Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Virginia Case Commentaries

Virginia SCC CPCN Review: “Consideration” of Local Plans (Not “Substantial Accord”), Staff Verification of Reliability Need, and Feasibility-Based Rejection of Undergrounding Under Code § 56-46.1

Virginia SCC CPCN Review: “Consideration” of Local Plans (Not “Substantial Accord”), Staff Verification of Reliability Need, and Feasibility-Based Rejection of Undergrounding Under Code § 56-46.1

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Virginia SCC CPCN Review: “Consideration” of Local Plans (Not “Substantial Accord”), Staff Verification of Reliability Need, and Feasibility-Based Rejection of Undergrounding Under Code § 56-46.1 I....
Time-of-Filing Rule for Sovereign Immunity After Repeal of a Statutory Waiver (Commonwealth v. Mattocks)

Time-of-Filing Rule for Sovereign Immunity After Repeal of a Statutory Waiver (Commonwealth v. Mattocks)

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Time-of-Filing Rule for Sovereign Immunity After Repeal of a Statutory Waiver Introduction In Commonwealth v. Mattocks (Va. Feb. 19, 2026), a group of Department of Corrections employees sued the...
Code § 56-46.1 Limits SCC Duties in Transmission CPCNs: Verification May Rely on Staff; Undergrounding Turns on Feasibility and Timeliness; Local “Substantial Accord” Review Is Supplanted by § 56-46.1(F)

Code § 56-46.1 Limits SCC Duties in Transmission CPCNs: Verification May Rely on Staff; Undergrounding Turns on Feasibility and Timeliness; Local “Substantial Accord” Review Is Supplanted by § 56-46.1(F)

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Code § 56-46.1 Limits SCC Duties in Transmission CPCNs: Verification May Rely on Staff; Undergrounding Turns on Feasibility and Timeliness; Local “Substantial Accord” Review Is Supplanted by §...
Virginia SCC Transmission CPCNs: “Consideration” of Local Plans Is Not “Substantial Accord,” and Undergrounding Feasibility Turns on Timely Constructability Under Code § 56-46.1

Virginia SCC Transmission CPCNs: “Consideration” of Local Plans Is Not “Substantial Accord,” and Undergrounding Feasibility Turns on Timely Constructability Under Code § 56-46.1

Date: Feb 22, 2026
Virginia SCC Transmission CPCNs: “Consideration” of Local Plans Is Not “Substantial Accord,” and Undergrounding Feasibility Turns on Timely Constructability Under Code § 56-46.1 1. Introduction In...
Keil v. O'Sullivan: “May Be Located” Makes a Person a Data Subject Even Without Name-Indexed Files Under Virginia’s Government Data Act

Keil v. O'Sullivan: “May Be Located” Makes a Person a Data Subject Even Without Name-Indexed Files Under Virginia’s Government Data Act

Date: Feb 13, 2026
Keil v. O'Sullivan: “May Be Located” Makes a Person a Data Subject Even Without Name-Indexed Files Under Virginia’s Government Data Act I. Introduction Case: Keil v. O'Sullivan, Supreme Court of...
Mast v. A.A.: Code § 63.2-1216 as an Absolute Six-Month Statute of Repose for Final Adoption Orders (No “Void ab Initio” Escape Hatch)

Mast v. A.A.: Code § 63.2-1216 as an Absolute Six-Month Statute of Repose for Final Adoption Orders (No “Void ab Initio” Escape Hatch)

Date: Feb 13, 2026
Mast v. A.A.: Code § 63.2-1216 as an Absolute Six-Month Statute of Repose for Final Adoption Orders (No “Void ab Initio” Escape Hatch) Court: Supreme Court of Virginia Date: February 12, 2026...
VUTSA Damages: No Burden-Shifting—Plaintiff Must Prove Causation and Amount; Royalty Is the Statutory Backstop

VUTSA Damages: No Burden-Shifting—Plaintiff Must Prove Causation and Amount; Royalty Is the Statutory Backstop

Date: Jan 9, 2026
VUTSA Damages: No Burden-Shifting—Plaintiff Must Prove Causation and Amount; Royalty Is the Statutory Backstop Case: Appian Corporation v. Pegasystems, Inc. Court: Supreme Court of Virginia Date:...
Code § 40.1-29 “Wages” Do Not Include Commissions Absent Express Legislative Inclusion

Code § 40.1-29 “Wages” Do Not Include Commissions Absent Express Legislative Inclusion

Date: Dec 31, 2025
Code § 40.1-29 “Wages” Do Not Include Commissions Absent Express Legislative Inclusion Case: Groundworks Operations, LLC v. Campbell Court: Supreme Court of Virginia Date: 2025-12-30 1. Introduction...
“Substantially Uninterrupted” Means Mostly Continuous: Reasonableness Limits Virginia’s Continuing Treatment Exception

“Substantially Uninterrupted” Means Mostly Continuous: Reasonableness Limits Virginia’s Continuing Treatment Exception

Date: Dec 31, 2025
“Substantially Uninterrupted” Means Mostly Continuous: Reasonableness Limits Virginia’s Continuing Treatment Exception Case: Cothran v. Jauregui, Supreme Court of Virginia (Dec. 30, 2025) Posture:...
Accrual of Virginia Whistleblower Claims at the First Prohibited Retaliatory Act: Commentary on Ingleside Emergency Group, LLC v. Hollis

Accrual of Virginia Whistleblower Claims at the First Prohibited Retaliatory Act: Commentary on Ingleside Emergency Group, LLC v. Hollis

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Accrual of Virginia Whistleblower Claims at the First Prohibited Retaliatory Act: Commentary on Ingleside Emergency Group, LLC v. Hollis I. Introduction In Ingleside Emergency Group, LLC v. Hollis,...
Commonwealth v. Brawner: Willful Nonpayment of Court Costs, Indigence, and Community Service in Probation Revocations

Commonwealth v. Brawner: Willful Nonpayment of Court Costs, Indigence, and Community Service in Probation Revocations

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Commonwealth v. Brawner: Willful Nonpayment of Court Costs, Indigence, and Community Service in Probation Revocations I. Introduction Commonwealth v. Brawner (Supreme Court of Virginia, Dec. 18,...
In re Hargrove: Weak Touch DNA, Collateral Credibility Attacks, and the High Bar for Biological Actual Innocence in Virginia

In re Hargrove: Weak Touch DNA, Collateral Credibility Attacks, and the High Bar for Biological Actual Innocence in Virginia

Date: Dec 20, 2025
In re Hargrove: Weak Touch DNA, Collateral Credibility Attacks, and the High Bar for Biological Actual Innocence in Virginia 1. Introduction In In re: Corey Hargrove, decided December 18, 2025, the...

    Ellis v. Jolley: Ordinary Driving by Municipal Trash Truck Drivers Is Not Protected by Sovereign Immunity, While Municipal Trash Collection Itself Remains Immune

Ellis v. Jolley: Ordinary Driving by Municipal Trash Truck Drivers Is Not Protected by Sovereign Immunity, While Municipal Trash Collection Itself Remains Immune

Date: Dec 13, 2025
Ellis v. Jolley: Ordinary Driving by Municipal Trash Truck Drivers Is Not Protected by Sovereign Immunity, While Municipal Trash Collection Itself Remains Immune I. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Doe v. Green and the Limits of Retroactive Accrual for Childhood Sexual Abuse Claims in Virginia

Doe v. Green and the Limits of Retroactive Accrual for Childhood Sexual Abuse Claims in Virginia

Date: Nov 30, 2025
Doe v. Green and the Limits of Retroactive Accrual for Childhood Sexual Abuse Claims in Virginia I. Introduction Doe v. Green, decided by the Supreme Court of Virginia on November 26, 2025, addresses...
Commonwealth v. Jackson: Defining the Limits of “Acceptance of Responsibility” in Virginia Probation Revocation Sentencing

Commonwealth v. Jackson: Defining the Limits of “Acceptance of Responsibility” in Virginia Probation Revocation Sentencing

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Commonwealth v. Jackson: Defining the Limits of “Acceptance of Responsibility” in Virginia Probation Revocation Sentencing I. Introduction In Commonwealth v. Jackson (Supreme Court of Virginia, Nov....
Direct-Causation Test for LLC Member Expulsion and a Strict, Less-Than-Impossible Standard for Judicial Dissolution in Virginia

Direct-Causation Test for LLC Member Expulsion and a Strict, Less-Than-Impossible Standard for Judicial Dissolution in Virginia

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Direct-Causation Test for LLC Member Expulsion and a Strict, Less-Than-Impossible Standard for Judicial Dissolution in Virginia Introduction In Ticonderoga Farms, LLC v. Knop, the Supreme Court of...
Legislative Immunity Covers Local Member Discipline, But Not Gratuitous Third‑Party Defamation: Commentary on Brooks‑Buck v. Wahlstrom

Legislative Immunity Covers Local Member Discipline, But Not Gratuitous Third‑Party Defamation: Commentary on Brooks‑Buck v. Wahlstrom

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Legislative Immunity Covers Local Member Discipline, But Not Gratuitous Third‑Party Defamation: Brooks‑Buck v. Wahlstrom Court: Supreme Court of Virginia Date: October 16, 2025 Author: Justice Teresa...
Candor Requires Full Disclosure in Guardianship Petitions: Agreed “Good Faith” Orders Do Not Shield Attorneys from Discipline — Commentary on Pollack v. Virginia State Bar (Va. Oct. 16, 2025)

Candor Requires Full Disclosure in Guardianship Petitions: Agreed “Good Faith” Orders Do Not Shield Attorneys from Discipline — Commentary on Pollack v. Virginia State Bar (Va. Oct. 16, 2025)

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Candor Requires Full Disclosure in Guardianship Petitions: Agreed “Good Faith” Orders Do Not Shield Attorneys from Discipline Introduction This commentary analyzes the Supreme Court of Virginia’s...
Summary Contempt Narrowed: Personal Observation Must Establish Voluntary Intoxication Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, and Findings Must Match the Record — Orndoff v. Commonwealth (Va. 2025)

Summary Contempt Narrowed: Personal Observation Must Establish Voluntary Intoxication Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, and Findings Must Match the Record — Orndoff v. Commonwealth (Va. 2025)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Summary Contempt Narrowed: Personal Observation Must Establish Voluntary Intoxication Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, and Findings Must Match the Record — Orndoff v. Commonwealth (Va. 2025) Introduction...
Objective Reasonableness, Not Search Labels: Virginia High Court Upholds Limited Underwear Retrievals Incident to Arrest Based on Safety and Evidence-Destruction Risks (Commonwealth v. Hubbard)

Objective Reasonableness, Not Search Labels: Virginia High Court Upholds Limited Underwear Retrievals Incident to Arrest Based on Safety and Evidence-Destruction Risks (Commonwealth v. Hubbard)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Objective Reasonableness, Not Search Labels: Virginia High Court Upholds Limited Underwear Retrievals Incident to Arrest Based on Safety and Evidence-Destruction Risks Case: Commonwealth v. Hubbard,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • FAQs
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Campus Connect Fellow Program
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert