Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Possession Bans Are Not “Commercial Sale” Conditions: Standing and Second Amendment Framework for Colorado’s Unserialized-Firearm Prohibitions

Possession Bans Are Not “Commercial Sale” Conditions: Standing and Second Amendment Framework for Colorado’s Unserialized-Firearm Prohibitions

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Possession Bans Are Not “Commercial Sale” Conditions: Standing and Second Amendment Framework for Colorado’s Unserialized-Firearm Prohibitions I. Introduction In National Association for Gun Rights...
Criminal-Fraud Allegations Do Not Defeat Absolute Immunities in Civil § 1983/§ 1985 Damages Suits; Unbriefed/Unpled Claims Are Lost

Criminal-Fraud Allegations Do Not Defeat Absolute Immunities in Civil § 1983/§ 1985 Damages Suits; Unbriefed/Unpled Claims Are Lost

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Criminal-Fraud Allegations Do Not Defeat Absolute Immunities in Civil § 1983/§ 1985 Damages Suits; Unbriefed/Unpled Claims Are Lost I. Introduction In Sherratt v. Braithwaite (10th Cir. Apr. 23,...
General Understaffing Allegations and Contractual Fines Do Not Plead Supervisory “Deliberate Indifference” Without Facts Showing Prior Materialized Violence or Specific Known Threats

General Understaffing Allegations and Contractual Fines Do Not Plead Supervisory “Deliberate Indifference” Without Facts Showing Prior Materialized Violence or Specific Known Threats

Date: Apr 24, 2026
General Understaffing Allegations and Contractual Fines Do Not Plead Supervisory “Deliberate Indifference” Without Facts Showing Prior Materialized Violence or Specific Known Threats 1. Introduction...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Proof of Eighth Amendment Sanitation Violations in Overcrowding: Maintenance Records Do Not Defeat Claims Where Inmates Lack Meaningful Work-Order Access

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Proof of Eighth Amendment Sanitation Violations in Overcrowding: Maintenance Records Do Not Defeat Claims Where Inmates Lack Meaningful Work-Order Access

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Proof of Eighth Amendment Sanitation Violations in Overcrowding: Maintenance Records Do Not Defeat Claims Where Inmates Lack Meaningful Work-Order Access 1. Introduction...
Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County: Jail Standards Evidence and Closing-Argument Misconduct Rarely Justify New Trial/Remittitur Where Evidence Supports a § 1983 Municipal Medical-Care Verdict

Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County: Jail Standards Evidence and Closing-Argument Misconduct Rarely Justify New Trial/Remittitur Where Evidence Supports a § 1983 Municipal Medical-Care Verdict

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County: Jail Standards Evidence and Closing-Argument Misconduct Rarely Justify New Trial/Remittitur Where Evidence Supports a § 1983 Municipal Medical-Care Verdict...
Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County — Failure-to-Train Monell Liability for Pretrial Medical Death; Jail Standards Admissible as Circumstantial Evidence; Remittitur Not Driven by Comparative Verdicts or Deterrence Rhetoric Absent Prejudice

Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County — Failure-to-Train Monell Liability for Pretrial Medical Death; Jail Standards Admissible as Circumstantial Evidence; Remittitur Not Driven by Comparative Verdicts or Deterrence Rhetoric Absent Prejudice

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County — Failure-to-Train Monell Liability for Pretrial Medical Death; Jail Standards Admissible as Circumstantial Evidence; Remittitur Not Driven by Comparative Verdicts or...
Womble v. Chrisman: Maintenance Work Orders Do Not Eliminate Triable Eighth Amendment Sanitation Claims Where Inmates Lack Meaningful Reporting Access

Womble v. Chrisman: Maintenance Work Orders Do Not Eliminate Triable Eighth Amendment Sanitation Claims Where Inmates Lack Meaningful Reporting Access

Date: Apr 24, 2026
Womble v. Chrisman: Maintenance Work Orders Do Not Eliminate Triable Eighth Amendment Sanitation Claims Where Inmates Lack Meaningful Reporting Access 1. Introduction Parties: Joseph Z. Womble...
Ex parte Young Does Not Override § 1983’s Statutory Bar on Injunctions Against Judges Absent a Violated Declaratory Decree or Unavailable Declaratory Relief

Ex parte Young Does Not Override § 1983’s Statutory Bar on Injunctions Against Judges Absent a Violated Declaratory Decree or Unavailable Declaratory Relief

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Ex parte Young Does Not Override § 1983’s Statutory Bar on Injunctions Against Judges Absent a Violated Declaratory Decree or Unavailable Declaratory Relief I. Introduction Lowrey v. Collela (10th...
IGRA § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) Abrogates Tribal Immunity for Suits Brought by Any Indian Tribe to Enjoin Compact-Violating Class III Gaming on Indian Lands

IGRA § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) Abrogates Tribal Immunity for Suits Brought by Any Indian Tribe to Enjoin Compact-Violating Class III Gaming on Indian Lands

Date: Apr 23, 2026
IGRA § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) Abrogates Tribal Immunity for Suits Brought by Any Indian Tribe to Enjoin Compact-Violating Class III Gaming on Indian Lands Introduction In Comanche Nation v. Ware (10th...
Shao v. Garland: Non-Credible Testimony Cannot Lay Foundation for Key Documents; Spousal Inconsistencies May Impeach the Lead Asylum Claim

Shao v. Garland: Non-Credible Testimony Cannot Lay Foundation for Key Documents; Spousal Inconsistencies May Impeach the Lead Asylum Claim

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Shao v. Garland: Non-Credible Testimony Cannot Lay Foundation for Key Documents; Spousal Inconsistencies May Impeach the Lead Asylum Claim 1. Introduction In Shao v. Garland (10th Cir. Apr. 21,...
Womble v. Chrisman: Persistent Exposure to Human Waste from Overcrowding Creates a Triable Eighth Amendment Claim (and Costs Must Await a True “Prevailing Party”)

Womble v. Chrisman: Persistent Exposure to Human Waste from Overcrowding Creates a Triable Eighth Amendment Claim (and Costs Must Await a True “Prevailing Party”)

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Womble v. Chrisman: Persistent Exposure to Human Waste from Overcrowding Creates a Triable Eighth Amendment Claim (and Costs Must Await a True “Prevailing Party”) 1. Introduction In Womble v....
Packard v. City and County of Denver: Failure-to-Train Monell Liability for Protest Policing and Admissibility of Post-Event Independent Monitor Findings

Packard v. City and County of Denver: Failure-to-Train Monell Liability for Protest Policing and Admissibility of Post-Event Independent Monitor Findings

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Failure-to-Train Monell Liability for Protest Policing, and Post-Event Independent Monitor Findings as Admissible Non-Remedial Evidence 1. Introduction Packard v. City and County of Denver (10th Cir....
Robinson v. Nationstar Mortgage: Article III Traceability Fails Where Independent Insurer and Borrower Actions Break the Causal Chain in FHA-Related Claims

Robinson v. Nationstar Mortgage: Article III Traceability Fails Where Independent Insurer and Borrower Actions Break the Causal Chain in FHA-Related Claims

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Robinson v. Nationstar Mortgage: Article III Traceability Fails Where Independent Insurer and Borrower Actions Break the Causal Chain in FHA-Related Claims 1. Introduction In Robinson v. Nationstar...
Pre-Enforcement Judicial-Takings Suits May Proceed Against State Enforcers Under Ex parte Young, but Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Allege an “Established” Property Right

Pre-Enforcement Judicial-Takings Suits May Proceed Against State Enforcers Under Ex parte Young, but Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Allege an “Established” Property Right

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Pre-Enforcement Judicial-Takings Suits May Proceed Against State Enforcers Under Ex parte Young, but Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Allege an “Established” Property Right I. Introduction Sanchez v. Torrez...
Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County — Upholding Monell Failure-to-Train Liability Using Jail-Standards Evidence and Rejecting Comparative-Verdict Benchmarks for Remittitur

Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County — Upholding Monell Failure-to-Train Liability Using Jail-Standards Evidence and Rejecting Comparative-Verdict Benchmarks for Remittitur

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Bond v. Sheriff of Ottawa County — Upholding Monell Failure-to-Train Liability Using Jail-Standards Evidence and Rejecting Comparative-Verdict Benchmarks for Remittitur Court: United States Court of...
Tenth Circuit: Clearly Established Fourth Amendment Violation to Shoot a Peaceful Protester with Pepperballs Absent Threat, Serious Crime, or Flight

Tenth Circuit: Clearly Established Fourth Amendment Violation to Shoot a Peaceful Protester with Pepperballs Absent Threat, Serious Crime, or Flight

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Tenth Circuit: Clearly Established Fourth Amendment Violation to Shoot a Peaceful Protester with Pepperballs Absent Threat, Serious Crime, or Flight Introduction In Epps v. Christian (10th Cir. Apr....
§ 7701(o) Reaches Mechanically Compliant TCJA “Mismatch” Shelters: Integrated Series Treated as the Transaction

§ 7701(o) Reaches Mechanically Compliant TCJA “Mismatch” Shelters: Integrated Series Treated as the Transaction

Date: Apr 23, 2026
§ 7701(o) Reaches Mechanically Compliant TCJA “Mismatch” Shelters: Integrated Series Treated as the Transaction Case: Liberty Global, Inc. v. United States (No. 23-1410) | Court: Tenth Circuit |...
United States v. Carpena: Duress in § 1326 “Found In” Cases Requires Proof of No Reasonable Escape and Prompt Bona Fide Surrender

United States v. Carpena: Duress in § 1326 “Found In” Cases Requires Proof of No Reasonable Escape and Prompt Bona Fide Surrender

Date: Apr 23, 2026
United States v. Carpena: Duress in § 1326 “Found In” Cases Requires Proof of No Reasonable Escape and Prompt Bona Fide Surrender I. Introduction In United States v. Carpena (10th Cir. Apr. 21,...
United States v. King: Alternate § 1152/§ 1153 Charging Permitted; Indian-Status Proof May Rest on Totality of Recognition Evidence (Including Descendant Benefits and Tribal Custody)

United States v. King: Alternate § 1152/§ 1153 Charging Permitted; Indian-Status Proof May Rest on Totality of Recognition Evidence (Including Descendant Benefits and Tribal Custody)

Date: Apr 23, 2026
United States v. King: Alternate § 1152/§ 1153 Charging Permitted; Indian-Status Proof May Rest on Totality of Recognition Evidence (Including Descendant Benefits and Tribal Custody) Court: U.S....
Expired Travel Credits Are Not Refunds of TSA Security Fees; Airlines Must Remit Collected § 44940 Fees Unless Actually Returned to Passengers

Expired Travel Credits Are Not Refunds of TSA Security Fees; Airlines Must Remit Collected § 44940 Fees Unless Actually Returned to Passengers

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Expired Travel Credits Are Not Refunds of TSA Security Fees; Airlines Must Remit Collected § 44940 Fees Unless Actually Returned to Passengers I. Introduction In Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Department...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert