Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Ohio Case Commentaries

PUCO Prudency Reviews: Must-Run Strategy Judged Without Hindsight; Subpoenas Discretionary; Auditor Independence Requires “Undue Influence,” Not Mere Appearance

PUCO Prudency Reviews: Must-Run Strategy Judged Without Hindsight; Subpoenas Discretionary; Auditor Independence Requires “Undue Influence,” Not Mere Appearance

Date: Apr 29, 2026
PUCO Prudency Reviews: Must-Run Strategy Judged Without Hindsight; Subpoenas Discretionary; Auditor Independence Requires “Undue Influence,” Not Mere Appearance I. Introduction Case: In re Rev. of...
2026-Ohio-1471: Summary Dispositions and Procedural Orders—No New Substantive Precedent, but Clear Signals on Mootness and Gatekeeping

2026-Ohio-1471: Summary Dispositions and Procedural Orders—No New Substantive Precedent, but Clear Signals on Mootness and Gatekeeping

Date: Apr 29, 2026
2026-Ohio-1471: Summary Dispositions and Procedural Orders—No New Substantive Precedent, but Clear Signals on Mootness and Gatekeeping Court: Supreme Court of Ohio Date: April 28, 2026 Citation:...
Penn Central “Investment-Backed Expectations” Must Track Known Regulatory Risk—Agency “Stonewalling” Does Not Create a Taking

Penn Central “Investment-Backed Expectations” Must Track Known Regulatory Risk—Agency “Stonewalling” Does Not Create a Taking

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Penn Central “Investment-Backed Expectations” Must Track Known Regulatory Risk—Agency “Stonewalling” Does Not Create a Taking Case: State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. Mertz, Slip Opinion...
In re L.E.S. (2026-Ohio-1449): R.C. 3111.95(A) Cannot Be Retroactively Extended to Unmarried Same-Sex Partners via a “Would Have Been Married” Test

In re L.E.S. (2026-Ohio-1449): R.C. 3111.95(A) Cannot Be Retroactively Extended to Unmarried Same-Sex Partners via a “Would Have Been Married” Test

Date: Apr 29, 2026
In re L.E.S. (2026-Ohio-1449): R.C. 3111.95(A) Cannot Be Retroactively Extended to Unmarried Same-Sex Partners via a “Would Have Been Married” Test 1. Introduction In re L.E.S., E.S., and N.S. is an...
Ordinary Lawn Maintenance Is Not “Open and Notorious” Enough to Start Ohio’s 21-Year Adverse-Possession Clock

Ordinary Lawn Maintenance Is Not “Open and Notorious” Enough to Start Ohio’s 21-Year Adverse-Possession Clock

Date: Apr 27, 2026
Ordinary Lawn Maintenance Is Not “Open and Notorious” Enough to Start Ohio’s 21-Year Adverse-Possession Clock 1. Introduction In NC Ents., L.L.C. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., Slip Opinion No....
Fair-Notice and Context Rule for Public-Records Requests Embedded in Administrative Grievances (Ohio)

Fair-Notice and Context Rule for Public-Records Requests Embedded in Administrative Grievances (Ohio)

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Fair-Notice and Context Rule for Public-Records Requests Embedded in Administrative Grievances (Ohio) Introduction In State ex rel. Howard v. Chief Inspector's Office, Slip Opinion No....
R.C. 2953.21 Is the Exclusive Vehicle for Collateral Attacks: Civ.R. 60(B) Cannot Reopen Postconviction Judgments

R.C. 2953.21 Is the Exclusive Vehicle for Collateral Attacks: Civ.R. 60(B) Cannot Reopen Postconviction Judgments

Date: Apr 24, 2026
R.C. 2953.21 Is the Exclusive Vehicle for Collateral Attacks: Civ.R. 60(B) Cannot Reopen Postconviction Judgments I. Introduction State v. Hill, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1427 (Supreme Court of...
State v. J.B. (2026-Ohio-1405): Trial Courts May Weigh Number/Nature of Convictions and Governmental Interests Sua Sponte When Deciding Sealing Under R.C. 2953.32

State v. J.B. (2026-Ohio-1405): Trial Courts May Weigh Number/Nature of Convictions and Governmental Interests Sua Sponte When Deciding Sealing Under R.C. 2953.32

Date: Apr 24, 2026
State v. J.B. (2026-Ohio-1405): Trial Courts May Weigh Number/Nature of Convictions and Governmental Interests Sua Sponte When Deciding Sealing Under R.C. 2953.32 1. Introduction In State v. J.B.,...
Third-Party Electric Submetering Providers Are “Electric Light Companies” (Public Utilities) Under R.C. 4905.03(C)

Third-Party Electric Submetering Providers Are “Electric Light Companies” (Public Utilities) Under R.C. 4905.03(C)

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Third-Party Electric Submetering Providers Are “Electric Light Companies” (Public Utilities) Under R.C. 4905.03(C) 1. Introduction Case: In re Complaint of Ohio Power Co. v. Nationwide Energy...
Strict-Compliance Rule: Inmate Affidavits Must List Every Party in Every Prior Civil Action Under R.C. 2969.25(A)(3)

Strict-Compliance Rule: Inmate Affidavits Must List Every Party in Every Prior Civil Action Under R.C. 2969.25(A)(3)

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Strict-Compliance Rule: Inmate Affidavits Must List Every Party in Every Prior Civil Action Under R.C. 2969.25(A)(3) 1. Introduction State ex rel. Bates v. Copley, 2026-Ohio-1270 is a Supreme Court...
Electronically Soliciting a Client’s Significant Other for Sex as Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h) Misconduct; Actual Two-Year Suspension for Combined Neglect, Dishonesty, and Noncooperation

Electronically Soliciting a Client’s Significant Other for Sex as Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h) Misconduct; Actual Two-Year Suspension for Combined Neglect, Dishonesty, and Noncooperation

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Electronically Soliciting a Client’s Significant Other for Sex as Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h) Misconduct; Actual Two-Year Suspension for Combined Neglect, Dishonesty, and Noncooperation I. Introduction In...
Mandatory R.C. 3503.24(B) Hearing When Records Are Insufficient; Statewide Elector Standing and Limited Res Judicata in Voter-Registration Challenges

Mandatory R.C. 3503.24(B) Hearing When Records Are Insufficient; Statewide Elector Standing and Limited Res Judicata in Voter-Registration Challenges

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Mandatory R.C. 3503.24(B) Hearing When Records Are Insufficient; Statewide Elector Standing and Limited Res Judicata in Voter-Registration Challenges 1. Introduction State ex rel. Hicks v. Adams Cty....
Jones v. Galloway: Improper Judicial Assignment Creates a Voidable Error (Not a Void Judgment) and Inmates Must Strictly Comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) in Habeas Filings

Jones v. Galloway: Improper Judicial Assignment Creates a Voidable Error (Not a Void Judgment) and Inmates Must Strictly Comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) in Habeas Filings

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Jones v. Galloway: Improper Judicial Assignment Creates a Voidable Error (Not a Void Judgment) and Inmates Must Strictly Comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) in Habeas Filings 1. Introduction In Jones v....
Mandamus Cannot Be Used to Vacate a Conviction by Compelling a Municipal-Court Clerk; Adequate Remedy by Appeal Bars the Writ

Mandamus Cannot Be Used to Vacate a Conviction by Compelling a Municipal-Court Clerk; Adequate Remedy by Appeal Bars the Writ

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Mandamus Cannot Be Used to Vacate a Conviction by Compelling a Municipal-Court Clerk; Adequate Remedy by Appeal Bars the Writ I. Introduction In State ex rel. Wright v. Clerk of Mun. Court, Slip...
State v. Seymour: But-For Causation in Mixed-Drug Overdose Cases Does Not Require the Defendant’s Drug to Be the Sole Cause

State v. Seymour: But-For Causation in Mixed-Drug Overdose Cases Does Not Require the Defendant’s Drug to Be the Sole Cause

Date: Apr 16, 2026
State v. Seymour: But-For Causation in Mixed-Drug Overdose Cases Does Not Require the Defendant’s Drug to Be the Sole Cause 1. Introduction State v. Seymour (Supreme Court of Ohio, 2026-Ohio-1249)...
State v. Fips (2026-Ohio-1207): License-Status Checks Are Part of a Traffic Stop’s Mission Even After the Original Suspicion Is Dispelled

State v. Fips (2026-Ohio-1207): License-Status Checks Are Part of a Traffic Stop’s Mission Even After the Original Suspicion Is Dispelled

Date: Apr 9, 2026
State v. Fips (2026-Ohio-1207): License-Status Checks Are Part of a Traffic Stop’s Mission Even After the Original Suspicion Is Dispelled Court: Supreme Court of Ohio | Date: April 7, 2026 |...
Crim.R. 33 Motions Must Be Ruled on Sequentially; Mandamus Lies to Compel a Long-Delayed Ruling on Leave, Not on the New-Trial Motion Itself

Crim.R. 33 Motions Must Be Ruled on Sequentially; Mandamus Lies to Compel a Long-Delayed Ruling on Leave, Not on the New-Trial Motion Itself

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Crim.R. 33 Motions Must Be Ruled on Sequentially; Mandamus Lies to Compel a Long-Delayed Ruling on Leave, Not on the New-Trial Motion Itself Case: State ex rel. Quinn v. Rastatter, Slip Opinion No....
R.C. 2969.25(A)(2) Strict-Compliance Rule: Inmates Must List Case Numbers for Both Prior Civil Actions and Appeals (“Or” Is Inclusive)

R.C. 2969.25(A)(2) Strict-Compliance Rule: Inmates Must List Case Numbers for Both Prior Civil Actions and Appeals (“Or” Is Inclusive)

Date: Apr 9, 2026
R.C. 2969.25(A)(2) Strict-Compliance Rule: Inmates Must List Case Numbers for Both Prior Civil Actions and Appeals (“Or” Is Inclusive) I. Introduction In State ex rel. Stokes v. Combs, Slip Opinion...
April 8, 2026 Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements: Disposition Notices, Conflict Certification, and Extraordinary-Writ Gatekeeping

April 8, 2026 Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements: Disposition Notices, Conflict Certification, and Extraordinary-Writ Gatekeeping

Date: Apr 9, 2026
April 8, 2026 Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements: Disposition Notices, Conflict Certification, and Extraordinary-Writ Gatekeeping Introduction The document titled 04/08/2026 Case Announcements,...
Hoskins v. Cleveland: “Physical Defect” Under R.C. 2744.02(B)(4) Requires a Tangible Imperfection, Not a Lifeguard’s Seating Choice

Hoskins v. Cleveland: “Physical Defect” Under R.C. 2744.02(B)(4) Requires a Tangible Imperfection, Not a Lifeguard’s Seating Choice

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Hoskins v. Cleveland: “Physical Defect” Under R.C. 2744.02(B)(4) Requires a Tangible Imperfection, Not a Lifeguard’s Seating Choice 1. Introduction In Hoskins v. Cleveland, Slip Opinion No....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert