Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Post-Deprivation State Remedies Defeat § 1983 Due Process Claims for Unauthorized Property Seizures; Sherman Act Pleading Requires Market-Wide Competitive Harm

Post-Deprivation State Remedies Defeat § 1983 Due Process Claims for Unauthorized Property Seizures; Sherman Act Pleading Requires Market-Wide Competitive Harm

Date: Apr 22, 2026
Post-Deprivation State Remedies Defeat § 1983 Due Process Claims for Unauthorized Property Seizures; Sherman Act Pleading Requires Market-Wide Competitive Harm Introduction In Ams. Choice Veterans...
MVRA Restitution in “Fraudulent Clinic” No-Fault Schemes: Full Reimbursement as Loss, Joint-and-Several Liability, and Defendant-Borne Offset Proof

MVRA Restitution in “Fraudulent Clinic” No-Fault Schemes: Full Reimbursement as Loss, Joint-and-Several Liability, and Defendant-Borne Offset Proof

Date: Apr 22, 2026
MVRA Restitution in “Fraudulent Clinic” No-Fault Schemes: Full Reimbursement as Loss, Joint-and-Several Liability, and Defendant-Borne Offset Proof 1. Introduction United States v. Israilov (2d Cir....
United States v. Gnahore: Intended-Loss Stipulations After Rainford Are Not Ineffective Assistance; Acquittals Do Not Create Retroactive Misjoinder; Post‑Trial Rule 17(c) “Fishing Expeditions” Properly Denied

United States v. Gnahore: Intended-Loss Stipulations After Rainford Are Not Ineffective Assistance; Acquittals Do Not Create Retroactive Misjoinder; Post‑Trial Rule 17(c) “Fishing Expeditions” Properly Denied

Date: Apr 21, 2026
United States v. Gnahore: Intended-Loss Stipulations After Rainford Are Not Ineffective Assistance; Acquittals Do Not Create Retroactive Misjoinder; Post‑Trial Rule 17(c) “Fishing Expeditions”...
Williams v. Smith — Expired Eligibility Defeats Standing for APA Delay Claims; FAA Interpretive Letters Are Notice-and-Comment Exempt

Williams v. Smith — Expired Eligibility Defeats Standing for APA Delay Claims; FAA Interpretive Letters Are Notice-and-Comment Exempt

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Williams v. Smith — Expired Eligibility Defeats Standing for APA Delay Claims; FAA Interpretive Letters Are Notice-and-Comment Exempt 1. Introduction In Williams v. Smith (2d Cir. Apr. 17, 2026)...
Remand Futility in Asylum Appeals: Nexus Error Does Not Require Remand Where Lack of Future Persecution Independently Defeats Relief

Remand Futility in Asylum Appeals: Nexus Error Does Not Require Remand Where Lack of Future Persecution Independently Defeats Relief

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Remand Futility in Asylum Appeals: Nexus Error Does Not Require Remand Where Lack of Future Persecution Independently Defeats Relief I. Introduction In Carbajal-Carbajal v. Blanche (2d Cir. Apr. 16,...
Advocacy Organizations Cannot “Spend Their Way” Into Article III Standing; Increased-Risk Standing Requires Non-Speculative, Corroborated Facts

Advocacy Organizations Cannot “Spend Their Way” Into Article III Standing; Increased-Risk Standing Requires Non-Speculative, Corroborated Facts

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Advocacy Organizations Cannot “Spend Their Way” Into Article III Standing; Increased-Risk Standing Requires Non-Speculative, Corroborated Facts Introduction In Farm Sanctuary v. United States...
Williams v. Trans Union LLC — Procedural Forfeiture, Judicial Notice on Rule 12 Motions, and No Sua Sponte Leave to Amend for Pro Se Attorneys

Williams v. Trans Union LLC — Procedural Forfeiture, Judicial Notice on Rule 12 Motions, and No Sua Sponte Leave to Amend for Pro Se Attorneys

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Williams v. Trans Union LLC — Procedural Forfeiture, Judicial Notice on Rule 12 Motions, and No Sua Sponte Leave to Amend for Pro Se Attorneys 1. Introduction In Williams v. Trans Union LLC (2d Cir....
Crypto-Ponzi Prosecutions: Prior-Fraud 404(b) Evidence and “Red Flag” Willful Blindness Sustain Wire-Fraud Conspiracy Convictions (United States v. Carmona)

Crypto-Ponzi Prosecutions: Prior-Fraud 404(b) Evidence and “Red Flag” Willful Blindness Sustain Wire-Fraud Conspiracy Convictions (United States v. Carmona)

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Crypto-Ponzi Prosecutions: Prior-Fraud 404(b) Evidence and “Red Flag” Willful Blindness Sustain Wire-Fraud Conspiracy Convictions (United States v. Carmona) Introduction In United States v. Carmona...
Issue Exhaustion Controls: Unchallenged BIA Waiver Bars Asylum/Withholding Review; CAT Relief Requires Proof of Government Acquiescence

Issue Exhaustion Controls: Unchallenged BIA Waiver Bars Asylum/Withholding Review; CAT Relief Requires Proof of Government Acquiescence

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Issue Exhaustion Controls: Unchallenged BIA Waiver Bars Asylum/Withholding Review; CAT Relief Requires Proof of Government Acquiescence 1. Introduction Gonzalez Gonzalez v. Blanche (2d Cir. Apr. 13,...
Pleading an Oral Joint Venture for Crypto Profits Requires Concrete Allegations of Capital Contribution, Joint Control, and Profit/Loss Sharing

Pleading an Oral Joint Venture for Crypto Profits Requires Concrete Allegations of Capital Contribution, Joint Control, and Profit/Loss Sharing

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Pleading an Oral Joint Venture for Crypto Profits Requires Concrete Allegations of Capital Contribution, Joint Control, and Profit/Loss Sharing Introduction In Tesla v. Pelinkovic (2d Cir. Apr. 13,...
Issue-Abandonment in Immigration Petitions: Failure to Challenge Dispositive Findings (Including Internal Relocation) Defeats Asylum/CAT Claims; Continuance Denials Require Prejudice

Issue-Abandonment in Immigration Petitions: Failure to Challenge Dispositive Findings (Including Internal Relocation) Defeats Asylum/CAT Claims; Continuance Denials Require Prejudice

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Issue-Abandonment in Immigration Petitions: Failure to Challenge Dispositive Findings (Including Internal Relocation) Defeats Asylum/CAT Claims; Continuance Denials Require Prejudice Case: Sheraz v....
United States v. Pence: Voluntary Questioning in an FBI Vehicle During Warrant Execution Is Not “Custody” for Miranda When the Suspect Is Told He Is Not Under Arrest and Is Not Restrained

United States v. Pence: Voluntary Questioning in an FBI Vehicle During Warrant Execution Is Not “Custody” for Miranda When the Suspect Is Told He Is Not Under Arrest and Is Not Restrained

Date: Apr 16, 2026
United States v. Pence: Voluntary Questioning in an FBI Vehicle During Warrant Execution Is Not “Custody” for Miranda When the Suspect Is Told He Is Not Under Arrest and Is Not Restrained...
Post–Loper Bright, the Second Circuit Reaffirms Wei Sun: No Pre-Decision Notice Requirement for Corroboration, and Pattern-or-Practice Claims Still Require Proof of Group Inclusion

Post–Loper Bright, the Second Circuit Reaffirms Wei Sun: No Pre-Decision Notice Requirement for Corroboration, and Pattern-or-Practice Claims Still Require Proof of Group Inclusion

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Post–Loper Bright, the Second Circuit Reaffirms Wei Sun: No Pre-Decision Notice Requirement for Corroboration, and Pattern-or-Practice Claims Still Require Proof of Group Inclusion 1. Introduction In...
“Vulnerability” and Crime-Reporting Victimhood Are Not Enough: Particular Social Group Precision, Exhaustion, and Nexus Limits in Gang-Extortion Asylum Claims

“Vulnerability” and Crime-Reporting Victimhood Are Not Enough: Particular Social Group Precision, Exhaustion, and Nexus Limits in Gang-Extortion Asylum Claims

Date: Apr 16, 2026
“Vulnerability” and Crime-Reporting Victimhood Are Not Enough: Particular Social Group Precision, Exhaustion, and Nexus Limits in Gang-Extortion Asylum Claims 1. Introduction In Diaz Pulig v. Blanche...
Esposito v. Gary: Pleading Legal Malpractice Requires Plausible Negligence and “But-For” Causation; Optimistic Litigation Predictions Are Not Negligent Misrepresentation

Esposito v. Gary: Pleading Legal Malpractice Requires Plausible Negligence and “But-For” Causation; Optimistic Litigation Predictions Are Not Negligent Misrepresentation

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Esposito v. Gary: Pleading Legal Malpractice Requires Plausible Negligence and “But-For” Causation; Optimistic Litigation Predictions Are Not Negligent Misrepresentation 1. Introduction In Esposito...
Second Circuit: Plausible Fourth Amendment Firearms-Seizure Claim Survives § 1915(e) Screening; Implied Consent to Enter May Be Revoked

Second Circuit: Plausible Fourth Amendment Firearms-Seizure Claim Survives § 1915(e) Screening; Implied Consent to Enter May Be Revoked

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Second Circuit: Plausible Fourth Amendment Firearms-Seizure Claim Survives § 1915(e) Screening; Implied Consent to Enter May Be Revoked I. Introduction In Campbell v. Broome County (2d Cir. Apr. 9,...
Section 1326(d) Is Strictly Mandatory: Palomar-Santiago Abrogates Sosa’s “Invalid Waiver” Exception

Section 1326(d) Is Strictly Mandatory: Palomar-Santiago Abrogates Sosa’s “Invalid Waiver” Exception

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Section 1326(d) Is Strictly Mandatory: Palomar-Santiago Abrogates Sosa’s “Invalid Waiver” Exception 1. Introduction In United States v. Manuel Zumba Mejia (Second Circuit, Apr. 9, 2026), the...
Article 78 Adequacy and Personal Involvement as Threshold Bars to § 1983 Search/Seizure and Due Process Claims (and Monell’s Policy-or-Custom Requirement)

Article 78 Adequacy and Personal Involvement as Threshold Bars to § 1983 Search/Seizure and Due Process Claims (and Monell’s Policy-or-Custom Requirement)

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Article 78 Adequacy and Personal Involvement as Threshold Bars to § 1983 Search/Seizure and Due Process Claims (and Monell’s Policy-or-Custom Requirement) 1. Introduction Campbell v. City of...
Agency Must Consider Race Nexus and Conflicting Country-Conditions Evidence When Assessing PSG Social Distinction and “Unable or Unwilling to Protect”

Agency Must Consider Race Nexus and Conflicting Country-Conditions Evidence When Assessing PSG Social Distinction and “Unable or Unwilling to Protect”

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Agency Must Consider Race Nexus and Conflicting Country-Conditions Evidence When Assessing PSG Social Distinction and “Unable or Unwilling to Protect” Nonprecedential posture: The Second Circuit...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Immunity for Court-Integrated Actors and Enforces Waiver for Untimely Objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report

Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Immunity for Court-Integrated Actors and Enforces Waiver for Untimely Objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Immunity for Court-Integrated Actors and Enforces Waiver for Untimely Objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report Introduction In Weilburg v. Fitzgerald (2d Cir. Apr....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert