Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Missouri Case Commentaries

Missouri Rule 74.04: Summary Judgment Is Not an “Extreme and Drastic Remedy,” and Noncompliant Responses Admit Movant’s Facts

Missouri Rule 74.04: Summary Judgment Is Not an “Extreme and Drastic Remedy,” and Noncompliant Responses Admit Movant’s Facts

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Missouri Rule 74.04: Summary Judgment Is Not an “Extreme and Drastic Remedy,” and Noncompliant Responses Admit Movant’s Facts Case: Wilkinson v. Farmers Holding Companies d/b/a Capital Sand, Inc....
Cox v. Grady Hotel Investments, LLC — Political-Actor Standing Limits and Validation of Missouri’s Airport-Boundary Valuation Formula

Cox v. Grady Hotel Investments, LLC — Political-Actor Standing Limits and Validation of Missouri’s Airport-Boundary Valuation Formula

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Political-Actor Standing Limits and Validation of Missouri’s Airport-Boundary Valuation Formula (Section 137.115.1) 1. Introduction Cox v. Grady Hotel Investments, LLC (Supreme Court of Missouri, en...
“When” Means “At Least When”: Article III, Section 45 Does Not Bar Mid‑Decade Congressional Redistricting in Missouri

“When” Means “At Least When”: Article III, Section 45 Does Not Bar Mid‑Decade Congressional Redistricting in Missouri

Date: Mar 27, 2026
“When” Means “At Least When”: Article III, Section 45 Does Not Bar Mid‑Decade Congressional Redistricting in Missouri Case: Merri Suzanne Luther, et al. v. Denny Hoskins (with Missouri State...
Voter-Engagement “Solicitation” Is Core Political Speech Under Missouri’s Constitution; Broad Registration/Compensation Limits and Absentee-Solicitation Ban Are Facially Unconstitutional

Voter-Engagement “Solicitation” Is Core Political Speech Under Missouri’s Constitution; Broad Registration/Compensation Limits and Absentee-Solicitation Ban Are Facially Unconstitutional

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Voter-Engagement “Solicitation” Is Core Political Speech Under Missouri’s Constitution; Broad Registration/Compensation Limits and Absentee-Solicitation Ban Are Facially Unconstitutional Case: State...
Missouri Standing Doctrine in Voting-Law Challenges: No Merits Adjudication Without a Justiciable Controversy; No “Diversion-of-Resources” Standing by Self-Inflicted Reallocation

Missouri Standing Doctrine in Voting-Law Challenges: No Merits Adjudication Without a Justiciable Controversy; No “Diversion-of-Resources” Standing by Self-Inflicted Reallocation

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Missouri Standing Doctrine in Voting-Law Challenges: No Merits Adjudication Without a Justiciable Controversy; No “Diversion-of-Resources” Standing by Self-Inflicted Reallocation Introduction In...
Municipal “DWI” Record Must Prove Physical Driving/Operating to Count as an IRTO for Chronic-Offender Enhancement

Municipal “DWI” Record Must Prove Physical Driving/Operating to Count as an IRTO for Chronic-Offender Enhancement

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Municipal “DWI” Record Must Prove Physical Driving/Operating to Count as an IRTO for Chronic-Offender Enhancement Introduction In State v. Peters (Mo. banc Feb. 24, 2026), the Supreme Court of...
Section 452.375.5(5) Does Not Create an Independent Third-Party Visitation/Custody Cause of Action Absent a Pending Custody Dispute

Section 452.375.5(5) Does Not Create an Independent Third-Party Visitation/Custody Cause of Action Absent a Pending Custody Dispute

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Section 452.375.5(5) Does Not Create an Independent Third-Party Visitation/Custody Cause of Action Absent a Pending Custody Dispute Case: In re A.L.P. and S.H.P. (Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc)...
Hanshaw v. Crown Equipment Corp.: Reliability Proof Required for Expert Design-Defect Opinions Under § 490.065; Exclusion Can Compel Summary Judgment

Hanshaw v. Crown Equipment Corp.: Reliability Proof Required for Expert Design-Defect Opinions Under § 490.065; Exclusion Can Compel Summary Judgment

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Reliability Proof Required for Expert Design-Defect Opinions Under § 490.065; Exclusion Can Compel Summary Judgment 1. Introduction In Hanshaw v. Crown Equipment Corp. (Mo. banc Feb. 24, 2026), the...
Unreported Attorney-Discipline Orders Are Not Citable Precedent; Intentional Client-Fund Deception Warrants Disbarment

Unreported Attorney-Discipline Orders Are Not Citable Precedent; Intentional Client-Fund Deception Warrants Disbarment

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Unreported Attorney-Discipline Orders Are Not Citable Precedent; Intentional Client-Fund Deception Warrants Disbarment 1. Introduction In re: Brian Todd Goldstein, Respondent (Supreme Court of...
Apperson v. Kaminsky — Plaintiff Testimony May Prove Actual Reputational Harm; “Independent Evidence” Not Required

Apperson v. Kaminsky — Plaintiff Testimony May Prove Actual Reputational Harm; “Independent Evidence” Not Required

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Apperson v. Kaminsky: Plaintiff Testimony May Establish Actual Reputational Injury in Missouri Defamation Actions (and Unstated Directed-Verdict Grounds Cannot Support Affirmance) Introduction...
Nicholson v. State — “Germanness” Limits Floor Amendments: Non‑Severable Invalidity for Original‑Purpose Violations (and Taxpayer Standing via State Litigation Expenditures)

Nicholson v. State — “Germanness” Limits Floor Amendments: Non‑Severable Invalidity for Original‑Purpose Violations (and Taxpayer Standing via State Litigation Expenditures)

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Nicholson v. State — “Germanness” Limits Floor Amendments: Non‑Severable Invalidity for Original‑Purpose Violations (and Taxpayer Standing via State Litigation Expenditures) 1. Introduction Case:...
Missouri’s Solar Access Rule: §442.404.3 Voids Pre-Existing HOA Solar Bans and Bars Placement Rules that Adversely Affect Cost or Efficiency

Missouri’s Solar Access Rule: §442.404.3 Voids Pre-Existing HOA Solar Bans and Bars Placement Rules that Adversely Affect Cost or Efficiency

Date: Jan 29, 2026
Missouri’s Solar Access Rule: §442.404.3 Voids Pre-Existing HOA Solar Bans and Bars Placement Rules that Adversely Affect Cost or Efficiency Case: Eikmeier v. Granite Springs Home Owners Association,...
Missouri Upholds SAFE Act and Medicaid Funding Ban Under Rational-Basis Review as Age-and-Medical-Use Classifications

Missouri Upholds SAFE Act and Medicaid Funding Ban Under Rational-Basis Review as Age-and-Medical-Use Classifications

Date: Jan 15, 2026
Missouri Upholds SAFE Act and Medicaid Funding Ban Under Rational-Basis Review as Age-and-Medical-Use Classifications Case: E.N. v. Kehoe (Supreme Court of Missouri, Jan. 13, 2026) Holding in brief:...
Missouri Attorney Discipline: Supreme Court Not Bound by Mental-State Stipulations; Knowing Facilitation of Fraudulent Asset-Reduction Triggers Suspension (Stayed with Probation)

Missouri Attorney Discipline: Supreme Court Not Bound by Mental-State Stipulations; Knowing Facilitation of Fraudulent Asset-Reduction Triggers Suspension (Stayed with Probation)

Date: Jan 15, 2026
Missouri Attorney Discipline: Supreme Court Not Bound by Mental-State Stipulations; Knowing Facilitation of Fraudulent Asset-Reduction Triggers Suspension (Stayed with Probation) 1. Introduction In...
Missouri Persistent-Offender DWI: “Separate Occasions” Must Be Found by a Jury, Yet § 577.023.2 Survives Facial Challenge Through Second-Stage Jury Findings

Missouri Persistent-Offender DWI: “Separate Occasions” Must Be Found by a Jury, Yet § 577.023.2 Survives Facial Challenge Through Second-Stage Jury Findings

Date: Jan 15, 2026
Missouri Persistent-Offender DWI: “Separate Occasions” Must Be Found by a Jury, Yet § 577.023.2 Survives Facial Challenge Through Second-Stage Jury Findings 1. Introduction In State ex rel. Catherine...
Wood v. State of Missouri: Capital Postconviction Limits—Victim-Impact Poetry Not Hearsay, Strategic Choices “Virtually Unchallengeable,” and Preservation Failures Not Cognizable Under Rule 29.15

Wood v. State of Missouri: Capital Postconviction Limits—Victim-Impact Poetry Not Hearsay, Strategic Choices “Virtually Unchallengeable,” and Preservation Failures Not Cognizable Under Rule 29.15

Date: Jan 15, 2026
Capital Postconviction Review in Missouri: Strategic Trial Choices, Victim-Impact Evidence, and the Procedural Limits of Rule 29.15 1. Introduction Wood v. State of Missouri (Supreme Court of...
State v. Burkett: Discretion to Decline Plain-Error Review When the Defendant Contributes to Unpreserved Error or the Claim Likely Reflects Trial Strategy

State v. Burkett: Discretion to Decline Plain-Error Review When the Defendant Contributes to Unpreserved Error or the Claim Likely Reflects Trial Strategy

Date: Dec 30, 2025
State v. Burkett: Discretion to Decline Plain-Error Review When the Defendant Contributes to Unpreserved Error or the Claim Likely Reflects Trial Strategy 1. Introduction State v. Burkett (Mo. banc...
Rule 30.20 Plain-Error Review Requires a Facially Substantial Showing; “Into” May Subsumes “At” in Variance Claims

Rule 30.20 Plain-Error Review Requires a Facially Substantial Showing; “Into” May Subsumes “At” in Variance Claims

Date: Dec 30, 2025
Rule 30.20 Plain-Error Review Requires a Facially Substantial Showing; “Into” May Subsumes “At” in Variance Claims 1. Introduction State v. Jones (Supreme Court of Missouri, Dec. 29, 2025) addresses...
Corroborated Medical Evidence Can Supply Probable Cause for Bodily-Fluid Testing Despite Hearsay Gaps: State v. Barrera (Mo. banc 2025)

Corroborated Medical Evidence Can Supply Probable Cause for Bodily-Fluid Testing Despite Hearsay Gaps: State v. Barrera (Mo. banc 2025)

Date: Dec 30, 2025
Corroborated Medical Evidence Can Supply Probable Cause for Bodily-Fluid Testing Despite Hearsay Gaps: State v. Barrera (Mo. banc 2025) Court: Supreme Court of Missouri | Date: 2025-12-29 1....
Political Campaigning from the Bench Warrants Immediate Removal; “Delayed-Resignation” Sanctions Rejected

Political Campaigning from the Bench Warrants Immediate Removal; “Delayed-Resignation” Sanctions Rejected

Date: Dec 30, 2025
Political Campaigning from the Bench Warrants Immediate Removal; “Delayed-Resignation” Sanctions Rejected Case: In re: The Honorable Matthew E.P. Thornhill, Respondent (Mo. banc Dec. 29, 2025) 1....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert