Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Erroneous Dismissal of a Nondiverse Defendant Does Not Cure an Improper Removal: Vacatur Required; Rule 21 Cannot Defeat Plaintiff’s Forum Choice I. Introduction Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v....
FTCA Postal Exception Covers Intentional Nondelivery: “Loss” and “Miscarriage” Include Willful Withholding of Mail I. Introduction United States Postal Service et al. v. Konan (607 U. S. ___ (2026))...
IEEPA Does Not Authorize Presidential Tariffs: Tariffs as Taxing Power Require Clear Congressional Delegation Case: LEARNING RESOURCES, INC. v. TRUMP (consolidated with Trump v. V.O.S. Selections,...
IEEPA Does Not Authorize Presidential Tariffs: “Regulate … Importation” Is Not a Delegation of the Taxing Power Case: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (consolidated with Trump v. V.O.S. Selections,...
Klein v. Martin: AEDPA Deference Bars Federal Habeas Relief Where State Court Correctly Applies Brady Materiality Despite Allegedly “Unnuanced” Analysis Introduction Klein v. Martin (U.S. Supreme...
Prospective “Martin” Filing Bars Extend to Indigent Prisoners After Repeated Frivolous Noncriminal Petitions Case: INDIANA, EX REL. DANNY W. HOWELL v. CIRCUIT COURT OF INDIANA, WELLS COUNTY, ETAL....
Rule 60(b)(4) Void-Judgment Motions Must Be Filed Within a “Reasonable Time” Under Rule 60(c)(1) 1. Introduction In Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton, Chapter 7 Trustee for Vista-Pro...
MVRA Restitution Is Criminal Punishment for Ex Post Facto Purposes Case: Ellingburg v. United States (U.S. Supreme Court, Jan. 20, 2026) | Citation: 607 U.S. ____ (2026) 1. Introduction Ellingburg v....
Rule 8 Preempts State Affidavit-of-Merit Gatekeeping in Federal Diversity Malpractice Suits I. Introduction Berk v. Choy (607 U. S. ___ (2026)) addresses a recurring Erie/Hanna conflict: whether a...
Emergency-Aid Home Entries Require an “Objectively Reasonable Basis,” Not Probable Cause Introduction Case: Case v. Montana, 607 U. S. ____ (2026). Court: U.S. Supreme Court. Date: January 14, 2026....
Barrett v. United States: §924(j) Is an Alternative, Not an Additional Conviction, to §924(c)(1)(A)(i) for a Single Fatal Firearm Act Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: January 14, 2026 Citation: 607 U....
Candidate Standing to Challenge Vote-Counting Rules Without Proving Outcome-Determinative Harm: Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections (2026) 1. Introduction Bost et al. v. Illinois State Board of...
Bowe v. United States: Federal Prisoners May Seek Certiorari from §2255 Gatekeeping Denials, and §2244(b)(1)’s “Old-Claim” Bar Does Not Govern Successive §2255 Motions Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date:...
“Regular Forces” Means Regular Military: Trump v. Illinois and the New Limits on Federalizing the National Guard Trump v. Illinois, 607 U.S. ___ (2025) U.S. Supreme Court, December 23, 2025 (on...
“Regular Forces” Means the Regular Military: Limiting National Guard Federalization Under 10 U.S.C. §12406(3) Absent Lawful Military Law-Execution Authority Case: Trump v. Illinois, 607 U. S. ____...
Abbott v. League of United Latin American Citizens (Abbott v. LULAC): Elevating the Presumption of Legislative Good Faith and the Alternative‑Map Requirement in Racial Gerrymandering Cases I....
Pitts v. Mississippi: Reaffirming Case-Specific Necessity Before Shielding Child Witnesses from Face-to-Face Confrontation I. Introduction In Pitts v. Mississippi, 607 U.S. ___ (2025), the U.S....
Beck v. United States and the “Enhanced Force” of Statutory Stare Decisis in the Shadow of the Feres Doctrine I. Introduction Beck v. United States, 607 U.S. ___ (2025), arises out of a tragic...
No Plenary Power Without Constitutional Warrant: Justice Gorsuch’s Dissent in Veneno v. United States Introduction In Veneno v. United States, 607 U.S. ___ (2025), the Supreme Court denied a petition...