Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

MHPA Participation Alone Does Not Make a Private Hospital a Title II “Public Entity,” and Due Process Property Claims Fail Absent a State-Actor Deprivation

MHPA Participation Alone Does Not Make a Private Hospital a Title II “Public Entity,” and Due Process Property Claims Fail Absent a State-Actor Deprivation

Date: Apr 23, 2026
MHPA Participation Alone Does Not Make a Private Hospital a Title II “Public Entity,” and Due Process Property Claims Fail Absent a State-Actor Deprivation 1. Introduction In Susan Kerr v. County of...
Untimely BIA Appeals and Gang-Recruitment PSGs: Particularity/Social-Distinction Limits and CAT Acquiescence Proof Requirements

Untimely BIA Appeals and Gang-Recruitment PSGs: Particularity/Social-Distinction Limits and CAT Acquiescence Proof Requirements

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Untimely BIA Appeals and Gang-Recruitment PSGs: Particularity/Social-Distinction Limits and CAT Acquiescence Proof Requirements 1. Introduction Case: Melvin Mendoza-Perez v. Attorney General United...
Pleading Gender-Stereotyping Under Title IX: Conclusory “Not Masculine Enough” Allegations Do Not Plausibly Allege Same-Sex Peer Harassment “On the Basis of Sex”

Pleading Gender-Stereotyping Under Title IX: Conclusory “Not Masculine Enough” Allegations Do Not Plausibly Allege Same-Sex Peer Harassment “On the Basis of Sex”

Date: Apr 21, 2026
Pleading Gender-Stereotyping Under Title IX: Conclusory “Not Masculine Enough” Allegations Do Not Plausibly Allege Same-Sex Peer Harassment “On the Basis of Sex” Case: Isaiah Humphries v....
No Post-Deadline Doe Substitution Without a Rule 6(b)(1)(B) Motion and a Finding of Excusable Neglect

No Post-Deadline Doe Substitution Without a Rule 6(b)(1)(B) Motion and a Finding of Excusable Neglect

Date: Apr 20, 2026
No Post-Deadline Doe Substitution Without a Rule 6(b)(1)(B) Motion and a Finding of Excusable Neglect 1. Introduction Kenneth J. Konias, Jr. v. David Druskin, PA-C, et al. is a prisoner civil-rights...
NJLAD Summary Judgment: No Pretext Without Evidence, No Retaliation Without Decisionmaker Knowledge, and No Aiding-and-Abetting Without an Underlying Violation

NJLAD Summary Judgment: No Pretext Without Evidence, No Retaliation Without Decisionmaker Knowledge, and No Aiding-and-Abetting Without an Underlying Violation

Date: Apr 20, 2026
NJLAD Summary Judgment: No Pretext Without Evidence, No Retaliation Without Decisionmaker Knowledge, and No Aiding-and-Abetting Without an Underlying Violation Introduction Mary Crawford v. Sandra...
Jurisdiction Must Be Pleaded—and Jurisdictional Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice

Jurisdiction Must Be Pleaded—and Jurisdictional Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Jurisdiction Must Be Pleaded—and Jurisdictional Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice Introduction In Sungsuk Kim v. Unlimited Settlement Services (3d Cir. Apr. 16, 2026) (not precedential), the Third...
Narrowly Tailored Pre-Filing Injunctions After Vexatious, Rule 8–Deficient Filings (Tajimier v. Montclair State University)

Narrowly Tailored Pre-Filing Injunctions After Vexatious, Rule 8–Deficient Filings (Tajimier v. Montclair State University)

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Narrowly Tailored Pre-Filing Injunctions After Vexatious, Rule 8–Deficient Filings Introduction In Tajimier v. Montclair State University (3d Cir. Apr. 16, 2026) (not precedential), the United States...
Private Hospital COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Are Not State Action; EUA Statute Creates No Private Right of Action

Private Hospital COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Are Not State Action; EUA Statute Creates No Private Right of Action

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Private Hospital COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Are Not State Action; EUA Statute Creates No Private Right of Action Introduction In Beth Boyd v. Shriners Hospitals for Children (3d Cir. Apr. 14, 2026)...
Third Circuit: No Preliminary Injunction for Contract Breach Absent Non-Speculative, Practically Unquantifiable Harm—Market-Share Loss in Biologics Is Not Per Se Irreparable

Third Circuit: No Preliminary Injunction for Contract Breach Absent Non-Speculative, Practically Unquantifiable Harm—Market-Share Loss in Biologics Is Not Per Se Irreparable

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Third Circuit: No Preliminary Injunction for Contract Breach Absent Non-Speculative, Practically Unquantifiable Harm—Market-Share Loss in Biologics Is Not Per Se Irreparable 1. Introduction In...
Accomplice Liability Does Not Defeat “Crime of Violence” Status for Pennsylvania § 2702(a)(4) Under the Career-Offender Elements Clause

Accomplice Liability Does Not Defeat “Crime of Violence” Status for Pennsylvania § 2702(a)(4) Under the Career-Offender Elements Clause

Date: Apr 20, 2026
Accomplice Liability Does Not Defeat “Crime of Violence” Status for Pennsylvania § 2702(a)(4) Under the Career-Offender Elements Clause Introduction In United States v. Brock Cochran (3d Cir. Apr....
Bankruptcy Plan Third-Party Releases Bar Continued Prosecution Against Prison Medical Vendors; No Eighth Amendment Right to DAADs Absent Chronic (Detectable) HCV

Bankruptcy Plan Third-Party Releases Bar Continued Prosecution Against Prison Medical Vendors; No Eighth Amendment Right to DAADs Absent Chronic (Detectable) HCV

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Bankruptcy Plan Third-Party Releases Bar Continued Prosecution Against Prison Medical Vendors; No Eighth Amendment Right to DAADs Absent Chronic (Detectable) HCV Introduction In Karlester Young v....
Plain-Error Allocution Claims: Judicial Interruptions Are Not “Plain” Rule 32 Violations Absent Clear Curtailment of the Defendant’s Opportunity to Speak

Plain-Error Allocution Claims: Judicial Interruptions Are Not “Plain” Rule 32 Violations Absent Clear Curtailment of the Defendant’s Opportunity to Speak

Date: Apr 16, 2026
Plain-Error Allocution Claims: Judicial Interruptions Are Not “Plain” Rule 32 Violations Absent Clear Curtailment of the Defendant’s Opportunity to Speak I. Introduction United States v. Fuquan Hill...
Third Circuit: Publishing Standards as “the Law” (Including Non‑Mandatory Context) Is Transformative Fair Use Despite a For‑Profit Platform

Third Circuit: Publishing Standards as “the Law” (Including Non‑Mandatory Context) Is Transformative Fair Use Despite a For‑Profit Platform

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Third Circuit: Publishing Standards as “the Law” (Including Non‑Mandatory Context) Is Transformative Fair Use Despite a For‑Profit Platform I. Introduction American Society for Testing and Materials...
Third Circuit Affirms § 7201 Tax Evasion Convictions: Intrinsic Fraud-Income Proof, No Constructive Amendment, and No Brady “Suppression” Where Discovery Was Produced to Counsel

Third Circuit Affirms § 7201 Tax Evasion Convictions: Intrinsic Fraud-Income Proof, No Constructive Amendment, and No Brady “Suppression” Where Discovery Was Produced to Counsel

Date: Apr 10, 2026
Third Circuit Affirms § 7201 Tax Easion Convictions: Intrinsic Fraud-Income Proof, No Constructive Amendment, and No Brady “Suppression” Where Discovery Was Produced to Counsel I. Introduction United...
CAT Relief Denials Sustained Where Torture Theories Are Record-Bound, Not Compelled by Evidence, and “Aggregation” Extends Only to Presented Sources of Harm

CAT Relief Denials Sustained Where Torture Theories Are Record-Bound, Not Compelled by Evidence, and “Aggregation” Extends Only to Presented Sources of Harm

Date: Apr 9, 2026
CAT Relief Denials Sustained Where Torture Theories Are Record-Bound, Not Compelled by Evidence, and “Aggregation” Extends Only to Presented Sources of Harm 1. Introduction Her Tou Yang v. Attorney...
IDEA Stay-Put: An Order to Develop an IEP Is Not a New “Educational Placement” When No IEP Exists

IDEA Stay-Put: An Order to Develop an IEP Is Not a New “Educational Placement” When No IEP Exists

Date: Apr 9, 2026
IDEA Stay-Put: An Order to Develop an IEP Is Not a New “Educational Placement” When No IEP Exists Case: Y. C. Q. v. Chichester School District Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Date:...
CEA Exclusive Jurisdiction Preempts State Gambling Bans as Applied to CFTC-Licensed DCM Sports Event Contracts

CEA Exclusive Jurisdiction Preempts State Gambling Bans as Applied to CFTC-Licensed DCM Sports Event Contracts

Date: Apr 8, 2026
CEA Exclusive Jurisdiction Preempts State Gambling Bans as Applied to CFTC-Licensed DCM Sports Event Contracts Case: Kalshiex LLC v. Mary Jo Flaherty (3d Cir. Apr. 6, 2026) | Posture: Appeal from...
Exhaustion and Issue-Preservation Rule for Particular Social Group (PSG) Theories in Asylum Appeals

Exhaustion and Issue-Preservation Rule for Particular Social Group (PSG) Theories in Asylum Appeals

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Exhaustion and Issue-Preservation Rule for Particular Social Group (PSG) Theories in Asylum Appeals 1. Introduction In Miryam Soler-Martinez v. Attorney General United States of America (3d Cir. Apr....
Internal Policy Disputes by Public-Employee Union Leaders Are Not, Without More, Protected First Amendment Speech (Third Circuit, Nonprecedential)

Internal Policy Disputes by Public-Employee Union Leaders Are Not, Without More, Protected First Amendment Speech (Third Circuit, Nonprecedential)

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Internal Policy Disputes by Public-Employee Union Leaders Are Not, Without More, Protected First Amendment Speech (Third Circuit, Nonprecedential) 1. Introduction In Reuven Lyak v. City of Hackensack...
Third Circuit: “Is or Was” in Special-Rule (Battered Child) Cancellation Turns on Abuser’s Status by Adjudication, Not at Time of Abuse

Third Circuit: “Is or Was” in Special-Rule (Battered Child) Cancellation Turns on Abuser’s Status by Adjudication, Not at Time of Abuse

Date: Apr 4, 2026
Third Circuit: “Is or Was” in Special-Rule (Battered Child) Cancellation Turns on Abuser’s Status by Adjudication, Not at Time of Abuse 1. Introduction In Samuel Cardenas v. Attorney General United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert