Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alabama Case Commentaries

Keister v. Neurology Consultants of Huntsville, P.C.: Expert Testimony Must Be Read as a Whole on “Better-Position” Causation; Post-Judgment “Clarification” Affidavits Are Untimely When Diligence Could Have Produced Them Earlier

Keister v. Neurology Consultants of Huntsville, P.C.: Expert Testimony Must Be Read as a Whole on “Better-Position” Causation; Post-Judgment “Clarification” Affidavits Are Untimely When Diligence Could Have Produced Them Earlier

Date: Feb 11, 2026
Keister v. Neurology Consultants of Huntsville, P.C.: Expert Testimony Must Be Read as a Whole on “Better-Position” Causation; Post-Judgment “Clarification” Affidavits Are Untimely When Diligence...
Ex parte Stonebridge, LLC — “Bona Fide Intent to Immediately Serve” as an Objective, Statute-of-Limitations Commencement Requirement

Ex parte Stonebridge, LLC — “Bona Fide Intent to Immediately Serve” as an Objective, Statute-of-Limitations Commencement Requirement

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Ex parte Stonebridge, LLC: Filing Is Not Enough—An Action Is Not “Commenced” for Limitations Purposes Without an Objective Bona Fide Intent to Immediately Serve Court: Supreme Court of Alabama Date:...
Ex parte University of Alabama Health Services Foundation — Mandamus for Facial Limitations Bars; § 6-2-3 Requires Concealment Beyond Later Realization of Illegality

Ex parte University of Alabama Health Services Foundation — Mandamus for Facial Limitations Bars; § 6-2-3 Requires Concealment Beyond Later Realization of Illegality

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Ex parte University of Alabama Health Services Foundation: Mandamus Relief Where Limitations Bars Are Clear on the Face of the Complaint, and § 6-2-3 Is Not Triggered by a Later “Discovery” That...
Proximate-Cause Gatekeeping in Wantonness Claims Against Pawnbrokers for Purchased Stolen Property

Proximate-Cause Gatekeeping in Wantonness Claims Against Pawnbrokers for Purchased Stolen Property

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Proximate-Cause Gatekeeping in Wantonness Claims Against Pawnbrokers for Purchased Stolen Property Case: EFS Inc. v. Lee, Supreme Court of Alabama (Jan. 30, 2026) Disposition: Reversed and judgment...
Minors Are Not Exempt from Alabama’s Six-Month Municipal Notice-of-Claim Deadline (§ 11-47-23)

Minors Are Not Exempt from Alabama’s Six-Month Municipal Notice-of-Claim Deadline (§ 11-47-23)

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Minors Are Not Exempt from Alabama’s Six-Month Municipal Notice-of-Claim Deadline (§ 11-47-23) Introduction In A.G.R. v. The City of Irondale (paired appeals also involving the City of Birmingham),...
Mandamus Requires a Developed Constitutional/Statutory Basis to Compel a Jury Determination of Prevailing-Party Contractual Attorney’s Fees

Mandamus Requires a Developed Constitutional/Statutory Basis to Compel a Jury Determination of Prevailing-Party Contractual Attorney’s Fees

Date: Feb 3, 2026
Mandamus Requires a Developed Constitutional/Statutory Basis to Compel a Jury Determination of Prevailing-Party Contractual Attorney’s Fees I. Introduction In Ex parte Vestavia Hills, Ltd. (Ala. Jan....
Marital Presumption as an Absolute Bar Under the AUPA When the Husband Persists: Ex parte Jarrod Sessions

Marital Presumption as an Absolute Bar Under the AUPA When the Husband Persists: Ex parte Jarrod Sessions

Date: Jan 28, 2026
Marital Presumption as an Absolute Bar Under the AUPA When the Husband Persists: Ex parte Jarrod Sessions 1. Introduction Case: Ex parte Jarrod Sessions, Supreme Court of Alabama (Jan. 23, 2026),...
Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar

Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Alabama’s decision in Jerry...
Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement

Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement I. Introduction In Dendy v. Ryan, decided on December 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of Alabama...
Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation

Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation I. Introduction In Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A., decided on...
“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center (SC‑2024‑0767) and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics (SC‑2024‑0770)

“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center (SC‑2024‑0767) and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics (SC‑2024‑0770)

Date: Dec 15, 2025
“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics, P.C. I. Introduction This decision...
No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State: Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P.

No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State: Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P.

Date: Dec 15, 2025
No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P., Supreme Court of Alabama (Dec. 12, 2025) I. Introduction...
Substantial Compliance with Public-Works Bid Advertising under Alabama Title 39: Commentary on Pinpoint Locating, Inc. v. Water Works & Gas Board of Red Bay

Substantial Compliance with Public-Works Bid Advertising under Alabama Title 39: Commentary on Pinpoint Locating, Inc. v. Water Works & Gas Board of Red Bay

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Substantial Compliance with Public-Works Bid Advertising under Alabama Title 39 Commentary on Pinpoint Locating, Inc. v. The Water Works and Gas Board of the City of Red Bay, Supreme Court of Alabama...
Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC: Clarifying Alabama’s “Seriously Inconvenient” Standard for Outbound Forum‑Selection Clauses

Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC: Clarifying Alabama’s “Seriously Inconvenient” Standard for Outbound Forum‑Selection Clauses

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC: Clarifying Alabama’s “Seriously Inconvenient” Standard for Outbound Forum‑Selection Clauses I. Introduction In Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC...
Southampton 100, LLC v. Alabama Department of Revenue: Limiting Dismissal Sanctions for Rule 30(b)(6) Discovery Violations and Encouraging Hearings on Contested Dispositive Motions

Southampton 100, LLC v. Alabama Department of Revenue: Limiting Dismissal Sanctions for Rule 30(b)(6) Discovery Violations and Encouraging Hearings on Contested Dispositive Motions

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Southampton 100, LLC v. Alabama Department of Revenue: Limiting Dismissal Sanctions for Rule 30(b)(6) Discovery Violations and Encouraging Hearings on Contested Dispositive Motions I. Introduction...
Roberson v. Daniel: Tightening Rule 54(b) Final-Judgment Certification in Multi‑Party, Bankruptcy‑Affected Litigation

Roberson v. Daniel: Tightening Rule 54(b) Final-Judgment Certification in Multi‑Party, Bankruptcy‑Affected Litigation

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Roberson v. Daniel: Tightening Rule 54(b) Final-Judgment Certification in Multi‑Party, Bankruptcy‑Affected Litigation I. Introduction Roberson v. Daniel, decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on...
Lay Witness “Indicated” Abuse Findings as Impermissible Ultimate-Issue Testimony: Commentary on Ex parte William Chad Randolph

Lay Witness “Indicated” Abuse Findings as Impermissible Ultimate-Issue Testimony: Commentary on Ex parte William Chad Randolph

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Lay Witness “Indicated” Abuse Findings as Impermissible Ultimate-Issue Testimony: Commentary on Ex parte William Chad Randolph Introduction In Ex parte William Chad Randolph (Ala. Nov. 21, 2025), the...
Timely Amendments under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Ex parte Steven M. Taylor, M.D.

Timely Amendments under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Ex parte Steven M. Taylor, M.D.

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Timely Amendments under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Integrating Rule 15(a) with § 6‑5‑551 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Alabama’s decision in Ex parte Steven M. Taylor, M.D. (Nov. 7,...
Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Juror Nondisclosure and Clarifying Rule 59.1 Extensions: Commentary on Nissan North America, Inc. & Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Henderson‑Brundidge

Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Juror Nondisclosure and Clarifying Rule 59.1 Extensions: Commentary on Nissan North America, Inc. & Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Henderson‑Brundidge

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Juror Nondisclosure and Clarifying Rule 59.1 Extensions: Commentary on Nissan North America, Inc., and Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Alise Henderson‑Brundidge I....
Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway

Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway Introduction In City of Birmingham v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert