Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

Matta v. State: Harmless Error and Plain-Error Limits for Prejudicial Background Testimony

Matta v. State: Harmless Error and Plain-Error Limits for Prejudicial Background Testimony

Date: May 2, 2026
Matta v. State: Erroneously Admitted Background Testimony Is Not Reversible Absent Prejudice to the Verdict Introduction In Matta v. State, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed Gary Matta’s...
As-Applied Challenges to Advance Notice Bylaws Require a Concrete Nomination Controversy

As-Applied Challenges to Advance Notice Bylaws Require a Concrete Nomination Controversy

Date: May 2, 2026
As-Applied Challenges to Advance Notice Bylaws Require a Concrete Nomination Controversy Introduction In In re The AES Corporation and Owens Corning, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of...
Best v. State (Del. 2026) — Pretrial-Suppression Waiver and Plain-Error Limits in Rule 26(c) Direct Appeals

Best v. State (Del. 2026) — Pretrial-Suppression Waiver and Plain-Error Limits in Rule 26(c) Direct Appeals

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Pretrial-Suppression Waiver and Plain-Error Limits in Rule 26(c) Direct Appeals 1. Introduction In Best v. State (Del. Apr. 27, 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed, by Order on direct appeal,...
Wheeler v. State: Prosecutorial Closing Argument May Characterize Mixed-Profile “Contributor” DNA as “On” an Item When Fairly Grounded in the Evidence

Wheeler v. State: Prosecutorial Closing Argument May Characterize Mixed-Profile “Contributor” DNA as “On” an Item When Fairly Grounded in the Evidence

Date: Apr 28, 2026
Wheeler v. State: Prosecutorial Closing Argument May Characterize Mixed-Profile “Contributor” DNA as “On” an Item When Fairly Grounded in the Evidence Introduction Wheeler v. State is a direct appeal...
§ 2365 Retaliation Requires an Affirmative Attempt to Claim Workers’ Compensation—Mere Injury Notice Is Not Enough

§ 2365 Retaliation Requires an Affirmative Attempt to Claim Workers’ Compensation—Mere Injury Notice Is Not Enough

Date: Apr 24, 2026
§ 2365 Retaliation Requires an Affirmative Attempt to Claim Workers’ Compensation—Mere Injury Notice Is Not Enough Introduction In Jewel Redic v. Interfaith Community Housing of Delaware, Inc. (Del....
Contract Silence on Payment Timing Requires a Court-Implied “Reasonable Time” (Often a Fact Question), While Stock Compensation Still Qualifies as Commissionable “Marketing Income”

Contract Silence on Payment Timing Requires a Court-Implied “Reasonable Time” (Often a Fact Question), While Stock Compensation Still Qualifies as Commissionable “Marketing Income”

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Contract Silence on Payment Timing Requires a Court-Implied “Reasonable Time” (Often a Fact Question), While Stock Compensation Still Qualifies as Commissionable “Marketing Income” I. Introduction In...
Heck v. State: Probable Cause for CSLI Warrants Requires a Case-Specific “Logical Nexus,” and D.R.E. 702 Demands Reliability—Not Infallibility—for Presumptive Blood Tests

Heck v. State: Probable Cause for CSLI Warrants Requires a Case-Specific “Logical Nexus,” and D.R.E. 702 Demands Reliability—Not Infallibility—for Presumptive Blood Tests

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Heck v. State: Probable Cause for CSLI Warrants Requires a Case-Specific “Logical Nexus,” and D.R.E. 702 Demands Reliability—Not Infallibility—for Presumptive Blood Tests Introduction In Heck v....
Baldwin v. State: Rape Shield Does Not Bar Alternative-Source DNA; D.R.E. 403 Must Credit Exculpatory Probative Value

Baldwin v. State: Rape Shield Does Not Bar Alternative-Source DNA; D.R.E. 403 Must Credit Exculpatory Probative Value

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Baldwin v. State (Del. 2026): Rape Shield Does Not Bar Alternative-Source DNA; D.R.E. 403 Must Credit Exculpatory Probative Value 1. Introduction In Baldwin v. State, the Supreme Court of Delaware...
Merchants Are Not “Financial Institutions” or “Debt Collectors” for EFTA/FDCPA Claims Arising from Refund and Payment-Dispute Conduct

Merchants Are Not “Financial Institutions” or “Debt Collectors” for EFTA/FDCPA Claims Arising from Refund and Payment-Dispute Conduct

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Merchants Are Not “Financial Institutions” or “Debt Collectors” for EFTA/FDCPA Claims Arising from Refund and Payment-Dispute Conduct 1. Introduction Still, David v. Wayfair Inc. (Del. Apr. 14, 2026)...
ERISA § 1110 Does Not Void Contractual Advancement for State-Law Defense Costs When Subject to Repayment Undertaking

ERISA § 1110 Does Not Void Contractual Advancement for State-Law Defense Costs When Subject to Repayment Undertaking

Date: Apr 16, 2026
ERISA § 1110 Does Not Void Contractual Advancement for State-Law Defense Costs When Subject to Repayment Undertaking Case: Invictus Global Management, LLC v. Invictus Special Situations Master I,...
Delaware “Face to Face” Confrontation Permits Child CCTV Testimony Under 11 Del. C. § 3514 When In‑Court Presence Would Prevent Reasonable Communication

Delaware “Face to Face” Confrontation Permits Child CCTV Testimony Under 11 Del. C. § 3514 When In‑Court Presence Would Prevent Reasonable Communication

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Delaware “Face to Face” Confrontation Permits Child CCTV Testimony Under 11 Del. C. § 3514 When In‑Court Presence Would Prevent Reasonable Communication Case: Roberson v. State (Supreme Court of...
Walsh v. Walsh: Deference to Family Court Discretion on Continuances, Forced Sale of a Marital Home Absent Reliable Valuation, Averaging Conflicting Asset Values, and Permanent Alimony Findings Under 13 Del. C. § 1512

Walsh v. Walsh: Deference to Family Court Discretion on Continuances, Forced Sale of a Marital Home Absent Reliable Valuation, Averaging Conflicting Asset Values, and Permanent Alimony Findings Under 13 Del. C. § 1512

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Walsh v. Walsh: Deference to Family Court Discretion on Continuances, Forced Sale of a Marital Home Absent Reliable Valuation, Averaging Conflicting Asset Values, and Permanent Alimony Findings Under...
Unpreserved Procedural Objections in Delaware Custody Appeals Trigger Plain-Error Review; Rule 20(f) Fees Denied Absent Frivolity

Unpreserved Procedural Objections in Delaware Custody Appeals Trigger Plain-Error Review; Rule 20(f) Fees Denied Absent Frivolity

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Unpreserved Procedural Objections in Delaware Custody Appeals Trigger Plain-Error Review; Rule 20(f) Fees Denied Absent Frivolity 1. Introduction In Zimmerman, Caleb v. Felicia Da Costa (Del. Supr....
LG Electronics Inc. v. Invention Investment Fund I, L.P.: Late-Raised Reinterpretations of Contractual Damages Caps Are Barred by Prejudice; Prejudgment Interest Is Mandatory; Rule 54 Costs Are Not “Incidental Damages”

LG Electronics Inc. v. Invention Investment Fund I, L.P.: Late-Raised Reinterpretations of Contractual Damages Caps Are Barred by Prejudice; Prejudgment Interest Is Mandatory; Rule 54 Costs Are Not “Incidental Damages”

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Late-Raised Reinterpretations of Contractual Damages Caps Are Barred by Prejudice; Prejudgment Interest Is Mandatory; Rule 54 Costs Are Not “Incidental Damages” Case: LG Electronics Inc. v. Invention...
Kibiro v. State: Limiting 11 Del. C. § 263 Instructions to “Outside-the-Risk” Results and Improbable Intervening Conduct

Kibiro v. State: Limiting 11 Del. C. § 263 Instructions to “Outside-the-Risk” Results and Improbable Intervening Conduct

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Kibiro v. State: Limiting 11 Del. C. § 263 Instructions to “Outside-the-Risk” Results and Improbable Intervening Conduct Introduction In Kibiro v. State (Del. Mar. 27, 2026), the Delaware Supreme...
Delaware § 220: Post-Demand Evidence May Be Considered (in Exceptional Circumstances) and Reliably Sourced Anonymous Media Reports May Support a Credible-Basis Showing

Delaware § 220: Post-Demand Evidence May Be Considered (in Exceptional Circumstances) and Reliably Sourced Anonymous Media Reports May Support a Credible-Basis Showing

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Delaware § 220: Post-Demand Evidence May Be Considered (in Exceptional Circumstances) and Reliably Sourced Anonymous Media Reports May Support a Credible-Basis Showing Introduction Paramount Global...
Expired DUI Administrative Revocation Appeals Are Moot Absent Practical Relief, Especially Where a Criminal Revocation Notation Independently Remains

Expired DUI Administrative Revocation Appeals Are Moot Absent Practical Relief, Especially Where a Criminal Revocation Notation Independently Remains

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Expired DUI Administrative Revocation Appeals Are Moot Absent Practical Relief, Especially Where a Criminal Revocation Notation Independently Remains Introduction Nathaniel Raiford v. Amy Anthony,...
Jacobs v. State: Victim Testimony Sustains § 1313 Interference; Self-Defense Instruction Requires Evidence of Immediate Necessity (Not Retaliation)

Jacobs v. State: Victim Testimony Sustains § 1313 Interference; Self-Defense Instruction Requires Evidence of Immediate Necessity (Not Retaliation)

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Victim Testimony Sustains § 1313 Emergency-Call Interference; Self-Defense Instruction Requires Evidence of Immediate Necessity (Not Retaliation) 1. Introduction Jacobs v. State (Del. Mar. 23, 2026)...
Riley v. State — Statutory-Language Indictments Suffice and Counsel Is Not Ineffective for Omitting Unsettled Fifth Amendment Thumbprint Theories After a Guilty Plea

Riley v. State — Statutory-Language Indictments Suffice and Counsel Is Not Ineffective for Omitting Unsettled Fifth Amendment Thumbprint Theories After a Guilty Plea

Date: Mar 22, 2026
Riley v. State: Statutory-Language Indictments Suffice; Post-Plea Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Absent Prejudice; No Deficiency for Omitting Unsettled Fifth Amendment Thumbprint Suppression...
Bryan v. State: No Plain Error in “All-or-Nothing” Interpreter Testimony; Joinder Proper Where Child-Sex Episodes Are Cross-Admissible Under Getz

Bryan v. State: No Plain Error in “All-or-Nothing” Interpreter Testimony; Joinder Proper Where Child-Sex Episodes Are Cross-Admissible Under Getz

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Bryan v. State: No Plain Error in “All-or-Nothing” Interpreter Testimony; Joinder Proper Where Child-Sex Episodes Are Cross-Admissible Under Getz 1. Introduction In Bryan v. State (Del. Mar. 20,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert