Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Ohio Case Commentaries

Habeas Corpus Barred When Judge-Assignment Irregularities Are Voidable and Reviewable on Direct Appeal (Peace v. Galloway)

Habeas Corpus Barred When Judge-Assignment Irregularities Are Voidable and Reviewable on Direct Appeal (Peace v. Galloway)

Date: Feb 28, 2026
Habeas Corpus Barred When Judge-Assignment Irregularities Are Voidable and Reviewable on Direct Appeal (Peace v. Galloway) 1. Introduction Peace v. Galloway, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-628 is a per...
R.C. 5717.04 Jurisdictional Bar to Ohio Supreme Court Review of Board-of-Revision–Origin Appeals (2026-Ohio-616)

R.C. 5717.04 Jurisdictional Bar to Ohio Supreme Court Review of Board-of-Revision–Origin Appeals (2026-Ohio-616)

Date: Feb 27, 2026
R.C. 5717.04 Jurisdictional Bar to Ohio Supreme Court Review of Board-of-Revision–Origin Appeals (and Related Procedural Gatekeeping) — 02/25/2026 Case Announcements, 2026-Ohio-616 1. Introduction...
Indigent Parents’ Rights to Appointed Counsel and State-Funded Transcripts in Dependency Custody-Modification Proceedings (Unresolved)

Indigent Parents’ Rights to Appointed Counsel and State-Funded Transcripts in Dependency Custody-Modification Proceedings (Unresolved)

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Indigent Parents’ Rights to Appointed Counsel and State-Funded Transcripts in Dependency Custody-Modification Proceedings (Unresolved) 1. Introduction In In re A.B. (02/25/2026 Case Announcements #2,...
Procedendo Mootness and Appellate Forfeiture: Failure to Oppose Summary Judgment Bars New “Final Appealable Order” Attacks

Procedendo Mootness and Appellate Forfeiture: Failure to Oppose Summary Judgment Bars New “Final Appealable Order” Attacks

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Procedendo Mootness and Appellate Forfeiture: Failure to Oppose Summary Judgment Bars New “Final Appealable Order” Attacks I. Introduction State ex rel. Martin v. McCormick, 2026-Ohio-568 is an...
Eddy v. Farmers: R.C. 2317.02(A)(2) Supersedes Boone and Requires Prima Facie Bad Faith + In Camera Review Before Piercing Insurer Attorney-Client Privilege; Work Product Disclosable Only on Civ.R. 26(B)(4) Good Cause

Eddy v. Farmers: R.C. 2317.02(A)(2) Supersedes Boone and Requires Prima Facie Bad Faith + In Camera Review Before Piercing Insurer Attorney-Client Privilege; Work Product Disclosable Only on Civ.R. 26(B)(4) Good Cause

Date: Feb 27, 2026
R.C. 2317.02(A)(2) Supersedes Boone: Insurer Attorney-Client Communications Are Discoverable Only After a Prima Facie Showing of Bad Faith and an In Camera Finding of “Aiding or Furthering” Bad...
Fully Stayed Six-Month Suspension with Targeted Probation for Court-Appointed Counsel’s Neglect of an Incarcerated, Unhoused Misdemeanor Defendant

Fully Stayed Six-Month Suspension with Targeted Probation for Court-Appointed Counsel’s Neglect of an Incarcerated, Unhoused Misdemeanor Defendant

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Fully Stayed Six-Month Suspension with Targeted Probation for Court-Appointed Counsel’s Neglect of an Incarcerated, Unhoused Misdemeanor Defendant 1. Introduction In Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hall,...
Mandamus Cannot Relitigate an Unsuccessful Appeal to Enforce a Remand Absent “Direct Disobedience” of the Mandate

Mandamus Cannot Relitigate an Unsuccessful Appeal to Enforce a Remand Absent “Direct Disobedience” of the Mandate

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Mandamus Cannot Relitigate an Unsuccessful Appeal to Enforce a Remand Absent “Direct Disobedience” of the Mandate I. Introduction In State ex rel. Patterson v. Starn, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-627...
Email “Advice” Is Not an Appealable Zoning “Decision” Under R.C. 519.15

Email “Advice” Is Not an Appealable Zoning “Decision” Under R.C. 519.15

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Email “Advice” Is Not an Appealable Zoning “Decision” Under R.C. 519.15 1. Introduction In 729 W. 130th St., L.L.C. v. Hinckley Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-595 (Feb. 25,...
R.C. 519.12(H) “An Appropriate Map” Means One: Multiple-Map Filings Do Not Invalidate a Township Zoning Referendum Petition if at Least One Map Is Appropriate

R.C. 519.12(H) “An Appropriate Map” Means One: Multiple-Map Filings Do Not Invalidate a Township Zoning Referendum Petition if at Least One Map Is Appropriate

Date: Feb 27, 2026
R.C. 519.12(H) “An Appropriate Map” Means One: Multiple-Map Filings Do Not Invalidate a Township Zoning Referendum Petition if at Least One Map Is Appropriate I. Introduction State ex rel. DeGraff v....
Ohio Mandamus Review: Civ.R. 53 Waiver Bars Appellate Challenges to BWC “Essentially the Same Employer” Transfers Under Adm.Code 4123-17-13(D)

Ohio Mandamus Review: Civ.R. 53 Waiver Bars Appellate Challenges to BWC “Essentially the Same Employer” Transfers Under Adm.Code 4123-17-13(D)

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Ohio Mandamus Review: Civ.R. 53 Waiver Bars Appellate Challenges to BWC “Essentially the Same Employer” Transfers Under Adm.Code 4123-17-13(D) I. Introduction In State ex rel. Suburban Driving...
PUCO Forfeiture and Restitution Orders Must Be Explained and Internally Clear Under R.C. 4903.09

PUCO Forfeiture and Restitution Orders Must Be Explained and Internally Clear Under R.C. 4903.09

Date: Feb 27, 2026
PUCO Forfeiture and Restitution Orders Must Be Explained and Internally Clear Under R.C. 4903.09 Commentary on In re RPA Energy, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-563 (Supreme Court of Ohio, Feb. 24,...
Pending-Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc Corrections Under Crim.R. 36 Do Not Patently and Unambiguously Exceed Trial-Court Jurisdiction

Pending-Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc Corrections Under Crim.R. 36 Do Not Patently and Unambiguously Exceed Trial-Court Jurisdiction

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Pending-Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc Corrections Under Crim.R. 36 Do Not Patently and Unambiguously Exceed Trial-Court Jurisdiction I. Introduction State ex rel. Harris v. Rothgery, 2026-Ohio-578, arose from...
Separate Electronic-Kite Public-Records Requests Accrue Separate Statutory-Damages Caps Under R.C. 149.43(C)(2)

Separate Electronic-Kite Public-Records Requests Accrue Separate Statutory-Damages Caps Under R.C. 149.43(C)(2)

Date: Feb 27, 2026
Separate Electronic-Kite Public-Records Requests Accrue Separate Statutory-Damages Caps Under R.C. 149.43(C)(2) I. Introduction In State ex rel. Teagarden v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2026-Ohio-567,...
State ex rel. Ames v. Big Walnut Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (2026-Ohio-532) — Commentary

State ex rel. Ames v. Big Walnut Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (2026-Ohio-532) — Commentary

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Public-Records Mandamus Is Limited to Relief Pleaded; No Statutory Damages for Nonproduction When the Requested Record No Longer Exists 1. Introduction Case: State ex rel. Ames v. Big Walnut Local...
Escalated Actual Suspension for Repeat Alcohol-Related Misconduct After Failed Stayed Sanction

Escalated Actual Suspension for Repeat Alcohol-Related Misconduct After Failed Stayed Sanction

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Escalated Actual Suspension for Repeat Alcohol-Related Misconduct After Failed Stayed Sanction Case: Disciplinary Counsel v. Gernert, 2026-Ohio-529 (Supreme Court of Ohio, Feb. 19, 2026) 1....
Ohio Public-Records Mandamus: R.C. 2969.25 Inapplicable in Supreme Court Original Actions; Records Schedules Don’t Prove Possession; Unreasonable Delay Triggers Statutory Damages

Ohio Public-Records Mandamus: R.C. 2969.25 Inapplicable in Supreme Court Original Actions; Records Schedules Don’t Prove Possession; Unreasonable Delay Triggers Statutory Damages

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Ohio Public-Records Mandamus: R.C. 2969.25 Inapplicable in Supreme Court Original Actions; Records Schedules Don’t Prove Possession; Unreasonable Delay Triggers Statutory Damages Case: State ex rel....
Statutory Standing for Mortgage-Release Violations and Retroactive Remedial Limits on Classwide Statutory Damages Under R.C. 5301.36(C)(2)

Statutory Standing for Mortgage-Release Violations and Retroactive Remedial Limits on Classwide Statutory Damages Under R.C. 5301.36(C)(2)

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Statutory Standing for Mortgage-Release Violations and Retroactive Remedial Limits on Classwide Statutory Damages Under R.C. 5301.36(C)(2) I. Introduction Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C., Slip Opinion...
Ohio Supreme Court Case Announcements (2026-Ohio-475): Mootness-Driven Denials and Sua Sponte Dismissals Under Rule 12.04

Ohio Supreme Court Case Announcements (2026-Ohio-475): Mootness-Driven Denials and Sua Sponte Dismissals Under Rule 12.04

Date: Feb 19, 2026
Mootness-Driven Denials and Sua Sponte Dismissals Under Rule 12.04: What 2026-Ohio-475 Signals About Ohio Supreme Court Case Administration Citation: 02/17/2026 Case Announcements, 2026-Ohio-475...
Possession Controls: ODRC Must Produce an Inmate’s Master File If It Exists Anywhere in the Department

Possession Controls: ODRC Must Produce an Inmate’s Master File If It Exists Anywhere in the Department

Date: Feb 19, 2026
Possession Controls: ODRC Must Produce an Inmate’s Master File If It Exists Anywhere in the Department I. Introduction In State ex rel. Lawrence v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., Slip Opinion No....
R.C. 149.43(C)(3)(c) “Good-Faith” Bar Applies Only to Whether Fees Are Awarded (and Must Be Timely Raised), Not to Reducing a Fee Amount

R.C. 149.43(C)(3)(c) “Good-Faith” Bar Applies Only to Whether Fees Are Awarded (and Must Be Timely Raised), Not to Reducing a Fee Amount

Date: Feb 19, 2026
R.C. 149.43(C)(3)(c) “Good-Faith” Bar Applies Only to Whether Fees Are Awarded (and Must Be Timely Raised), Not to Reducing a Fee Amount Case: State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert