Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Mandrell: Descriptive Testimony from Phone-Monitoring Software Can Sustain Supervised-Release Revocation for Halfway-House “Sexually Explicit Material” Policy Violations

United States v. Mandrell: Descriptive Testimony from Phone-Monitoring Software Can Sustain Supervised-Release Revocation for Halfway-House “Sexually Explicit Material” Policy Violations

Date: Apr 23, 2026
Descriptive Testimony from Phone-Monitoring Software Can Sustain Supervised-Release Revocation for Halfway-House “Sexually Explicit Material” Policy Violations Case: United States v. Mandrell...
Parkhurst v. Shannon: Prison-Job Retaliation Requires Job-Specific Proof of Chilling Effect; Disciplinary Guilt Does Not Bar Retaliation Claims Based on Timing and Departures from Practice

Parkhurst v. Shannon: Prison-Job Retaliation Requires Job-Specific Proof of Chilling Effect; Disciplinary Guilt Does Not Bar Retaliation Claims Based on Timing and Departures from Practice

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Parkhurst v. Shannon: Prison-Job Retaliation Requires Job-Specific Proof of Chilling Effect; Disciplinary Guilt Does Not Bar Retaliation Claims Based on Timing and Departures from Practice...
Oral, Preliminary Assurances—Especially Where a Writing Is Expected—Do Not Satisfy Wyoming Promissory Estoppel

Oral, Preliminary Assurances—Especially Where a Writing Is Expected—Do Not Satisfy Wyoming Promissory Estoppel

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Oral, Preliminary Assurances—Especially Where a Writing Is Expected—Do Not Satisfy Wyoming Promissory Estoppel 1. Introduction Four B Properties, LLC; Ranch 10, LLC; Gary A. Binning v. The Nature...
Mazur v. State Farm: Foreseeability Does Not Satisfy Kastner UM Causation; Independent Acts Break the Coverage Chain

Mazur v. State Farm: Foreseeability Does Not Satisfy Kastner UM Causation; Independent Acts Break the Coverage Chain

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Foreseeability Does Not Satisfy Kastner UM Causation; Independent Acts Break the “Directly Related or Inextricably Linked” Chain Introduction Mazur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company...
No Due Process Right to Attend a Limited Plea-Offer-Expiration Hearing; No Substitute Counsel Absent an Actual Ineffectiveness Adjudication

No Due Process Right to Attend a Limited Plea-Offer-Expiration Hearing; No Substitute Counsel Absent an Actual Ineffectiveness Adjudication

Date: Apr 20, 2026
No Due Process Right to Attend a Limited Plea-Offer-Expiration Hearing; No Substitute Counsel Absent an Actual Ineffectiveness Adjudication Introduction In United States v. Buzzard (10th Cir. Apr....
Good-Faith Reliance Saves a Warrant with a Potential Street-Name Error When Officers Use Official Records and Know the Target Location

Good-Faith Reliance Saves a Warrant with a Potential Street-Name Error When Officers Use Official Records and Know the Target Location

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Good-Faith Reliance Saves a Warrant with a Potential Street-Name Error When Officers Use Official Records and Know the Target Location 1. Introduction In United States v. Davis (10th Cir. Apr. 16,...
United States v. Jackson: Appellate Burden to Show a Fourth Amendment “Search” Before Litigating Warrant-Scope and Exclusionary-Rule Exceptions

United States v. Jackson: Appellate Burden to Show a Fourth Amendment “Search” Before Litigating Warrant-Scope and Exclusionary-Rule Exceptions

Date: Apr 20, 2026
United States v. Jackson: Appellate Burden to Show a Fourth Amendment “Search” Before Litigating Warrant-Scope and Exclusionary-Rule Exceptions Introduction In United States v. Jackson (10th Cir....
Allocution Contradictions Do Not Preserve PSR Fact Objections Absent a Clear, Timely, and Specific Alert to the Court

Allocution Contradictions Do Not Preserve PSR Fact Objections Absent a Clear, Timely, and Specific Alert to the Court

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Allocution Contradictions Do Not Preserve PSR Fact Objections Absent a Clear, Timely, and Specific Alert to the Court Case: United States v. Rodriguez-Parra (10th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026) (Order and...
Stipulated Judgment as Admission of Liability (Not a Promise to Pay) and Rule 52(c) Mid-Trial Judgment in § 523(a)(2)(A) Bench Trials

Stipulated Judgment as Admission of Liability (Not a Promise to Pay) and Rule 52(c) Mid-Trial Judgment in § 523(a)(2)(A) Bench Trials

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Stipulated Judgment Is an Admission of Liability (Not a “Promise to Pay”) for § 523(a)(2)(A), and Mid-Trial Judgment in a Bench Trial Proceeds Under Civil Rule 52(c), Not Rule 50(a) Case: Desiree...
TVPRA Restitution in Multi-Perpetrator Trafficking Requires Defendant-Specific But-For Proof Before Any Apportionment

TVPRA Restitution in Multi-Perpetrator Trafficking Requires Defendant-Specific But-For Proof Before Any Apportionment

Date: Apr 20, 2026
TVPRA Restitution in Multi-Perpetrator Trafficking Requires Defendant-Specific But-For Proof Before Any Apportionment I. Introduction In United States v. Cifuentes-Lopez (10th Cir. Apr. 14, 2026),...
Odell v. Ford County Sheriff’s Department — Screening-Stage Limits on Martinez-Report Video and Non-Categorical Heck Bar for Excessive-Force Claims

Odell v. Ford County Sheriff’s Department — Screening-Stage Limits on Martinez-Report Video and Non-Categorical Heck Bar for Excessive-Force Claims

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Screening-Stage Limits on Martinez-Report Video: No “Blatant Contradiction” Finding Without a Truly Conclusive Recording, and Heck Does Not Categorically Bar Excessive-Force Claims After...
Rule 14 Severance: No Prejudice Where Evidence Is Intrinsic to Both Counts in a Unified Fraud Scheme

Rule 14 Severance: No Prejudice Where Evidence Is Intrinsic to Both Counts in a Unified Fraud Scheme

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Rule 14 Severance: No Prejudice Where Evidence Is Intrinsic to Both Counts in a Unified Fraud Scheme 1. Introduction United States v. Fairbanks (10th Cir. Apr. 15, 2026) arose from an alleged...
Rule 12 Waiver for Newly Reframed Suppression Theories and Continued Foreclosure of § 922(g)(1) Challenges After Vincent II

Rule 12 Waiver for Newly Reframed Suppression Theories and Continued Foreclosure of § 922(g)(1) Challenges After Vincent II

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Rule 12 Waiver for Newly Reframed Suppression Theories and Continued Foreclosure of § 922(g)(1) Challenges After Vincent II Case: United States v. Nemeth (No. 24-8049) | Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
Rooker-Feldman Bars Attacks on Child-Support Judgments but Not Independent Due-Process Claims for a Modification Hearing (Eaves v. Paxton)

Rooker-Feldman Bars Attacks on Child-Support Judgments but Not Independent Due-Process Claims for a Modification Hearing (Eaves v. Paxton)

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Rooker-Feldman Bars Attacks on Child-Support Judgments but Not Independent Due-Process Claims for a Modification Hearing (Eaves v. Paxton) Introduction In Eaves v. Paxton (10th Cir. Apr. 15, 2026), a...
Hackford v. United States Department of Interior — Finality and Time-Bar of Ute Partition Act Roll Challenges

Hackford v. United States Department of Interior — Finality and Time-Bar of Ute Partition Act Roll Challenges

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Hackford v. United States Department of Interior: Ute Partition Act Roll Classifications Are Final After the Statutory Appeal Window—Late Membership Challenges Fail at § 1915 Screening 1....
Livingston v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County: No-Citation Traffic Stops, Police-Action Accrual, and No Relation-Back for “John Doe” Defendants Under Rule 15(c)

Livingston v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County: No-Citation Traffic Stops, Police-Action Accrual, and No Relation-Back for “John Doe” Defendants Under Rule 15(c)

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Livingston v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County: No-Citation Traffic Stops, Police-Action Accrual, and No Relation-Back for “John Doe” Defendants Under Rule 15(c) 1. Introduction In Livingston...
Vasquez-Garcia v. Centurion: Pleading-Stage Limits on Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals in § 1983 Deliberate-Indifference Claims; Continuing Violations for Persistent Failure to Treat Chronic Conditions

Vasquez-Garcia v. Centurion: Pleading-Stage Limits on Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals in § 1983 Deliberate-Indifference Claims; Continuing Violations for Persistent Failure to Treat Chronic Conditions

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Vasquez-Garcia v. Centurion: Pleading-Stage Limits on Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals in § 1983 Deliberate-Indifference Claims; Continuing Violations for Persistent Failure to Treat Chronic...
“Seriousness” Is Not Retribution: Considering the Nature and Circumstances of a Supervised-Release Violation Only for Deterrence, Public Protection, and Rehabilitation

“Seriousness” Is Not Retribution: Considering the Nature and Circumstances of a Supervised-Release Violation Only for Deterrence, Public Protection, and Rehabilitation

Date: Apr 17, 2026
“Seriousness” Is Not Retribution: Considering the Nature and Circumstances of a Supervised-Release Violation Only for Deterrence, Public Protection, and Rehabilitation 1. Introduction In United...
Pleading a “Shadow Partnership” as a RICO Enterprise Requires Plausible, Distinct Profit-Sharing Facts—Not Just “Partner” Titles or Law-Firm Practices

Pleading a “Shadow Partnership” as a RICO Enterprise Requires Plausible, Distinct Profit-Sharing Facts—Not Just “Partner” Titles or Law-Firm Practices

Date: Apr 17, 2026
Pleading a “Shadow Partnership” as a RICO Enterprise Requires Plausible, Distinct Profit-Sharing Facts—Not Just “Partner” Titles or Law-Firm Practices 1. Introduction Kosher Eats LLC, et al. v....
Tenth Circuit: A Defendant’s Police-Officer Status, Standing Alone, Cannot Aggravate Sentence; Supervised Release Preserves Mootness on Direct Appeal

Tenth Circuit: A Defendant’s Police-Officer Status, Standing Alone, Cannot Aggravate Sentence; Supervised Release Preserves Mootness on Direct Appeal

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Tenth Circuit: A Defendant’s Police-Officer Status, Standing Alone, Cannot Aggravate Sentence; Supervised Release Preserves Mootness on Direct Appeal Case: United States v. Thompson (10th Cir. Apr....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert