Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kentucky Case Commentaries

Waiver by Affirmative Approval of Jury Instructions and Limits on Speculative Digital-Extraction Challenges

Waiver by Affirmative Approval of Jury Instructions and Limits on Speculative Digital-Extraction Challenges

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Waiver by Affirmative Approval of Jury Instructions and Limits on Speculative Digital-Extraction Challenges (Hatfield v. Commonwealth) Introduction In Ryan Hatfield v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the...
Hall v. Commonwealth: Defendant Bears Burden to Disqualify Entire Prosecutor’s Office When Former Defense Counsel Joins That Office; Broad Admissibility of Crime-Context Evidence in Penalty-Phase-Only Trials

Hall v. Commonwealth: Defendant Bears Burden to Disqualify Entire Prosecutor’s Office When Former Defense Counsel Joins That Office; Broad Admissibility of Crime-Context Evidence in Penalty-Phase-Only Trials

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Hall v. Commonwealth: Defendant Bears Burden to Disqualify Entire Prosecutor’s Office When Former Defense Counsel Joins That Office; Broad Admissibility of Crime-Context Evidence in...
Combined Penalty-Phase Misinstructions on Offense Class and Maximum Sentence Constitute Palpable Error Requiring Resentencing

Combined Penalty-Phase Misinstructions on Offense Class and Maximum Sentence Constitute Palpable Error Requiring Resentencing

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Combined Penalty-Phase Misinstructions on Offense Class and Maximum Sentence Constitute Palpable Error Requiring Resentencing Case: Christopher T. Thrasher v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court: Supreme...
When the Defense Calls the KCPC Competency Evaluator: No Conley “Wall” Violation from Wide-Open Cross on Criminal Responsibility; Surprise Expert Diagnosis Changes Permit Exclusion

When the Defense Calls the KCPC Competency Evaluator: No Conley “Wall” Violation from Wide-Open Cross on Criminal Responsibility; Surprise Expert Diagnosis Changes Permit Exclusion

Date: Mar 21, 2026
When the Defense Calls the KCPC Competency Evaluator: No Conley “Wall” Violation from Wide-Open Cross on Criminal Responsibility; Surprise Expert Diagnosis Changes Permit Exclusion I. Introduction In...
Mandamus Unavailable to Compel Privilege Ruling or Disqualify Counsel After Inadvertent Disclosure When Ordinary Evidentiary Remedies Exist

Mandamus Unavailable to Compel Privilege Ruling or Disqualify Counsel After Inadvertent Disclosure When Ordinary Evidentiary Remedies Exist

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Mandamus Unavailable to Compel Privilege Ruling or Disqualify Counsel After Inadvertent Disclosure When Ordinary Evidentiary Remedies Exist Case: City of Prospect, Kentucky v. Ann Bailey Smith (Ky....
Kentucky Parole Revocations: ALJ Final Hearings Permitted, but Due Process Requires a Parolee “Exceptions” Path to the Parole Board

Kentucky Parole Revocations: ALJ Final Hearings Permitted, but Due Process Requires a Parolee “Exceptions” Path to the Parole Board

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Kentucky Parole Revocations: ALJ Final Hearings Permitted, but Due Process Requires a Parolee “Exceptions” Path to the Parole Board Case: Douglas Hodge v. Kentucky Parole Board; Kentucky Parole Board...
Limits of Kentucky’s Castle Doctrine for Invited Guests: “Unlawful and Forcible Entry” Remains Essential (and Mistrial Does Not Preserve Instructional Error)

Limits of Kentucky’s Castle Doctrine for Invited Guests: “Unlawful and Forcible Entry” Remains Essential (and Mistrial Does Not Preserve Instructional Error)

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Limits of Kentucky’s Castle Doctrine for Invited Guests: “Unlawful and Forcible Entry” Remains Essential (and Mistrial Does Not Preserve Instructional Error) Publication status: This is a Kentucky...
Due Process Requires an “Exceptions” Opportunity When the Kentucky Parole Board Delegates Final Revocation Hearings to ALJs

Due Process Requires an “Exceptions” Opportunity When the Kentucky Parole Board Delegates Final Revocation Hearings to ALJs

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Due Process Requires an “Exceptions” Opportunity When the Kentucky Parole Board Delegates Final Revocation Hearings to ALJs I. Introduction In Kentucky Parole Board v. Timothy Shane (consolidated...
KRS 421.350 Protection Turns on the Child’s Age at the Time of the Offense: Sparkman and Walker Overruled to the Extent They Conflict with Danner

KRS 421.350 Protection Turns on the Child’s Age at the Time of the Offense: Sparkman and Walker Overruled to the Extent They Conflict with Danner

Date: Mar 21, 2026
KRS 421.350 Protection Turns on the Child’s Age at the Time of the Offense: Sparkman and Walker Overruled to the Extent They Conflict with Danner Case: Michael Gibbs v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky....
Mootness of In Forma Pauperis Appeals Once the Clerk Has Filed the Pleading (and “Adversely Affected” Limits Reconsideration)

Mootness of In Forma Pauperis Appeals Once the Clerk Has Filed the Pleading (and “Adversely Affected” Limits Reconsideration)

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Mootness of In Forma Pauperis Appeals Once the Clerk Has Filed the Pleading (and “Adversely Affected” Limits Reconsideration) 1. Introduction In Rebekah A. Atkins v. Office of the Jefferson County...
Kentucky Recognizes a Limited “Take-Home” Asbestos Duty for Regular Household Contact and Bars “No Duty” Summary Judgment Where Foreseeability Is Fact-Disputed

Kentucky Recognizes a Limited “Take-Home” Asbestos Duty for Regular Household Contact and Bars “No Duty” Summary Judgment Where Foreseeability Is Fact-Disputed

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Kentucky Recognizes a Limited “Take-Home” Asbestos Duty for Regular Household Contact and Bars “No Duty” Summary Judgment Where Foreseeability Is Fact-Disputed I. Introduction In Schneider Electric...
When Compensability Is Denied, the 45-Day Medical-Billing Rule Is Excused for “Reasonable Grounds,” and Workers’ Compensation Petitions for Review Count as “Briefs” for Amicus Timing

When Compensability Is Denied, the 45-Day Medical-Billing Rule Is Excused for “Reasonable Grounds,” and Workers’ Compensation Petitions for Review Count as “Briefs” for Amicus Timing

Date: Mar 21, 2026
When Compensability Is Denied, the 45-Day Medical-Billing Rule Is Excused for “Reasonable Grounds,” and Workers’ Compensation Petitions for Review Count as “Briefs” for Amicus Timing I. Introduction...
Kentucky “Take-Home” Asbestos Duty Survives Summary Judgment When Foreseeability Turns on Disputed Facts

Kentucky “Take-Home” Asbestos Duty Survives Summary Judgment When Foreseeability Turns on Disputed Facts

Date: Mar 21, 2026
Kentucky “Take-Home” Asbestos Duty Survives Summary Judgment When Foreseeability Turns on Disputed Facts Case: Schneider Electric USA, Inc., f/k/a Square D v. Williams / Union Carbide Corporation v....
RAP 11 Requires Post-Filing, Court-Determined Sanctions: Kentucky Rejects Clerk-Gatekept Pre-Filing Appellate Injunctions

RAP 11 Requires Post-Filing, Court-Determined Sanctions: Kentucky Rejects Clerk-Gatekept Pre-Filing Appellate Injunctions

Date: Mar 13, 2026
RAP 11 Requires Post-Filing, Court-Determined Sanctions: Kentucky Rejects Clerk-Gatekept Pre-Filing Appellate Injunctions Introduction In Meredith L. Lawrence v. Bingham, Greenebaum, Doll, LLP...
Claimant Testimony Alone Can Support KRS 342.730(1)(c)(1)’s 3x Multiplier Despite No Physician-Imposed Restrictions (Including Cumulative Trauma)

Claimant Testimony Alone Can Support KRS 342.730(1)(c)(1)’s 3x Multiplier Despite No Physician-Imposed Restrictions (Including Cumulative Trauma)

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Claimant Testimony Alone Can Support KRS 342.730(1)(c)(1)’s 3x Multiplier Despite No Physician-Imposed Restrictions (Including Cumulative Trauma) I. Introduction In International Automotive...
Transportation Services Agreements Can Create “Contractor” Status: Up-the-Ladder Immunity for Manufacturers Assuming Delivery/Transport Work by Contract

Transportation Services Agreements Can Create “Contractor” Status: Up-the-Ladder Immunity for Manufacturers Assuming Delivery/Transport Work by Contract

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Transportation Services Agreements Can Create “Contractor” Status: Up-the-Ladder Immunity for Manufacturers Assuming Delivery/Transport Work by Contract Case: Minova USA, Inc. v. Tom Jolly (Ky. Feb....
Temporary Injunctions Cannot Compel Prejudgment Monetary Payments; CR 65.05 Bond Is Mandatory and Nonwaivable

Temporary Injunctions Cannot Compel Prejudgment Monetary Payments; CR 65.05 Bond Is Mandatory and Nonwaivable

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Temporary Injunctions Cannot Compel Prejudgment Monetary Payments; CR 65.05 Bond Is Mandatory and Nonwaivable Case: Ashley Caudill; Brittany Evans; Chase Fossitt; Cherry Wilson; Darwin Simpson;...
Contextual “Family-Dynamic” Bad-Acts Evidence Admissible to Explain Delay in Child-Sex-Abuse Reporting; Admonition Cures Stray Character Remark; Directed-Verdict Preservation Requires Element-Specificity

Contextual “Family-Dynamic” Bad-Acts Evidence Admissible to Explain Delay in Child-Sex-Abuse Reporting; Admonition Cures Stray Character Remark; Directed-Verdict Preservation Requires Element-Specificity

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Contextual “Family-Dynamic” Bad-Acts Evidence Admissible to Explain Delay in Child-Sex-Abuse Reporting; Admonition Cures Stray Character Remark; Directed-Verdict Preservation Requires...
Unequivocal Invocation Required: No Faretta Hearing, No Substitution of Appointed Counsel, and No Lesser-Included Instructions Without Supporting Evidence

Unequivocal Invocation Required: No Faretta Hearing, No Substitution of Appointed Counsel, and No Lesser-Included Instructions Without Supporting Evidence

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Unequivocal Invocation Required: No Faretta Hearing, No Substitution of Appointed Counsel, and No Lesser-Included Instructions Without Supporting Evidence Case: Brice Rhodes v. Commonwealth of...
Routine Affirmance of ALJ Economic-Realities Findings: Substantial Evidence, No “Third-Guessing,” and No Sua Sponte Redesign of the Test

Routine Affirmance of ALJ Economic-Realities Findings: Substantial Evidence, No “Third-Guessing,” and No Sua Sponte Redesign of the Test

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Routine Affirmance of ALJ Economic-Realities Findings: Substantial Evidence, No “Third-Guessing,” and No Sua Sponte Redesign of the Test Introduction In Christine Nicole Falconite v. Shed Wise, LLC...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert