Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
PUCO Prudency Reviews: Must-Run Strategy Judged Without Hindsight; Subpoenas Discretionary; Auditor Independence Requires “Undue Influence,” Not Mere Appearance I. Introduction Case: In re Rev. of...
2026-Ohio-1471: Summary Dispositions and Procedural Orders—No New Substantive Precedent, but Clear Signals on Mootness and Gatekeeping Court: Supreme Court of Ohio Date: April 28, 2026 Citation:...
Penn Central “Investment-Backed Expectations” Must Track Known Regulatory Risk—Agency “Stonewalling” Does Not Create a Taking Case: State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. Mertz, Slip Opinion...
In re L.E.S. (2026-Ohio-1449): R.C. 3111.95(A) Cannot Be Retroactively Extended to Unmarried Same-Sex Partners via a “Would Have Been Married” Test 1. Introduction In re L.E.S., E.S., and N.S. is an...
Ordinary Lawn Maintenance Is Not “Open and Notorious” Enough to Start Ohio’s 21-Year Adverse-Possession Clock 1. Introduction In NC Ents., L.L.C. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., Slip Opinion No....
Fair-Notice and Context Rule for Public-Records Requests Embedded in Administrative Grievances (Ohio) Introduction In State ex rel. Howard v. Chief Inspector's Office, Slip Opinion No....
R.C. 2953.21 Is the Exclusive Vehicle for Collateral Attacks: Civ.R. 60(B) Cannot Reopen Postconviction Judgments I. Introduction State v. Hill, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1427 (Supreme Court of...
State v. J.B. (2026-Ohio-1405): Trial Courts May Weigh Number/Nature of Convictions and Governmental Interests Sua Sponte When Deciding Sealing Under R.C. 2953.32 1. Introduction In State v. J.B.,...
Third-Party Electric Submetering Providers Are “Electric Light Companies” (Public Utilities) Under R.C. 4905.03(C) 1. Introduction Case: In re Complaint of Ohio Power Co. v. Nationwide Energy...
Strict-Compliance Rule: Inmate Affidavits Must List Every Party in Every Prior Civil Action Under R.C. 2969.25(A)(3) 1. Introduction State ex rel. Bates v. Copley, 2026-Ohio-1270 is a Supreme Court...
Electronically Soliciting a Client’s Significant Other for Sex as Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h) Misconduct; Actual Two-Year Suspension for Combined Neglect, Dishonesty, and Noncooperation I. Introduction In...
Mandatory R.C. 3503.24(B) Hearing When Records Are Insufficient; Statewide Elector Standing and Limited Res Judicata in Voter-Registration Challenges 1. Introduction State ex rel. Hicks v. Adams Cty....
Jones v. Galloway: Improper Judicial Assignment Creates a Voidable Error (Not a Void Judgment) and Inmates Must Strictly Comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) in Habeas Filings 1. Introduction In Jones v....
Mandamus Cannot Be Used to Vacate a Conviction by Compelling a Municipal-Court Clerk; Adequate Remedy by Appeal Bars the Writ I. Introduction In State ex rel. Wright v. Clerk of Mun. Court, Slip...
State v. Seymour: But-For Causation in Mixed-Drug Overdose Cases Does Not Require the Defendant’s Drug to Be the Sole Cause 1. Introduction State v. Seymour (Supreme Court of Ohio, 2026-Ohio-1249)...
State v. Fips (2026-Ohio-1207): License-Status Checks Are Part of a Traffic Stop’s Mission Even After the Original Suspicion Is Dispelled Court: Supreme Court of Ohio | Date: April 7, 2026 |...
Crim.R. 33 Motions Must Be Ruled on Sequentially; Mandamus Lies to Compel a Long-Delayed Ruling on Leave, Not on the New-Trial Motion Itself Case: State ex rel. Quinn v. Rastatter, Slip Opinion No....
R.C. 2969.25(A)(2) Strict-Compliance Rule: Inmates Must List Case Numbers for Both Prior Civil Actions and Appeals (“Or” Is Inclusive) I. Introduction In State ex rel. Stokes v. Combs, Slip Opinion...
April 8, 2026 Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements: Disposition Notices, Conflict Certification, and Extraordinary-Writ Gatekeeping Introduction The document titled 04/08/2026 Case Announcements,...
Hoskins v. Cleveland: “Physical Defect” Under R.C. 2744.02(B)(4) Requires a Tangible Imperfection, Not a Lifeguard’s Seating Choice 1. Introduction In Hoskins v. Cleveland, Slip Opinion No....