for Plea Withdrawal and OCGA § 5‑6‑39.1

Nuckles v. State — Limits on Post‑Judgment Relief After Guilty Pleas: No “Void Conviction” Vacatur Motion; Strict Timeliness for Plea Withdrawal and OCGA § 5‑6‑39.1

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Limits on Post‑Judgment Relief After Guilty Pleas: No Standalone “Void Conviction” Vacatur Motion; Strict Timeliness for Plea Withdrawal and OCGA § 5‑6‑39.1 1. Introduction In Nuckles v. State...
Painter v. State — Insanity Jury Instructions Require “Slight Evidence” of Legal Insanity, Not Mere Mental Illness or an “Abnormal” Killing

Painter v. State — Insanity Jury Instructions Require “Slight Evidence” of Legal Insanity, Not Mere Mental Illness or an “Abnormal” Killing

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Insanity Jury Instructions Require “Slight Evidence” of Legal Insanity, Not Mere Mental Illness or an “Abnormal” Killing 1. Introduction In Painter v. State (Ga. Apr. 21, 2026), Gregory Painter...
Smith v. State: Vacatur Required When a Trial Court Denies a New-Trial Motion Without Exercising OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 “General Grounds” Discretion

Smith v. State: Vacatur Required When a Trial Court Denies a New-Trial Motion Without Exercising OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 “General Grounds” Discretion

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Smith v. State: Vacatur Required When a Trial Court Denies a New-Trial Motion Without Exercising OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 “General Grounds” Discretion 1. Introduction In Smith v. State (Supreme...
Sneed v. State Commentary

Sneed v. State Commentary

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Sneed v. State (Ga. 2026): Closing-Argument “Credibility” Inferences Do Not Create Ineffective Assistance, and Lesser Firearm-Possession Counts Must Merge into OCGA § 16-11-133 1. Introduction In...
Unrepresented-Estate Tolling Does Not Extend the GTCA’s 12-Month Ante Litem Notice; a Decedent’s Estate Exists at Death

Unrepresented-Estate Tolling Does Not Extend the GTCA’s 12-Month Ante Litem Notice; a Decedent’s Estate Exists at Death

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Unrepresented-Estate Tolling Does Not Extend the GTCA’s 12-Month Ante Litem Notice; a Decedent’s Estate Exists at Death Introduction Walker et al. v. Georgia Department of Human Services (Court of...
App-Based Ride-Share Platforms Qualify as “Headquarters Operators” Under Georgia’s Taxicab Regulation and Must Collect Sales Tax on For-Hire Fares (Pre-2020)

App-Based Ride-Share Platforms Qualify as “Headquarters Operators” Under Georgia’s Taxicab Regulation and Must Collect Sales Tax on For-Hire Fares (Pre-2020)

Date: Mar 28, 2026
App-Based Ride-Share Platforms Qualify as “Headquarters Operators” Under Georgia’s Taxicab Regulation and Must Collect Sales Tax on For-Hire Fares (Pre-2020) 1. Introduction In UBER TECHNOLOGIES,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert