Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Hybrid Return-to-Office Equipment Transport as a Compensable “Special Errand” Based on an Implied Employer Directive

Hybrid Return-to-Office Equipment Transport as a Compensable “Special Errand” Based on an Implied Employer Directive

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Hybrid Return-to-Office Equipment Transport as a Compensable “Special Errand” Based on an Implied Employer Directive Case: Cindy Ludwig v. Dakota County, Self-Insured by SFM Risk Solutions, Relator...
Minnesota Requires Warrants for Google Location Data and Bars Geofence Warrants that Delegate Step-Two Expansion Decisions to Police

Minnesota Requires Warrants for Google Location Data and Bars Geofence Warrants that Delegate Step-Two Expansion Decisions to Police

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Minnesota Requires Warrants for Google Location Data and Bars Geofence Warrants that Delegate Step-Two Expansion Decisions to Police Introduction Case: State of Minnesota v. Ivan Contreras-Sanchez...
Berry and Summary Denial: No Evidentiary Hearing When Ineffective-Appellate-Counsel Claims Fail as a Matter of Law

Berry and Summary Denial: No Evidentiary Hearing When Ineffective-Appellate-Counsel Claims Fail as a Matter of Law

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Berry and Summary Denial: No Evidentiary Hearing When Ineffective-Appellate-Counsel Claims Fail as a Matter of Law Case: Cedric Lamont Berry v. State of Minnesota Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Judicial Impartiality in Minnesota: Legal Research and On-the-Record Clarification Are Not “Independent Investigation” or Advocacy

Judicial Impartiality in Minnesota: Legal Research and On-the-Record Clarification Are Not “Independent Investigation” or Advocacy

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Judicial Impartiality in Minnesota: Legal Research and On-the-Record Clarification Are Not “Independent Investigation” or Advocacy 1. Introduction In Andrew Vernard Glover v. State of Minnesota...
Reinstatement Requires Proven Moral Change; Separate Disciplinary Disputes Should Not Drive the Moral-Change Inquiry

Reinstatement Requires Proven Moral Change; Separate Disciplinary Disputes Should Not Drive the Moral-Change Inquiry

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Reinstatement Requires Proven Moral Change; Separate Disciplinary Disputes Should Not Drive the Moral-Change Inquiry 1. Introduction In In re Petition for Reinstatement of Registration No. 0191139...
State v. Tillman: “Searching Inquiry” for Substitute Counsel May Be Satisfied by Targeted Questioning Plus the Court’s Record Knowledge

State v. Tillman: “Searching Inquiry” for Substitute Counsel May Be Satisfied by Targeted Questioning Plus the Court’s Record Knowledge

Date: Apr 4, 2026
State v. Tillman: “Searching Inquiry” for Substitute Counsel May Be Satisfied by Targeted Questioning Plus the Court’s Record Knowledge I. Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Shawn Michael Tillman...
Indefinite Suspension for Retaliatory Frivolous Litigation Under MRPC 3.1 and 8.4(d), While Declining to Reach Rule 4.4(a) for Pro Se Lawyers

Indefinite Suspension for Retaliatory Frivolous Litigation Under MRPC 3.1 and 8.4(d), While Declining to Reach Rule 4.4(a) for Pro Se Lawyers

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Indefinite Suspension for Retaliatory Frivolous Litigation Under MRPC 3.1 and 8.4(d), While Declining to Reach Rule 4.4(a) for Pro Se Lawyers 1. Introduction In In re Petition for Disciplinary Action...
Reinstatement Requires Clear and Convincing Proof of Moral Change; Contesting Separate Discipline Should Not Be Counted Against “Renewed Commitment”

Reinstatement Requires Clear and Convincing Proof of Moral Change; Contesting Separate Discipline Should Not Be Counted Against “Renewed Commitment”

Date: Apr 2, 2026
Reinstatement Requires Clear and Convincing Proof of Moral Change; Contesting Separate Discipline Should Not Be Counted Against “Renewed Commitment” 1. Introduction In In re Petition for...
Trial-Record Contradictions and Appellate Concessions Defeat “Reasonable Probability” Under Minnesota’s 2023 Aid-and-Abet Felony Murder Relief Act

Trial-Record Contradictions and Appellate Concessions Defeat “Reasonable Probability” Under Minnesota’s 2023 Aid-and-Abet Felony Murder Relief Act

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Trial-Record Contradictions and Appellate Concessions Defeat “Reasonable Probability” Under Minnesota’s 2023 Aid-and-Abet Felony Murder Relief Act Introduction State of Minnesota v. Scot Perry...
Exclusivity of Summary-Denial Grounds and Hearing-First Credibility in Minnesota’s Aid/Abet Felony-Murder Relief Act

Exclusivity of Summary-Denial Grounds and Hearing-First Credibility in Minnesota’s Aid/Abet Felony-Murder Relief Act

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Exclusivity of Summary-Denial Grounds and Hearing-First Credibility in Minnesota’s Aid/Abet Felony-Murder Relief Act Introduction State of Minnesota v. Melissa Madelyne Zielinski (Minn. Mar. 25,...
Waiver by Retention: A Foreclosure Certificate Holder Accepts Redemption Money by Receiving It and Not Returning It as Soon as Administratively Possible

Waiver by Retention: A Foreclosure Certificate Holder Accepts Redemption Money by Receiving It and Not Returning It as Soon as Administratively Possible

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Waiver by Retention: A Foreclosure Certificate Holder Accepts Redemption Money by Receiving It and Not Returning It as Soon as Administratively Possible Introduction In Petition of Minnesota Housing...
Paramedic Communications Are Privileged Only If the Paramedic Acts Under a Treating Physician’s Direction; Nonprivileged Medical-Record Content Remains Nonprivileged; Privilege Does Not Bar Particularized Warrants for Accident-Day Records

Paramedic Communications Are Privileged Only If the Paramedic Acts Under a Treating Physician’s Direction; Nonprivileged Medical-Record Content Remains Nonprivileged; Privilege Does Not Bar Particularized Warrants for Accident-Day Records

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Paramedic Communications Are Privileged Only If the Paramedic Acts Under a Treating Physician’s Direction; Nonprivileged Medical-Record Content Remains Nonprivileged; Privilege Does Not Bar...
Turner: Appellate Review of Counsel-Waiver Validity is De Novo (with Clear-Error Review of Underlying Facts) and Renewal After Charge Increase Requires Only a Focused Inquiry into the Changed Circumstances

Turner: Appellate Review of Counsel-Waiver Validity is De Novo (with Clear-Error Review of Underlying Facts) and Renewal After Charge Increase Requires Only a Focused Inquiry into the Changed Circumstances

Date: Mar 20, 2026
Turner: Appellate Review of Counsel-Waiver Validity is De Novo (with Clear-Error Review of Underlying Facts) and Renewal After Charge Increase Requires Only a Focused Inquiry into the Changed...
CHIPS Exclusivity: Chapter 257C Third-Party Custody Petitions Are Non-Cognizable in Juvenile Court, and Advisory Constitutional Holdings Must Be Vacated

CHIPS Exclusivity: Chapter 257C Third-Party Custody Petitions Are Non-Cognizable in Juvenile Court, and Advisory Constitutional Holdings Must Be Vacated

Date: Mar 13, 2026
CHIPS Exclusivity: Chapter 257C Third-Party Custody Petitions Are Non-Cognizable in Juvenile Court, and Advisory Constitutional Holdings Must Be Vacated 1. Introduction In In the Matter of the...
Price/Jarvis “Necessary and Reasonable” Test Satisfies § 253B.03, subd. 6(b)’s “Necessary to Preserve Life or Health” Requirement (No Separate Threshold Finding)

Price/Jarvis “Necessary and Reasonable” Test Satisfies § 253B.03, subd. 6(b)’s “Necessary to Preserve Life or Health” Requirement (No Separate Threshold Finding)

Date: Mar 13, 2026
Price/Jarvis “Necessary and Reasonable” Test Satisfies § 253B.03, subd. 6(b)’s “Necessary to Preserve Life or Health” Requirement (No Separate Threshold Finding) 1. Introduction Case: In the Matter...
Chapter 278 Exclusivity Bars Repackaged Tort, Statutory Discrimination, and Constitutional Claims Attacking Property Tax Valuation

Chapter 278 Exclusivity Bars Repackaged Tort, Statutory Discrimination, and Constitutional Claims Attacking Property Tax Valuation

Date: Mar 13, 2026
Chapter 278 Exclusivity Bars Repackaged Tort, Statutory Discrimination, and Constitutional Claims Attacking Property Tax Valuation Introduction In Theodore Lockhart, Sr., Relator v. Hennepin County...
No Sender Privacy in Recipient-Stored Messages; Social-Media Warrants Must Be Narrowed by Time/Subject

No Sender Privacy in Recipient-Stored Messages; Social-Media Warrants Must Be Narrowed by Time/Subject

Date: Feb 27, 2026
No Sender Privacy in Recipient-Stored Messages; Social-Media Warrants Must Be Narrowed by Time/Subject Case: State of Minnesota v. Deshon Israel Bonnell | Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota | Date:...
Direct-Evidence Standard Governs Pre-Verdict Judgments of Acquittal Even When Proof Is Entirely Circumstantial (and Clarifies “Circumstances Proved”)

Direct-Evidence Standard Governs Pre-Verdict Judgments of Acquittal Even When Proof Is Entirely Circumstantial (and Clarifies “Circumstances Proved”)

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Direct-Evidence Standard Governs Pre-Verdict Judgments of Acquittal Even When Proof Is Entirely Circumstantial (and Clarifies “Circumstances Proved”) 1. Introduction State of Minnesota v. Nicholas...
Reasonable Suspicion for a PBT Is Not “Dispelled” by a Passed HGN and No Physical Signs When Other Objective Facts Still Support Impairment

Reasonable Suspicion for a PBT Is Not “Dispelled” by a Passed HGN and No Physical Signs When Other Objective Facts Still Support Impairment

Date: Feb 6, 2026
Reasonable Suspicion for a PBT Is Not “Dispelled” by a Passed HGN and No Physical Signs When Other Objective Facts Still Support Impairment Case: Melissa Ann Lorsung v. Commissioner of Public Safety...
“Refused to Submit” Is Enough: No Mandatory “Actual Unwillingness” Jury Instruction in Minnesota Test-Refusal Cases

“Refused to Submit” Is Enough: No Mandatory “Actual Unwillingness” Jury Instruction in Minnesota Test-Refusal Cases

Date: Feb 5, 2026
“Refused to Submit” Is Enough: No Mandatory “Actual Unwillingness” Jury Instruction in Minnesota Test-Refusal Cases 1. Introduction Case: State of Minnesota v. Jamie Sara Schmeichel Court: Supreme...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert