Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Hawaii Case Commentaries

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing; Clarifies Final-Judgment Protocols in Special Proceedings

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing; Clarifies Final-Judgment Protocols in Special Proceedings

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reaffirming the Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing under HRS § 658A-28 and Mandating “In Aid of Jurisdiction” Remands for Final Judgments in Special Proceedings...
Cotenants’ Standing To Defend Absent Cotenants Against Adverse Possession, and Laches as a Bar to Century‑Old Land Court Claims: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court’s Decision in In re Application of Pioneer Mill Co., Limited (2025)

Cotenants’ Standing To Defend Absent Cotenants Against Adverse Possession, and Laches as a Bar to Century‑Old Land Court Claims: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court’s Decision in In re Application of Pioneer Mill Co., Limited (2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Equity Aids the Vigilant”: Cotenants May Defend Absent Cotenants Against Adverse Possession, and Laches Bars a Century-Old Land Court Claim Introduction In a published opinion with far-reaching...
Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty

Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty Introduction In Honoipu Hideaway, LLC v. State (Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, August...
“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025)

“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025) Introduction In State v....
When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record

When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record Introduction In Ke Kauhulu O Mānā v. Board of...
Rodriguez v. Mauna Kea Resort LLC: The “Specific-Percentage” Disclosure Rule for Hawaiʻi Service Charges

Rodriguez v. Mauna Kea Resort LLC: The “Specific-Percentage” Disclosure Rule for Hawaiʻi Service Charges

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Rodriguez v. Mauna Kea Resort LLC: The New Requirement to State the Exact Portion of a Service Charge Paid as Tip Income Introduction Rodriguez v. Mauna Kea Resort LLC, 155 Haw. 223 (Haw. 2025),...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Director Indemnification and “Fees-on-Fees” Recovery: Loyalty Development Company, Ltd. v. Ching (2025)

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Director Indemnification and “Fees-on-Fees” Recovery: Loyalty Development Company, Ltd. v. Ching (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Director Indemnification and “Fees-on-Fees” Recovery Loyalty Development Company, Ltd. v. Ching, 154 Haw. 256 (2025) Introduction In Loyalty Development...
Cowan v. Exclusive Resorts: Contractual Attorney-Fee Clauses Override HRS § 607-14 in Assumpsit Actions

Cowan v. Exclusive Resorts: Contractual Attorney-Fee Clauses Override HRS § 607-14 in Assumpsit Actions

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Cowan v. Exclusive Resorts PBL1, LLC Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, Opinion filed 14 August 2025 “Contract-Specific Fee Clauses Defeat Statutory Fees in Assumpsit” 1. Introduction Cowan v. Exclusive...
State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges

State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges

Date: Aug 15, 2025
State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges 1. Introduction In State v....
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosures Introduction In The Bank of New York Mellon v. White, SCWC-21-0000400 (Aug. 7 2025), the Hawaiʻi Supreme...
Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f)

Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f) Introduction On 4 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi issued a...
“Implied Dissolution of Litigation Stays upon Reinstatement Orders” — A Commentary on Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A., Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi (2025)

“Implied Dissolution of Litigation Stays upon Reinstatement Orders” — A Commentary on Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A., Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi (2025)

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“Implied Dissolution of Litigation Stays upon Reinstatement Orders” Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A. — Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, 29 July 2025 Introduction Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A. concerns prolonged...
Expanding Due-Process Standing: Skilled Nursing Facilities Gain Direct Appeal Rights in Hawaiʻi Medicaid Eligibility Disputes

Expanding Due-Process Standing: Skilled Nursing Facilities Gain Direct Appeal Rights in Hawaiʻi Medicaid Eligibility Disputes

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Expanding Due-Process Standing: Skilled Nursing Facilities Gain Direct Appeal Rights in Hawaiʻi Medicaid Eligibility Disputes Introduction Case: In re FT, by and through Aloha Nursing Rehab Centre v....
Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (2025)

Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (Haw. 2025) 1. Introduction Case: State of Hawaiʻi v. Erik Willis,...
“Beyond Aspirations: Restricting Attorney Discipline to Conduct Expressly Covered By the Hawaiʻi Rules of Professional Conduct”

“Beyond Aspirations: Restricting Attorney Discipline to Conduct Expressly Covered By the Hawaiʻi Rules of Professional Conduct”

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Beyond Aspirations: Restricting Attorney Discipline to Conduct Expressly Covered By the Hawaiʻi Rules of Professional Conduct Introduction In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zenger, the Supreme...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Recasts Punitive-Damages Doctrine and Rejects “Kinship” Fiduciary Duty – A Commentary on Guieb v. Guieb (2025)

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Recasts Punitive-Damages Doctrine and Rejects “Kinship” Fiduciary Duty – A Commentary on Guieb v. Guieb (2025)

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Recasts Punitive-Damages Doctrine and Rejects “Kinship” Fiduciary Duty – A Commentary on Guieb v. Guieb (2025) 1. Introduction Guieb v. Guieb, SCWC-20-0000727 (July 1 2025), is...
Excess Credit as a Condition Precedent: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Limits RETITC Refundability Elections to Credits Exceeding Tax Liability

Excess Credit as a Condition Precedent: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Limits RETITC Refundability Elections to Credits Exceeding Tax Liability

Date: Jul 1, 2025
Excess Credit as a Condition Precedent: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Limits RETITC Refundability Elections to Credits Exceeding Tax Liability Introduction In Suganuma v. Goodman, SCWC-24-0000229 (Haw. June...
“Temporal Alignment” under HRS § 657-1.8:  Criminal Statutes in Force at the Time of Abuse Govern Civil Child-Sexual-Abuse Suits

“Temporal Alignment” under HRS § 657-1.8: Criminal Statutes in Force at the Time of Abuse Govern Civil Child-Sexual-Abuse Suits

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Temporal Alignment” under HRS § 657-1.8: Criminal Statutes in Force at the Time of Abuse Govern Civil Child-Sexual-Abuse Suits Introduction In Foresman v. Foresman, 154 Haw. 46, cert. granted and...
Prospective Due-Process Notice for Junior Judgment Lienholders in Hawaiʻi Execution Sales

Prospective Due-Process Notice for Junior Judgment Lienholders in Hawaiʻi Execution Sales

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Prospective Due-Process Notice for Junior Judgment Lienholders in Hawaiʻi Execution Sales 1. Introduction In Winn v. Brady, SCWC-17-0000806 (Haw. June 13 2025), the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court delivered a...
Prospective Constitutional Notice Rights for Junior Judgment Lienholders – A Commentary on Winn v. Brady (2025)

Prospective Constitutional Notice Rights for Junior Judgment Lienholders – A Commentary on Winn v. Brady (2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Prospective Constitutional Notice Rights for Junior Judgment Lienholders: An In-Depth Commentary on Winn v. Brady (Haw. 2025) Introduction The Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi’s decision in Winn v. Brady,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert