Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Ohio Case Commentaries

Final Criminal Convictions Are Conclusive in Ohio Attorney Discipline; Predatory Sex Felonies Against Clients Require Permanent Disbarment

Final Criminal Convictions Are Conclusive in Ohio Attorney Discipline; Predatory Sex Felonies Against Clients Require Permanent Disbarment

Date: Apr 9, 2026
Final Criminal Convictions Are Conclusive in Ohio Attorney Discipline; Predatory Sex Felonies Against Clients Require Permanent Disbarment I. Introduction Columbus Bar Assn. v. Armengau...
R.C. 4123.56(F) Requires a Two-Sentence Causation Analysis for TTD During School Recess, Displacing Glenn’s Stretch-Pay Shortcut

R.C. 4123.56(F) Requires a Two-Sentence Causation Analysis for TTD During School Recess, Displacing Glenn’s Stretch-Pay Shortcut

Date: Apr 5, 2026
R.C. 4123.56(F) Requires a Two-Sentence Causation Analysis for TTD During School Recess, Displacing Glenn’s Stretch-Pay Shortcut Case: State ex rel. Columbus City Schools, Columbus Bd. of Edn. v....
Mandamus Cannot Compel an Inmate’s Preferred MAT Medication Absent a Legislatively Created Duty (and Where an Adequate Remedy Exists)

Mandamus Cannot Compel an Inmate’s Preferred MAT Medication Absent a Legislatively Created Duty (and Where an Adequate Remedy Exists)

Date: Apr 5, 2026
Mandamus Cannot Compel an Inmate’s Preferred MAT Medication Absent a Legislatively Created Duty (and Where an Adeate Remedy Exists) I. Introduction In State ex rel. Sandy v. Spatny, Slip Opinion No....
State v. Reed (2026-Ohio-1174): Crim.R. 14 Severance Requires a Case-Specific Showing; “Simple-and-Direct” Turns on Separability, Not Emotional Weight

State v. Reed (2026-Ohio-1174): Crim.R. 14 Severance Requires a Case-Specific Showing; “Simple-and-Direct” Turns on Separability, Not Emotional Weight

Date: Apr 5, 2026
State v. Reed (2026-Ohio-1174): Crim.R. 14 Severance Requires a Case-Specific Showing; “Simple-and-Direct” Turns on Separability, Not Emotional Weight Court: Supreme Court of Ohio Date: April 3, 2026...
Contextual “Mining-and-Vein” Reservation Rule: “Other minerals” Does Not Include Oil and Gas When the Clause, Read as a Whole, Targets Underground Vein Mining

Contextual “Mining-and-Vein” Reservation Rule: “Other minerals” Does Not Include Oil and Gas When the Clause, Read as a Whole, Targets Underground Vein Mining

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Contextual “Mining-and-Vein” Reservation Rule: “Other minerals” Does Not Include Oil and Gas When the Clause, Read as a Whole, Targets Underground Vein Mining I. Introduction Faith Ranch & Farms...
Mandamus Is Moot—and Statutory Damages Unavailable—When a Public Office Makes the Requested Record Available on the Filing Day (Even if Prison Security Bars Inmate Possession of a Copy)

Mandamus Is Moot—and Statutory Damages Unavailable—When a Public Office Makes the Requested Record Available on the Filing Day (Even if Prison Security Bars Inmate Possession of a Copy)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Mandamus Is Moot—and Statutory Damages Unavailable—When a Public Office Makes the Requested Record Available on the Filing Day (Even if Prison Security Bars Inmate Possession of a Copy) I....
Judicial Endorsement Bans Fail Strict Scrutiny: Ohio Invalidates Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(3) Under the First Amendment

Judicial Endorsement Bans Fail Strict Scrutiny: Ohio Invalidates Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(3) Under the First Amendment

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Judicial Endorsement Bans Fail Strict Scrutiny: Ohio Invalidates Jud.Cond.R. 4.1(A)(3) Under the First Amendment Introduction Disciplinary Counsel v. Rudduck, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1126 (Apr. 2,...
Public Offices May First Assert “No Responsive Records” in R.C. 149.43 Mandamus Litigation

Public Offices May First Assert “No Responsive Records” in R.C. 149.43 Mandamus Litigation

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Public Offices May First Assert “No Responsive Records” in R.C. 149.43 Mandamus Litigation Introduction In State ex rel. Rosnick v. Geauga Cty. Sheriff's Office, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1127 (Apr....
Preliminary Injunctions Enjoining Municipal Ordinances Are Immediately Appealable as Final Orders Under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4)

Preliminary Injunctions Enjoining Municipal Ordinances Are Immediately Appealable as Final Orders Under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Preliminary Injunctions Enjoining Municipal Ordinances Are Immediately Appealable as Final Orders Under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) I. Introduction Doe v. Columbus, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1095 (Ohio Apr....
BWC Must Administer Group-Retro Under Adm.Code 4123-17-73 Despite COVID-19 Dividends; Unpleaded Accord-and-Satisfaction Is Waived

BWC Must Administer Group-Retro Under Adm.Code 4123-17-73 Despite COVID-19 Dividends; Unpleaded Accord-and-Satisfaction Is Waived

Date: Apr 4, 2026
BWC Must Administer Group-Retro Under Adm.Code 4123-17-73 Despite COVID-19 Dividends; Unpleaded Accord-and-Satisfaction Is Waived I. Introduction Case: State ex rel. Kent Elastomer Prods., Inc. v....
Mandamus May Compel After-the-Fact Preparation and Disclosure of Minutes for Advisory CIC Committee Meetings Discussing Public Business

Mandamus May Compel After-the-Fact Preparation and Disclosure of Minutes for Advisory CIC Committee Meetings Discussing Public Business

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Mandamus May Compel After-the-Fact Preparation and Disclosure of Minutes for Advisory CIC Committee Meetings Discussing Public Business I. Introduction In State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Avon Lake, Slip...
Administrative Gatekeeping in Ohio Supreme Court Case Announcements: Sua Sponte Habeas Dismissals, Delayed-Appeal Screening, and Docket Control

Administrative Gatekeeping in Ohio Supreme Court Case Announcements: Sua Sponte Habeas Dismissals, Delayed-Appeal Screening, and Docket Control

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Administrative Gatekeeping in Ohio Supreme Court Case Announcements: Sua Sponte Habeas Dismissals, Delayed-Appeal Screening, and Docket Control Source: 03/31/2026 Case Announcements, 2026-Ohio-1092...
Prison Public-Records Compliance: “Availability” of Surveillance Video by On-Site Viewing and Statutory Damages for Unreasonable Delay Despite Mootness

Prison Public-Records Compliance: “Availability” of Surveillance Video by On-Site Viewing and Statutory Damages for Unreasonable Delay Despite Mootness

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Prison Public-Records Compliance: “Availability” of Surveillance Video by On-Site Viewing and Statutory Damages for Unreasonable Delay Despite Mootness I. Introduction State ex rel. Harris v....
Conveyor Crossings: Ladder-Top Steps Qualify as “Fixed Platforms” Requiring Standard Guard Railings Under Former Adm.Code 4123:1-5-05(C)(3)

Conveyor Crossings: Ladder-Top Steps Qualify as “Fixed Platforms” Requiring Standard Guard Railings Under Former Adm.Code 4123:1-5-05(C)(3)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Conveyor Crossings: Ladder-Top Steps Qualify as “Fixed Platforms” Requiring Standard Guard Railings Under Former Adm.Code 4123:1-5-05(C)(3) Introduction State ex rel. Whirlpool Corp. v. Rice,...
Rule of Necessity Compels Recused Board-of-Elections Members to Form a Quorum for Statutory Protest and Voter-Registration Challenge Hearings

Rule of Necessity Compels Recused Board-of-Elections Members to Form a Quorum for Statutory Protest and Voter-Registration Challenge Hearings

Date: Mar 28, 2026
Rule of Necessity Compels Recused Board-of-Elections Members to Form a Quorum for Statutory Protest and Voter-Registration Challenge Hearings 1. Introduction In State ex rel. Dunn v. Delaware Cty....
Immaterial Protest Allegations Do Not Trigger a Mandatory R.C. 3513.05 Hearing; Mandamus Will Not Compel a Futile Protest Hearing

Immaterial Protest Allegations Do Not Trigger a Mandatory R.C. 3513.05 Hearing; Mandamus Will Not Compel a Futile Protest Hearing

Date: Mar 27, 2026
Immaterial Protest Allegations Do Not Trigger a Mandatory R.C. 3513.05 Hearing; Mandamus Will Not Compel a Futile Protest Hearing I. Introduction In State ex rel. Hicks v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of...
Corrected Serious-Mental-Illness Diagnosis as “Newly Discovered Evidence” for Successive Capital Postconviction Petitions

Corrected Serious-Mental-Illness Diagnosis as “Newly Discovered Evidence” for Successive Capital Postconviction Petitions

Date: Mar 26, 2026
Corrected Serious-Mental-Illness Diagnosis as “Newly Discovered Evidence” for Successive Capital Postconviction Petitions Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio, in its March 23, 2026 case...
R.C. 3513.05: In Multicounty Districts, the Filing Board Cannot Recheck Other-County Signatures at Certification, but May Reevaluate Them at the Protest Hearing

R.C. 3513.05: In Multicounty Districts, the Filing Board Cannot Recheck Other-County Signatures at Certification, but May Reevaluate Them at the Protest Hearing

Date: Mar 21, 2026
R.C. 3513.05: In Multicounty Districts, the Filing Board Cannot Recheck Other-County Signatures at Certification, but May Reevaluate Them at the Protest Hearing Introduction In State ex rel. Spencer...
2026-Ohio-667: No New Substantive Precedent—Procedural Gatekeeping Through Sua Sponte Dismissals, Delayed-Appeal Rulings, and “Held-for” Orders

2026-Ohio-667: No New Substantive Precedent—Procedural Gatekeeping Through Sua Sponte Dismissals, Delayed-Appeal Rulings, and “Held-for” Orders

Date: Mar 7, 2026
2026-Ohio-667: No New Substantive Precedent—Procedural Gatekeeping Through Sua Sponte Dismissals, Delayed-Appeal Rulings, and “Held-for” Orders 1. Introduction 03/03/2026 Case Announcements,...
Public-Records Mandamus Requires a Respondent with Record Custody or Legal Duty; Post–Summary Judgment Dispositions Must Deny (Not Dismiss)

Public-Records Mandamus Requires a Respondent with Record Custody or Legal Duty; Post–Summary Judgment Dispositions Must Deny (Not Dismiss)

Date: Mar 1, 2026
Public-Records Mandamus Requires a Respondent with Record Custody or Legal Duty; Post–Summary Judgment Dispositions Must Deny (Not Dismiss) Introduction In State ex rel. Mason v. Basinger,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert