Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Undisputed PSR Facts and Corroborated Co-Conspirator Statements May Support Drug-Quantity Estimates at Sentencing

Undisputed PSR Facts and Corroborated Co-Conspirator Statements May Support Drug-Quantity Estimates at Sentencing

Date: May 1, 2026
Undisputed PSR Facts and Corroborated Co-Conspirator Statements May Support Drug-Quantity Estimates at Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Freeman, the Tenth Circuit affirmed Jerry Lana...
Invoking § 1442 Opens § 1447(d) Review, but Unsupported Federal-Officer Removal and Unpreserved Arguments Fail

Invoking § 1442 Opens § 1447(d) Review, but Unsupported Federal-Officer Removal and Unpreserved Arguments Fail

Date: May 1, 2026
Invoking § 1442 Opens § 1447(d) Review, but Unsupported Federal-Officer Removal and Unpreserved Arguments Fail Introduction Winn v. Wakat concerns two consolidated appeals arising from August Wakat’s...
Independent Traffic Violations and Concurrent Dog Sniffs Sustain Fourth Amendment Stops

Independent Traffic Violations and Concurrent Dog Sniffs Sustain Fourth Amendment Stops

Date: May 1, 2026
Independent Traffic Violations and Concurrent Dog Sniffs Sustain Fourth Amendment Stops Introduction In United States v. Salcido-Gonzalez, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Rene...
PLRA Screening Requires Tolling and Futility Analysis Before Dismissing Pro Se Prisoner § 1983 Claims

PLRA Screening Requires Tolling and Futility Analysis Before Dismissing Pro Se Prisoner § 1983 Claims

Date: Apr 30, 2026
PLRA Screening Requires Tolling and Futility Analysis Before Dismissing Pro Se Prisoner § 1983 Claims Introduction In Shores v. Williams, the Tenth Circuit reviewed the dismissal of a pro se...
Post-Judgment Amendment Requires Reopening Under Rule 59(e)/60(b) Before Rule 15 Leave; Rule 8 Deficiencies Can Warrant Dismissal Without Sua Sponte Leave

Post-Judgment Amendment Requires Reopening Under Rule 59(e)/60(b) Before Rule 15 Leave; Rule 8 Deficiencies Can Warrant Dismissal Without Sua Sponte Leave

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Post-Judgment Amendment Requires Reopening Under Rule 59(e)/60(b) Before Rule 15 Leave; Rule 8 Deficiencies Can Warrant Dismissal Without Sua Sponte Leave 1. Introduction Reeves v. Seibert (10th Cir....
Harris v. Warden: § 2241 First Step Act Time-Credit Relief Requires Proof of Actual Qualifying Participation

Harris v. Warden: § 2241 First Step Act Time-Credit Relief Requires Proof of Actual Qualifying Participation

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Harris v. Warden: § 2241 First Step Act Time-Credit Relief Requires Proof of Actual Qualifying Participation 1. Introduction In Harris v. Warden, FCI - Leavenworth (10th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026), federal...
Preserving Rule 106 “Completeness” Claims: A Proponent Must Identify the Ground for Admission, Not Merely Proffer the Recording

Preserving Rule 106 “Completeness” Claims: A Proponent Must Identify the Ground for Admission, Not Merely Proffer the Recording

Date: Apr 29, 2026
Preserving Rule 106 “Completeness” Claims: A Proponent Must Identify the Ground for Admission, Not Merely Proffer the Recording Case: United States v. Velazquez Hernandez (10th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026)...
Tenth Circuit: Inadequate Appellate Briefing Waives Challenges, and Confidential Settlement Terms Merit Targeted Redaction (Not Blanket Sealing)

Tenth Circuit: Inadequate Appellate Briefing Waives Challenges, and Confidential Settlement Terms Merit Targeted Redaction (Not Blanket Sealing)

Date: Apr 28, 2026
Tenth Circuit: Inadequate Appellate Briefing Waives Challenges, and Confidential Settlement Terms Merit Targeted Redaction (Not Blanket Sealing) I. Introduction Borsody v. Federal Express Corporation...
Agency Action Is Arbitrary and Capricious When It Ignores a Potentially Controlling Royalty Settlement Agreement

Agency Action Is Arbitrary and Capricious When It Ignores a Potentially Controlling Royalty Settlement Agreement

Date: Apr 28, 2026
Agency Action Is Arbitrary and Capricious When It Ignores a Potentially Controlling Royalty Settlement Agreement 1. Introduction Case: Devon Energy Production Company v. DOI (10th Cir. Apr. 27, 2026)...
Martinez v. City of Aurora: Lindke’s “Actual Authority” Requirement Bars § 1983 State Action Where an Officer on Administrative Leave Was Explicitly Forbidden to Act

Martinez v. City of Aurora: Lindke’s “Actual Authority” Requirement Bars § 1983 State Action Where an Officer on Administrative Leave Was Explicitly Forbidden to Act

Date: Apr 28, 2026
Martinez v. City of Aurora: Lindke’s “Actual Authority” Requirement Bars § 1983 State Action Where an Officer on Administrative Leave Was Explicitly Forbidden to Act 1. Introduction In Martinez v....
United States v. Petro: Prosecutors May Not Argue the Presumption of Innocence Has Been “Removed” Before Deliberations

United States v. Petro: Prosecutors May Not Argue the Presumption of Innocence Has Been “Removed” Before Deliberations

Date: Apr 28, 2026
United States v. Petro: Prosecutors May Not Argue the Presumption of Innocence Has Been “Removed” Before Deliberations (and Visual Metaphors Can Aggravate Plain-Error Prejudice) Introduction In...
Ward v. Wesley Medical Center: Pretrial-Order Waiver and Strict Rule 56 Compliance (Plus Employer-Knowledge and Temporal-Proximity Limits) in ADA/FMLA Litigation

Ward v. Wesley Medical Center: Pretrial-Order Waiver and Strict Rule 56 Compliance (Plus Employer-Knowledge and Temporal-Proximity Limits) in ADA/FMLA Litigation

Date: Apr 28, 2026
Ward v. Wesley Medical Center: Pretrial-Order Waiver and Strict Rule 56 Compliance (Plus Employer-Knowledge and Temporal-Proximity Limits) in ADA/FMLA Litigation Introduction In Ward v. Wesley...
COA Denied for Rule 2(c) Pleading Defects and Waiver of Any Challenge to a Procedural Dismissal in § 2254 Appeals

COA Denied for Rule 2(c) Pleading Defects and Waiver of Any Challenge to a Procedural Dismissal in § 2254 Appeals

Date: Apr 26, 2026
COA Denied for Rule 2(c) Pleading Defects and Waiver of Any Challenge to a Procedural Dismissal in § 2254 Appeals Introduction In Welch v. Attorney General of the State of Colorado (10th Cir. Apr....
Jarvis v. County of Teton, Wyoming — Litigants Must Verify AI-Generated Citations; Fabricated Authorities Are Disregarded and May Trigger Sanctions

Jarvis v. County of Teton, Wyoming — Litigants Must Verify AI-Generated Citations; Fabricated Authorities Are Disregarded and May Trigger Sanctions

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Jarvis v. County of Teton, Wyoming — Litigants Must Verify AI-Generated Citations; Fabricated Authorities Are Disregarded and May Trigger Sanctions Introduction In Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming...
Good-Faith Reliance on a Tribal Search Warrant Despite a Contemporaneous State-Court Denial (and Rule 41’s “Federal Character” Limit)

Good-Faith Reliance on a Tribal Search Warrant Despite a Contemporaneous State-Court Denial (and Rule 41’s “Federal Character” Limit)

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Good-Faith Reliance on a Tribal Search Warrant Despite a Contemporaneous State-Court Denial (and Rule 41’s “Federal Character” Limit) I. Introduction In United States v. Holt (10th Cir. Apr. 24,...
Ambiguous Surveillance Video Can Support “Arguable Probable Cause,” Preserving Qualified Immunity Absent Particularized Clearly Established Law (Puller v. Greco)

Ambiguous Surveillance Video Can Support “Arguable Probable Cause,” Preserving Qualified Immunity Absent Particularized Clearly Established Law (Puller v. Greco)

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Ambiguous Surveillance Video Can Support “Arguable Probable Cause,” Preserving Qualified Immunity Absent Particularized Clearly Established Law Introduction In Puller v. Greco (10th Cir. Apr. 24,...
Torres v. Polis — Failure to Object to a Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation Waives Appellate Review, and Non-Consent Under § 636(c) Does Not Trigger Mandatory De Novo Review

Torres v. Polis — Failure to Object to a Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation Waives Appellate Review, and Non-Consent Under § 636(c) Does Not Trigger Mandatory De Novo Review

Date: Apr 26, 2026
Failure to Object to a Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation Waives Appellate Review, and Non-Consent Under § 636(c) Does Not Trigger Mandatory De Novo Review 1. Introduction Torres v. Polis (10th Cir....
Wyoming Duty-to-Defend Triggered for Additional Insured Where Complaint Alleges Subcontractor’s Partial Causation and Incomplete (“Ongoing”) Operations

Wyoming Duty-to-Defend Triggered for Additional Insured Where Complaint Alleges Subcontractor’s Partial Causation and Incomplete (“Ongoing”) Operations

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Wyoming Duty-to-Defend Triggered for Additional Insured Where Complaint Alleges Subcontractor’s Partial Causation and Incomplete (“Ongoing”) Operations Case: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v....
Within-Guidelines Sentences Remain Presumptively Reasonable on Appeal Despite “One-Photo” Child-Pornography Enhancements

Within-Guidelines Sentences Remain Presumptively Reasonable on Appeal Despite “One-Photo” Child-Pornography Enhancements

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Within-Guidelines Sentences Remain Presumptively Reasonable on Appeal Despite “One-Photo” Child-Pornography Enhancements 1. Introduction In United States v. Presley (10th Cir. Apr. 23, 2026)...
Coit v. Stancil: Official-Capacity Damages Barred by Eleventh Amendment; Rule 8 Requires a Single, Self-Contained Operative Prisoner Complaint; Failure to Challenge All Grounds on Appeal Warrants Affirmance

Coit v. Stancil: Official-Capacity Damages Barred by Eleventh Amendment; Rule 8 Requires a Single, Self-Contained Operative Prisoner Complaint; Failure to Challenge All Grounds on Appeal Warrants Affirmance

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Coit v. Stancil: Official-Capacity Damages Barred by Eleventh Amendment; Rule 8 Requires a Single, Self-Contained Operative Prisoner Complaint; Failure to Challenge All Grounds on Appeal Warrants...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert