Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Waiver by Affirmative Approval of Jury Instructions and Limits on Speculative Digital-Extraction Challenges (Hatfield v. Commonwealth) Introduction In Ryan Hatfield v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the...
Hall v. Commonwealth: Defendant Bears Burden to Disqualify Entire Prosecutor’s Office When Former Defense Counsel Joins That Office; Broad Admissibility of Crime-Context Evidence in...
Combined Penalty-Phase Misinstructions on Offense Class and Maximum Sentence Constitute Palpable Error Requiring Resentencing Case: Christopher T. Thrasher v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court: Supreme...
When the Defense Calls the KCPC Competency Evaluator: No Conley “Wall” Violation from Wide-Open Cross on Criminal Responsibility; Surprise Expert Diagnosis Changes Permit Exclusion I. Introduction In...
Mandamus Unavailable to Compel Privilege Ruling or Disqualify Counsel After Inadvertent Disclosure When Ordinary Evidentiary Remedies Exist Case: City of Prospect, Kentucky v. Ann Bailey Smith (Ky....
Kentucky Parole Revocations: ALJ Final Hearings Permitted, but Due Process Requires a Parolee “Exceptions” Path to the Parole Board Case: Douglas Hodge v. Kentucky Parole Board; Kentucky Parole Board...
Limits of Kentucky’s Castle Doctrine for Invited Guests: “Unlawful and Forcible Entry” Remains Essential (and Mistrial Does Not Preserve Instructional Error) Publication status: This is a Kentucky...
Due Process Requires an “Exceptions” Opportunity When the Kentucky Parole Board Delegates Final Revocation Hearings to ALJs I. Introduction In Kentucky Parole Board v. Timothy Shane (consolidated...
KRS 421.350 Protection Turns on the Child’s Age at the Time of the Offense: Sparkman and Walker Overruled to the Extent They Conflict with Danner Case: Michael Gibbs v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky....
Mootness of In Forma Pauperis Appeals Once the Clerk Has Filed the Pleading (and “Adversely Affected” Limits Reconsideration) 1. Introduction In Rebekah A. Atkins v. Office of the Jefferson County...
Kentucky Recognizes a Limited “Take-Home” Asbestos Duty for Regular Household Contact and Bars “No Duty” Summary Judgment Where Foreseeability Is Fact-Disputed I. Introduction In Schneider Electric...
When Compensability Is Denied, the 45-Day Medical-Billing Rule Is Excused for “Reasonable Grounds,” and Workers’ Compensation Petitions for Review Count as “Briefs” for Amicus Timing I. Introduction...
Kentucky “Take-Home” Asbestos Duty Survives Summary Judgment When Foreseeability Turns on Disputed Facts Case: Schneider Electric USA, Inc., f/k/a Square D v. Williams / Union Carbide Corporation v....
Claimant Testimony Alone Can Support KRS 342.730(1)(c)(1)’s 3x Multiplier Despite No Physician-Imposed Restrictions (Including Cumulative Trauma) I. Introduction In International Automotive...
Transportation Services Agreements Can Create “Contractor” Status: Up-the-Ladder Immunity for Manufacturers Assuming Delivery/Transport Work by Contract Case: Minova USA, Inc. v. Tom Jolly (Ky. Feb....
Unequivocal Invocation Required: No Faretta Hearing, No Substitution of Appointed Counsel, and No Lesser-Included Instructions Without Supporting Evidence Case: Brice Rhodes v. Commonwealth of...
Routine Affirmance of ALJ Economic-Realities Findings: Substantial Evidence, No “Third-Guessing,” and No Sua Sponte Redesign of the Test Introduction In Christine Nicole Falconite v. Shed Wise, LLC...