Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nebraska Case Commentaries

Cramer v. Union Pacific RR. Co.: FELA Requires Jury-Based Diminution of Damages; § 55 Setoff for Disability Benefits Demands Clear FELA-Indemnity Language and Does Not Reach Non-Periodic FELA Recoveries

Cramer v. Union Pacific RR. Co.: FELA Requires Jury-Based Diminution of Damages; § 55 Setoff for Disability Benefits Demands Clear FELA-Indemnity Language and Does Not Reach Non-Periodic FELA Recoveries

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Cramer v. Union Pacific RR. Co.: FELA Requires Jury-Based Diminution of Damages; § 55 Setoff for Disability Benefits Demands Clear FELA-Indemnity Language and Does Not Reach Non-Periodic FELA...
Cyboron v. Merrick County — No Waiver of “Amendment as a Matter of Course” by Moving for Leave; Rule 12(b)(6) Is Not a “Responsive Pleading” Under § 6-1115(a)

Cyboron v. Merrick County — No Waiver of “Amendment as a Matter of Course” by Moving for Leave; Rule 12(b)(6) Is Not a “Responsive Pleading” Under § 6-1115(a)

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Cyboron v. Merrick County: No Waiver of “Amendment as a Matter of Course” by Moving for Leave; a § 6-1112(b)(6) Motion Is Not a “Responsive Pleading” Under § 6-1115(a) 1. Introduction In Cyboron v....
Contract Coverage Clarified: Worksite-Change Clauses Encompass Remote-Work Bans Without Requiring “Implementation Steps,” and CIR Fee Awards Require Statutory/Rule Authority

Contract Coverage Clarified: Worksite-Change Clauses Encompass Remote-Work Bans Without Requiring “Implementation Steps,” and CIR Fee Awards Require Statutory/Rule Authority

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Contract Coverage Clarified: Worksite-Change Clauses Encompass Remote-Work Bans Without Requiring “Implementation Steps,” and CIR Fee Awards Require Statutory/Rule Authority I. Introduction In...
State v. Holland (321 Neb. 194): No Jeopardy Attachment for Charges Dismissed in a Plea Deal Absent Merits Resolution or Risk of Conviction

State v. Holland (321 Neb. 194): No Jeopardy Attachment for Charges Dismissed in a Plea Deal Absent Merits Resolution or Risk of Conviction

Date: Apr 16, 2026
No Jeopardy Attachment for Charges Dismissed in a Plea Deal Absent Merits Resolution or Risk of Conviction Case: State v. Holland, 321 Neb. 194 (Neb. Apr. 10, 2026) Court: Supreme Court of Nebraska...
State v. McKinney: Seized-Firearm Transfers Not Automatically Void Under § 29-818; “Derivative Contraband” Includes Weapons/Ammunition “Used” as Defined by § 28-1205(6)(d)

State v. McKinney: Seized-Firearm Transfers Not Automatically Void Under § 29-818; “Derivative Contraband” Includes Weapons/Ammunition “Used” as Defined by § 28-1205(6)(d)

Date: Apr 16, 2026
State v. McKinney: Seized-Firearm Transfers Not Automatically Void Under § 29-818; “Derivative Contraband” Includes Weapons/Ammunition “Used” as Defined by § 28-1205(6)(d) I. Introduction In State v....
In re Estate of Knapp: Missing Cross-Referenced Prenuptial Term Is an Omission (Reformation), Not an Ambiguity; Oral 60/40 “Estate Plan” Unenforceable Without Clear Contract and Solely-Referable Part Performance

In re Estate of Knapp: Missing Cross-Referenced Prenuptial Term Is an Omission (Reformation), Not an Ambiguity; Oral 60/40 “Estate Plan” Unenforceable Without Clear Contract and Solely-Referable Part Performance

Date: Apr 5, 2026
In re Estate of Knapp: Missing Cross-Referenced Prenuptial Term Is an Omission (Reformation), Not an Ambiguity; Oral 60/40 “Estate Plan” Unenforceable Without Clear Contract and Solely-Referable Part...
State v. Lopez (2026): Deadly-Force Self-Defense Instructions Require Evidence of an Imminent Threat Beyond Mere Gun Possession or Suspicion

State v. Lopez (2026): Deadly-Force Self-Defense Instructions Require Evidence of an Imminent Threat Beyond Mere Gun Possession or Suspicion

Date: Apr 5, 2026
State v. Lopez (2026): Deadly-Force Self-Defense Instructions Require Evidence of an Imminent Threat Beyond Mere Gun Possession or Suspicion I. Introduction In State v. Lopez, the Nebraska Supreme...
Goldie v. McNeil & Co. Builders — Commentary

Goldie v. McNeil & Co. Builders — Commentary

Date: Mar 29, 2026
Visible-Contrast “Notorious” Possession: Nonenclosing Improvements and Maintenance Can Put an Owner on Notice in Nebraska Adverse-Possession Claims I. Introduction Goldie v. McNeil & Co. Builders,...
Unappealed Juvenile Disposition Orders Adopting Case Plans Cannot Be Collaterally Attacked Absent a Jurisdictional Defect

Unappealed Juvenile Disposition Orders Adopting Case Plans Cannot Be Collaterally Attacked Absent a Jurisdictional Defect

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Unappealed Juvenile Disposition Orders Adopting Case Plans Cannot Be Collaterally Attacked Absent a Jurisdictional Defect 1. Introduction In In re Interest of Joel T. et al., the Nebraska Supreme...
Public Reprimand for Retaliatory Courtroom Delay, Degrading Staff Communications, and Lack of Candor in JQC Investigations

Public Reprimand for Retaliatory Courtroom Delay, Degrading Staff Communications, and Lack of Candor in JQC Investigations

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Public Reprimand for Retaliatory Courtroom Delay, Degrading Staff Communications, and Lack of Candor in JQC Investigations Decision: In the Matter of Candice J. Novak (JQC Public Reprimand)...
Unappealed Juvenile Disposition Case Plans Cannot Be Collaterally Attacked in a Later Termination Appeal

Unappealed Juvenile Disposition Case Plans Cannot Be Collaterally Attacked in a Later Termination Appeal

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Unappealed Juvenile Disposition Case Plans Cannot Be Collaterally Attacked in a Later Termination Appeal 1. Introduction In re Interest of Joel T. et al., 321 Neb. 106 (Neb. Mar. 27, 2026),...
Burbank v. Evnen: § 32-624’s 7-Day Objection Deadline Binds All Objectors (Including the Secretary), Creating a Conclusive Presumption of Validity and a Ministerial Certification Duty Enforceable by Mandamus

Burbank v. Evnen: § 32-624’s 7-Day Objection Deadline Binds All Objectors (Including the Secretary), Creating a Conclusive Presumption of Validity and a Ministerial Certification Duty Enforceable by Mandamus

Date: Mar 26, 2026
§ 32-624’s 7-Day Objection Deadline Binds All Objectors (Including the Secretary), Creating a Conclusive Presumption of Validity and a Ministerial Certification Duty Enforceable by Mandamus...
State v. White (321 Neb. 1): Prospective Waiver Rule Requiring Renewal of Motions to Sever at Close of Evidence

State v. White (321 Neb. 1): Prospective Waiver Rule Requiring Renewal of Motions to Sever at Close of Evidence

Date: Mar 22, 2026
State v. White (321 Neb. 1): Prospective Waiver Rule Requiring Renewal of Motions to Sever at Close of Evidence I. Introduction In State v. White, the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed Quan A. White’s...
Prososki v. Regan: Filing Fictitious (Including AI-“Hallucinated”) Authority Warrants Striking the Brief, Dismissing the Appeal, and Disciplinary Referral Under Existing Candor/Competence Rules

Prososki v. Regan: Filing Fictitious (Including AI-“Hallucinated”) Authority Warrants Striking the Brief, Dismissing the Appeal, and Disciplinary Referral Under Existing Candor/Competence Rules

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Prososki v. Regan: Filing Fictitious (Including AI-“Hallucinated”) Authority Warrants Striking the Brief, Dismissing the Appeal, and Disciplinary Referral Under Existing Candor/Competence Rules 1....
Inactive Law Enforcement Certification Qualifies a Sheriff Candidate Under § 23-1701.01(1) Absent Statutory Ambiguity

Inactive Law Enforcement Certification Qualifies a Sheriff Candidate Under § 23-1701.01(1) Absent Statutory Ambiguity

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Inactive Law Enforcement Certification Qualifies a Sheriff Candidate Under § 23-1701.01(1) Absent Statutory Ambiguity Case: Martinez v. Jensen, 320 Neb. 996 (Neb. Mar. 18, 2026) (Cassel, J.)...
Restoration-Cost Damages for Destroyed Trees Are Capped by the Value of the Entire Property—Not Merely the Damaged Portion (Functional Replacement Permitted)

Restoration-Cost Damages for Destroyed Trees Are Capped by the Value of the Entire Property—Not Merely the Damaged Portion (Functional Replacement Permitted)

Date: Mar 15, 2026
Restoration-Cost Damages for Destroyed Trees Are Capped by the Value of the Entire Property—Not Merely the Damaged Portion (Functional Replacement Permitted) I. Introduction Helzer Farms, LLC v....
Postdecree Sale of Restricted Stock Units as a Material Change Permitting Child Support Modification; Preclusion Inapplicable Where New Facts Arise

Postdecree Sale of Restricted Stock Units as a Material Change Permitting Child Support Modification; Preclusion Inapplicable Where New Facts Arise

Date: Mar 15, 2026
Postdecree Sale of Restricted Stock Units as a Material Change Permitting Child Support Modification; Preclusion Inapplicable Where New Facts Arise Introduction In Kingston v. Kingston, 320 Neb. 981...
Powers v. Board of Directors of Elmwood Tower (320 Neb. 906): Nonprofit Corporation Is an Indispensable Party in Declaratory Challenges to Board Composition; Board Itself Generally Lacks Capacity to Be Sued

Powers v. Board of Directors of Elmwood Tower (320 Neb. 906): Nonprofit Corporation Is an Indispensable Party in Declaratory Challenges to Board Composition; Board Itself Generally Lacks Capacity to Be Sued

Date: Mar 8, 2026
Nonprofit Corporation Must Be Joined (Not Merely Its Board) in Declaratory Suits Determining the Rightful Directors Case: Powers v. Board of Directors of Elmwood Tower, 320 Neb. 906 (Neb. Mar. 6,...
State v. Damore: “Untenable” as Flexible Shorthand for Abuse-of-Discretion Review in Juvenile-Transfer Appeals

State v. Damore: “Untenable” as Flexible Shorthand for Abuse-of-Discretion Review in Juvenile-Transfer Appeals

Date: Mar 8, 2026
State v. Damore: “Untenable” as Flexible Shorthand for Abuse-of-Discretion Review in Juvenile-Transfer Appeals I. Introduction In State v. Damore, the Nebraska Supreme Court addressed an increasingly...
State v. Weber: “Refuses to Permit” Under § 60-6,199 Requires Denial of Authorization/Consent—Gratuitous Incorrect Advice Does Not Trigger Suppression

State v. Weber: “Refuses to Permit” Under § 60-6,199 Requires Denial of Authorization/Consent—Gratuitous Incorrect Advice Does Not Trigger Suppression

Date: Mar 8, 2026
State v. Weber: “Refuses to Permit” Under § 60-6,199 Requires Denial of Authorization/Consent—Gratuitous Incorrect Advice Does Not Trigger Suppression 1. Introduction In State v. Weber, 320 Neb. 934...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert