Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

Responsive Prison Medical Care and Strict Summary-Judgment Rules Defeat Eighth Amendment Deliberate-Indifference Claims

Responsive Prison Medical Care and Strict Summary-Judgment Rules Defeat Eighth Amendment Deliberate-Indifference Claims

Date: May 2, 2026
Responsive Prison Medical Care and Strict Summary-Judgment Rules Defeat Eighth Amendment Deliberate-Indifference Claims Introduction In Paul Smith v. Pamela Hart, the Seventh Circuit affirmed summary...
Default Is Not Damages Proof: Lanham Act Plaintiffs Must Support Enhanced Statutory Damages After Default

Default Is Not Damages Proof: Lanham Act Plaintiffs Must Support Enhanced Statutory Damages After Default

Date: May 1, 2026
Default Is Not Damages Proof: Lanham Act Plaintiffs Must Support Enhanced Statutory Damages After Default Introduction In Shenzhen Huajie Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Leyibei Technology Co.,...
Failure to Notify the Immigration Court Can Defeat “Exceptional Circumstances” for Reopening an In Absentia Removal Order

Failure to Notify the Immigration Court Can Defeat “Exceptional Circumstances” for Reopening an In Absentia Removal Order

Date: Apr 30, 2026
Failure to Notify the Immigration Court Can Defeat “Exceptional Circumstances” for Reopening an In Absentia Removal Order Introduction In Souleymane Nimaga v. Todd W. Blanche, the Seventh Circuit...
IDHR “Complainant Information Sheet” Is Not an ADA Charge, but Misleading Agency Communications May Equitably Toll the 300-Day Deadline

IDHR “Complainant Information Sheet” Is Not an ADA Charge, but Misleading Agency Communications May Equitably Toll the 300-Day Deadline

Date: Apr 29, 2026
IDHR “Complainant Information Sheet” Is Not an ADA Charge, but Misleading Agency Communications May Equitably Toll the 300-Day Deadline 1. Introduction Kimberly Ballard v. Ameren Illinois Company...
Stream-of-Benefits Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Specific “Official Act” Matter Required, and “Corruptly” Means Knowing the Payment Is a Bribe Under § 666

Stream-of-Benefits Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Specific “Official Act” Matter Required, and “Corruptly” Means Knowing the Payment Is a Bribe Under § 666

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Stream-of-Benefits Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Specific “Official Act” Matter Required, and “Corruptly” Means Knowing the Payment Is a Bribe Under § 666 I. Introduction United States v. Michael...
Police-Involved-Shooting Reviews Do Not Automatically Trigger U.S.S.G. § 2J1.2(c) “Murder Investigation” Cross-Reference; Upward Variances May Rest on Policy Disagreement with § 2K2.1 in Non-Routine Straw Purchases

Police-Involved-Shooting Reviews Do Not Automatically Trigger U.S.S.G. § 2J1.2(c) “Murder Investigation” Cross-Reference; Upward Variances May Rest on Policy Disagreement with § 2K2.1 in Non-Routine Straw Purchases

Date: Apr 28, 2026
Police-Involved-Shooting Reviews Do Not Automatically Trigger U.S.S.G. § 2J1.2(c) “Murder Investigation” Cross-Reference; Upward Variances May Rest on Policy Disagreement with § 2K2.1 in Non-Routine...
United States v. Ashantae Corruthers: Upward Variances for Straw Purchases Based on Case-Specific Dangerous Consequences and Policy Disagreement with U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1; Limits on U.S.S.G. § 2J1.2(c) When No Underlying Murder Investigation Exists

United States v. Ashantae Corruthers: Upward Variances for Straw Purchases Based on Case-Specific Dangerous Consequences and Policy Disagreement with U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1; Limits on U.S.S.G. § 2J1.2(c) When No Underlying Murder Investigation Exists

Date: Apr 28, 2026
United States v. Ashantae Corruthers: Upward Variances for Straw Purchases Based on Case-Specific Dangerous Consequences and Policy Disagreement with U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1; Limits on U.S.S.G. § 2J1.2(c)...
United States v. Melega: Coordination-and-Concealment Supports Sophisticated-Means and Manager Enhancements; Co-Defendant Disparity May Rest on Accountability and Uncharged Similar Misconduct

United States v. Melega: Coordination-and-Concealment Supports Sophisticated-Means and Manager Enhancements; Co-Defendant Disparity May Rest on Accountability and Uncharged Similar Misconduct

Date: Apr 26, 2026
United States v. Melega: Coordination-and-Concealment Supports Sophisticated-Means and Manager Enhancements; Co-Defendant Disparity May Rest on Accountability and Uncharged Similar Misconduct 1....
Strict PLRA Exhaustion in Illinois: Missing ARB Attachments and Untimely Grievances Defeat Eighth Amendment Medical-Policy Claims

Strict PLRA Exhaustion in Illinois: Missing ARB Attachments and Untimely Grievances Defeat Eighth Amendment Medical-Policy Claims

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Strict PLRA Exhaustion in Illinois: Missing ARB Attachments and Untimely Grievances Defeat Eighth Amendment Medical-Policy Claims Introduction In Paul Blake v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. (7th Cir....
Egan Is Nonjurisdictional: Security-Clearance Deference Requires Merits Dismissal, Not Rule 12(b)(1)

Egan Is Nonjurisdictional: Security-Clearance Deference Requires Merits Dismissal, Not Rule 12(b)(1)

Date: Apr 25, 2026
Egan Is Nonjurisdictional: Security-Clearance Deference Requires Merits Dismissal, Not Rule 12(b)(1) 1. Introduction In Dored Shiba v. Markwayne Mullin (7th Cir. Apr. 23, 2026), the Seventh Circuit...
Lincoln v. Bisignano: Substantial-Evidence Deference for RFC Findings on Intermittent Cane Use, Fatigue, and “Supportability/Consistency” Medical-Opinion Review

Lincoln v. Bisignano: Substantial-Evidence Deference for RFC Findings on Intermittent Cane Use, Fatigue, and “Supportability/Consistency” Medical-Opinion Review

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Lincoln v. Bisignano: Substantial-Evidence Deference for RFC Findings on Intermittent Cane Use, Fatigue, and “Supportability/Consistency” Medical-Opinion Review I. Introduction In Michael Lincoln v....
Claim-of-Right Must Be Addressed Independently of Trust-Fund Doctrine; “Other Property” in Treas. Reg. § 1.451-4 Not Limited to Tangibles

Claim-of-Right Must Be Addressed Independently of Trust-Fund Doctrine; “Other Property” in Treas. Reg. § 1.451-4 Not Limited to Tangibles

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Claim-of-Right Must Be Addressed Independently of Trust-Fund Doctrine; “Other Property” in Treas. Reg. § 1.451-4 Not Limited to Tangibles Introduction In Hyatt Hotels Corporation & Subsidiaries v....
Rehabilitation Act § 504 Imposes a “Solely by Reason of” Causation Requirement (Not ADA But-For)

Rehabilitation Act § 504 Imposes a “Solely by Reason of” Causation Requirement (Not ADA But-For)

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Rehabilitation Act § 504 Imposes a “Solely by Reason of” Causation Requirement (Not ADA But-For) Introduction In Keisha Lewis v. Indiana Department of Transportation (7th Cir. Apr. 22, 2026), the...
No Severance Prejudice Where Other-Act Evidence Is Cross-Admissible and Lay Identification by an Intimate Partner Is Proper Under Rule 701 (Seventh Circuit Anders Dismissal)

No Severance Prejudice Where Other-Act Evidence Is Cross-Admissible and Lay Identification by an Intimate Partner Is Proper Under Rule 701 (Seventh Circuit Anders Dismissal)

Date: Apr 24, 2026
No Severance Prejudice Where Other-Act Evidence Is Cross-Admissible and Lay Identification by an Intimate Partner Is Proper Under Rule 701 (Seventh Circuit Anders Dismissal) Introduction In United...
States May Condition ENDS Sales on FDA Premarket Authorization Without TCA/FDCA Preemption

States May Condition ENDS Sales on FDA Premarket Authorization Without TCA/FDCA Preemption

Date: Apr 23, 2026
States May Condition ENDS Sales on FDA Premarket Authorization Without TCA/FDCA Preemption I. Introduction Case: Wisconsinites for Alternatives to Smoking v. David Casey (7th Cir. Apr. 21, 2026)....
Facial Challenges to Pre‑K–3 Curriculum Limits Fail Where “Instruction on Human Sexuality” Has a Discernable Core and Largely Regulates Unprotected Official‑Duties Speech

Facial Challenges to Pre‑K–3 Curriculum Limits Fail Where “Instruction on Human Sexuality” Has a Discernable Core and Largely Regulates Unprotected Official‑Duties Speech

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Facial Challenges to Pre‑K–3 Curriculum Limits Fail Where “Instruction on Human Sexuality” Has a Discernable Core and Largely Regulates Unprotected Official‑Duties Speech Introduction Kayla Smiley v....
Waiver of Rule 14 Severance Without Renewal at Close of Evidence; Proper Joinder of Similar Bank Robberies and Identity Proof by Modus Operandi

Waiver of Rule 14 Severance Without Renewal at Close of Evidence; Proper Joinder of Similar Bank Robberies and Identity Proof by Modus Operandi

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Waiver of Rule 14 Severance Without Renewal at Close of Evidence; Proper Joinder of Similar Bank Robberies and Identity Proof by Modus Operandi 1. Introduction In United States v. Christopher Porter...
Experience-Based Reliability Under Rule 702 (Including Photoshop-Adjusted Fingerprint Images) and Enforceable Circuit Rule 30 Certifications

Experience-Based Reliability Under Rule 702 (Including Photoshop-Adjusted Fingerprint Images) and Enforceable Circuit Rule 30 Certifications

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Experience-Based Reliability Under Rule 702 (Including Photoshop-Adjusted Fingerprint Images) and Enforceable Circuit Rule 30 Certifications I. Introduction United States v. Omari Andrews, Jr. (7th...
Economic Detriment Alone Cannot Satisfy “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship,” and Reopening Requires Previously Unavailable, Material Evidence Tied to Qualifying Relatives

Economic Detriment Alone Cannot Satisfy “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship,” and Reopening Requires Previously Unavailable, Material Evidence Tied to Qualifying Relatives

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Economic Detriment Alone Cannot Satisfy “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship,” and Reopening Requires Previously Unavailable, Material Evidence Tied to Qualifying Relatives I. Introduction...
Economic Hardship Alone Does Not Meet the “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Standard, and Motions to Reopen Require Previously Unavailable, Material Evidence

Economic Hardship Alone Does Not Meet the “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Standard, and Motions to Reopen Require Previously Unavailable, Material Evidence

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Economic Hardship Alone Does Not Meet the “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Standard, and Motions to Reopen Require Previously Unavailable, Material Evidence I. Introduction Bato Petrov v....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert